On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 06:01:03 -0400, "Caduceus" <kcom@deadspam.com>
wrote:

>Is it true that Ross Cummins a.k.a. Gassen Burnham left alt.revisionism to
>play for the rock band War Hammer?

Never heard of either the man or the band. Is this an old friend of
the group?

On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 11:24:53 PM UTC-4, Judith Latham wrote:

> >Is it true that Ross Cummins a.k.a. Gassen Burnham left alt.revisionism to
> >play for the rock band War Hammer?
> Never heard of either the man or the band. Is this an old friend of
> the group?

alt.revisionism eh? Another political type group from your past? Responding to people from 1904, pretty funny. Would be something if one person still hung out there alone, like Japs hiding in caves for years because they didn't know WW2 was over. Well, for them it wasn't over. And it never will be. How many groups would you say you have visited in your newsgroup career, Judith?

On 10/27/2021 7:31 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 11:24:53 PM UTC-4, Judith Latham wrote:
>
>>> Is it true that Ross Cummins a.k.a. Gassen Burnham left alt.revisionism to
>>> play for the rock band War Hammer?
>> Never heard of either the man or the band. Is this an old friend of
>> the group?
>
>
> alt.revisionism eh? Another political type group from your past? Responding to people from 1904, pretty funny. Would be something if one person still hung out there alone, like Japs hiding in caves for years because they didn't know WW2 was over. Well, for them it wasn't over. And it never will be. How many groups would you say you have visited in your newsgroup career, Judith?
>

I'm using a excellent news server with retention going back to 2002.
This was originally posted here, as your Google Groups is showing you. I
only post to few groups; this one, cooking, math, and cats. Those other
groups are just my interests, you guys are my life..

On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 11:24:53 PM UTC-4, Judith Latham wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 06:01:03 -0400, "Caduceus" <kc...@deadspam.com>
> wrote:
> >Is it true that Ross Cummins a.k.a. Gassen Burnham left alt.revisionism to
> >play for the rock band War Hammer?
> Never heard of either the man or the band. Is this an old friend of
> the group?

How would I know? You're the one who pasted his post here, aren't you? Either you or Bozo. I never heard of the guy. I am not a big internet troller. I have been directly to maybe 5 newsgroups over time with this one being home base, the others often not visited for months at a time, the food group being one of them. The revisionist group, sounds like something Bozo might have been fishing around in. He's into revisionism and other things dealing directly with the most important aspect of his life - his Jewishness.

On 10/27/2021 9:34 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 11:24:53 PM UTC-4, Judith Latham wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 06:01:03 -0400, "Caduceus" <kc...@deadspam.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Is it true that Ross Cummins a.k.a. Gassen Burnham left alt.revisionism to
>>> play for the rock band War Hammer?
>> Never heard of either the man or the band. Is this an old friend of
>> the group?
>
>
> How would I know? You're the one who pasted his post here, aren't you? Either you or Bozo. I never heard of the guy. I am not a big internet troller. I have been directly to maybe 5 newsgroups over time with this one being home base, the others often not visited for months at a time, the food group being one of them. The revisionist group, sounds like something Bozo might have been fishing around in. He's into revisionism and other things dealing directly with the most important aspect of his life - his Jewishness.
>

I looked at those groups. neo-Nazis and Jewish zealots; all the scum of
the earth.

> I'm using a excellent news server with retention going back to 2002.
> This was originally posted here, as your Google Groups is showing you. I
> only post to few groups; this one, cooking, math, and cats. Those other
> groups are just my interests, you guys are my life..

Well, in that case I have no idea who posted it. I only know it shows it was initially posted into a group called alt.revisionism which I assume is about WW2 or some other political crap I don't give a shit about. I have nothing against going into a group and finding something of interest from the past, no matter how far back, and posting it here. But this one, not only is it old, it means nothing to me. I am done with it. Dig it? Finito. End of story. Ten four. Roger Wilco. Over and out!.

Gassem Burnham

On 10/28/2021 5:07 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
>
>> I'm using a excellent news server with retention going back to 2002.
>> This was originally posted here, as your Google Groups is showing you. I
>> only post to few groups; this one, cooking, math, and cats. Those other
>> groups are just my interests, you guys are my life..
>
>
> Well, in that case I have no idea who posted it. I only know it shows it was initially posted into a group called alt.revisionism which I assume is about WW2 or some other political crap I don't give a shit about. I have nothing against going into a group and finding something of interest from the past, no matter how far back, and posting it here. But this one, not only is it old, it means nothing to me. I am done with it. Dig it? Finito. End of story. Ten four. Roger Wilco. Over and out!.
>
> Gassem Burnham
>

The more I think about, the more I see the name as a Nazi troll tag. Let
it die like all Nazis

