It was funny. I came into the group today and saw about 8 posts marked in bold. That meant I had not yet read them. I figured Ollie had found time out of his busy "Joad on the Road" lifestyle to post a few. I was happy. "Good", I said, "this gives me something to do", which was an understatement. Actually it gave me something to live for. Then I learned the new posts were from the sex addicts who mass post into our group now and then. I can handle it. That's what newsgroups are all about - open expression. But how does our readership feel about it? I understand many want to remain anonymous and I respect that. But come on people, how about a little feedback on this one? We want to know how our loyal readership feels about anything that impacts our group. Please, if you have any complaints, if there's anything, or anyone, getting on your nerves for any reason, please let us know about it and we'll take care of it pronto. Remember, we are wide open here. Anybody can say anything that want, believe anything they want, even do anything they want. There is only one exception. Nobody disses our readership. Not ever!

On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 4:21:02 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> It was funny. I came into the group today and saw about 8 posts marked in bold. That meant I had not yet read them. I figured Ollie had found time out of his busy "Joad on the Road" lifestyle to post a few. I was happy. "Good", I said, "this gives me something to do", which was an understatement. Actually it gave me something to live for. Then I learned the new posts were from the sex addicts who mass post into our group now and then. I can handle it. That's what newsgroups are all about - open expression. But how does our readership feel about it? I understand many want to remain anonymous and I respect that. But come on people, how about a little feedback on this one? We want to know how our loyal readership feels about anything that impacts our group. Please, if you have any complaints, if there's anything, or anyone, getting on your nerves for any reason, please let us know about it and we'll take care of it pronto. Remember, we are wide open here. Anybody can say anything that want, believe anything they want, even do anything they want. There is only one exception. Nobody disses our readership. Not ever!

What sex addicts?

On 7/3/2021 4:21 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
> It was funny. I came into the group today and saw about 8 posts marked in bold. That meant I had not yet read them. I figured Ollie had found time out of his busy "Joad on the Road" lifestyle to post a few. I was happy. "Good", I said, "this gives me something to do", which was an understatement. Actually it gave me something to live for. Then I learned the new posts were from the sex addicts who mass post into our group now and then. I can handle it. That's what newsgroups are all about - open expression. But how does our readership feel about it? I understand many want to remain anonymous and I respect that. But come on people, how about a little feedback on this one? We want to know how our loyal readership feels about anything that impacts our group. Please, if you have any complaints, if there's anything, or anyone, getting on your nerves for any reason, please let us know about it and we'll take care of it pronto. Remember, we are wide open here. Anybody can say anything that want, believe anything they want, even do anything they want. There is only one exception. Nobody disses our readership. Not ever!
>
Get off Google. There are free newsreaders and news servers that easy to
use that can filter out anything you want.

> Get off Google. There are free newsreaders and news servers that easy to
> use that can filter out anything you want.

Years ago I accessed the groups through Outlook. Then one day the Outlook news server quit working along with my email which was Outlook Express, something about files corrupted or whatever. I went back to google and have stuck with them ever since. I don't want to filter anything out. I don't care who reads my stuff either. I don't like the way google makes sudden changes without warning and there's no way to get a hold of them - like most big companies, the CEOs of which deserve to die - but other than that I'm satisfied with things the way they are, for a variety of reasons, chief among them I'm too lazy to switch. I didn't live all these years so I could start changing now. Although I am capable of changing if it's a stress free transition. Love that word transition. It's trending now. I like when it's used as a verb, as in, "Sorry, I don't know what to call myself at the moment - I'm in the process of transitioning right now - but I will get back with you later and let you know what's up."

I have a friend who is a computer geek capable of accessing any computer on earth. Fortunate for many he is not an evil guy. I asked him if he could tell me the percentage of our readership that uses google. He checked and said the majority use it. Do you know what that means? The majority of people who read our group religiously use google. Out of respect for them I will stick with Google. You come in here and see only Ollie and me. You think, "Wow, what a dead place." I understand, believe me. But you are probably not aware of just how powerful our readership is. My computer buddy told me there are more than 20,000 people following our group. Shy lonely types who wish to remain anonymous. Still, can you grasp the scope of that? Only two guys posting - me and Ollie along with you and Bozo on rare occasion - yet countless thousands tuning in every day to abbbbbzzzzorb our words, our thoughts, our philosophies, our concepts, and our way of life which will not end even after we are dead. Don't bother Googling it, we are way too far ahead of them to have that information yet.

