On Sunday, May 30, 2021 at 3:50:21 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > A useless gesture. The best kind.
> The half-staff flag represents a nation of victims. Always down.

Exactly. I am a victim but I keep it to myself.

> Exactly. I am a victim but I keep it to myself.

I do not look at myself as a victim except when forced by life or whatever system is in place to seek out the help of so-called professionals. I feel victimized in that way. Otherwise I think I'm on the top dog side of things. If I were a victim - let's say I find out I have cancer tomorrow - well, I can guarantee you everybody's going to hear about it. I am not going to keep my suffering to myself. But I also won't overdo it the way some people do, always whining and competing over degrees of suffering.

"Yes yes, I know, you already told me, your parents died in an airplane crash yesterday. It's bad and I know it, but it's nothing compared to what happened to me earlier today. Wait till you hear this!"

On Monday, May 31, 2021 at 2:01:10 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Exactly. I am a victim but I keep it to myself.
> I do not look at myself as a victim except when forced by life or whatever system is in place to seek out the help of so-called professionals. I feel victimized in that way. Otherwise I think I'm on the top dog side of things. If I were a victim - let's say I find out I have cancer tomorrow - well, I can guarantee you everybody's going to hear about it. I am not going to keep my suffering to myself. But I also won't overdo it the way some people do, always whining and competing over degrees of suffering.
>
> "Yes yes, I know, you already told me, your parents died in an airplane crash yesterday. It's bad and I know it, but it's nothing compared to what happened to me earlier today. Wait till you hear this!"

Victimhood is another form of one upmanship. Maybe the most common one. Jews can out do the negro by saying 'yes you were a slave but we were exterminated (except for the guy speaking).

> Victimhood is another form of one upmanship. Maybe the most common one. Jews can out do the negro by saying 'yes you were a slave but we were exterminated (except for the guy speaking).

Hah hah. Yes indeed. Negroes suffered way more the Jews (if I have to choose). Yes, it is a form of oneupmanship and always has been but it's more competitive today than ever. I have never seen so many victims. I saw today the President ordered the flags at half staff for the victims of the San Jose workplace shooting. An obvious ploy to work gun control politics into the story - as usual. Has anyone told Biden the flags are already at half staff and have been for several years. How much further can they lower it. As I said before, an inch at a time would be good for most tragedies, two inches for severe ones. When the flag hits the ground throw it away and put another one at half staff so we can get to working it down all over again.

On Monday, May 31, 2021 at 7:12:28 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Victimhood is another form of one upmanship. Maybe the most common one. Jews can out do the negro by saying 'yes you were a slave but we were exterminated (except for the guy speaking).
> Hah hah. Yes indeed. Negroes suffered way more the Jews (if I have to choose). Yes, it is a form of oneupmanship and always has been but it's more competitive today than ever. I have never seen so many victims. I saw today the President ordered the flags at half staff for the victims of the San Jose workplace shooting. An obvious ploy to work gun control politics into the story - as usual. Has anyone told Biden the flags are already at half staff and have been for several years. How much further can they lower it. As I said before, an inch at a time would be good for most tragedies, two inches for severe ones. When the flag hits the ground throw it away and put another one at half staff so we can get to working it down all over again.

I hate these 'false flags'. when a flag is lowered I am hoping for something big like the President being killed. Come on man do it for the country.

> I hate these 'false flags'. when a flag is lowered I am hoping for something big like the President being killed. Come on man do it for the country.

Tragedy levels are reflected by how low the flag goes. A Presidential assassination is a big thing. To demonstrate how big the flag is lowered to half staff. But the flags are already at half staff. Now what? The impact of Presidential assassination is so great that to demonstrate our sorrow the flag should be lowered from half staff with such force that it explodes into the earth like a rocket or meteor coming down hard from outer space. How can we honor our dead Presidents with half staff lowering when the flags are already at half staff. This is something the supreme court needs to look at.

On Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 5:06:20 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I hate these 'false flags'. when a flag is lowered I am hoping for something big like the President being killed. Come on man do it for the country.
> Tragedy levels are reflected by how low the flag goes. A Presidential assassination is a big thing. To demonstrate how big the flag is lowered to half staff. But the flags are already at half staff. Now what? The impact of Presidential assassination is so great that to demonstrate our sorrow the flag should be lowered from half staff with such force that it explodes into the earth like a rocket or meteor coming down hard from outer space. How can we honor our dead Presidents with half staff lowering when the flags are already at half staff. This is something the supreme court needs to look at.

