Hello,

More of my philosophy about happiness and about quality..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I just said the following:

---

More of my philosophy about what is quality..

I think i am smart and i think i am a philosopher that is smart, so
now i will ask a philosophical question of:

What is really "quality" ?

So i think i am smart, and it is like measuring it absolutely or
relatively, so i think that even a thing of absolutely great quality can
become relatively of not so great quality, so i will give an example so
that you understand clearly:

So notice that intellectual taste or taste is much more enhanced by
being well educated and by this democratization of information on
internet and by our kind of more sophisticated civilization, so now i am
seeing a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is the following:

I think by enhancing "much" more the intellectual taste and taste
you can fall into a constraint that you can become much more
discriminatory and you can reject things or humans of not of high
quality and you can reject things or humans of even high quality and
this can become that you have much less of those choices in your life
and you become much less happy or sad, and this can cause problems to
the economy, this is why quality is also relative to our intellectual
taste or taste.

----

But i think even if you are much less happy by being a much enhanced
intellectual taste and taste , i think that you can attain peace, read
my following proverb so that to understand how:

"In my philosophy our past and our future prevent us from living
peacefully our present, so the best way is to be much more peace by
being Stability that is obtained with the force of perfection, because
when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you
resist better instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality"

"Dans ma philosophie notre passé et notre futur nous empêchent de vivre
paisiblement notre présent, donc le meilleur moyen est d'être beaucoup
plus de paix en étant la stabilité qui s'obtient avec la force de la
perfection, car quand tu deviens plus parfait tu augmentes tes forces,
alors tu résistes mieux aux instabilités, et je pense que c'est comme
une loi de la morale"

So i think that we have not to be pessimistic, since when i say that you
can be much less happy by becoming a much enhanced intellectual taste
and taste, this doesn't mean that you can not be peace and be more happy
by living your life in smart way.

Other than that i have also talked about my new model that i call
coopetition that shows that Adam Smith was not right by saying the
following:

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

Since you can easliy notice that even Open source software, that is also
a cooperation and that is not an egoism, enhances creativity and
competitiveness and innovation locally and globally(since we have also
to enhance them globally), so read the following to notice it:

Open source software promotes competitiveness and innovation in the EU
, and could help achieve digital sovereignty, according to a Commission
study

Read more here:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsolutions-entreprise.developpez.com%2Factu%2F318176%2FLes-logiciels-open-source-favorisent-la-competitivite-et-l-innovation-au-sein-de-l-UE-et-pourraient-permettre-d-atteindre-la-souverainete-numerique-selon-une-etude-de-Commission%2F

Also read my following thoughts about my new model that i call
coopetition and about the philosopher and economist Adam Smith and about
his Liberalism so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc

And read more of my thoughts about Adam Smith here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

And read my previous thoughts to understand better:

More of my philosophy about the economic market and about success..

Here is my just new proverb, read it again and my answer is below:

"Consumers are demanding high quality at low prices, so this is
why you have to master the tools of adaptation, such as having
a good education with a good education system, since getting
rich quickly is not the wise thing to do, since mastering the
tools of adaptation like having a good education will allow
you to get rich and will allow you to keep you rich, so in this
proverb of mine the kind of "adaptation" sets the kind of tools that you
need, so if you need to adapt in internet, so it depends on your kind of
adaptation of your kind of job that for example will set the size of
knowledge about internet that you need so that to adapt efficiently in
your kind of job, so you are understanding the idea, so this proverb of
mine is efficient since it is adaptative to the contexts or situations,
so then you have to be of this right perfection and you have to think
Economies of scale since they also resulted in the most affordable price
of any product for the consumer without the manufacturer having to
sacrifice profits, and you have to be fast exponential growth by also
using digitalization and you have to be exponential thinking."

So as you are noticing that my proverb is saying the following:

"Consumers are demanding high quality at low prices"

And i think that it is the strong tendency of consumers, but i think
that if we let the consumers in the economic market always decide, it is
not so efficient, since they are too much demanding, so how can we solve
the problem ? i think that even if the product is not of high quality,
but it is of a decent quality, it can also include "some" good
creativity and we have also to give the illusion that the product is of
high quality by respecting the laws so that to be successful, since i
think that this giving the illusion to be of high quality is what also
"bypass" the above constraint.

And read my previous thoughts so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about how to be successful..

I invite you to look at the following video of a known psychologist:

Jordan Peterson Leaves the Audience SPEECHLESS | One of the Best
Motivational Speeches Ever

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3cjksFFKAQ

I think i am smart, and i don't agree with Jordan Peterson,
i will answer smartly so that you understand:

So if i ask a philosophical question:

What makes a product useful and successful ?

This is the most important question that makes the good business:

Useful and successful is not being of high quality, this is why i don't
agree with Jordan Peterson, since i think i am smart,
and i say that when you let the consumers of the economic market always
decide , it is not so efficient, because i will ask a smart question:

Can we live a decent human life by just consuming high quality products ?

So you are noticing that a decent human life also needs less quality
than high quality products ! and also high quality products are a really
small percentage of the products, and this is the main reason why being
successful is also knowing how to convince the consumers that
your product or service is useful and the good product even if it is not
of high quality, so how can you make your product useful and successful
even if it is not a high quality product ? so as you notice it is a
smart question ! so i think i will make you feel more how you can be a
good business man, so there is what i call: "Being of like a decent
quality that is useful and that is much less quality than high quality
and by also adding "some" good quality "creativity" and by like giving
the "illusion" of being of a high quality(it is like convincing) and by
also respecting the laws of the country" , so when you become a smart
good business man you will understand that this way of doing is a smart
way of doing and you will notice that when you apply this rule to your
product and service this can make your product or service really successful.

Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.