[Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>in
>news:j17ogi9np26afqp6q4d87duejh6decjhpi@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>ing.dwarf.com:
>
>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote
>>>in
>>>
>news:6f3mgit9baqhkcn256n53fe5kdnrm15nbt@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>
>>>> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:uedlqh$2oa0o$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>
>news:84gjgilskrbh03f1gc5plqb7aqppjrog4e@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cock
>>>>>> suck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cock
>>>>>> suck
>>>>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>So you'd re-write history?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Baxter is desperate now. He *SO* wanted Gov. Grisham to succeed
>>>>>>>>> at denying gun owner's constitutional rights!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <CRICKETS>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Too bad!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LOL!!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Why'd you snip the rest,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why do you keep trying-- and failing-- to change the subject?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just admit you approve of violating the Constitution in your
>effort
>>>>>>> to ban guns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We both know what's what you want.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stop running away and do explain why it was alright for Wyatt Earp
>>>>>> to ban guns, but not Gov. Grisham.
>>>>>
>>>>>Wyatt Earp was also in the violation of the Constitution.
>>>
>>>Actually, no he wasn't in "violation of the Constitution" as it was
>>>interpreted then.
>>
>> Yes, he was, you stupid fuck.
>>
>Prove it!

ROFLMAO

He violated the Constitution, just like N.M. Gov. Grisham.

This is so simple even a nitwit like yourself should be able to
understand it.

[Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:

>"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>news:uehgan$3hsm9$5@dont-email.me:
>
>>
>>
>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>> news:ueg9bl$3ar1r$4@dont-email.me...
>
>>> Actually, no he wasn't in "violation of the Constitution" as it was
>>> interpreted then.
>>
>> 1) He was in violation
>> 2) Interpretations change
>> 3) Changing Interpretations don't change the Constitution.
>> 4) The intent of the Constitution remains constant.
>>
>True the words don't change, but the interpretation is the law. No one at
>the time said his actions were unConstitutional.

That doesn't mean they weren't. Are you now claiming that slavery was
OK, because nobody issued a Supreme Court challenge?

"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uehm4s$3is6p$6@dont-email.me...
> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
> news:uehgan$3hsm9$5@dont-email.me:
>
>>
>>
>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>> news:ueg9bl$3ar1r$4@dont-email.me...
>
>>> Actually, no he wasn't in "violation of the Constitution" as it was
>>> interpreted then.
>>
>> 1) He was in violation
>> 2) Interpretations change
>> 3) Changing Interpretations don't change the Constitution.
>> 4) The intent of the Constitution remains constant.
>>
> True the words don't change, but the interpretation is the law.

No, it's not. Otherwise, somebody could simply declare the 1st Amendment no
longer applies and prohibit you from saying anything.

That's not the way it works. Ref Marbury v. Madison (1803)

You can't simply change the interpretation to change the meaning, much as
I'm sure you would love to be able to do so, since then you could interpret
the Constitution and all laws to mean whatever you decide they should no
matter what the language actually says.

>No one at
> the time said his actions were unConstitutional.

Didn't need to.

"The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the
form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time
of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding
it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if
it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it
purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted."
16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256

> And next SCOTUS might
> well rule that such bans REQUIRED by the Constitution.

Which still wouldn't change the Constitution, much as I'm sure you think it
would.

"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uehlto$3is6p$5@dont-email.me...
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
> in
> news:j17ogi9np26afqp6q4d87duejh6decjhpi@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
> ing.dwarf.com:
>
>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote
>>>in
>>>
> news:6f3mgit9baqhkcn256n53fe5kdnrm15nbt@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>
>>>> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:uedlqh$2oa0o$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>
> news:84gjgilskrbh03f1gc5plqb7aqppjrog4e@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cock
>>>>>> suck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
> news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cock
>>>>>> suck
>>>>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>So you'd re-write history?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Baxter is desperate now. He *SO* wanted Gov. Grisham to succeed
>>>>>>>>> at denying gun owner's constitutional rights!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <CRICKETS>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Too bad!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LOL!!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Why'd you snip the rest,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why do you keep trying-- and failing-- to change the subject?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just admit you approve of violating the Constitution in your
> effort
>>>>>>> to ban guns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We both know what's what you want.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stop running away and do explain why it was alright for Wyatt Earp
>>>>>> to ban guns, but not Gov. Grisham.
>>>>>
>>>>>Wyatt Earp was also in the violation of the Constitution.
>>>
>>>Actually, no he wasn't in "violation of the Constitution" as it was
>>>interpreted then.
>>
>> Yes, he was, you stupid fuck.
>>
> Prove it!

Recent Court rules on the banning of carrying guns in towns and cities.

The Constitution hasn't changed, so if it's Unconstitutional NOW.. it was
just as Unconstitutional THEN.