> Get off Google. There are free newsreaders and news servers that easy to
> use that can filter out anything you want.

Let's simplify it. Which one do you use and how does one go about installing it. I have a Mac. Advice is nice but it is sometimes easier to give than to take. Reminds me of when you tell someone you just got a moving violation ticket and you're innocent and they go, "Oh, let me tell you what to do with that one", and it turns out to be something I have either tried before or seen someone else try before and it's bullshit. Maybe it worked for them one time. Maybe the Judge was in a good mood. Or maybe the defendant was a female and his puppet was dancing within his flowing black robe.

"No, no, let me tell you what you do........................", blah blah blah - and then you do it and you get screwed over worse than ever. Ever been there with that one?

On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 5:27:40 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Get off Google. There are free newsreaders and news servers that easy to
> > use that can filter out anything you want.
> Let's simplify it. Which one do you use and how does one go about installing it. I have a Mac. Advice is nice but it is sometimes easier to give than to take. Reminds me of when you tell someone you just got a moving violation ticket and you're innocent and they go, "Oh, let me tell you what to do with that one", and it turns out to be something I have either tried before or seen someone else try before and it's bullshit. Maybe it worked for them one time. Maybe the Judge was in a good mood. Or maybe the defendant was a female and his puppet was dancing within his flowing black robe.
>
> "No, no, let me tell you what you do........................", blah blah blah - and then you do it and you get screwed over worse than ever. Ever been there with that one?

This thread started out about me and then deteriorated into what? Parking ticket shit!

> > "No, no, let me tell you what you do........................", blah blah blah - and then you do it and you get screwed over worse than ever. Ever been there with that one?
> This thread started out about me and then deteriorated into what? Parking ticket shit!

Just the glad the thread is still alive, asshole. We could have abandoned it, you know. You never would have known the difference. Instead, out of respect for you we struggled to keep the thread live, even though our material was lacking - and now what do we get for our troubles? - nothing but a bunch of complaints. Man, why don't you go back where you came from? Go on, get out of here. Hit the fucking road, Joad Boy. Take that Lincoln Highway. Ride 66. Take the side roads. This land is your land. Eat it. Get down on your knees and eat your land. Do it. Now!

On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 7:18:40 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > "No, no, let me tell you what you do........................", blah blah blah - and then you do it and you get screwed over worse than ever. Ever been there with that one?
> > This thread started out about me and then deteriorated into what? Parking ticket shit!
> Just the glad the thread is still alive, asshole. We could have abandoned it, you know. You never would have known the difference. Instead, out of respect for you we struggled to keep the thread live, even though our material was lacking - and now what do we get for our troubles? - nothing but a bunch of complaints. Man, why don't you go back where you came from? Go on, get out of here. Hit the fucking road, Joad Boy. Take that Lincoln Highway. Ride 66. Take the side roads. This land is your land. Eat it. Get down on your knees and eat your land. Do it. Now!

You are right. I have gotten a big head. Blame it on Mt Rushmore.

> You are right. I have gotten a big head. Blame it on Mt Rushmore.

What is/was your opinion of Rushmore? What if you didn't know it existed but were just hiking in the area and came across it without expecting it. "What the fuck is this crap?", might be your reaction. I don't know, it could be the opposite. You might gawk at the massive sculpture and go, "Wow, we need more of that around here." Now is the time to buy a mountain and hire a new artist to sculpt it with something new and outstanding that will blow Rushmore out of the water. Turn an entire mountain range into a sculpted billboard.

On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 5:44:52 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > You are right. I have gotten a big head. Blame it on Mt Rushmore.
> What is/was your opinion of Rushmore? What if you didn't know it existed but were just hiking in the area and came across it without expecting it. "What the fuck is this crap?", might be your reaction. I don't know, it could be the opposite. You might gawk at the massive sculpture and go, "Wow, we need more of that around here." Now is the time to buy a mountain and hire a new artist to sculpt it with something new and outstanding that will blow Rushmore out of the water. Turn an entire mountain range into a sculpted billboard.

