On Saturday, November 6, 2021 at 2:26:40 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I would be pissed. I am tired of these tests or life decisions. I want to coast....
> Funny. I am in your camp all the way about not liking to make decisions. I hate it. That's why I just spend 5 days pretty much in bed and that's why there have been no posts from me lately. Actually, I would love to make decisions if I really cared about what I'm deciding about. I am not joking when I say I would be great working on a rules committee. Not for society per se, more for football games and so forth. I am all about balance. I want balance. I need balance. So when I am making a decision - so painstaking in its rendering that I wonder if it will ever happen - I put every ounce of the golden rule into it. I am totally biased when it comes to rules.
> But yes, I not only do not like decisions, I have left myself with very few and am now beginning to wonder if I did the wrong thing. I will think about it a while - and then I will decide.

The supreme court can take forever but that is to hear a case. Once they get it they already know how they will vote.

> The supreme court can take forever but that is to hear a case. Once they get it they already know how they will vote.

The fact that they have a supreme court and other higher courts on the way to it only serves to further prove that all courts are full of shit. Like all the other courts the plaintiff went through were not capable of understanding his point, but these 9 special assholes can. We need our own high court. Our first order of business will be to decide in what order our supreme justices will die by our hand.

If someone managed to kill all 9 Jurors at the same time, how long would the replacement process take? Or are there already substitutes arranged? We need those 9 Jurors. Without them how can we address the need decision making at its highest level? We would be lost without them. Chaos would rein. The streets would run red with blood. People would think they could get away with murder. If you have the balls to kill a Supreme Court Justice, then by God no one is safe. It's worse than being a cop killer. So we must guard against any and all future potential attacks on our top Jurors who are so vital and so much needed in these unprecedented times of peril and uncertainty.

"Keep the 9 Alive!"

On Sunday, November 7, 2021 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-5, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> If someone managed to kill all 9 Jurors at the same time, how long would the replacement process take? Or are there already substitutes arranged? We need those 9 Jurors. Without them how can we address the need decision making at its highest level? We would be lost without them. Chaos would rein. The streets would run red with blood. People would think they could get away with murder. If you have the balls to kill a Supreme Court Justice, then by God no one is safe. It's worse than being a cop killer. So we must guard against any and all future potential attacks on our top Jurors who are so vital and so much needed in these unprecedented times of peril and uncertainty.
>
> "Keep the 9 Alive!"

What would happen if only 1 was left and they made a split decision?

On 11/7/2021 5:27 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
> If someone managed to kill all 9 Jurors at the same time, how long would the replacement process take? Or are there already substitutes arranged? We need those 9 Jurors. Without them how can we address the need decision making at its highest level? We would be lost without them. Chaos would rein. The streets would run red with blood. People would think they could get away with murder. If you have the balls to kill a Supreme Court Justice, then by God no one is safe. It's worse than being a cop killer. So we must guard against any and all future potential attacks on our top Jurors who are so vital and so much needed in these unprecedented times of peril and uncertainty.
>
> "Keep the 9 Alive!"
>

Who among us would make the best Supreme Court Justice? I think I would
be the logical choice. I'm the smartest, I'm Jewish and I'm an
over-weight woman.

> "Keep the 9 Alive!"

> What would happen if only 1 was left and they made a split decision?

All 9 were in a van heading to an event in Washington when they were t-boned by a car coming the other way. The 8 that died were not wearing seat belts. The 1 that was left was wearing a seat belt, but the savage impact of the collision jerked his body backwards and the belt went straight through his waist, separating his torso from his legs. Paramedics were able to get him to the hospital in time for life saving surgery. But he will be in a wheelchair for life. He was justified in rendering a "split" decision in the aforementioned case because he himself was "split" in two when the decision came down from God on high to wipe out all members of the court but one.. One that became two in the brutal accident. His legs are useless and cannot be reattached to his other half. You can find them at the Smithsonian institute.

> Who among us would make the best Supreme Court Justice? I think I would
> be the logical choice. I'm the smartest, I'm Jewish and I'm an over-weight woman.