How about if the entire Supreme court is killed? Do we lowere the flag 9 times lower or 9 times longer? We need a constitutional amendment so we do this thing the right way. Of course the supreme court could rule it is unconstitutional but if they are dead their ruling will be automatically overturned.

> How about if the entire Supreme court is killed? Do we lower the flag 9 times lower or 9 times longer? We need a constitutional amendment so we do this thing the right way. Of course the supreme court could rule it is unconstitutional but if they are dead their ruling will be automatically overturned.

After your first sentence about the entire Supreme Court being killed at one time, when I saw the first word of your second sentence, the word "Do", I honestly thought you were going to say, "Do the math." It's a mathematician's joke. Good point. We need the Supreme Court to get on the right away.. Also interesting to address methods for reconstituting the bench. Look how long it takes to confirm just one Judge. Imagine finding 9 new ones all at the same time. I'll bet ethnicity and gender will play heavy in the format. Maybe there should be substitutes in the waiting. Maybe there already are. I don't know how it works. I don't care about the Supreme Court because it is the only Court in which I might actually like to appear but will never happen because I am not supreme enough.

On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 4:36:37 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > How about if the entire Supreme court is killed? Do we lower the flag 9 times lower or 9 times longer? We need a constitutional amendment so we do this thing the right way. Of course the supreme court could rule it is unconstitutional but if they are dead their ruling will be automatically overturned.
>
> After your first sentence about the entire Supreme Court being killed at one time, when I saw the first word of your second sentence, the word "Do", I honestly thought you were going to say, "Do the math." It's a mathematician's joke. Good point. We need the Supreme Court to get on the right away. Also interesting to address methods for reconstituting the bench. Look how long it takes to confirm just one Judge. Imagine finding 9 new ones all at the same time. I'll bet ethnicity and gender will play heavy in the format.. Maybe there should be substitutes in the waiting. Maybe there already are.. I don't know how it works. I don't care about the Supreme Court because it is the only Court in which I might actually like to appear but will never happen because I am not supreme enough.

Like alternate jurors. Supremes in waiting. Call a new one from the bull pen. Let them do a few warm up decisions then it's "Play ball"

> Like alternate jurors. Supremes in waiting. Call a new one from the bull pen. Let them do a few warm up decisions then it's "Play ball."

"I'll take this all the way to the Supreme Court if I have to." Do you know anyone who has ever taken a case all the way to the Supreme Court? We need more total inclusiveness on our highest bench - so evenly dealt out that all decisions wind up draws. Thus nobody ever has to do anything based on the Supreme Court decision because there never is a decision - each case resulting in a hung jury. Then a mob storms the chambers and drags all 9 of them out into the street to live up to their high-court name by being hung from the highest downtown fixture. But not too high. Not so high we can't get a close look at all 9 of them doing the fish at the end of the line. Now maybe you're wondering how their decisions can always come out a draw when there's 9 of them. That's because one of them is ultra sensitive and afraid of hurting anyone's feelings, so they always pass on the decision. The other 8 always split 4 to 4. The Supreme Court - who needs them? Probably the people who need them most never get a shot at using them.

Fuck em - all 9 of em. How about assassinating 9 Supreme Court justices all at once? Would that rank higher than killing just one President? It would be unprecedented, that's for sure. Unprecedented - a word professional jurors love to use. Now they can go beyond using it - they can live it. Play ball alright. Batter up. Let's get out our Louisville sluggers and knock all 9 innings straight out of the park.

