On 8/25/2022 7:19 AM, Frank wrote:
> On 8/24/2022 9:20 PM, T wrote:
>> On 8/24/22 16:19, Bob F wrote:
>>> On 8/24/2022 3:26 PM, 567gh wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:44:40 +1000, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 8/24/2022 12:10 PM, Ken wrote:
>>>>>> AK wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 9:21:56 PM UTC-5, micky wrote:
>>>>>>>> Acc to Rachel Madow quoting the NYTimes, before the first return of
>>>>>>>> documents, this January, stumpie went through the boxes personally
>>>>>>>> deciding which ones to return and which ones to keep. In late 2021,
>>>>>>>> before returning any of them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He returned about 150 classified docs, but kept about another 150.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So he can't say he didn't know what he had.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When his lawyers tried to get him to return all of htem he said,
>>>>>>>> "It's
>>>>>>>> not theirs, it's mine."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The FBI found them in at least 2 places, the basement room we've
>>>>>>>> heard
>>>>>>>> about but also in a container in a closet in his office.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We still don't know if they were photographed, photocopied,
>>>>>>>> scanned,
>>>>>>>> copied to USB drives or otherwise given to his good friends,
>>>>>>>> such as
>>>>>>>> Putin and N. Korea guy who sends him love letters.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And the lawyer who signed the statement to the FBI, in Jan. I
>>>>>>>> think,
>>>>>>>> saying everything was returned when it wasn't was the woman,
>>>>>>>> Chritina
>>>>>>>> Bobb, Babs or Babette or something like that. Evan Corcoran
>>>>>>>> drafted the
>>>>>>>> statemnt.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So why didn't the investigation end then? ON June 22nd they
>>>>>>>> subpoenad
>>>>>>>> the video of the hall or the basement room and it showed people
>>>>>>>> moving
>>>>>>>> the boxes around and moving some papers from one box to another.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is almost surely the warticle msnbc was working from:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/22/us/politics/trump-mar-a-lago-documents.html
>>>>>>>> If I made a mistake in my summary, let me know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's as dirty as pig dung.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thi
>>>>>>> Trump will be in a federal prison some time next year.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you think people are pissed now at what has happened, just wait
>>>>>> and see what would happen if that happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree, the wacko righties are getting dangerously crazy. So much
>>>>> for their old "law and order" claims.
>>>>>
>>>>> But it looks like trump could be lining up for a possible 20 year
>>>>> sentence. They gave him many opportunities to return the stolen
>>>>> documents, but he ignored most of them. These are SERIOUS crimes!
>>>>
>>>> No chance of a jail term for an ex president doing that.
>>>
>>> So, in your mind, the laws of the USA do not apply to a president?
>>
>>
>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
>
> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/08/25/whistleblower-fbi-officials-ordered-agents-to-steer-clear-of-hunter-biden-laptop-n2612219
>

You guys are funny. You complain about the MSM and American Pravda but
post from strong right biases sources.

Sorry, but neutral credibility was lost with the first sentence:

The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s attempts to look like the
impartial, professional, and apolitical law enforcement agency they once
were in their glory days only makes them appear more like the Democratic
Party’s Gestapo

