Hello,

Yet more of my philosophy about how to be harmony and how solve the
problems of materialism..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

Here is my other just new proverb that explains how to solve the
problems of materialism:

"The problem is not the tool that we call a knife, but it is how to use
correctly the knife, and how to use correctly the knife can be laws that
control the use of a knife or/and it can be also the knowing how to use
correctly a knife."

And this "knowing how to use correctly a knife" is also
like the "knowing how to live in harmony" of my following important
proverb:

"There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we
have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say
that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or
dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner
le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de
vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people
by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know
how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good
philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel."

I have just written the following:

Knox College psychologist Tim Kasser said the following:

"We know from research that materialism tends to be associated with
treating others in more competitive, manipulative and selfish ways, as
well as with being less empathetic"

Read more here:

https://www.vox.com/2014/12/24/7447727/materialism-psychology

But i think that i am not in accordance with the psychologist Tim Kasser
above, since i don't think that materialism is the problem,
but it is what we call in french: "Il faudrait du savoir vivre ensemble"
and here is my new proverbs that talk about it:

Here is my other new proverb:

"There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we
have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say
that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or
dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner
le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de
vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people
by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know
how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good
philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel."

And Here is my other new proverbs:

"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of
responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."

And here is my new proverb:

"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."

And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:

"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la
traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."

So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for
success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or
advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
global world, and read my following thoughts about how i am redefining
Utilitarianism so that to make you understand the how:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

So you can read all my other proverbs that i have just invented quickly
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8

And I think that Nazism or neo-nazism or white supremacism or communism
are also too rigid, so they don't work correctly, since they also have
the strong tendency to want to like too much homogenize, so they are not
correct thinking, and this is the basis of evolutionary algorithms in
artificial intelligence, so you have to introduce a kind of randomness
that permits the evolutionary algorithms to be effective and efficient,
and you have to also understand the symbolic of it, and i also say that
in consumerism in capitalism we have also to avoid to too much
homogenize by being a kind of randomness that avoids to too much
monopolize that hurts creativity and innovation, so you have to know how
to avoid nationalism and the like , and you have to know how to "buy"
products or services from the other countries or the others so that to
encourage creativity and innovation. And speaking about the
evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence, here is more of my
thoughts about them:

As i said before, notice how i am talking about how we have not to have
a narrow view of what is smartness, and notice how i am talking about
the distributed smartness as rules etc. so i think i can logically infer
from my below thoughts the other way of solving the greatly complex
systems that is not by like "planning" the whole system from a
centralized government, but by emergence of a higher level intelligence
from distributing like the rules or.. into the small parts of the system
that will solve the greatly complex system, it looks like the
evolutionary design and planning, and it looks like the way of the
higher level smartness from an Ant colony, since in an Ant colony there
is no central government, but there is a distributed intelligence that
needs a kind of diversity of genetics of the members of the colony and
it needs like a distributed rules that the members have to follow that
will make emerge a higher level of intelligence. And of course it looks
like evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence, since the
advantage of evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence is that
they don't plan in advance but they search by like following some
distributed rules, and of course they need some "randomness" so that to
not get stuck in a local optimum, this is why i am talking below about
how to make our civilization that is a complex system much more
resilient by learning how to learn to humans with like a set
of rules like in an Ant colony by saying the following and notice
that the learning how to learn can be an efficient abstraction that
helps a lot: