New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 - 40,000-pound bombs killed???

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp

On 10/8/2021 12:16 am, Rusty Wyse wrote:
> New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 - 40,000-pound bombs killed???
>
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp
>

Withstanding an explosion near the carrier that measured at 3.9 scale
earthquake magnitude will not them, as there are other with more
powerful than this to rock and sink it.

It is strange to build such an expensive overbearing carrier ship that
cannot compete with the swarm of hyperspeed of drones and hypersonic
missiles on the ship.

"reachi" AKA "cicini" wrote in message news:seronl$932$1@dont-email.me...
>
> It is strange to build such an expensive overbearing carrier ship that
> cannot compete with the swarm of hyperspeed of drones and hypersonic
> missiles on the ship.

What's the Chingchongs' excuse?:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYIv3nUrav8&t=36s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lx7PsFBqXdI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miIKWnC2HTY

On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 9:16:54 AM UTC-7, yale...@gmail.com wrote:
> New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 - 40,000-pound bombs killed???
>
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp

If you'd bothered to read the article you posted, you might have noticed that a lot of effort went in to minimizing the damage to the marine environment.

As opposed to the shitball in the South China Sea visible from space, where absolutely zero effort was made to treat the marine life with any respect.

Too funny that you criticize one and ignore the other. And disturbing.

On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 11:11:35 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 9:16:54 AM UTC-7, yale...@gmail.com wrote:
> > New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 - 40,000-pound bombs killed???
> >
> > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp
> If you'd bothered to read the article you posted, you might have noticed that a lot of effort went in to minimizing the damage to the marine environment.

"...a lot of effort went in to minimizing the damage to the marine environment. "

How would you prevent the fish from swimming in the explosion area??? and the blast damage probably extent to a couple of hundred feet...

>
> As opposed to the shitball in the South China Sea visible from space, where absolutely zero effort was made to treat the marine life with any respect.
>
> Too funny that you criticize one and ignore the other. And disturbing.

My criticism applies to all countries ...

On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 6:48:58 PM UTC-7, yale...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 11:11:35 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
> > On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 9:16:54 AM UTC-7, yale...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 - 40,000-pound bombs killed???
> > >
> > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp
> > If you'd bothered to read the article you posted, you might have noticed that a lot of effort went in to minimizing the damage to the marine environment.
> "...a lot of effort went in to minimizing the damage to the marine environment. "
>
> How would you prevent the fish from swimming in the explosion area??? and the blast damage probably extent to a couple of hundred feet...

Try reading the article for once.

> >
> > As opposed to the shitball in the South China Sea visible from space, where absolutely zero effort was made to treat the marine life with any respect.
> >
> > Too funny that you criticize one and ignore the other. And disturbing.
> My criticism applies to all countries ...

On Wednesday, August 11, 2021 at 8:58:09 AM UTC-4, bmoore wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 6:48:58 PM UTC-7, yale...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 11:11:35 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
> > > On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 9:16:54 AM UTC-7, yale...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 - 40,000-pound bombs killed???
> > > >
> > > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp
> > > If you'd bothered to read the article you posted, you might have noticed that a lot of effort went in to minimizing the damage to the marine environment.
> > "...a lot of effort went in to minimizing the damage to the marine environment. "
> >
> > How would you prevent the fish from swimming in the explosion area??? and the blast damage probably extent to a couple of hundred feet...
> Try reading the article for once.

Does the article say anything on how the environment and marine life were protected?
For example, does it say on what depth was the bomb exploded?

> > >
> > > As opposed to the shitball in the South China Sea visible from space, where absolutely zero effort was made to treat the marine life with any respect.
> > >
> > > Too funny that you criticize one and ignore the other. And disturbing.
> > My criticism applies to all countries ...

On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 1:30:32 PM UTC-4, reachi wrote:
> On 10/8/2021 12:16 am, Rusty Wyse wrote:
> > New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 - 40,000-pound bombs killed???
> >
> > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp
> >
> Withstanding an explosion near the carrier that measured at 3.9 scale
> earthquake magnitude will not them, as there are other with more
> powerful than this to rock and sink it.
>
> It is strange to build such an expensive overbearing carrier ship that
> cannot compete with the swarm of hyperspeed of drones and hypersonic
> missiles on the ship.

