Any updates on aioe and mixmin?

badgolferman wrote:
> Any updates on aioe and mixmin?
>

Don't know about aioe, but now that you mention it, mixmin
is still having issues. Port 119 (no SSL) is read only,
SSL port 563 refuses connections.

On 09 Apr 2023, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> posted
some news:u0v989$1s81n$1@paganini.bofh.team:

> Any updates on aioe and mixmin?

AIOE

_.-^^---....,,--
_-- --_
< >)
| |
\._ _./
```--. . , ; .--'''
| | |
.-=|| | |=-.
`-=#$%&%$#=-'
| ; :|
_____.,-#%&$@%#&#~,._____

Mixmin

Up and working with some limitations.
news.mixmin.net:563 not working.
YAMN is working.
NYM sporadic, may not be working for everyone, YMMV.

Am 09.04.2023 um 22:15:50 Uhr schrieb wattney:

> Don't know about aioe, but now that you mention it, mixmin
> is still having issues. Port 119 (no SSL) is read only,
> SSL port 563 refuses connections.

The Mixmin spam server is working for me on 563.

On 4/9/2023 5:04 PM, badgolferman wrote:
> Any updates on aioe and mixmin?
>

Mixmin - status = "heh..."

Which means, roughly, it's down more than it's up.

At the current time, it's just sending RST in response
to incoming packets. Which means it is likely in the
same state it was before it was fixed for a few days.

Paul

On 10 Apr 2023, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> posted some
news:u10sjr$25npf$1@dont-email.me:

> On 4/9/2023 5:04 PM, badgolferman wrote:
>> Any updates on aioe and mixmin?
>>
>
> Mixmin - status = "heh..."
>
> Which means, roughly, it's down more than it's up.
>
> At the current time, it's just sending RST in response
> to incoming packets. Which means it is likely in the
> same state it was before it was fixed for a few days.

Working for me.

On 4/10/2023 1:49 PM, tim segovia wrote:
> On 10 Apr 2023, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> posted some
> news:u10sjr$25npf$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 4/9/2023 5:04 PM, badgolferman wrote:
>>> Any updates on aioe and mixmin?
>>>
>>
>> Mixmin - status = "heh..."
>>
>> Which means, roughly, it's down more than it's up.
>>
>> At the current time, it's just sending RST in response
>> to incoming packets. Which means it is likely in the
>> same state it was before it was fixed for a few days.
>
> Working for me.
>
Now working for me.

And I have been checking it in past days, so
this got fixed today.

Paul

Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> wrote:

> Am 09.04.2023 um 22:15:50 Uhr schrieb wattney:
>
>> Don't know about aioe, but now that you mention it, mixmin
>> is still having issues. Port 119 (no SSL) is read only,
>> SSL port 563 refuses connections.
>
> The Mixmin spam server is working for me on 563.

I can't get news.mixmin.net:563 to work for me for weeks on end.
Are you using a different server than news.mixmin.net perchance?

Sean <seanohara@dublin.ie> wrote:

> YAMN is working.
> NYM sporadic, may not be working for everyon

Do you have a server:port for yamn (is it username=blank, password=blank)?
Same question for nym's server:port if you have it please.

tim segovia <invalid@nowhere.net> wrote:

> Working for me.

Read only?
I can't get news.mixmin.net:563 username=blank, password=blank to send.

Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

> And I have been checking it in past days, so
> this got fixed today.

At around the time aioe went down, mixmin went to a multi-day delay
status for sent message using news.mixmin.net:563 and no credentials.

Sending this with news.mixmin.net:563 username=blank, password=blank
so if you get this, then it's working for me at this very moment too.

The current date is: Tue 04/11/2023
The current time is: 3:58:23.99

Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote in news:u122v1$2bgru$1@news.mixmin.net:

> On 4/10/2023 1:49 PM, tim segovia wrote:
>> On 10 Apr 2023, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> posted some
>> news:u10sjr$25npf$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On 4/9/2023 5:04 PM, badgolferman wrote:
>>>> Any updates on aioe and mixmin?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Mixmin - status = "heh..."
>>>
>>> Which means, roughly, it's down more than it's up.
>>>
>>> At the current time, it's just sending RST in response
>>> to incoming packets. Which means it is likely in the
>>> same state it was before it was fixed for a few days.
>>
>> Working for me.
>>
> Now working for me.
>