On 8/24/22 21:14, Snag wrote:
> On 8/24/2022 10:01 PM, 567gh wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:20:05 +1000, T <T@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/24/22 16:19, Bob F wrote:
>>>> On 8/24/2022 3:26 PM, 567gh wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:44:40 +1000, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/24/2022 12:10 PM, Ken wrote:
>>>>>>> AK wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 9:21:56 PM UTC-5, micky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Acc to Rachel Madow quoting the NYTimes, before the first
>>>>>>>>> return of
>>>>>>>>> documents, this January, stumpie went through the boxes personally
>>>>>>>>> deciding which ones to return and which ones to keep. In late
>>>>>>>>> 2021,
>>>>>>>>> before returning any of them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He returned about 150 classified docs, but kept about another 150.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So he can't say he didn't know what he had.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When his lawyers tried to get him to return all of htem he
>>>>>>>>> said, "It's
>>>>>>>>> not theirs, it's mine."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The FBI found them in at least 2 places, the basement room
>>>>>>>>> we've heard
>>>>>>>>> about but also in a container in a closet in his office.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We still don't know if they were photographed, photocopied,
>>>>>>>>> scanned,
>>>>>>>>> copied to USB drives or otherwise given to his good friends,
>>>>>>>>> such as
>>>>>>>>> Putin and N. Korea guy who sends him love letters.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And the lawyer who signed the statement to the FBI, in Jan. I
>>>>>>>>> think,
>>>>>>>>> saying everything was returned when it wasn't was the woman,
>>>>>>>>> Chritina
>>>>>>>>> Bobb, Babs or Babette or something like that. Evan Corcoran
>>>>>>>>> drafted the
>>>>>>>>> statemnt.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So why didn't the investigation end then? ON June 22nd they
>>>>>>>>> subpoenad
>>>>>>>>> the video of the hall or the basement room and it showed people
>>>>>>>>> moving
>>>>>>>>> the boxes around and moving some papers from one box to another.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is almost surely the warticle msnbc was working from:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/22/us/politics/trump-mar-a-lago-documents.html
>>>>>>>>> If I made a mistake in my summary, let me know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He's as dirty as pig dung.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thi
>>>>>>>> Trump will be in a federal prison some time next year.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you think people are pissed now at what has happened, just
>>>>>>> wait and see what would happen if that happened.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree, the wacko righties are getting dangerously crazy. So much
>>>>>> for their old "law and order" claims.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But it looks like trump could be lining up for a possible 20 year
>>>>>> sentence. They gave him many opportunities to return the stolen
>>>>>> documents, but he ignored most of them. These are SERIOUS crimes!
>>>>>
>>>>> No chance of a jail term for an ex president doing that.
>>>>  So, in your mind, the laws of the USA do not apply to a president?
>>>
>>>
>>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
>>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
>>
>> Inciting the storming of the Capitol is one of the most
>> serious crimes possible and that is an undeniable fact,
>> not propaganda at all.
>
>   Trump didn't incite anything , he told the crowd to "go peacefully" .
> Fact is , the "insurrection" (gag/puke) started before any of the crowd
> that were listening to Trump's speech had time to get there . FACT !
> There is so much information NOT being divulged by MSM that it's
> impossible to get the whole picture unless you also watch alternative
> ("fake news and lies" to most staunch liberals) news sources . I have
> personal experience with how the news media twists what people say .
> What I said ain't what they reported (about a shooting on the street we
> lived on in Memphis) .
The propaganda narrative is their religion. Who dare you!
Chuckle!
The truth in not in them. End justifies the means.

On 8/25/2022 9:31 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 8/25/2022 7:19 AM, Frank wrote:
>> On 8/24/2022 9:20 PM, T wrote:
>>> On 8/24/22 16:19, Bob F wrote:
>>>> On 8/24/2022 3:26 PM, 567gh wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:44:40 +1000, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/24/2022 12:10 PM, Ken wrote:
>>>>>>> AK wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 9:21:56 PM UTC-5, micky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Acc to Rachel Madow quoting the NYTimes, before the first
>>>>>>>>> return of
>>>>>>>>> documents, this January, stumpie went through the boxes personally
>>>>>>>>> deciding which ones to return and which ones to keep. In late
>>>>>>>>> 2021,
>>>>>>>>> before returning any of them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He returned about 150 classified docs, but kept about another 150.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So he can't say he didn't know what he had.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When his lawyers tried to get him to return all of htem he
>>>>>>>>> said, "It's
>>>>>>>>> not theirs, it's mine."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The FBI found them in at least 2 places, the basement room
>>>>>>>>> we've heard
>>>>>>>>> about but also in a container in a closet in his office.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We still don't know if they were photographed, photocopied,
>>>>>>>>> scanned,
>>>>>>>>> copied to USB drives or otherwise given to his good friends,
>>>>>>>>> such as
>>>>>>>>> Putin and N. Korea guy who sends him love letters.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And the lawyer who signed the statement to the FBI, in Jan. I
>>>>>>>>> think,
>>>>>>>>> saying everything was returned when it wasn't was the woman,
>>>>>>>>> Chritina
>>>>>>>>> Bobb, Babs or Babette or something like that. Evan Corcoran
>>>>>>>>> drafted the
>>>>>>>>> statemnt.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So why didn't the investigation end then? ON June 22nd they
>>>>>>>>> subpoenad
>>>>>>>>> the video of the hall or the basement room and it showed people
>>>>>>>>> moving
>>>>>>>>> the boxes around and moving some papers from one box to another.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is almost surely the warticle msnbc was working from:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/22/us/politics/trump-mar-a-lago-documents.html
>>>>>>>>> If I made a mistake in my summary, let me know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He's as dirty as pig dung.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thi
>>>>>>>> Trump will be in a federal prison some time next year.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you think people are pissed now at what has happened, just
>>>>>>> wait and see what would happen if that happened.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree, the wacko righties are getting dangerously crazy. So much
>>>>>> for their old "law and order" claims.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But it looks like trump could be lining up for a possible 20 year
>>>>>> sentence. They gave him many opportunities to return the stolen
>>>>>> documents, but he ignored most of them. These are SERIOUS crimes!
>>>>>
>>>>> No chance of a jail term for an ex president doing that.
>>>>
>>>> So, in your mind, the laws of the USA do not apply to a president?
>>>
>>>
>>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
>>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
>>
>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/08/25/whistleblower-fbi-officials-ordered-agents-to-steer-clear-of-hunter-biden-laptop-n2612219
>>
>
> You guys are funny.  You complain about the MSM and American Pravda but
> post from strong right biases sources.
>
> Sorry, but neutral credibility was lost with the first sentence:
>
> The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s attempts to look like the
> impartial, professional, and apolitical law enforcement agency they once
> were in their glory days only makes them appear more like the Democratic
> Party’s Gestapo