Judging from the relative calmness of the sea near to the ship, looks like shaped charges were exploded deep underneath the sea.

On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 12:16:54 AM UTC+8, yale...@gmail.com wrote:
> New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 - 40,000-pound bombs killed???
>
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp
---------

The carrier survived the shock of a 40,000-pound bomb blast nearby? The US should tell us only if the carrier survived a direct hit by a 40,000-pound bomb or missile.

Wakalukong

Summer is the time where fishes start to rebreed and raise fry. The 3 months
of summer time is where fishes matured for mating and spawning.

The sea is quiet down for fishes to breed. Fishing is stopped during summer
time to allow fishes to grow their baby fishes and rebuild their breeding
nest in the sea.

The restock of fishes and whale and sharks and other sea foods such has like
octopus, squids, crabs, and prawns, and shell fishes, etc.

The summer time is important "rest and reproduction time" for them to spawn,
rebreed, and mate, and nurse and nurture their new born fishes.

They will also shed and replace and picked their own skins and other things,
to keep clean, too.

When their baby fishes are fully grown in 3 months, they will be ready for
their sacrifices and deaths when fishing harvesters will resume on them.

Now the Americans sent 40,000 pounds of explosives in the sea to test its
huge carrier. The explosives will kill thousands and millions of fishes and
other sea foods. There will

According to the US fishery department, fishes, humpback whales, sharks,
killer shark will die from shocks from the explosion.

If the fishes, whales, sharks, and killer sharks were within 10 miles radius
of explosion noise shock and shock waves, they will die from it.

They will die from internal bleeding of the intestines and ears will be
punctured. Their gills and lungs will be pierced and leaked.

Their brain will be shaken and shocked and concussed; and their eyes will be
red and bloodshot, and blinded.

The vertigo of the ear loses body balances, goes into spinning and
disorientation. They will be struggling with muscle energy to keep afloat.

However, they will not able to sustain their floating anymore. Eventually,
their fins cannot move and will cannot swim normally anymore.

They will lose control of their sense in the brain. Their balancing motor in
the brain is weakened.

The body and fins wobbled. They will not be able to swim as fast as normally
before.

Eventually, they will gasping for air and nutrients will not be able to be
absorbed by the gills and intestines and the fins cannot

The explosion is a evil act of US navy. However, it is good also for the
world, as it will be set as a precedent for other powers to also test high
explosive testing of their subsea missiles and other tests as well.

Therefore, in the next time, US cannot say to other big power for their
testing of heavy explosive testing in the sea, too.

"Rusty Wyse" wrote in message
news:0e6a337d-58a1-4bf0-acd4-b33381615659n@googlegroups.com...

New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb
blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 -
40,000-pound bombs killed???

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp

Other countries can now also resume their old traditional way of using high
explosive to blow up the sea in order to stun and catch fishes.

Fishes stunned by shocks will die and float to the sea surface. Fishermen
will then easily scoop them up with their scooping net.

US cannot now say to them not to use explosive anymore. They have to right
to test their explosive too.

".kitaro.." wrote in message news:sf5h1n$7vh$1@dont-email.me...

Summer is the time where fishes start to rebreed and raise fry. The 3 months
of summer time is where fishes matured for mating and spawning.

The sea is quiet down for fishes to breed. Fishing is stopped during summer
time to allow fishes to grow their baby fishes and rebuild their breeding
nest in the sea.

The restock of fishes and whale and sharks and other sea foods such has like
octopus, squids, crabs, and prawns, and shell fishes, etc.

The summer time is important "rest and reproduction time" for them to spawn,
rebreed, and mate, and nurse and nurture their new born fishes.

They will also shed and replace and picked their own skins and other things,
to keep clean, too.

When their baby fishes are fully grown in 3 months, they will be ready for
their sacrifices and deaths when fishing harvesters will resume on them.