I wouldn't want the job, so go ahead, it's yours if you want it. I like the way you put "Jewish" in the middle, couching it with "smartest" and "overweight" to make it look incidental, when obviously with you it is never incidental - NEVER - and the same goes for Bozo (except you're even more obsessed with it) - come hell or high water you will always find a way to drag Jewishness into the conversation. Right? What's your verdict on that? Also, who says you're smart just because you post into a food group. Those people also think they are smart. You would make a horrible Judge of any kind. Very unfair and biased. I sense in you just enough honesty to admit it.. But then a person can publicly confess to being biased and unfair, and if they do it with flair they will be applauded for being honest enough to admit it. If they have no flair to go along with their confession they will be beaten to death on the village square. I think you might be honest enough to know you would make a horrible Judge - or smart enough to know that in a world of true goodness there should never be the need for a Judge to begin with. Either way, I believe if you were offered a spot on the Supreme Court, you would do the same thing I would do - turn it down. If that is the case I would applaud you, You smart ass Jewish fatty you.

On 11/9/2021 1:06 AM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
>
>> Who among us would make the best Supreme Court Justice? I think I would
>> be the logical choice. I'm the smartest, I'm Jewish and I'm an over-weight woman.
>
>
> I wouldn't want the job, so go ahead, it's yours if you want it. I like the way you put "Jewish" in the middle, couching it with "smartest" and "overweight" to make it look incidental, when obviously with you it is never incidental - NEVER - and the same goes for Bozo (except you're even more obsessed with it) - come hell or high water you will always find a way to drag Jewishness into the conversation. Right? What's your verdict on that? Also, who says you're smart just because you post into a food group. Those people also think they are smart. You would make a horrible Judge of any kind. Very unfair and biased. I sense in you just enough honesty to admit it. But then a person can publicly confess to being biased and unfair, and if they do it with flair they will be applauded for being honest enough to admit it. If they have no flair to go along with their confession they will be beaten to death on the village square. I think you might be honest enough to know you would make a horrible Judge - or smart enough to know that in a world of true goodness there should never be the need for a Judge to begin with. Either way, I believe if you were offered a spot on the Supreme Court, you would do the same thing I would do - turn it down. If that is the case I would applaud you, You smart ass Jewish fatty you.
>

Thank you, that's one of the sweetest things anyone has said to me in a
long, long time.

> Thank you, that's one of the sweetest things anyone has said to me in a
> long, long time.

To begin with, you - no wait, all of us, everyone alive - you and everyone on earth should be glad that anyone talks to them at all, especially these days. There's a lot of gabbing out there, but it's mostly into cellphones. Maybe the cellphones don't even work and people are using them as an excuse to do what they've always wanted to do, talk out loud in public without people thinking they're nuts. Gutless bastards. They didn't have the nerve to talk out loud in public till the cellphone came along. Out loud public ranting was the exclusive domain of night roving street loonies. But it proves what I've been saying for years - many years - that even though they won't admit it, most people really want to be alone. Forget most, let's make that all. All people want to be alone and have company only when they want it. That is normal and natural. Now with the cellphone they can make it happen, always in touch with someone, doesn't matter who as long as they can keep on gabbing. Kind of like this newsgroup actually.

On 11/9/2021 4:54 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
>
>> Thank you, that's one of the sweetest things anyone has said to me in a
>> long, long time.
>
> To begin with, you - no wait, all of us, everyone alive - you and everyone on earth should be glad that anyone talks to them at all, especially these days. There's a lot of gabbing out there, but it's mostly into cellphones. Maybe the cellphones don't even work and people are using them as an excuse to do what they've always wanted to do, talk out loud in public without people thinking they're nuts. Gutless bastards. They didn't have the nerve to talk out loud in public till the cellphone came along. Out loud public ranting was the exclusive domain of night roving street loonies. But it proves what I've been saying for years - many years - that even though they won't admit it, most people really want to be alone. Forget most, let's make that all. All people want to be alone and have company only when they want it. That is normal and natural. Now with the cellphone they can make it happen, always in touch with someone, doesn't matter who as long as they can keep on gabbing. Kind of like this newsgroup actually.
>

Having schizophrenia means you are never alone. The best outdoor ranters
are those afflicted with Coprolalia. They can be very entertaining in
the right situation, for example at a solemn funeral.

> Having schizophrenia means you are never alone. The best outdoor ranters
> are those afflicted with Coprolalia. They can be very entertaining in
> the right situation, for example at a solemn funeral.

I had to google that word, Coprolalia. I had a feeling it was that syndrome where people uncontrollably cry one minute and laugh the next. Coprolalia reminds me of Tourettes. I feel sorry for those people - sometimes. I've known a few. I see them as potential victims of bullies posing as guardian angels. Like, "Hey, watch your language asshole, can't you see there are ladies around", as an excuse to start something physical.