" The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the
form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time
of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding
it. "
16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256

"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uehlp6$3is6p$2@dont-email.me...
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
> in
> news:vk6ogi53ok8dfbkp916qt3u70vdcelu1a1@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
> ing.dwarf.com:
>
>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>wrote in
>>>news:pu4mgipp4sjksdj17nccg2q5hqq7h4r65j@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
>>>ck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>
>>>> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:uef1o8$2vtg9$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>> news:ttmlgi19lujoq8bhmv7llknu0v88i3v80q@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>> ck suck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> news:k1ejgi5opjtfi156librhat6q72mp19e0u@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>> ck suck
>>>>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>> ck su
>>>>>>>>>>ckin g.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Who told you they were being mutilated?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody told me. I've seen it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>What?! You work in a hospital?
>>>>>>>>>>> Only Baxter would be stupid enough to think you'd have to
>>>>>>>>>>> work at a hospital to see it.
>>>>>>> <Crickets>
>>>>>>>>>>So you're admitting you've been viewing children's naked
>>>>>>>>>>bodies!!!! Pedophile!!
>>>>>>>>> And Pedophile Baxter runs away again, failing to defend his
>>>>>>>>> admiration of child molesters who abuse kids.
>>>>>>>>KKKlaun admitts he's looking at children's naked bodies.
>>>>>>> Admitted Pedophile Baxter thinks any doctor who sees you naked is
>>>>>>> a pervert.
>>>>>> No, I specifically asked if KKKlaun worked in a hospital, he said
>>>>>> no. So where does he see those naked children?
>>>>>
>>>>>I take it then you never had any children of your own..... overall,
>>>>>that's a good thing, after all we certainly don't need your genes
>>>>>around
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Baxter thinks you have to be a doctor, or work in a hospital to see
>>>> an example of leftist child mutilation. And those pictures MUST be
>>>> of naked children.
>>>>
>>>> https://imgur.com/a/ZX5uxw8
>>>>
>>>
>>>You got proof that's not a lie?
>>
>> And Baxter runs away AGAIN.
>>
>> ROFLMAO!!!!!
>>
>> You too fucking stupid to look it up yourself?
>> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12514799/gender-dysphoria-se
>> x-change-surgery-suing-doctors.html
>>
>>
>
> And what percentage of trans change their minds?

Is sex with a minor not a crime unless the child changes their mind about
agreeing to it??

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
in message
news:k1qogita6g9jrqh4ocq4fpas80dv199f12@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>>in
>>news:ph6ogil41ffbrtqjb3cjpha4tcd01q0bmv@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>
>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote in
>>>>news:n63mgipb6d0p3a5lsmjrcijfotesc8volj@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
>>>>ckin g.dwarf.com:
>>>>
>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>No, I specifically asked if KKKlaun worked in a hospital, he said
>>>>>>no.
>>>>>
>>>>> Baxter thinks doctors only work in hospitals.
>>>>
>>>>Are you a doctor? Or any kind of medical professional? Doctors
>>>>outside of hospitals don't usually deal with naked children. That's
>>>>pretty much surgeons - in hospitals.
>>>
>>> Poor stupid Baxter KEEPS running away. He thinks sexual mutilation of
>>> children can ONLY be seen by looking at naked photos.
>>>
>>> Maybe that's why he has such a large collection at home?
>>>
>>> https://imgur.com/a/ZX5uxw8
>>>
>>So, if that's a girl, you're looking at her bare chest.
>
> Could you possibly *BE* any more stupid?

Yes, as Rudy had proven time and again..

Never underestimate the ability of Liberals to be stupid.

"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uehlq8$3is6p$3@dont-email.me...
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
> in news:kq6ogi5r7sv8i2uuvq21iq67581nae2k34
> @Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:
>
>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote
>>>in
>>>
> news:6b3mgi5ahq3453sh1l3qv87es4vk8n287h@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>
>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>wrote
>>>>>in news:g0nlgipmkk3m6g072al0savg3t3d55nrp2
>>>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote
>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>news:39ejgipa6f25adi2f2foldr39pu2a4agt5
>>>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.
> @gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>wrote in
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
> news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
>>>>>>>>>ckin g.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Actually, Hormone therapy is critical medical for
>>>>>>>>>>>some people - particularly Intersex people.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Actually, no, when applied to children, it's child abuse. The
>>>>>doctor
>>>>>>>>>> and parents responsible should be jailed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Hormons are necessary for a child's body development. If their
> body
>>>>>>>>>doesn't produce the necessary homones, then "hormone therapy" is
>>>>>>>>>absolutely required -- and has nothing to do with Trans.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And Baxter tries to change the subject AGAIN.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, you're the one trying to change the subject.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Poor Baxter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Humiliated by Klaus for pointing out his stupid support of
>>>>>> totalitarian N.M. Governer Grisham's illegal order, he twists and
>>>>>> turns, DESPERATE to find a way out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Was Wyatt Earp a totalitarian , and the Clantons heroes?
>>>>
>>>> And Baxter CONTINUES to run away from the FACT that he hates the
>>>> Constitution.
>>>>
>>>
>>>KKKlaun continues to run away from hundreds of years of restrictions on
>>>gun carry.
>>
>> Baxter continues to flee the public exposure of his hatred of the
>> Constitution.
>>
>> He LOVES the fact that N.M. Gov tried to suspend the Constitution,
>> knowing it would have no effect.
>>
>>
> Was Wyatt Earp a totalitarian

Yes.