> The more I think about, the more I see the name as a Nazi troll tag. Let
> it die like all Nazis

When it takes on that political vibe it could be anyone, either side of the coin. The word revisionism is divisive right from the start. Someone is assuming someone else's point of view is revisionism. They may not even really assume it, they may just see it as an opportunity to make their opponents look bad or phony in some way. "They're changing history", they cry. Well, so what. Yes, now that I think about it, all history deserves to be revised because the moment it was written down and passed on to others it became a hunk of public domain bullshit. In other words, history is revisionism from the start. Just having to maintain it to pass on to others is a bogus concept. Naturally gifted people such as myself - who should be the only people that count when it comes to having opinions - are able to look in the mirror and see not only the history of the past but the history of the future as well. We don't need to stinking lessons. Therefore, those who 'revise' written history are no less guilty than those who wrote it.

> The more I think about, the more I see the name as a Nazi troll tag. Let
> it die like all Nazis

When it takes on that political vibe it could be anyone, either side of the coin. The word revisionism is divisive right from the start. Someone is assuming someone else's point of view is revisionism. They may not even really assume it, they may just see it as an opportunity to make their opponents look bad or phony in some way. "They're changing history", they cry. Well, so what. Yes, now that I think about it, all history deserves to be revised because the moment it was written down and passed on to others it became a hunk of public domain bullshit. In other words, history is revisionism from the start. Just having to maintain it to pass on to others is a bogus concept. Naturally gifted people such as myself - who should be the only people that count when it comes to having opinions - are able to look in the mirror and see not only the history of the past but the history of the future as well. We don't need to stinking lessons. Therefore, those who 'revise' written history are no less guilty than those who wrote it.

"Those who 'revise' written history are no less guilty than those who wrote it." - Thomas Joseph 2021

I don't know if I really believe that but will roll with it for now because it sounds cool. Or change it up a bit maybe, like to, "Those who write history are worse than those who revise it."

Imagine that on national TV with a big leader of some kind. The President makes the comment and a reporter yells out, "Do you really believe that, Mr. President?" and the President replies, "I'm not sure, but it sounds cool, so let's roll with it."

"Next!"

On Friday, October 29, 2021 at 6:06:19 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> "Those who 'revise' written history are no less guilty than those who wrote it." - Thomas Joseph 2021
>
> I don't know if I really believe that but will roll with it for now because it sounds cool. Or change it up a bit maybe, like to, "Those who write history are worse than those who revise it."
>
> Imagine that on national TV with a big leader of some kind. The President makes the comment and a reporter yells out, "Do you really believe that, Mr. President?" and the President replies, "I'm not sure, but it sounds cool, so let's roll with it."
>
> "Next!"

I think the president should ask the questions.

> I think the president should ask the questions.

So people can enjoy ripping apart his questions as much as they once did his answers. "Did you hear the questions he asked last night? God, what an idiot!" Putting down the President, no matter who it is, makes the common man feel free. It's all part of the free speech hoax. Well, it's not a hoax actually, it's more of a method of subterfuge. "Let them speak. We will listen and record their words. And their thoughts. If we don't like what we hear we will kill them."

On 10/31/2021 7:19 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
>
>> I think the president should ask the questions.
>
> So people can enjoy ripping apart his questions as much as they once did his answers. "Did you hear the questions he asked last night? God, what an idiot!" Putting down the President, no matter who it is, makes the common man feel free. It's all part of the free speech hoax. Well, it's not a hoax actually, it's more of a method of subterfuge. "Let them speak. We will listen and record their words. And their thoughts. If we don't like what we hear we will kill them."
>

Nobody laughed at Stalin's press conferences. I've always been an
admirer of his, but I've always been haunted by one thing; did he take
to his grave the secret of what really became of Anastasia? I've always
suspected the Lathams were Russian royalty, even though my grandparents
all came from Poland. At least that's what they claim. I wasn't around
back then so I can't say for sure.

On Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 11:30:13 PM UTC-4, Judith Latham wrote:
> On 10/31/2021 7:19 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
> >
> >> I think the president should ask the questions.
> >
> > So people can enjoy ripping apart his questions as much as they once did his answers. "Did you hear the questions he asked last night? God, what an idiot!" Putting down the President, no matter who it is, makes the common man feel free. It's all part of the free speech hoax. Well, it's not a hoax actually, it's more of a method of subterfuge. "Let them speak. We will listen and record their words. And their thoughts. If we don't like what we hear we will kill them."
> >
> Nobody laughed at Stalin's press conferences. I've always been an
> admirer of his, but I've always been haunted by one thing; did he take
> to his grave the secret of what really became of Anastasia? I've always
> suspected the Lathams were Russian royalty, even though my grandparents
> all came from Poland. At least that's what they claim. I wasn't around
> back then so I can't say for sure.