> And I have been checking it in past days, so
> this got fixed today.

I noticed kensi diarrhea flowing again.

Am 11.04.2023 um 02:53:56 Uhr schrieb badgolferman:

> Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> wrote:
>
> > Am 09.04.2023 um 22:15:50 Uhr schrieb wattney:
> >
> >> Don't know about aioe, but now that you mention it, mixmin
> >> is still having issues. Port 119 (no SSL) is read only,
> >> SSL port 563 refuses connections.
> >
> > The Mixmin spam server is working for me on 563.
>
> I can't get news.mixmin.net:563 to work for me for weeks on end.
> Are you using a different server than news.mixmin.net perchance?

No, I have used the same as you. Did you connect via TOR?
It didn't work via TOR some weeks ago.

Why do you stick with Mixmin?
There are many other servers available that offer free registration and
work.

Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> wrote:

> There are many other servers available that offer free registration and
> work.

What other privacy focused free news servers offer free registration with
no username or password required, other than paganini.bofh.team:119 today?

If you can name a free no registration privacy server, I'll try it now.

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:51:16 +0000, JT wrote:

> Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote in news:u122v1$2bgru$1@news.mixmin.net:
>
>> On 4/10/2023 1:49 PM, tim segovia wrote:
>>> On 10 Apr 2023, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> posted some
>>> news:u10sjr$25npf$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On 4/9/2023 5:04 PM, badgolferman wrote:
>>>>> Any updates on aioe and mixmin?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mixmin - status = "heh..."
>>>>
>>>> Which means, roughly, it's down more than it's up.
>>>>
>>>> At the current time, it's just sending RST in response
>>>> to incoming packets. Which means it is likely in the
>>>> same state it was before it was fixed for a few days.
>>>
>>> Working for me.
>>>
>> Now working for me.
>>
>> And I have been checking it in past days, so
>> this got fixed today.
>
> I noticed kensi diarrhea flowing again.

I bet you're not even charging her rent to take up so much space in your
head, Socky.

<snicker>

--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Checkmate admits that, for all intents and purposes, he carries a teddy
bear in public: <d6cnes.ket.17.19@news.alt.net>

Am 11.04.2023 um 17:41:29 Uhr schrieb badgolferman:

> What other privacy focused free news servers offer free registration
> with no username or password required, other than
> paganini.bofh.team:119 today?

You can use eternal-septemberg, they don't verify your name, you can
enter Donald Duck.

Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> wrote:

>> What other privacy focused free news servers offer free registration
>> with no username or password required, other than
>> paganini.bofh.team:119 today?
>
> You can use eternal-septemberg, they don't verify your name, you can
> enter Donald Duck.

It's surprising that you didn't understand the question since you are
supposed to be knowledgeable in nntp server administration tasks.

The only nntp servers that didn't require registration that I knew about
were aioe, dizum, netfront, the problematic mixmin, paganini & tulanet.

I may be wrong as I don't know anything about free news servers, but I
thought you did, so if you know of any no-registration free newsservers,
then please let me know as the only one left I know above that is still
working is paganini, but that's so unreliable as to be as bad as mixmin.

You can post to paganini.bofh.team:119 once, and then when you post another
message it gives an arbitrary failure and if you keep trying (with the
exact same message!) you get _different_ arbitrary failures each time.

With both paganini & mixmin, sometimes it works - most of the times not.

I don't know anything so it's not surprising I don't know of any other
privacy aware free news server that does not require an email registration.

I will ask again since you didn't seem to understand the question, which is
what no-registration free news server do you know about other than those
(none of which actually work reliably, and only two work at all anymore).

badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> wrote:

>>>What other privacy focused free news servers offer free registration
>>>with no username or password required, other than
>>>paganini.bofh.team:119 today?

>>You can use eternal-septemberg, they don't verify your name, you can
>>enter Donald Duck.

>It's surprising that you didn't understand the question since you are
>supposed to be knowledgeable in nntp server administration tasks.

See if you can understand this. Your choices are

1) Stop whining and suck it up, or

2) Fuck off, seamus

Marco was being nice to you for no reason you deserve.

>. . .

"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> Marco was being nice to you for no reason you deserve.

I'm sorry but all I asked was an on topic question of a free news server
newsgroup and what Marco did was tell me to not ask such questions here.

If Marco didn't know the answer, why did he suggest the wrong answers?
Does Marco not understand what was different about aioe & netfront?

I'm not blaming Marco (but you're blaming me just for asking the question).
What do you think is so very wrong with asking this simple question anyway?

Are there any no-registration free news (aka nntp, usenet) servers other
than mixmin & paganini? (Why? Because both of them are highly unreliable.)

badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>>Marco was being nice to you for no reason you deserve.

>I'm sorry but all I asked was an on topic question of a free news server
>newsgroup and what Marco did was tell me to not ask such questions here.

No, he didn't.

Are you expecting to be kicked off paganini soon, seamus?

>. . .

"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>>I'm sorry but all I asked was an on topic question of a free news server
>>newsgroup and what Marco did was tell me to not ask such questions here.
>
> No, he didn't.

Does you really not know that Wolffang's server requires registration?

The question was & still is asking about no-registration free news servers.

Why do you think that basic question is not valid for this a.f.n newsgroup?

On 2023-04-12 11:43, badgolferman wrote:

> The only nntp servers that didn't require registration that I knew about
> were aioe, dizum, netfront, the problematic mixmin, paganini & tulanet.
....
> You can post to paganini.bofh.team:119 once, and then when you post another
> message it gives an arbitrary failure and if you keep trying (with the

First attempted posting through paganini.bofh.team.

--
David Canzi | "Nonconformists travel as a rule in bunches. You
| rarely find a nonconformist who goes it alone. And
| woe to him inside a nonconformist clique who does
| not conform with nonconformity." -- Eric Hoffer

Am 12.04.2023 um 15:43:06 Uhr schrieb badgolferman:

> Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> wrote:
>
> >> What other privacy focused free news servers offer free
> >> registration with no username or password required, other than
> >> paganini.bofh.team:119 today?
> >
> > You can use eternal-septemberg, they don't verify your name, you can
> > enter Donald Duck.
>
> It's surprising that you didn't understand the question since you are
> supposed to be knowledgeable in nntp server administration tasks.

You asked impossible things. Either it allows posting without
registration or it needs registration, that is maybe free.

Servers that don't need login and allow posting are most of the time
used for posting spam and troll messages. Everybody hates them and so
only a small amount of people operate such servers.

On 2023-04-12 11:43, badgolferman wrote:
> The only nntp servers that didn't require registration that I knew about
> were aioe, dizum, netfront, the problematic mixmin, paganini & tulanet.
....
> You can post to paganini.bofh.team:119 once, and then when you post another
> message it gives an arbitrary failure and if you keep trying (with the

Second attempted posting through paganini.bofh.team.

Live with the reputation you earn instead of fleeing to new nyms.

--
David Canzi | "Nonconformists travel as a rule in bunches. You
| rarely find a nonconformist who goes it alone. And
| woe to him inside a nonconformist clique who does
| not conform with nonconformity." -- Eric Hoffer

David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:

> Second attempted posting through paganini.bofh.team.

Keep going... you can get maybe three or four postings per day before it
stops. Also you may get random errors which change with each posting.

You know they're random because you can get different errors each attempt.