>and the Clantons heroes?

No, but they could have been victims. Certainly a lot of the town folk
thought so.

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
in message
news:e4qogi1qvrjl6ppubadka5c022gpdgehn3@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>>in news:kq6ogi5r7sv8i2uuvq21iq67581nae2k34
>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:
>>
>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>wrote
>>>>in
>>>>
>>news:6b3mgi5ahq3453sh1l3qv87es4vk8n287h@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>
>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote
>>>>>>in news:g0nlgipmkk3m6g072al0savg3t3d55nrp2
>>>>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>>wrote
>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>news:39ejgipa6f25adi2f2foldr39pu2a4agt5
>>>>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.
>>@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
>>>>>>>>>>ckin g.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Actually, Hormone therapy is critical medical for
>>>>>>>>>>>>some people - particularly Intersex people.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, no, when applied to children, it's child abuse. The
>>>>>>doctor
>>>>>>>>>>> and parents responsible should be jailed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Hormons are necessary for a child's body development. If their
>>body
>>>>>>>>>>doesn't produce the necessary homones, then "hormone therapy" is
>>>>>>>>>>absolutely required -- and has nothing to do with Trans.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And Baxter tries to change the subject AGAIN.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No, you're the one trying to change the subject.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Poor Baxter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Humiliated by Klaus for pointing out his stupid support of
>>>>>>> totalitarian N.M. Governer Grisham's illegal order, he twists and
>>>>>>> turns, DESPERATE to find a way out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Was Wyatt Earp a totalitarian , and the Clantons heroes?
>>>>>
>>>>> And Baxter CONTINUES to run away from the FACT that he hates the
>>>>> Constitution.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>KKKlaun continues to run away from hundreds of years of restrictions on
>>>>gun carry.
>>>
>>> Baxter continues to flee the public exposure of his hatred of the
>>> Constitution.
>>>
>>> He LOVES the fact that N.M. Gov tried to suspend the Constitution,
>>> knowing it would have no effect.
>>>
>>>
>>Was Wyatt Earp a totalitarian , and the Clantons heroes?
>
> Note how Baxter REFUSES to acknowledge his support of totalitarian
> despot Grisham.
>
> What's the matter, Baxter?
>
> Are you embarrassed at her stupidity?
>
> Or are you embarrassed at your desire to see the Constitution
> suspended?

Hmmmm... If the Constitution is suspended.. then couldn't we simply kill
Baxter outright as it would no longer be illegal?

After all, if the Constitution is suspended then all law enacted under the
Constitution is suspended.

Let me guess, once again Baxter didn't think through the consequences of his
desires....

[Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:

>
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>in message
>news:e4qogi1qvrjl6ppubadka5c022gpdgehn3@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>>>in news:kq6ogi5r7sv8i2uuvq21iq67581nae2k34
>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:
>>>
>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>wrote
>>>>>in
>>>>>
>>>news:6b3mgi5ahq3453sh1l3qv87es4vk8n287h@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote
>>>>>>>in news:g0nlgipmkk3m6g072al0savg3t3d55nrp2
>>>>>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>wrote
>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>news:39ejgipa6f25adi2f2foldr39pu2a4agt5
>>>>>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>>>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.
>>>@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
>>>>>>>>>>>ckin g.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Actually, Hormone therapy is critical medical for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>some people - particularly Intersex people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, no, when applied to children, it's child abuse. The
>>>>>>>doctor
>>>>>>>>>>>> and parents responsible should be jailed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Hormons are necessary for a child's body development. If their
>>>body
>>>>>>>>>>>doesn't produce the necessary homones, then "hormone therapy" is
>>>>>>>>>>>absolutely required -- and has nothing to do with Trans.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And Baxter tries to change the subject AGAIN.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No, you're the one trying to change the subject.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Poor Baxter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Humiliated by Klaus for pointing out his stupid support of
>>>>>>>> totalitarian N.M. Governer Grisham's illegal order, he twists and
>>>>>>>> turns, DESPERATE to find a way out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Was Wyatt Earp a totalitarian , and the Clantons heroes?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And Baxter CONTINUES to run away from the FACT that he hates the
>>>>>> Constitution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>KKKlaun continues to run away from hundreds of years of restrictions on
>>>>>gun carry.
>>>>
>>>> Baxter continues to flee the public exposure of his hatred of the
>>>> Constitution.
>>>>
>>>> He LOVES the fact that N.M. Gov tried to suspend the Constitution,
>>>> knowing it would have no effect.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Was Wyatt Earp a totalitarian , and the Clantons heroes?
>>
>> Note how Baxter REFUSES to acknowledge his support of totalitarian
>> despot Grisham.
>>
>> What's the matter, Baxter?
>>
>> Are you embarrassed at her stupidity?
>>
>> Or are you embarrassed at your desire to see the Constitution
>> suspended?
>
>Hmmmm... If the Constitution is suspended.. then couldn't we simply kill
>Baxter outright as it would no longer be illegal?
>
>After all, if the Constitution is suspended then all law enacted under the
>Constitution is suspended.
>
>Let me guess, once again Baxter didn't think through the consequences of his
>desires....

He'd much rather turn tail and try and change the subject.

[Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:

>
>
>"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>news:uehlto$3is6p$5@dont-email.me...
>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>> in
>> news:j17ogi9np26afqp6q4d87duejh6decjhpi@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>> ing.dwarf.com:
>>
>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> wrote
>>>>in
>>>>
>> news:6f3mgit9baqhkcn256n53fe5kdnrm15nbt@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>
>>>>> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:uedlqh$2oa0o$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>
>> news:84gjgilskrbh03f1gc5plqb7aqppjrog4e@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cock
>>>>>>> suck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cock
>>>>>>> suck
>>>>>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>So you'd re-write history?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Baxter is desperate now. He *SO* wanted Gov. Grisham to succeed
>>>>>>>>>> at denying gun owner's constitutional rights!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <CRICKETS>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Too bad!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LOL!!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why'd you snip the rest,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why do you keep trying-- and failing-- to change the subject?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just admit you approve of violating the Constitution in your
>> effort
>>>>>>>> to ban guns.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We both know what's what you want.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stop running away and do explain why it was alright for Wyatt Earp
>>>>>>> to ban guns, but not Gov. Grisham.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wyatt Earp was also in the violation of the Constitution.
>>>>
>>>>Actually, no he wasn't in "violation of the Constitution" as it was
>>>>interpreted then.
>>>
>>> Yes, he was, you stupid fuck.
>>>
>> Prove it!
>
>Recent Court rules on the banning of carrying guns in towns and cities.
>
>The Constitution hasn't changed, so if it's Unconstitutional NOW.. it was
>just as Unconstitutional THEN.

Baxter is too stupid to understand that it's the same Constitution.

>" The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the
>form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
>ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time
>of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding
>it. "
>16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256
>
>

[Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:

>
>
>"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>news:uehm4s$3is6p$6@dont-email.me...
>> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>> news:uehgan$3hsm9$5@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ueg9bl$3ar1r$4@dont-email.me...
>>
>>>> Actually, no he wasn't in "violation of the Constitution" as it was
>>>> interpreted then.
>>>
>>> 1) He was in violation
>>> 2) Interpretations change
>>> 3) Changing Interpretations don't change the Constitution.
>>> 4) The intent of the Constitution remains constant.
>>>
>> True the words don't change, but the interpretation is the law.
>
>No, it's not. Otherwise, somebody could simply declare the 1st Amendment no
>longer applies and prohibit you from saying anything.
>
>That's not the way it works. Ref Marbury v. Madison (1803)
>
>You can't simply change the interpretation to change the meaning, much as
>I'm sure you would love to be able to do so, since then you could interpret
>the Constitution and all laws to mean whatever you decide they should no
>matter what the language actually says.
>
>>No one at
>> the time said his actions were unConstitutional.
>
>Didn't need to.
>
>"The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the
>form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
>ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time
>of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding
>it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if
>it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it
>purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted."
>16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256
>
>
>
>> And next SCOTUS might
>> well rule that such bans REQUIRED by the Constitution.
>
>Which still wouldn't change the Constitution, much as I'm sure you think it
>would.
>

Baxter is also too dumb to comprehend that the Supreme Court doesn't
leave Washington D.C. and cruise around the country looking for
violators.

Now, if he could show that someone in Tombstone or wherever sued the
Sheriff for a 2A violation, he might have a point. But he can't, so he
doesn't. All he can do is desperately and frantically try to change
the subject, which is, and always has been:

Re: Baxter approves violating the constitution and laws to further
limit guns.

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
in message
news:2ovogi1ivrm5knpdmvcqakotjcophc4hfi@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
>
>>
>>
>>"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>news:uehm4s$3is6p$6@dont-email.me...
>>> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>> news:uehgan$3hsm9$5@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:ueg9bl$3ar1r$4@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>>> Actually, no he wasn't in "violation of the Constitution" as it was
>>>>> interpreted then.
>>>>
>>>> 1) He was in violation
>>>> 2) Interpretations change
>>>> 3) Changing Interpretations don't change the Constitution.
>>>> 4) The intent of the Constitution remains constant.
>>>>
>>> True the words don't change, but the interpretation is the law.
>>
>>No, it's not. Otherwise, somebody could simply declare the 1st Amendment
>>no
>>longer applies and prohibit you from saying anything.
>>
>>That's not the way it works. Ref Marbury v. Madison (1803)
>>
>>You can't simply change the interpretation to change the meaning, much as
>>I'm sure you would love to be able to do so, since then you could
>>interpret
>>the Constitution and all laws to mean whatever you decide they should no
>>matter what the language actually says.
>>
>>>No one at
>>> the time said his actions were unConstitutional.
>>
>>Didn't need to.
>>
>>"The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the
>>form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
>>ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time
>>of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding
>>it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as
>>if
>>it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it
>>purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted."
>>16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256
>>
>>
>>
>>> And next SCOTUS might
>>> well rule that such bans REQUIRED by the Constitution.
>>
>>Which still wouldn't change the Constitution, much as I'm sure you think
>>it
>>would.
>>
>
> Baxter is also too dumb to comprehend that the Supreme Court doesn't
> leave Washington D.C. and cruise around the country looking for
> violators.
>
> Now, if he could show that someone in Tombstone or wherever sued the
> Sheriff for a 2A violation, he might have a point. But he can't, so he
> doesn't. All he can do is desperately and frantically try to change
> the subject, which is, and always has been:
>
> Re: Baxter approves violating the constitution and laws to further
> limit guns.

Heck, Doesn't matter.. we have currently rules overturning such
prohibitions.. the Constitution hasn't changed.. so neither has the
Unconstitutionality of such laws back then....

QED.

Read that part of the General Rule above again..

"unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment"

Which means if such a law is Unconstitutional NOW.. it was just as
Unconstitutional then.

On 9/21/2023 11:20 AM, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "Klaus  Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote in message
> news:e4qogi1qvrjl6ppubadka5c022gpdgehn3@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>
>> [Default]  Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>>> Klaus  Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>>> in news:kq6ogi5r7sv8i2uuvq21iq67581nae2k34
>>> @Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:
>>>
>>>> [Default]  Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>
>>>>> Klaus  Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>> wrote
>>>>> in
>>>>>
>>> news:6b3mgi5ahq3453sh1l3qv87es4vk8n287h@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>
>>>>> ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> [Default]  Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Klaus  Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>> in news:g0nlgipmkk3m6g072al0savg3t3d55nrp2
>>>>>>> @Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [Default]  Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Klaus  Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> news:39ejgipa6f25adi2f2foldr39pu2a4agt5
>>>>>>> @Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>>>>>>> ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [Default]  Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Klaus  Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.
>>> @gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
>>>>>>>>>>> ckin g.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, Hormone therapy is critical medical for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some people - particularly Intersex people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, no, when applied to children, it's child abuse. The
>>>>>>> doctor
>>>>>>>>>>>> and parents responsible should be jailed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hormons are necessary for a child's body development. If their
>>> body
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't produce the necessary homones, then "hormone therapy" is
>>>>>>>>>>> absolutely required -- and has nothing to do with Trans.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And Baxter tries to change the subject AGAIN.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, you're the one trying to change the subject.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Poor Baxter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Humiliated by Klaus for pointing out his stupid support of
>>>>>>>> totalitarian N.M. Governer Grisham's illegal order, he twists and
>>>>>>>> turns, DESPERATE to find a way out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Was Wyatt Earp a totalitarian , and the Clantons heroes?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And Baxter CONTINUES to run away from the FACT that he hates the
>>>>>> Constitution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> KKKlaun continues to run away from hundreds of years of
>>>>> restrictions on
>>>>> gun carry.
>>>>
>>>> Baxter continues to flee the public exposure of his hatred of the
>>>> Constitution.
>>>>
>>>> He LOVES the fact that N.M. Gov tried to suspend the Constitution,
>>>> knowing it would have no effect.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Was Wyatt Earp a totalitarian , and the Clantons heroes?
>>
>> Note how Baxter REFUSES to acknowledge his support of totalitarian
>> despot Grisham.
>>
>> What's the matter, Baxter?
>>
>> Are you embarrassed at her stupidity?
>>
>> Or are you embarrassed at your desire to see the Constitution
>> suspended?
>
> Hmmmm... If the Constitution is suspended.. then couldn't we simply kill
> Baxter outright as it would no longer be illegal?
>
The Constitution does not codify any crimes. You have to look
elsewhere for the criminal code, so the answer is no.