Do you seriously think you would see it published like this in the New
York Times or Washington Post?

On 8/25/2022 11:50 AM, Frank wrote:
> On 8/25/2022 9:31 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 8/25/2022 7:19 AM, Frank wrote:
>>> On 8/24/2022 9:20 PM, T wrote:
>>>> On 8/24/22 16:19, Bob F wrote:
>>>>> On 8/24/2022 3:26 PM, 567gh wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:44:40 +1000, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8/24/2022 12:10 PM, Ken wrote:
>>>>>>>> AK wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 9:21:56 PM UTC-5, micky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Acc to Rachel Madow quoting the NYTimes, before the first
>>>>>>>>>> return of
>>>>>>>>>> documents, this January, stumpie went through the boxes
>>>>>>>>>> personally
>>>>>>>>>> deciding which ones to return and which ones to keep. In late
>>>>>>>>>> 2021,
>>>>>>>>>> before returning any of them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He returned about 150 classified docs, but kept about another
>>>>>>>>>> 150.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So he can't say he didn't know what he had.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When his lawyers tried to get him to return all of htem he
>>>>>>>>>> said, "It's
>>>>>>>>>> not theirs, it's mine."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The FBI found them in at least 2 places, the basement room
>>>>>>>>>> we've heard
>>>>>>>>>> about but also in a container in a closet in his office.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We still don't know if they were photographed, photocopied,
>>>>>>>>>> scanned,
>>>>>>>>>> copied to USB drives or otherwise given to his good friends,
>>>>>>>>>> such as
>>>>>>>>>> Putin and N. Korea guy who sends him love letters.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And the lawyer who signed the statement to the FBI, in Jan. I
>>>>>>>>>> think,
>>>>>>>>>> saying everything was returned when it wasn't was the woman,
>>>>>>>>>> Chritina
>>>>>>>>>> Bobb, Babs or Babette or something like that. Evan Corcoran
>>>>>>>>>> drafted the
>>>>>>>>>> statemnt.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So why didn't the investigation end then? ON June 22nd they
>>>>>>>>>> subpoenad
>>>>>>>>>> the video of the hall or the basement room and it showed
>>>>>>>>>> people moving
>>>>>>>>>> the boxes around and moving some papers from one box to another.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is almost surely the warticle msnbc was working from:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/22/us/politics/trump-mar-a-lago-documents.html
>>>>>>>>>> If I made a mistake in my summary, let me know.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He's as dirty as pig dung.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thi
>>>>>>>>> Trump will be in a federal prison some time next year.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you think people are pissed now at what has happened, just
>>>>>>>> wait and see what would happen if that happened.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree, the wacko righties are getting dangerously crazy. So
>>>>>>> much for their old "law and order" claims.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it looks like trump could be lining up for a possible 20 year
>>>>>>> sentence. They gave him many opportunities to return the stolen
>>>>>>> documents, but he ignored most of them. These are SERIOUS crimes!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No chance of a jail term for an ex president doing that.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in your mind, the laws of the USA do not apply to a president?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
>>>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
>>>
>>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/08/25/whistleblower-fbi-officials-ordered-agents-to-steer-clear-of-hunter-biden-laptop-n2612219
>>>
>>
>> You guys are funny.  You complain about the MSM and American Pravda
>> but post from strong right biases sources.
>>
>> Sorry, but neutral credibility was lost with the first sentence:
>>
>> The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s attempts to look like the
>> impartial, professional, and apolitical law enforcement agency they
>> once were in their glory days only makes them appear more like the
>> Democratic Party’s Gestapo
>
> Do you seriously think you would see it published like this in the New
> York Times or Washington Post?

