Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  nodelist  faq  login

If God had not given us sticky tape, it would have been necessary to invent it.

rocksolid / Helpdesk / Re: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?

SubjectAuthor
* Java faster than C by a factor of 10?Guest
`* Re: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?AnonUser
 `* Re: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?Guest
  `- Re: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?trw

1
Subject: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?
From: Guest
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.helpdesk
Organization: Dancing elephants
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:00 UTC
Path: i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: gue...@retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com (Guest)
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.helpdesk
Subject: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:00:54 -0500
Organization: Dancing elephants
Lines: 0
Message-ID: <qr00em$l9m$1@i2pn2.org>
Reply-To: Guest <guest@retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:00:55 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; posting-account="def.i2p";
logging-data="21814"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"
User-Agent: FUDforum 3.0.7
X-FUDforum: 6666cd76f96956469e7be39d750cc7d9 <141897>
View all headers
Anybody experiences the Java router being faster by far compared to C?  I'm flying with both routers but the Java is incredible.  We are talking blink of an eye with Links browser.  I never saw it like this... maybe because somebody stopped screwing with the network.
Posted on def3


Subject: Re: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?
From: AnonUser
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.helpdesk
Organization: RetroBBS
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:30 UTC
References: 1
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid3!.POSTED.localhost!not-for-mail
From: anonu...@retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com.remove-ptf-this (AnonUser)
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.helpdesk
Subject: Re: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:30:52 +0000
Organization: RetroBBS
Message-ID: <0e3242c085b781e71b70e35b23a77af5$1@rocksolidbbs.com>
References: <qr00em$l9m$1@i2pn2.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: rocksolidbbs.com; posting-host="localhost:127.0.0.1";
logging-data="32756"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@rocksolidbbs.com"
User-Agent: rslight (http://news.novabbs.com)
To: Guest
X-Comment-To: Guest
In-Reply-To: <qr00em$l9m$1@i2pn2.org>
X-FTN-PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Linux Dec 29 2018 GCC 6.3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on rocksolidbbs.com
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$n8e1TuRdO5qZD618oqtufeJVthTi8QIVqFX.hK2McABKIG5.1sn6.
X-Gateway: retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com [Synchronet 3.17a-Linux NewsLink 1.110]
View all headers
  To: Guest
I will have to try it, but even if it is faster I still prefer i2pd because of
memory usage. Next you will tell me that it also uses less than i2pd ;).
--
Posted on RetroBBS



Subject: Re: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?
From: Guest
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.helpdesk
Organization: Dancing elephants
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 20:02 UTC
References: 1
Path: i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: gue...@retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com (Guest)
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.helpdesk
Subject: Re: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:02:09 -0500
Organization: Dancing elephants
Lines: 0
Message-ID: <qr1ho0$qio$1@i2pn2.org>
References: <0e3242c085b781e71b70e35b23a77af5$1@rocksolidbbs.com>
Reply-To: Guest <guest@retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 20:02:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; posting-account="def.i2p";
logging-data="27224"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"
User-Agent: FUDforum 3.0.7
X-FUDforum: 6666cd76f96956469e7be39d750cc7d9 <142796>
View all headers
No... It is just a fluke.  I have not seen i2p working this well ever.  5 years ago I ran a high speed router with a lot of bandwidth but it was not nearly as fast.
Posted on def3


Subject: Re: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?
From: trw
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.helpdesk
Organization: Dancing elephants
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:15 UTC
References: 1
Path: i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: trw...@i2pmail.org (trw)
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.helpdesk
Subject: Re: Java faster than C by a factor of 10?
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:15:38 -0500
Organization: Dancing elephants
Lines: 0
Message-ID: <qr1m1p$10o$1@i2pn2.org>
References: <qr1ho0$qio$1@i2pn2.org>
Reply-To: trw <trw@i2pmail.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:15:38 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; posting-account="def.i2p";
logging-data="1048"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"
User-Agent: FUDforum 3.0.7
X-FUDforum: 6666cd76f96956469e7be39d750cc7d9 <142910>
View all headers
The java version has drastically improved in speed for me ever since the update before the last, don't know about i2pd. Might of course just be connected with the improvement of the whole network, that is hard to tell.
Posted on def3


1

rocksolid light 0.8.3
clearneti2ptor