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> wrote
in
news:h2qogi5meid1111nnu69qpr6ur0d4tbdea@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:

> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com>
wrote
>>in
>>news:vk6ogi53ok8dfbkp916qt3u70vdcelu1a1
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>
>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote in
>>>>
news:pu4mgipp4sjksdj17nccg2q5hqq7h4r65j@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
>>>>ck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>
>>>>> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>> typed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:uef1o8$2vtg9$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.
@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>
news:ttmlgi19lujoq8bhmv7llknu0v88i3v80q@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>> ck suck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
news:k1ejgi5opjtfi156librhat6q72mp19e0u@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>> ck suck
>>>>>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>>>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>> ck su
>>>>>>>>>>>ckin g.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Who told you they were being mutilated?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody told me. I've seen it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>What?! You work in a hospital?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Only Baxter would be stupid enough to think you'd have to
>>>>>>>>>>>> work at a hospital to see it.
>>>>>>>> <Crickets>
>>>>>>>>>>>So you're admitting you've been viewing children's naked
>>>>>>>>>>>bodies!!!! Pedophile!!
>>>>>>>>>> And Pedophile Baxter runs away again, failing to defend his
>>>>>>>>>> admiration of child molesters who abuse kids.
>>>>>>>>>KKKlaun admitts he's looking at children's naked bodies.
>>>>>>>> Admitted Pedophile Baxter thinks any doctor who sees you naked
is
>>>>>>>> a pervert.
>>>>>>> No, I specifically asked if KKKlaun worked in a hospital, he said
>>>>>>> no. So where does he see those naked children?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I take it then you never had any children of your own..... overall,
>>>>>>that's a good thing, after all we certainly don't need your genes
>>>>>>around
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Baxter thinks you have to be a doctor, or work in a hospital to see
>>>>> an example of leftist child mutilation. And those pictures MUST be
>>>>> of naked children.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://imgur.com/a/ZX5uxw8
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You got proof that's not a lie?
>>>
>>> And Baxter runs away AGAIN.
>>>
>>> ROFLMAO!!!!!
>>>
>>> You too fucking stupid to look it up yourself?
>>> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12514799/gender-dysphoria-
se
>>> x-change-surgery-suing-doctors.html
>>>
>>>
>>
>>And what percentage of trans change their minds?
>
> I thought your mantra was-- "If we can save one child?"
>
> What percentage of horrible mutilations are acceptable for you?
>
What percentage of dead and mutilated kids from gun damage are acceptable
for you?

> EXPLAIN ---->
>
Yes, do explain support of gun violence. Your "concern" about the
welfare of kids is entirely bullshit.

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> wrote
in
news:e4qogi1qvrjl6ppubadka5c022gpdgehn3@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:

> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>

>>Was Wyatt Earp a totalitarian , and the Clantons heroes?
>
> Note how Baxter REFUSES to acknowledge his support of totalitarian
> despot Grisham.

Note how KKKlaun REFUSES to acknowledge that his claim of totalitarianism
would apply to historical heroes.

>
> What's the matter, Baxter?
>
> Are you embarrassed at her stupidity?
>
> Or are you embarrassed at your desire to see the Constitution
> suspended?
>
>
What's the matter KKKlaun too embarrassed at your own stupidity?

Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in news:oNZOM.104461$GHI6.94473
@fx17.iad:

> On 9/21/2023 8:59 AM, Baxter wrote:
>>
>> And what percentage of trans change their minds?
>>
> 100% of trans critters either change their minds or
> remain mentally unbalanced for their entire lives.
>

So if they don't change their mind, they are "mentally unbalanced"?

===========
Majority of trans adults are happier after transitioning, survey finds
This article is more than 5 months old

Washington Post and KFF study found 78% of respondents said living as
different gender from birth increased satisfaction in life

More than four out of 10 adults noted that they are �a lot more�
satisfied.

�Living doesn�t hurt any more,� said TC Caldwell of Alabama to the Post.
�It feels good to just breathe and be myself.�

While overall rates of life satisfaction among trans adults were lower
than the general population, many survey participants said that was
largely due to discrimination facing trans people.

�You always have that fear of what�s going to happen when you tell
somebody you�re transgender, especially these days,� said Tim McCoy, a
Syracuse resident. �That definitely affects one�s quality of life. It�s a
constant stress.�

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/mar/24/majority-trans-adults-
happier-transitioning-survey

==========
Yeah, YOU'RE part of the problem.

Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in news:sOZOM.104462$GHI6.49613@fx17.iad:

> On 9/21/2023 4:34 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>
>> Baxter is DESPERATE to change the subject AWAY from the news that his
>> hero, N.M. Governor Grisham, is a despotic totalitarian who should be
>> tarred and feathered.
>>
>> He admires how easily she violated the Constitution in order to strike
>> at gun owners, who he thinks are al murderers.
>>
> The push is already on to impeach her sorry self.
>

Conservaturds are trying to impeach EVERYONE they don't like.

