Hello,

Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about pleasures of
life and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think that the pleasure also comes from being stupid and looking
at a smarter movie, but i think that this pleasure is not a full
pleasure since it lacks pleasure since you are a stupid looking
at a smarter movie, so this is why i think technologically advanced
extraterrestrials than us are not so advanced, and i will explain
more my logical proofs in my next book of my new philosophy.

More of my philosophy about much more advanced extraterrestrials..

I think i am really smart and i say that much more technologically
advanced extraterrestrials than us are not so advanced, because you have
to look at how they can be happy, so you have to look at the problem of
happiness since it is the most important problem, so i think that we are
really "advanced", since you have to prioritize by weight of importance,
since happiness is possible today, so we have to be positive and read my
below thoughts so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about reading the mind of the future..

I think i am really smart, and i say that i can like efficiently read
the mind of the future and much further in the future, since it is like
weights of importance, since the great weight of importance is not that
we will be so technologically advanced in the future, since it is about
the problem of "happiness", so i think that i have found the way to
"forecast" happiness of the future and i have found the constraints on
happiness and this is why i have also just invented a concept that i am
talking about below, so i think from my calculations that happiness will
come from "few" kind of pleasures of life, and you have to know how to
be disciplined at how to use efficiently those few kind of pleasures of
life so that to be happy, and i will explain it much more in my next
book of my new philosophy.

More of my philosophy of is happiness possible..

I think i am a smart, and i will say that happiness is possible, and
since we are constantly interacting with our world and with its
imperfections too, so happiness can not just come from the inside from
the spirit of a human, so those imperfections of the world are like a
big weight that you can not lift and that make you much less happy or
sad and that you have to like smartly lift so that to be much more
happy, so how can you smartly and individually lift those big weights?,
so as you are noticing it is like physics, and look at how you can do it
in physics in the following video:

Levers and lifting objects | Simple machines | Physics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LF9oS-UJAA

And attaining happiness is like in physics, since you have to like use
smart levers so that to lift the big weights of those imperfections of
our world that make us much less happy or sad, so in my new philosophy i
have also just invented a powerful concept that is like a lever that
permits to like lift big weights of those imperfections of our world
that make us much less happy or sad, and my new concept make you much
more happy, and this concept of mine is like a "plan" that you have to
follow so that to be much more happy, and my new concept also shows how
to construct a "kind" of pleasures of life that make you much more
happy, so i will write a book about my new philosophy that also
includes my new concept that i have just invented and i will also extend
my new philosophy with much more creative ideas.

Here is my just new smart proverb:

"When you want to fly like a bird, you can fly like a bird and look from
high above from the sky at our world as a "beautiful" world without
looking at its imperfections and then you can be more happy, or you can
look at our world from the inside and think about it from inside by
looking at its imperfections and be much less happy or sad, so how do
you solve this problem ? so when you are smart you will notice that we
can solve the problem by also powerfully energizing the spirit using the
positive spirit so that to transcend much better the imperfections of
our world, and in my new philosophy i will speak about how to
efficiently and powerfully energize the spirit using the positive spirit"

And here is my other new proverb:

"Human smartness is finding a small number of tools that permit to
solve a great number of problems, so when you look carefully at what is
human smartness you will notice that it is not about great quantity, it
is about a small quantity of good quality that permits us to be so
powerful. Being smart is not about quantity, it is much more about quality."

So i think i am smart and i will explain my new proverb above:

With pattern recognition of fluid intelligence we are finding
patterns that are the tools, and we are understanding and applying those
patterns that we are finding with fluid intelligence to
other many other new problems, so then we are not finding the patterns
again and again, so then we are not finding the tools that are those
patterns again and again, so pattern recognition of fluid intelligence
is a minimization process that permits to find a small number of tools
that permit to solve great number of problems. I think i am smart, and I
have to be more precise, so you have to understand that the minimization
process above is on the "finding", so when i say in my proverb above:
"Human smartness is finding a small number of tools that permit to solve
a great number of problems", the "finding a small number" is my good
abstract thinking and it means that it is a minimization process on the
"finding", since we are not "finding" the tools that are the patterns
again and again.

More of my philosophy about my other just new proverb..

I think i am smart and i will explain my following just new proverb:

"You don't learn a valuable lesson from making mistakes, but you learn a
valuable lesson from being the right prevention and making the mistakes"

So if you say that you learn a valuable lesson from making mistakes, it
is the general way of saying, so it includes the mistakes that have not
be prevented by the right prevention, so then this way of learning must
logically not be allowed, so then it becomes not a valuable lesson as in
my new proverb, so i think that the general way of saying it is the way
of my new proverb.

So as i am saying below:

I will say that since you have two types of learning, and here they are:

1- Learning by being the right prevention

2- Learning by not being the right prevention

So the second way of learning by using the right prevention is the right
way.

Here is my just new proverb:

"You don't learn a valuable lesson from making mistakes, but you learn a
valuable lesson from being the right prevention and making the mistakes"

So I invite you to look at the following known black american that
says the following:

"FAILURE Means You've LEARNED Another VALUABLE LESSON!"

Here he is in the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHpDeonEwO4

So i think i am smart, and from my just new above proverb you are
understanding that the above general saying of the known black american
is not smart, since the "failure" comes also from the mistakes. And
now by reading my just new above proverb you are understanding my
logical proof below, so read all my previous thoughts below:

More of my philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism..

I think i am smart and i think that the problem of today Western
countries is that they are not being the right Elitism, since i think
that populism is not the right Elitism that we require, so i will give
you an example so that you understand, so look at the following new
article of a journalist of a white supremacist website in USA called
national vanguard:

https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/09/how-to-tell-true-philosophy-from-false-philosophy-in-30-seconds/

So i think that this article is not smart since look carefully
at how he is ranking Survival,Truth and Justice, Freedom, etc.
and notice carefully that he is saying that Survival comes before Truth,
and i think that it is not smart to say so, since i think i am smart and
i say that Survival is like my smart redefinition of Utilitarianism,
since you have to survive in the present and you have to survive in the
near future or in the future, so since you have to survive this way so
you have to survive as a group to be better survival and then
responsability is inherent to it since you have also to be more
organized as a group so that to survive in the near future or future, so
then since this responsability is inherent so we can logically say that
you have to be more organized by using more sophisticated knowledge or
smartness, so then this more sophisticated knowledge comes with truth
that permits you to be better organized so that to survive, so then this
proves that we can not simply Rank Survival before the truth, so then my
logical proof is finished and it shows that the above article is not
right by Ranking as he is ranking.