I was 13 when I went to my grandmother's funeral. At the time I considered her my mother. I did not want to go. It was my first time. Seeing the corpse was not pleasant, being told to get in line to kiss it was even worse.. I felt bad about her dying. I was sitting with a male cousin about my age when from the back of the room came a sudden shrieking that began with one woman wailing, then two, then more until the entire room was overtaken by shrieks of grief. It was an Arab thing, or just an old world thing that lots of people probably do. But to me, even though I felt sad, it was hilarious. I started to laugh. My cousin was laughing to. We were having trouble holding it in. I got up and so did he. As we walked to the exit doors with our hands over our laughing faces, our shoulders were shaking from laughs the same as they do from sobs, so from behind or the side or even head-on with our hands over our faces I'm sure from the shake of our shoulders most thought we were sobbing, or so I was inclined to believe. Most in attendance were adults. Looking back, maybe they knew we were laughing because they too at some early point of their life had done the same thing. Funny how the shoulders shake the same via sob or laugh.

Another time I was with a friend walking past a funeral home. We were both obsessed with death and its humor at that point of our lives. We didn't even know who had died, we went in. We saw a bunch of people sobbing and we started to laugh. But not out loud. We had to hold it in till we couldn't take it anymore. Then on our way out, once again using the hands over the face, shaking shoulders sob routine, we bumped into a kid we knew who was related to whoever was in the casket. We simply nodded and moved on. I never did it again.

On Wednesday, November 10, 2021 at 6:05:51 PM UTC-5, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Having schizophrenia means you are never alone. The best outdoor ranters
> > are those afflicted with Coprolalia. They can be very entertaining in
> > the right situation, for example at a solemn funeral.
> I had to google that word, Coprolalia. I had a feeling it was that syndrome where people uncontrollably cry one minute and laugh the next. Coprolalia reminds me of Tourettes. I feel sorry for those people - sometimes. I've known a few. I see them as potential victims of bullies posing as guardian angels. Like, "Hey, watch your language asshole, can't you see there are ladies around", as an excuse to start something physical.
>
> I was 13 when I went to my grandmother's funeral. At the time I considered her my mother. I did not want to go. It was my first time. Seeing the corpse was not pleasant, being told to get in line to kiss it was even worse. I felt bad about her dying. I was sitting with a male cousin about my age when from the back of the room came a sudden shrieking that began with one woman wailing, then two, then more until the entire room was overtaken by shrieks of grief. It was an Arab thing, or just an old world thing that lots of people probably do. But to me, even though I felt sad, it was hilarious. I started to laugh. My cousin was laughing to. We were having trouble holding it in. I got up and so did he. As we walked to the exit doors with our hands over our laughing faces, our shoulders were shaking from laughs the same as they do from sobs, so from behind or the side or even head-on with our hands over our faces I'm sure from the shake of our shoulders most thought we were sobbing, or so I was inclined to believe. Most in attendance were adults. Looking back, maybe they knew we were laughing because they too at some early point of their life had done the same thing. Funny how the shoulders shake the same via sob or laugh.
>
> Another time I was with a friend walking past a funeral home. We were both obsessed with death and its humor at that point of our lives. We didn't even know who had died, we went in. We saw a bunch of people sobbing and we started to laugh. But not out loud. We had to hold it in till we couldn't take it anymore. Then on our way out, once again using the hands over the face, shaking shoulders sob routine, we bumped into a kid we knew who was related to whoever was in the casket. We simply nodded and moved on. I never did it again.

When I was in the Navy I was on funeral detail. Had to attend a few funerals. Once I was a pall bearer and would do the flag fold bit. Right up with the family. Myself and the others almost laughed which would not have been good at all.

"thomas joseph" IS BOZO SMILKSTEIN'S SOCK PUPPET.

TOTALLY FAKE LIKE EVERYTHING ABOUT THE DEMON KIKE

EVERYTHING IS A FU*KING LIE.

wrote in message
news:d71004a9-8100-401a-82fa-0a24912db7b5n@googlegroups.com...

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 3:32:49 AM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I'd leave a note if I could find it, but I can't find the slots for new
> > and used toilet paper.
> I would leave a note. I would type it because I am a typist. It would be a
> long note. It could go on for years. Or until I develop a blood clot in
> one or both of my wrists from pounding the keys over the years. I would
> not commit suicide, but I could die by my own hand, or more accurately my
> own fingers.

SUicide or homicide - you decide.