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> wrote
in news:19qogi96lndbnuksb5e7v9nvas4t4l4kr2
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:

> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com>
wrote
>>in
>>
news:j17ogi9np26afqp6q4d87duejh6decjhpi@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>
>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com>
>>wrote
>>>>in
>>>>
>>
news:6f3mgit9baqhkcn256n53fe5kdnrm15nbt@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>
>>>>> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
typed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:uedlqh$2oa0o$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.
@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>
>>news:84gjgilskrbh03f1gc5plqb7aqppjrog4e@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cock
>>>>>>> suck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.
@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cock
>>>>>>> suck
>>>>>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>So you'd re-write history?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Baxter is desperate now. He *SO* wanted Gov. Grisham to
succeed
>>>>>>>>>> at denying gun owner's constitutional rights!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <CRICKETS>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Too bad!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LOL!!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why'd you snip the rest,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why do you keep trying-- and failing-- to change the subject?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just admit you approve of violating the Constitution in your
>>effort
>>>>>>>> to ban guns.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We both know what's what you want.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stop running away and do explain why it was alright for Wyatt
Earp
>>>>>>> to ban guns, but not Gov. Grisham.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wyatt Earp was also in the violation of the Constitution.
>>>>
>>>>Actually, no he wasn't in "violation of the Constitution" as it was
>>>>interpreted then.
>>>
>>> Yes, he was, you stupid fuck.
>>>
>>Prove it!
>
> ROFLMAO
>
> He violated the Constitution, just like N.M. Gov. Grisham.
>
Oh!! He did! You got even one voice from that time period that said
that? Perhaps the Clantons?
> This is so simple even a nitwit like yourself should be able to
> understand it.
>
If he violated the Constitution as people understood it then, it should b
easy for you to prove.

But you're too stupid to provide any actual proof.

[Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>in
>news:h2qogi5meid1111nnu69qpr6ur0d4tbdea@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>ing.dwarf.com:
>
>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote
>>>in
>>>news:vk6ogi53ok8dfbkp916qt3u70vdcelu1a1
>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>
>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote in
>>>>>
>news:pu4mgipp4sjksdj17nccg2q5hqq7h4r65j@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
>>>>>ck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:uef1o8$2vtg9$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.
>@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>>
>news:ttmlgi19lujoq8bhmv7llknu0v88i3v80q@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>>> ck suck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>news:k1ejgi5opjtfi156librhat6q72mp19e0u@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>>> ck suck
>>>>>>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>>>>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>>> ck su
>>>>>>>>>>>>ckin g.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Who told you they were being mutilated?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody told me. I've seen it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>What?! You work in a hospital?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only Baxter would be stupid enough to think you'd have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> work at a hospital to see it.
>>>>>>>>> <Crickets>
>>>>>>>>>>>>So you're admitting you've been viewing children's naked
>>>>>>>>>>>>bodies!!!! Pedophile!!
>>>>>>>>>>> And Pedophile Baxter runs away again, failing to defend his
>>>>>>>>>>> admiration of child molesters who abuse kids.
>>>>>>>>>>KKKlaun admitts he's looking at children's naked bodies.
>>>>>>>>> Admitted Pedophile Baxter thinks any doctor who sees you naked
>is
>>>>>>>>> a pervert.
>>>>>>>> No, I specifically asked if KKKlaun worked in a hospital, he said
>>>>>>>> no. So where does he see those naked children?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I take it then you never had any children of your own..... overall,
>>>>>>>that's a good thing, after all we certainly don't need your genes
>>>>>>>around
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Baxter thinks you have to be a doctor, or work in a hospital to see
>>>>>> an example of leftist child mutilation. And those pictures MUST be
>>>>>> of naked children.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://imgur.com/a/ZX5uxw8
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You got proof that's not a lie?
>>>>
>>>> And Baxter runs away AGAIN.
>>>>
>>>> ROFLMAO!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> You too fucking stupid to look it up yourself?
>>>> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12514799/gender-dysphoria-
>se
>>>> x-change-surgery-suing-doctors.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>And what percentage of trans change their minds?
>>
>> I thought your mantra was-- "If we can save one child?"

<CRICKETS>

>> What percentage of horrible mutilations are acceptable for you?

<CRICKETS>

>
>What percentage o[..]

And once again-- as predicted-- Baxter runs away instead of just
coming out and admitting he's totally in favor of ignoring the
Constitutional rights of Americans in order to further his
gun-grabbing agenda.

LOL

[Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:

>Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in news:oNZOM.104461$GHI6.94473
>@fx17.iad:
>
>> On 9/21/2023 8:59 AM, Baxter wrote:
>>>
>>> And what percentage of trans change their minds?
>>>
>> 100% of trans critters either change their minds or
>> remain mentally unbalanced for their entire lives.
>>
>
>So if they don't change their mind, they are "mentally unbalanced"?

Correct.

[Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>in
>news:e4qogi1qvrjl6ppubadka5c022gpdgehn3@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>ing.dwarf.com:
>
>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>
>>>Was Wyatt Earp a totalitarian , and the Clantons heroes?
>>
>> Note how Baxter REFUSES to acknowledge his support of totalitarian
>> despot Grisham.
>
>Note how KKKlaun REFUSES to acknowledge that his claim of totalitarianism
>would apply to historical heroes.

And once again-- as predicted-- Baxter runs away instead of just
coming out and admitting he's totally in favor of ignoring the
Constitutional rights of Americans in order to further his
gun-grabbing agenda.

LOL

[Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:

>Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in news:sOZOM.104462$GHI6.49613@fx17.iad:
>
>> On 9/21/2023 4:34 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>
>>> Baxter is DESPERATE to change the subject AWAY from the news that his
>>> hero, N.M. Governor Grisham, is a despotic totalitarian who should be
>>> tarred and feathered.
>>>
>>> He admires how easily she violated the Constitution in order to strike
>>> at gun owners, who he thinks are al murderers.
>>>
>> The push is already on to impeach her sorry self.
>>
>
>Conservaturds are trying to impeach EVERYONE they don't like.

That's pretty funny coming from a Democrat

[Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:

>> He violated the Constitution, just like N.M. Gov. Grisham.
>>
>Oh!! He did! You got even one voice from that time period that said
>that?

This has already been explained to you, old man.

And once again-- as predicted-- Baxter runs away instead of just
coming out and admitting he's totally in favor of ignoring the
Constitutional rights of Americans in order to further his
gun-grabbing agenda.

LOL

"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uej0es$3tra1$1@dont-email.me...
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
> in
> news:h2qogi5meid1111nnu69qpr6ur0d4tbdea@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
> ing.dwarf.com:
>
>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote
>>>in
>>>news:vk6ogi53ok8dfbkp916qt3u70vdcelu1a1
> @Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>
>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote in
>>>>>
> news:pu4mgipp4sjksdj17nccg2q5hqq7h4r65j@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
>>>>>ck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:uef1o8$2vtg9$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.
> @gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>>
> news:ttmlgi19lujoq8bhmv7llknu0v88i3v80q@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>>> ck suck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
> news:k1ejgi5opjtfi156librhat6q72mp19e0u@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>>> ck suck
>>>>>>>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>>>>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
> news:kisigil948qkcf75bkpkqnrshmrk1th1tm@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.co
>>>>>>>> ck su
>>>>>>>>>>>>ckin g.dwarf.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Who told you they were being mutilated?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody told me. I've seen it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>What?! You work in a hospital?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only Baxter would be stupid enough to think you'd have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> work at a hospital to see it.
>>>>>>>>> <Crickets>
>>>>>>>>>>>>So you're admitting you've been viewing children's naked
>>>>>>>>>>>>bodies!!!! Pedophile!!
>>>>>>>>>>> And Pedophile Baxter runs away again, failing to defend his
>>>>>>>>>>> admiration of child molesters who abuse kids.
>>>>>>>>>>KKKlaun admitts he's looking at children's naked bodies.
>>>>>>>>> Admitted Pedophile Baxter thinks any doctor who sees you naked
> is
>>>>>>>>> a pervert.
>>>>>>>> No, I specifically asked if KKKlaun worked in a hospital, he said
>>>>>>>> no. So where does he see those naked children?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I take it then you never had any children of your own..... overall,
>>>>>>>that's a good thing, after all we certainly don't need your genes
>>>>>>>around
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Baxter thinks you have to be a doctor, or work in a hospital to see
>>>>>> an example of leftist child mutilation. And those pictures MUST be
>>>>>> of naked children.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://imgur.com/a/ZX5uxw8
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You got proof that's not a lie?
>>>>
>>>> And Baxter runs away AGAIN.
>>>>
>>>> ROFLMAO!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> You too fucking stupid to look it up yourself?
>>>> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12514799/gender-dysphoria-
> se
>>>> x-change-surgery-suing-doctors.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>And what percentage of trans change their minds?
>>
>> I thought your mantra was-- "If we can save one child?"
>>
>> What percentage of horrible mutilations are acceptable for you?
>>
>
> What percentage of dead and mutilated kids from gun damage are acceptable
> for you?

What percentage of dead and mutilated kids from gender reassignment are
acceptable for you?

"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uej10d$3tra1$4@dont-email.me...
> Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in news:sOZOM.104462$GHI6.49613@fx17.iad:
>
>> On 9/21/2023 4:34 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>
>>> Baxter is DESPERATE to change the subject AWAY from the news that his
>>> hero, N.M. Governor Grisham, is a despotic totalitarian who should be
>>> tarred and feathered.
>>>
>>> He admires how easily she violated the Constitution in order to strike
>>> at gun owners, who he thinks are al murderers.
>>>
>> The push is already on to impeach her sorry self.
>>
>
> Conservaturds are trying to impeach EVERYONE they don't like.

Then why haven't you been impeached?