It was ok. Not as massive as I would have wanted. overhyped like so many things. But I was there. I saw it. The few the proud the gawking.

On 7/11/2021 5:44 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
>
>> You are right. I have gotten a big head. Blame it on Mt Rushmore.
>
> What is/was your opinion of Rushmore? What if you didn't know it existed but were just hiking in the area and came across it without expecting it. "What the fuck is this crap?", might be your reaction. I don't know, it could be the opposite. You might gawk at the massive sculpture and go, "Wow, we need more of that around here." Now is the time to buy a mountain and hire a new artist to sculpt it with something new and outstanding that will blow Rushmore out of the water. Turn an entire mountain range into a sculpted billboard. >

Excellent idea, Thomas! Your brilliance has no limit. They can dedicate
space on those mountains to prominent Americans (sorry, no foreigners).
People like General George Custer and Linda Lovelace are two who
immediately come to mind. I'm sure you, Ollie and Bozo can think of
others. The American public would love it, with the exception of the
Indians we'd displace in order to turn these lands into National Parks.
(They shouldn't complain too much; you'd think they'd be used to broken
treaties by now) An entire industry could be dedicated to this project,
boosting the economy. America can begin paying reparations for past sins
by hiring only 'N' words to do the labor. Thomas, where do you find
these magnificent ideas?

Excellent idea, Thomas! Your brilliance has no limit. They can dedicate
space on those mountains to prominent Americans (sorry, no foreigners).
People like General George Custer and Linda Lovelace are two who
immediately come to mind. I'm sure you, Ollie and Bozo can think of others........

Yeah I can think of others - mainly Ollie, Bozo, and me. Did you ever see those famous people talking robots like the one they have of Lincoln at Disneyland. I was a teenager when I saw it. It cracked me up. Get a large truck and fill it with 40 or 50 such robots - even more if they're blowup style - then travel town to town with people lining up to pay to speak directly with the favorite famous robot of their choice. A voice over artist hiding off stage supplies the voice so the customer and robot can communicate on a personal level. Not just famous politicians and movie people either - we'll have Dahmer and Manson and other off beat characters to spice things up. Maybe even a George Floyd. People can ask him stuff and the voice over guy can have him responding with unexpected stuff like, "What da fuck you ast'in dat fo, White Boy - I be George Floyd, an I ain't gotta be anserin none a yo stoopit motha fucking questions, asshole", followed by an unexpectedly civil response to the next questioner. You never know what you're going to get from them, that's the lure - a guy bragging he just came from seeing the Lincoln exhibit and Abe called him a worthless piece if shit - and he's got the video to prove it.

"The best day of my life - Abe Lincoln called me a piece of shit!"

On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 4:40:45 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> Excellent idea, Thomas! Your brilliance has no limit. They can dedicate
> space on those mountains to prominent Americans (sorry, no foreigners).
> People like General George Custer and Linda Lovelace are two who
> immediately come to mind. I'm sure you, Ollie and Bozo can think of others.......
>
>
> Yeah I can think of others - mainly Ollie, Bozo, and me. Did you ever see those famous people talking robots like the one they have of Lincoln at Disneyland. I was a teenager when I saw it. It cracked me up. Get a large truck and fill it with 40 or 50 such robots - even more if they're blowup style - then travel town to town with people lining up to pay to speak directly with the favorite famous robot of their choice. A voice over artist hiding off stage supplies the voice so the customer and robot can communicate on a personal level. Not just famous politicians and movie people either - we'll have Dahmer and Manson and other off beat characters to spice things up. Maybe even a George Floyd. People can ask him stuff and the voice over guy can have him responding with unexpected stuff like, "What da fuck you ast'in dat fo, White Boy - I be George Floyd, an I ain't gotta be anserin none a yo stoopit motha fucking questions, asshole", followed by an unexpectedly civil response to the next questioner. You never know what you're going to get from them, that's the lure - a guy bragging he just came from seeing the Lincoln exhibit and Abe called him a worthless piece if shit - and he's got the video to prove it.
>
> "The best day of my life - Abe Lincoln called me a piece of shit!"