On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 2:16:12 AM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Like alternate jurors. Supremes in waiting. Call a new one from the bull pen. Let them do a few warm up decisions then it's "Play ball."
>
> "I'll take this all the way to the Supreme Court if I have to." Do you know anyone who has ever taken a case all the way to the Supreme Court? We need more total inclusiveness on our highest bench - so evenly dealt out that all decisions wind up draws. Thus nobody ever has to do anything based on the Supreme Court decision because there never is a decision - each case resulting in a hung jury. Then a mob storms the chambers and drags all 9 of them out into the street to live up to their high-court name by being hung from the highest downtown fixture. But not too high. Not so high we can't get a close look at all 9 of them doing the fish at the end of the line. Now maybe you're wondering how their decisions can always come out a draw when there's 9 of them. That's because one of them is ultra sensitive and afraid of hurting anyone's feelings, so they always pass on the decision. The other 8 always split 4 to 4. The Supreme Court - who needs them? Probably the people who need them most never get a shot at using them.
>
> Fuck em - all 9 of em. How about assassinating 9 Supreme Court justices all at once? Would that rank higher than killing just one President? It would be unprecedented, that's for sure. Unprecedented - a word professional jurors love to use. Now they can go beyond using it - they can live it. Play ball alright. Batter up. Let's get out our Louisville sluggers and knock all 9 innings straight out of the park.

Their is talk of adding judges to the court. A lot like the number 9. Seems like enough to me. Adding more seems silly. But who am I to judge? Get it - Judge - like judging the judges....

> Their is talk of adding judges to the court. A lot like the number 9. Seems like enough to me. Adding more seems silly. But who am I to judge? Get it - Judge - like judging the judges....

It's more like a jury than a Judge, isn't it? The way their acceptance is debated forever prior to their being installed. The idea seems to be to get a good cross section of political types on the bench. Yes, 9 is enough. Too much in fact. Why not one Judge. Judge of the Year. Run a competition with the winner holding the title of Top Judge for one year, then yielding it to next year's winner. Is twice in a row allowed? I don't know, might be alright if the guy is popular enough. Auditions for the post will be held on TV with Simon Cowell hosting the panel. America will judge the contestants - thousands of them vying for Top Judge position - all hoping to win the coveted Roy Bean award.

On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 3:25:13 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Their is talk of adding judges to the court. A lot like the number 9. Seems like enough to me. Adding more seems silly. But who am I to judge? Get it - Judge - like judging the judges....
> It's more like a jury than a Judge, isn't it? The way their acceptance is debated forever prior to their being installed. The idea seems to be to get a good cross section of political types on the bench. Yes, 9 is enough. Too much in fact. Why not one Judge. Judge of the Year. Run a competition with the winner holding the title of Top Judge for one year, then yielding it to next year's winner. Is twice in a row allowed? I don't know, might be alright if the guy is popular enough. Auditions for the post will be held on TV with Simon Cowell hosting the panel. America will judge the contestants - thousands of them vying for Top Judge position - all hoping to win the coveted Roy Bean award.

Now it is all about diversity. Got to have blacks, women, gays, Jews. No room left for a white guy.

> Now it is all about diversity. Got to have blacks, women, gays, Jews. No room left for a white guy.

Oh no, they gotta keep at least one, preferably two or three. That way if the decision they render has negative ripple effects on society the whites on the bench can take the blame. We can't get rid of whites entirely in so-called power positions. Gotta have a few fall guys. Scapegoats. Patsies - Lee Harvey O style.

On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 5:03:10 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Now it is all about diversity. Got to have blacks, women, gays, Jews. No room left for a white guy.
> Oh no, they gotta keep at least one, preferably two or three. That way if the decision they render has negative ripple effects on society the whites on the bench can take the blame. We can't get rid of whites entirely in so-called power positions. Gotta have a few fall guys. Scapegoats. Patsies - Lee Harvey O style.

All white presidents were killed by fellow whites. Then Martin Luthor King is shot and he too is killed by a white guy. Man blacks can't even do there own assassinating.

> All white presidents were killed by fellow whites. Then Martin Luthor King is shot and he too is killed by a white guy. Man blacks can't even do there own assassinating.

I’m pissed. Computer crashed and lost the post. I was on the last line. The last mile. The Green Mile.

