Hello,

More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and neuroevolution
and common sense and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have just read the following article about neuroevolution
that is a meta-algorithm in artificial intelligence, an algorithm for
designing algorithms, i invite you to read about it here:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/computers-evolve-a-new-path-toward-human-intelligence-20191106/

So notice that it says the following

"In neuroevolution, you start by assigning random values to the weights
between layers. This randomness means the network won’t be very good at
its job. But from this sorry state, you then create a set of random
mutations — offspring neural networks with slightly different weights —
and evaluate their abilities. You keep the best ones, produce more
offspring, and repeat."

So i think that the problem with neuroevolution above is that the
"evaluate the abilities of the offspring neural networks" lacks common
sense.

So read the following interesting article that says that artificial
intelligence has also brought a kind of common sense to Computers, and
read about it here:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05317

And read about it in the following article:

"Now, Choi and her collaborators have united these approaches. COMET
(short for “commonsense transformers”) extends GOFAI-style symbolic
reasoning with the latest advances in neural language modeling — a kind
of deep learning that aims to imbue computers with a statistical
“understanding” of written language. COMET works by reimagining
common-sense reasoning as a process of generating plausible (if
imperfect) responses to novel input, rather than making airtight
deductions by consulting a vast encyclopedia-like database."

Read more here:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/common-sense-comes-to-computers-20200430/

Also I invite you to look carefully at the following video of a jewish
AI(artificial intelligence) scientist about artificial intelligence(And
read about him here: https://rogantribe.com/who-is-lex-fridman/):

Exponential Progress of AI: Moore's Law, Bitter Lesson, and the Future
of Computation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Me96OWd44q0

I think that the jewish AI(artificial intelligence) scientist that is
speaking on the video above and that is called Lex Fridman is making a
big mistake, since he focuses too much on improving Deep Learning in
artificial intelligence using exponential improvement of computation of
CPU hardware, but i think that it is a "big" mistake and you can easily
notice it by reading carefully my following thoughts and writing:

More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and specialized
hardwares and more..

I think that specialized hardwares for deep learning in artificial
intelligence like GPUs and quantum computers are no more needed, since
you can use only a much less powerful CPU with more memory and do it
efficiently, since a PhD researcher called Nir Shavit that is a jewish
from Israel has just invented a very interesting software called neural
magic that does it efficiently, and i invite you to look at the
following very interesting video of Nir Shavit to know more about it:

The Software GPU: Making Inference Scale in the Real World by Nir
Shavit, PhD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGj2CJHXXKQ

And there is not only the jewish above called Nir Shavit that has
invented a very interesting thing, but there is also the following
muslim Iranian and Postdoctoral Associate that has also invented a very
interesting thing too for artificial intelligence, and here it is:

Why is MIT's new "liquid" AI a breakthrough innovation?

Read more here:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fintelligence-artificielle.developpez.com%2Factu%2F312174%2FPourquoi-la-nouvelle-IA-liquide-de-MIT-est-elle-une-innovation-revolutionnaire-Elle-apprend-continuellement-de-son-experience-du-monde%2F

And here is Ramin Hasani, Postdoctoral Associate (he is an Iranian):

https://www.csail.mit.edu/person/ramin-hasani

And here he is:

http://www.raminhasani.com/

He is the study’s lead author of the following new study:

New ‘Liquid’ AI Learns Continuously From Its Experience of the World

Read more here:

https://singularityhub.com/2021/01/31/new-liquid-ai-learns-as-it-experiences-the-world-in-real-time/

More of my philosophy about can we trust the smartests in how they
measure what is beauty and Love..

There is still a philosophical question of:

Can we trust the smartests among us in how they measure what is beauty
and Love ?

This is a really important question that follows from my explanation
below of is Love and beauty subjective, i think i am smart
and i will answer it as follows:

I think we have discovered many sequences, patterns, or methods that
permit to compose the actual pleasant beauty that we are defining as
beauty, so then it logically follows that we can not say that beauty is
subjective, since also we have not to be pessimistic, since the
smartests among us that define what is beauty and Love will always
enhance there intellectual taste and taste that make us adapt correctly
in defining what is beauty and Love.

More precision of my philosophy of what is beauty and more..

Here is more precision of my definition of what is beauty, read it again:

I think i am smart, and i think i can define beauty with my fluid
intelligence as the following:

Beauty comes from both order and harmony, and i think that beauty is
"order" that is pleasant to the human senses, but this order that is
pleasant of beauty is an arrangement or disposition according to a
particular sequence, pattern, or method, and i think an order that is
pleasant is an arrangement or disposition according to a particular
sequence, pattern, or method that is more perfect or much more perfect
or perfect, so when you have disorder that is unpleasant for the human
senses, so it is not beautiful, so when you look at a circle it is an
order that is pleasant to look at, this is why a circle is beautiful.

More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty..

I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,

Now i can ask the following philosophical questions:

Does Love is subjective ?

Does Beauty is subjective ?

Here is my answer:

I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure
it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance,
i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of
doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at
beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a
not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific
and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say
that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure
beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if
we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way
with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't
become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that
Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that
merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my
following new proverb:

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and
its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a
process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a
process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a
"margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that
action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of
particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the
local optimization of PSO is like the process of individual Love, and
the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in
a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial
intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial
intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the
actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the
optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the
values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum.