Hello,

More of my philosophy about what is lacking in capitalism..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many
scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart and i think that what is lacking in capitalism
is that the actual model of emergence of the human civilization
from local interactions is not sufficient, since i think people
are too specialized in what they are doing, so they also lack the
correct spirit like lacking understanding of the capitalistic spirit as
a systemic thing that has to be understood correctly so that to act with
the right efficiency since for example the problems of economic growth
have to be solved by the being efficient and by the being innovative.
Notice it by reading my following writing:

The Limits of the Earth, Part 1: Problems

"In my own new book, The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a
Finite Planet, I challenge this view. The problem isn’t economic growth,
per se. Nor is the problem that our natural resources are too small.
While finite, the natural resources the planet supplies are vast and far
larger than humanity needs in order to continue to thrive and grow
prosperity for centuries to come. The problem, rather, is the types of
resources we access, and the manner and efficiency with which we use them.

And the ultimate solution to those problems is innovation – innovation
in the science and technology that we use to tap into physical
resources, and innovation in the economic system that steers our
consumption.

The situation we’re in isn’t a looming wall that we’re doomed to crash
into. It’s a race – a race between depletion and pollution of natural
resources on one side, and our pace of innovation on the other."

Read more here:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-limits-of-the-earth-part-1-problems/

More philosophy about emergence and more..

Emergence is the formation of global patterns from solely local
interactions.

I invite you to read more about the strong and weak emergence here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence

I invite you to look at the following video about emergence:

Emergence – How Stupid Things Become Smart Together

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16W7c0mb-rE

And read carefully my following thoughts on how i am redefining
Utilitarianism and more..

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

Read my previous thoughts:

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

More of my philosophy about the Exploration/Exploitation trade off in
AI(artificial intelligence)..

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
here in my website(I am 53 years old):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem

In Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial intelligence), for each
action (i.e. lever) on the machine, there is an expected reward. If this
expected reward is known to the Agent, then the problem degenerates into
a trivial one, which merely involves picking the action with the highest
expected reward. But since the expected rewards for the levers are not
known, we have to collate estimates to get an idea of the desirability
of each action. For this, the Agent will have to explore to get the
average of the rewards for each action. After, it can then exploit its
knowledge and choose an action with the highest expected rewards (this
is also called selecting a greedy action). As we can see, the Agent has
to balance exploring and exploiting actions to maximize the overall
long-term reward. So as you are noticing i am posting below my
just new proverb that talks about the Exploration/Exploitation trade off
in AI(artificial intelligence), and you also have to know how to build
correctly "trust" between you and the others so that to optimize
correctly, and this is why you are seeing me posting my thoughts like i
am posting.

You have to know about the Exploration/Exploitation trade off in
Reinforcement Learning and PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) in AI by
knowing the following and by reading my below thoughts about artificial
intelligence:

Exploration is finding more information about the environment.

Exploitation is exploiting known information to maximize the reward.

This is why i have just invented fast the following proverb that also
talks about this Exploration/Exploitation trade off in AI (artificial
intelligence):

And here is my just new proverb:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance
divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of
efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent
thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency, and it is related to my following thoughts about
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i invite you to read them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will
easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding
artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand
artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy
minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but
you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to
guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning
you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is
good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy
minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is
transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this
transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data,
also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level
abstraction in artificial intelligence..