The story of the Romanoffs is not a pretty one. I hear Anastasia got it the worse.

> > Nobody laughed at Stalin's press conferences. I've always been an
> > admirer of his, but I've always been haunted by one thing; did he take
> > to his grave the secret of what really became of Anastasia? I've always
> > suspected the Lathams were Russian royalty, even though my grandparents
> > all came from Poland. At least that's what they claim. I wasn't around
> > back then so I can't say for sure.

> The story of the Romanoffs is not a pretty one. I hear Anastasia got it the worse.

I have heard the name - sounds like a vodka - but never got into it. I have no idea who Anastasia is. And you know what? I'm glad. I like not knowing about famous people. I like being above it. I was not a Stalin fan but not against him either. I feel the same about all these fuckers on down to Hussein and Gaddafi and others. What the fuck do we know other than what we're told? So in other words, why even listen?

To hell with history

On Monday, November 1, 2021 at 9:25:41 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Nobody laughed at Stalin's press conferences. I've always been an
> > > admirer of his, but I've always been haunted by one thing; did he take
> > > to his grave the secret of what really became of Anastasia? I've always
> > > suspected the Lathams were Russian royalty, even though my grandparents
> > > all came from Poland. At least that's what they claim. I wasn't around
> > > back then so I can't say for sure.
>
> > The story of the Romanoffs is not a pretty one. I hear Anastasia got it the worse.
> I have heard the name - sounds like a vodka - but never got into it. I have no idea who Anastasia is. And you know what? I'm glad. I like not knowing about famous people. I like being above it. I was not a Stalin fan but not against him either. I feel the same about all these fuckers on down to Hussein and Gaddafi and others. What the fuck do we know other than what we're told? So in other words, why even listen?
>
> To hell with history

You can bet there are politicians in office right now who are as bad or worse (if it can be objectively defined) as Hitler or Stalin or any other politician that we have ever known about. Did Hitler gas millions of people? Or did others do it following orders from people in bureaucracies

> You can bet there are politicians in office right now who are as bad or worse (if it can be objectively defined) as Hitler or Stalin or any other politician that we have ever known about. Did Hitler gas millions of people? Or did others do it following orders from people in bureaucracies

If people don't believe in God or the Devil or other things they learn at a young age, how can they believe that one guy can come from out of nowhere and gather up a following overnight to try to take over the world? The people wanted Hitler. They may in fact have needed him. Maybe the world needed him. Maybe everything that has ever happened collectively has been for the good - or we wouldn't be here. Never look back and criticizing, this is my new way of seeing things. But I don't expect others to change so quickly just because I did. They need a little time, a little warning. So this is it. If you have anything nasty or close minded to say, say it now and get it out of the way or forever hold your motha fucking piece daddio.

On 11/2/2021 5:59 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
>
>> You can bet there are politicians in office right now who are as bad or worse (if it can be objectively defined) as Hitler or Stalin or any other politician that we have ever known about. Did Hitler gas millions of people? Or did others do it following orders from people in bureaucracies
>
>
> If people don't believe in God or the Devil or other things they learn at a young age, how can they believe that one guy can come from out of nowhere and gather up a following overnight to try to take over the world? The people wanted Hitler. They may in fact have needed him. Maybe the world needed him. Maybe everything that has ever happened collectively has been for the good - or we wouldn't be here. Never look back and criticizing, this is my new way of seeing things. But I don't expect others to change so quickly just because I did. They need a little time, a little warning. So this is it. If you have anything nasty or close minded to say, say it now and get it out of the way or forever hold your motha fucking piece daddio.
>

Vlad the Impaler was a cool dude. Legend has it he once impaled 40,000
people from the same town, same time as a warning to all other towns to
surrender food supplies. You'd have loved him.

> Vlad the Impaler was a cool dude. Legend has it he once impaled 40,000
> people from the same town, same time as a warning to all other towns to
> surrender food supplies. You'd have loved him.

I am not like you. I do not actually like these people, I only like to laugh at what they do. You actually like them. You are a sadist, and not in a good way. If someone wanted to be tortured, say for sexual purposes - tortured and released of their own free will - you would withhold them the pleasure. I can't say I blame you. I don't blame you. Not for that. But I do blame you for wrongly assuming or pretending to assume that I am a lover of creeps like Vlad the Impaler and other roughhouse characters out of history, a history that continues to churn them out faster and with greater need than ever before. We need torture - as long as it's not happening to us. I accept that. But I do applaud it and do not cheer for it, because I am not a sadistic creepazoid freak like YOU!

Change now - or die!