Now the Americans sent 40,000 pounds of explosives in the sea to test its
huge carrier. The explosives will kill thousands and millions of fishes and
other sea foods. There will

According to the US fishery department, fishes, humpback whales, sharks,
killer shark will die from shocks from the explosion.

If the fishes, whales, sharks, and killer sharks were within 10 miles radius
of explosion noise shock and shock waves, they will die from it.

They will die from internal bleeding of the intestines and ears will be
punctured. Their gills and lungs will be pierced and leaked.

Their brain will be shaken and shocked and concussed; and their eyes will be
red and bloodshot, and blinded.

The vertigo of the ear loses body balances, goes into spinning and
disorientation. They will be struggling with muscle energy to keep afloat.

However, they will not able to sustain their floating anymore. Eventually,
their fins cannot move and will cannot swim normally anymore.

They will lose control of their sense in the brain. Their balancing motor in
the brain is weakened.

The body and fins wobbled. They will not be able to swim as fast as normally
before.

Eventually, they will gasping for air and nutrients will not be able to be
absorbed by the gills and intestines and the fins cannot

The explosion is a evil act of US navy. However, it is good also for the
world, as it will be set as a precedent for other powers to also test high
explosive testing of their subsea missiles and other tests as well.

Therefore, in the next time, US cannot say to other big power for their
testing of heavy explosive testing in the sea, too.

"Rusty Wyse" wrote in message
news:0e6a337d-58a1-4bf0-acd4-b33381615659n@googlegroups.com...

New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb
blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 -
40,000-pound bombs killed???

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp

On Thursday, August 12, 2021 at 6:43:45 AM UTC, wakal...@yahoo.com.sg wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 12:16:54 AM UTC+8, yale...@gmail.com wrote:
> > New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 - 40,000-pound bombs killed???
> >
> > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp
> ---------
>
> The carrier survived the shock of a 40,000-pound bomb blast nearby? The US should tell us only if the carrier survived a direct hit by a 40,000-pound bomb or missile.
>
> Wakalukong

Good suggestion. Lols.
That's a useless test. It proves nothing. A real test would be to drop the bomb directly on the ship.

On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 7:13:03 AM UTC-7, wog wacker wrote:
> On Thursday, August 12, 2021 at 6:43:45 AM UTC, wakal...@yahoo.com.sg wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 12:16:54 AM UTC+8, yale...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 - 40,000-pound bombs killed???
> > >
> > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp
> > ---------
> >
> > The carrier survived the shock of a 40,000-pound bomb blast nearby? The US should tell us only if the carrier survived a direct hit by a 40,000-pound bomb or missile.
> >
> > Wakalukong
> Good suggestion. Lols.
> That's a useless test. It proves nothing. A real test would be to drop the bomb directly on the ship.

"...to drop the bomb directly on the ship."

The best suggestion of all...

On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 10:40:56 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
> On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 9:43:14 AM UTC-7, yale...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 7:13:03 AM UTC-7, wog wacker wrote:
> > > On Thursday, August 12, 2021 at 6:43:45 AM UTC, wakal...@yahoo.com.sg wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 12:16:54 AM UTC+8, yale...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > New US Navy supercarrier withstood the shock of multiple 40,000-pound bomb blasts, but some things did break, captain says - How many fish those 3 - 40,000-pound bombs killed???
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-us-navy-supercarrier-withstood-the-shock-of-multiple-40-000-pound-bomb-blasts-but-some-things-did-break-captain-says/ar-AAN6Yi6?ocid=msedgntp
> > > > ---------
> > > >
> > > > The carrier survived the shock of a 40,000-pound bomb blast nearby? The US should tell us only if the carrier survived a direct hit by a 40,000-pound bomb or missile.
> > > >
> > > > Wakalukong
> > > Good suggestion. Lols.
> > > That's a useless test. It proves nothing. A real test would be to drop the bomb directly on the ship.
> > "...to drop the bomb directly on the ship."
> >
> > The best suggestion of all...
> No ship can take a direct hit. Obviously, they are testing for nearby blasts.

Isn't that "the best way to eliminate war?"