Have actors pretending to be robots of the characters. Then they all get naked and boogie woogie.

> Have actors pretending to be robots of the characters. Then they all get naked and boogie woogie.

How much money are they going to demand? Are they going to drag the union into it? Better to forget actors altogether. But a good idea otherwise. Maybe just one actor who can do it all. Play all the parts. The hard part is retaining his services without letting him know just how valuable his is. Once they find out they are more valuable than they knew, that's when they start getting uppity. A great idea though. use a variety of assistants to get a read on certain audience members, stuff only they should know. Get real personal with them. Like if a guy requests Lincoln, the versatile actor puts on his Lincoln to address his one man audience, telling him stuff about himself he didn't think anyone knew. Like if the guy is an actor, Lincoln can mention it. "You're an actor, and you're good - but you're nowhere as good as you think. You over act. You need to speak more clearly" - and so forth.

On Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 5:36:00 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Have actors pretending to be robots of the characters. Then they all get naked and boogie woogie.
> How much money are they going to demand? Are they going to drag the union into it? Better to forget actors altogether. But a good idea otherwise. Maybe just one actor who can do it all. Play all the parts. The hard part is retaining his services without letting him know just how valuable his is. Once they find out they are more valuable than they knew, that's when they start getting uppity. A great idea though. use a variety of assistants to get a read on certain audience members, stuff only they should know. Get real personal with them. Like if a guy requests Lincoln, the versatile actor puts on his Lincoln to address his one man audience, telling him stuff about himself he didn't think anyone knew. Like if the guy is an actor, Lincoln can mention it. "You're an actor, and you're good - but you're nowhere as good as you think. You over act. You need to speak more clearly" - and so forth.

But the actor has been working the method and he becomes booth killing the Lincoln actor. What a play.

> But the actor has been working the method and he becomes booth killing the Lincoln actor. What a play.

A nice concept - if more than one actor is used. But to start out we plan to use only one actor. Some parts of the play will go unseen but will be narrated. For example we see Lincoln in his balcony seat watching the play. Then the curtain goes down and the narrator explains how Booth is about to enter the balcony behind Lincoln. The curtain goes up and the same actor is now dressed as Booth. A dummy of Lincoln is in the balcony seat. No matter what happens next or what scene is presented it will be the same actor playing every part. Maybe later after we get enough money we can hire more actors. Maybe even some of the top guys. I understand Tom Hanks looks pretty good in a stovepipe hat. Don't worry, we're moving forward with the project.

On Wednesday, July 14, 2021 at 4:48:56 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > But the actor has been working the method and he becomes booth killing the Lincoln actor. What a play.
> A nice concept - if more than one actor is used. But to start out we plan to use only one actor. Some parts of the play will go unseen but will be narrated. For example we see Lincoln in his balcony seat watching the play. Then the curtain goes down and the narrator explains how Booth is about to enter the balcony behind Lincoln. The curtain goes up and the same actor is now dressed as Booth. A dummy of Lincoln is in the balcony seat. No matter what happens next or what scene is presented it will be the same actor playing every part. Maybe later after we get enough money we can hire more actors. Maybe even some of the top guys. I understand Tom Hanks looks pretty good in a stovepipe hat. Don't worry, we're moving forward with the project.

LOL @ Hanks

> LOL @ Hanks

Oh I see, so all by themselves my words were not good enough until I dragged Hanks into it. You are implying that I somehow need Hanks, that I can't make it on my own. I appreciate the LOL, but my comments were not designed for laughs, I really do know Hanks, and he really has been approached about doing the project. Now I am tempted to ex him out of the picture. I will play Lincoln myself. I'm going back to my original philosophy that actors are not needed. Editing and footage are all we need. We don't need new action. Everything already on tape is up for grabs. We don't need Hanks. I personally don't need anybody, I can handle this project on my own. But you are a partner and I am in awe of your suggestions, so you are always welcome. Just leave the big names out of it. Please.