Of course not, they would not refer to the Democratic Party Gestapo.
Reeks of bias.

I know WAPO and NYT are left leaning but the actually report real news
and real truth. Do they leave things out? Possibly.

This article just comes across as a smear, not truth and facts. I have
no trust in them.

On 8/25/2022 9:00 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> Marilyn Manson <comawhiteknuckles@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 9:20:11 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
>
>> Did anyone else happen to notice that, as usual, T didn't answer the
>> question that was asked?
>>
>> He's as bad as most politicians.
>
> Both he and Frank change the topic when the facts don't agree with them.

We are just emulating your hero:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15RjcRJ3Z70

On 8/25/2022 12:00 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 8/25/2022 11:50 AM, Frank wrote:
>> On 8/25/2022 9:31 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> On 8/25/2022 7:19 AM, Frank wrote:
>>>> On 8/24/2022 9:20 PM, T wrote:
>>>>> On 8/24/22 16:19, Bob F wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/24/2022 3:26 PM, 567gh wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:44:40 +1000, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/24/2022 12:10 PM, Ken wrote:
>>>>>>>>> AK wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 9:21:56 PM UTC-5, micky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Acc to Rachel Madow quoting the NYTimes, before the first
>>>>>>>>>>> return of
>>>>>>>>>>> documents, this January, stumpie went through the boxes
>>>>>>>>>>> personally
>>>>>>>>>>> deciding which ones to return and which ones to keep. In late
>>>>>>>>>>> 2021,
>>>>>>>>>>> before returning any of them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He returned about 150 classified docs, but kept about another
>>>>>>>>>>> 150.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So he can't say he didn't know what he had.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When his lawyers tried to get him to return all of htem he
>>>>>>>>>>> said, "It's
>>>>>>>>>>> not theirs, it's mine."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The FBI found them in at least 2 places, the basement room
>>>>>>>>>>> we've heard
>>>>>>>>>>> about but also in a container in a closet in his office.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We still don't know if they were photographed, photocopied,
>>>>>>>>>>> scanned,
>>>>>>>>>>> copied to USB drives or otherwise given to his good friends,
>>>>>>>>>>> such as
>>>>>>>>>>> Putin and N. Korea guy who sends him love letters.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And the lawyer who signed the statement to the FBI, in Jan. I
>>>>>>>>>>> think,
>>>>>>>>>>> saying everything was returned when it wasn't was the woman,
>>>>>>>>>>> Chritina
>>>>>>>>>>> Bobb, Babs or Babette or something like that. Evan Corcoran
>>>>>>>>>>> drafted the
>>>>>>>>>>> statemnt.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So why didn't the investigation end then? ON June 22nd they
>>>>>>>>>>> subpoenad
>>>>>>>>>>> the video of the hall or the basement room and it showed
>>>>>>>>>>> people moving
>>>>>>>>>>> the boxes around and moving some papers from one box to another.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is almost surely the warticle msnbc was working from:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/22/us/politics/trump-mar-a-lago-documents.html
>>>>>>>>>>> If I made a mistake in my summary, let me know.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He's as dirty as pig dung.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thi
>>>>>>>>>> Trump will be in a federal prison some time next year.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you think people are pissed now at what has happened, just
>>>>>>>>> wait and see what would happen if that happened.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I agree, the wacko righties are getting dangerously crazy. So
>>>>>>>> much for their old "law and order" claims.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But it looks like trump could be lining up for a possible 20
>>>>>>>> year sentence. They gave him many opportunities to return the
>>>>>>>> stolen documents, but he ignored most of them. These are SERIOUS
>>>>>>>> crimes!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No chance of a jail term for an ex president doing that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, in your mind, the laws of the USA do not apply to a president?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
>>>>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
>>>>
>>>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/08/25/whistleblower-fbi-officials-ordered-agents-to-steer-clear-of-hunter-biden-laptop-n2612219
>>>>
>>>
>>> You guys are funny.  You complain about the MSM and American Pravda
>>> but post from strong right biases sources.
>>>
>>> Sorry, but neutral credibility was lost with the first sentence:
>>>
>>> The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s attempts to look like the
>>> impartial, professional, and apolitical law enforcement agency they
>>> once were in their glory days only makes them appear more like the
>>> Democratic Party’s Gestapo
>>
>> Do you seriously think you would see it published like this in the New
>> York Times or Washington Post?
>
>
> Of course not, they would not refer to the Democratic Party Gestapo.
> Reeks of bias.
>
> I know WAPO and NYT are left leaning but the actually report real news
> and real truth.  Do they leave things out?  Possibly.
>
> This article just comes across as a smear, not truth and facts.  I have
> no trust in them.

