Hello,

More of my philosophy of how to define smartness..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart, and i say that measuring smartness
with an IQ is really a "narrow" view, so i will make you feel more what
is smartness: I think that such a thing as a human "charisma" can be
a smart human dynamic system that can make us much more smart or much
more synchronized as a people etc. so it can make us much more smart,
so there is some such human qualities that can be a dynamic smart human
system that can be distributed into the brains of people as a smart
rules or etc. and that can make us much more smart as a people, so the
fact that we are distributing this smartness of those kind of qualities
into the brains of people as smart rules, it can give an "emergence" to
a high level of smartness as a group or people, so we have not to have
a narrow view of what is smartness, since those kind of qualities can
become a great smartness, so a "rule" can become a great smartness if
we believe in it and follow it, and a beautiful tree can become a
smartness too since we can have an artificial smartness, also we can say
that smartness come not only from IQ, but from creativity that make you
much more smart etc. and i think that smartness is about "adaptation" or
how we get more and more perfect as an individual or as a group..

More of my philosophy about the way of success of the best Big Brains..

I have just talked about the way to success, and read the following
about the best big brains from around the world in USA so that to
understand correctly the way of success:

Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai
that is a Ph.D., it says:

"Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the “smart
fraction” of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance
of that country, for example, its GDP."

And it also says the following:

"“According to recent population estimates, there are about eight
Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains.”
But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every
other country in the world because it continues to serve as a magnet for
brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings.

What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead
in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for
educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried
Americans are falling behind, but this is because everyone is focusing
on average and below average people. Maybe it’s time we started taking a
closer look at the smartest people of our own country."

Read more here:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world

So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese
and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are
making USA a rich country.

And read also the following to understand more:

Why Silicon Valley Wouldn’t Work Without Immigrants

There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech.
Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of
American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies.
Researchers have found that more than enough students graduate from
American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry’s
friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that
technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B
system, to get foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay
American-born ones.

But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it
misses the picture among Silicon Valley’s top companies. One common
misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in
that view, tech companies can hire just about anyone from anywhere in
the world to fill a particular role.

But today’s most ambitious tech companies are not like factories.
They’re more like athletic teams. They’re looking for the LeBrons and
Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new,
never-before-seen widget, to completely reimagine what widgets should do
in the first place.

“It’s not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into
manufacturing plants,” said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief
executive of the cloud-storage company Box. “It’s about the couple ideas
that are going to be invented that are going to change everything.”

Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with
those inventions? It’s partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture
capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5
percent of the world’s population; it stands to reason that most of the
world’s best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren’t born here.

If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an
unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google’s
entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority
of its revenues and profits, the engine that allows it to hire thousands
of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar
Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran,
and Eric Veach, from Canada.

But it’s not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well
in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to
new ideas.

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html

More of my philosophy about what is the way to success..

I invite you to look carefully at the following very interesting
video that explains what is the way to success, it is the same of
my way of doing below:

TOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's
Office Hours Ep. 4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk

More of my philosophy about the real fight..

I think i am smart and i will explain my kind of spirit, i will
ask the following question and you will understand my way of thinking:
How can you accept that a big company such as Microsoft or Intel is much
more smart and much better than you? so it is the way of my spirit, i am
not accepting that Intel or Microsoft or such big companies are much
smart or much better than me, so i am constructing "alone" my Big
business and i think i will win the fight and i think i will be
successful, this is my way of doing, i want and i like to be my own big
Boss and this is my way of doing, and i am not arab and i am not white
european or.. i am like a super Soldier that is fighting against the
best PhD researchers and against some powerful companies by doing the
following:

More precision about my way of being innovative and creative..

You have to understand my way of doing, i am in competition against
the best PhD researchers all around the world in what i am doing, so the
way to success is not to compete against one PhD or some researchers, i
think the way to success is competing against the best PhD researchers
around the world in what you are doing and win the fight, this is how i
am doing it, and i am also reading the best PhD papers of the best PhD
researchers and doing the following, read below, so i am like a super
Soldier:

More of my philosophy about my kind of innovation and creativity..

Here is also my way of how i am becoming rich:

First i want to say that i have passed four IQ tests and some of them
are certified and i have scored high, so i am highly smart, second,
my methodology is also that i am reading many PhD papers of researchers
and i am seeking the weaknesses of them, and i have found many
weaknesses on those PhD papers and from those weaknesses i have invented
many software scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented
some powerful software tools for parallelism etc., so i give you an
example of one of my invention that is: A Scalable reference counting
with efficient support for weak references, so that you understand that
i am truthful, here it is:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

But the truth is that i have invented many scalable algorithms such
as this one, and i have made public some of them. And here is another
example of how i am inventive and creative in operational research too,
i have just read the following book (and of other books like it) of a
PhD researcher about operational research and capacity planning, here
they are:

Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning by Example

https://www.amazon.ca/Performance-Design-Computer-Capacity-Planning/dp/0130906735

So i have just found that there methodologies of those PhD researchers
for the E-Business service don't work, because they are doing
calculations for a given arrival rate that is statistically and
empirically measured from the behavior of customers, but i think that it
is not correct, so i am being inventive and i have come with my new
methodology that fixes the arrival rate from the data by using an
hyperexponential service distribution(and it is mathematical) since it
is also good for Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks and i will write a
powerful book about it that will teach my new methodology and i will
also explain the mathematics behind it and i will sell it, and my new
methodology will work for cloud computing and for computer servers.