On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 11:12:25 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > LOL @ Hanks
>
>
> Oh I see, so all by themselves my words were not good enough until I dragged Hanks into it. You are implying that I somehow need Hanks, that I can't make it on my own. I appreciate the LOL, but my comments were not designed for laughs, I really do know Hanks, and he really has been approached about doing the project. Now I am tempted to ex him out of the picture. I will play Lincoln myself. I'm going back to my original philosophy that actors are not needed. Editing and footage are all we need. We don't need new action. Everything already on tape is up for grabs. We don't need Hanks. I personally don't need anybody, I can handle this project on my own. But you are a partner and I am in awe of your suggestions, so you are always welcome. Just leave the big names out of it. Please.

The whole concept of film and actors is not needed. Just record the production meetings and release that.

> The whole concept of film and actors is not needed. Just record the production meetings and release that.

An industry that is dead but refuses to go away because it has enough money to buy the illusion of life.

On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 6:50:37 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The whole concept of film and actors is not needed. Just record the production meetings and release that.
> An industry that is dead but refuses to go away because it has enough money to buy the illusion of life.

It is dead. The best movies today are like 50's sitcoms. No wait. That is not correct. They suck.

> It is dead. The best movies today are like 50's sitcoms. No wait. That is not correct. They suck.

I gave up on it decades ago. No big loss to me. Kind of freeing in fact. Unfortunately, while it is true that I am ahead of the times, my lead is not a large one. Today the movies are pretty much dead for everyone. At least I hope so. I no longer care what people today like. I expect disappointment when I surf into a movie to the point where if the movie is not disappointing I can be disappointed in that as well.

"I was hoping to hate it but turns out I thought it was all right. Oh man, what a drag!"

On Sunday, July 18, 2021 at 5:47:37 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > It is dead. The best movies today are like 50's sitcoms. No wait. That is not correct. They suck.
> I gave up on it decades ago. No big loss to me. Kind of freeing in fact. Unfortunately, while it is true that I am ahead of the times, my lead is not a large one. Today the movies are pretty much dead for everyone. At least I hope so. I no longer care what people today like. I expect disappointment when I surf into a movie to the point where if the movie is not disappointing I can be disappointed in that as well.
>
> "I was hoping to hate it but turns out I thought it was all right. Oh man, what a drag!"

Even movies that are ok are often too long. Better to be too short then too long. At least that is what I tell the girls.

> Even movies that are ok are often too long. Better to be too short then too long. At least that is what I tell the girls.

Back to the cock again I see. Well, while we're there, let me say this. I've said it before. The only real advantage to having a super long cock is not needing to get too close to the person you're fucking. You got a 20 foot cock, just lasso it up and send it across the room to your girlfriend's cunt and let her have a good at it. Plus a short dick is good for sucking.. To take that puppy in from warhead to base and to savor each segment in-between is a joy words cannot describe. And if once again you're thinking I'm gay because of these admissions, let's not forget I am a very open minded guy capable of understanding how people can get into things I don't care for. Funny about the movies, I agree of course. Even an hour is good. There are probably a few rare occasions where you saw a movie and actually went, "Gee, I wish it were longer", but it's rare of course. Even then it's probably not a drama or story, more a compilation of things. But I'm sure there are rare exceptions when even great movie critics such as us think movies could be a little longer than they are. But again - they are rare - like us.

On Monday, July 19, 2021 at 7:10:28 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Even movies that are ok are often too long. Better to be too short then too long. At least that is what I tell the girls.
> Back to the cock again I see. Well, while we're there, let me say this. I've said it before. The only real advantage to having a super long cock is not needing to get too close to the person you're fucking. You got a 20 foot cock, just lasso it up and send it across the room to your girlfriend's cunt and let her have a good at it. Plus a short dick is good for sucking. To take that puppy in from warhead to base and to savor each segment in-between is a joy words cannot describe. And if once again you're thinking I'm gay because of these admissions, let's not forget I am a very open minded guy capable of understanding how people can get into things I don't care for. Funny about the movies, I agree of course. Even an hour is good. There are probably a few rare occasions where you saw a movie and actually went, "Gee, I wish it were longer", but it's rare of course. Even then it's probably not a drama or story, more a compilation of things. But I'm sure there are rare exceptions when even great movie critics such as us think movies could be a little longer than they are. But again - they are rare - like us.

I no longer can tell what a good size for a cock is. I will live and die with the one I got.