Blacks like to say there are no black mass murderers. Only psycho whites. if Blacks kill they have a purpose. But it all comes down to math really. Blacks represent 11% of the US population. That’s approximately 1 in 10. So every time there’s a mass killing the odds are ten to one it’s a white guy. I can name 3 Black mass murderers. One of America’s pioneer Black serial killers back in the 70s, I think - Wayne Williams of Atlanta. Also Colin Ferguson, the famed NYC Subway killer. And let’s never forget Vaughn Greenwood. The press and therefore the public at large rarely mention them. Vaughn Greenwood was the Skidrow Slasher in L.A. I was put in a squad car as a suspect weeks before he was caught. The papers said the cops were looking for a white guy with long blonde hair. I had shaved my head only the day before, so the cops really thought they had their man. But within a half hour of driving me around asking questions they knew they had bombed out. I was in cuffs. I kind of enjoyed it. I mean, other than taking me out and killing me, I was not too concerned about being arrested as an actual suspect.

Anyway, point is it all comes down to math. Now some might say, “Wow, I can only name 3 Black mass murderers - that’s not many.” But remember the math. If there are 3 notable Black mass murderers then naming 10 times that number of white mass murderers should be a walk in the park. But it’s not. To any Black boasting about having only 3 easy to name Black mass murderers I say, “Ok then, name 30 White ones. Go.” Not so easy, is it. See, the whites gotta give the blacks odds. It’s all math. Always.

Tommy (the greek freak) Joseph

On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 8:59:43 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > All white presidents were killed by fellow whites. Then Martin Luthor King is shot and he too is killed by a white guy. Man blacks can't even do there own assassinating.
> I’m pissed. Computer crashed and lost the post. I was on the last line. The last mile. The Green Mile.
>
> Blacks like to say there are no black mass murderers. Only psycho whites. if Blacks kill they have a purpose. But it all comes down to math really. Blacks represent 11% of the US population. That’s approximately 1 in 10. So every time there’s a mass killing the odds are ten to one it’s a white guy. I can name 3 Black mass murderers. One of America’s pioneer Black serial killers back in the 70s, I think - Wayne Williams of Atlanta. Also Colin Ferguson, the famed NYC Subway killer. And let’s never forget Vaughn Greenwood. The press and therefore the public at large rarely mention them. Vaughn Greenwood was the Skidrow Slasher in L.A. I was put in a squad car as a suspect weeks before he was caught. The papers said the cops were looking for a white guy with long blonde hair. I had shaved my head only the day before, so the cops really thought they had their man. But within a half hour of driving me around asking questions they knew they had bombed out. I was in cuffs. I kind of enjoyed it. I mean, other than taking me out and killing me, I was not too concerned about being arrested as an actual suspect.
>
> Anyway, point is it all comes down to math. Now some might say, “Wow, I can only name 3 Black mass murderers - that’s not many.” But remember the math. If there are 3 notable Black mass murderers then naming 10 times that number of white mass murderers should be a walk in the park. But it’s not. To any Black boasting about having only 3 easy to name Black mass murderers I say, “Ok then, name 30 White ones. Go.” Not so easy, is it. See, the whites gotta give the blacks odds. It’s all math. Always.
>
> Tommy (the greek freak) Joseph

They are rewriting all history to show whites were the worse and other colored folks did all the great shit like invent the light bulb and going to the moon. Ok with me. I never took credit for any of that shit.

> They are rewriting all history to show whites were the worse and other colored folks did all the great shit like invent the light bulb and going to the moon. Ok with me. I never took credit for any of that shit.

How do we know that lightbulbs and other modern inventions did not contribute in some way to some of the new diseases we have today? The bulbs give off a soft glow - radiation perhaps? - that over time, a very long time, mutates in our bodies and causes cancer and other new and more powerful deadly stuff. Landing on the moon and coming back, who knows what kind of diseases they brought back. We won't know for centuries. Every invention for the good ultimately produces bad results. Don't ever forget that.

On Tuesday, June 8, 2021 at 2:46:35 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> =
> > They are rewriting all history to show whites were the worse and other colored folks did all the great shit like invent the light bulb and going to the moon. Ok with me. I never took credit for any of that shit.
> How do we know that lightbulbs and other modern inventions did not contribute in some way to some of the new diseases we have today? The bulbs give off a soft glow - radiation perhaps? - that over time, a very long time, mutates in our bodies and causes cancer and other new and more powerful deadly stuff. Landing on the moon and coming back, who knows what kind of diseases they brought back. We won't know for centuries. Every invention for the good ultimately produces bad results. Don't ever forget that.

I know this computer has.