Yes our sources are biased and you think that yours are not?

On 8/25/2022 12:44 PM, Frank wrote:
> On 8/25/2022 12:00 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

>>>>>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
>>>>>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/08/25/whistleblower-fbi-officials-ordered-agents-to-steer-clear-of-hunter-biden-laptop-n2612219
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You guys are funny.  You complain about the MSM and American Pravda
>>>> but post from strong right biases sources.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, but neutral credibility was lost with the first sentence:
>>>>
>>>> The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s attempts to look like the
>>>> impartial, professional, and apolitical law enforcement agency they
>>>> once were in their glory days only makes them appear more like the
>>>> Democratic Party’s Gestapo
>>>
>>> Do you seriously think you would see it published like this in the
>>> New York Times or Washington Post?
>>
>>
>> Of course not, they would not refer to the Democratic Party Gestapo.
>> Reeks of bias.
>>
>> I know WAPO and NYT are left leaning but the actually report real news
>> and real truth.  Do they leave things out?  Possibly.
>>
>> This article just comes across as a smear, not truth and facts.  I
>> have no trust in them.
>
> Yes our sources are biased and you think that yours are not?

I already said that.

What makes your good and others bad? Bias is bias, lies are lies.

On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:47:51 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 8/25/2022 12:44 PM, Frank wrote:
> > On 8/25/2022 12:00 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
> >>>>>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
> >>>>>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/08/25/whistleblower-fbi-officials-ordered-agents-to-steer-clear-of-hunter-biden-laptop-n2612219
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> You guys are funny. You complain about the MSM and American Pravda
> >>>> but post from strong right biases sources.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sorry, but neutral credibility was lost with the first sentence:
> >>>>
> >>>> The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s attempts to look like the
> >>>> impartial, professional, and apolitical law enforcement agency they
> >>>> once were in their glory days only makes them appear more like the
> >>>> Democratic Party’s Gestapo
> >>>
> >>> Do you seriously think you would see it published like this in the
> >>> New York Times or Washington Post?
> >>
> >>
> >> Of course not, they would not refer to the Democratic Party Gestapo.
> >> Reeks of bias.
> >>
> >> I know WAPO and NYT are left leaning but the actually report real news
> >> and real truth. Do they leave things out? Possibly.
> >>
> >> This article just comes across as a smear, not truth and facts. I
> >> have no trust in them.
> >
> > Yes our sources are biased and you think that yours are not?
> I already said that.
>
> What makes your good and others bad? Bias is bias, lies are lies.

Frank is pretty slow on the uptake. You were probably typing too
fast for him to understand your point.

And trump has made a firm speech on classified document security.

https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/1559212852334022656?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1559234589020889091%7Ctwgr%5E25dd4d95a571f5395bd6f7f38a4938a1cf4f828f%7Ctwcon%5Es3_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fpolitics%2Ftrumps-2016-campaign-promise-to-protect-classified-information-during-his-administration-goes-viral%2F

On 8/25/2022 3:47 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 8/25/2022 12:44 PM, Frank wrote:
>> On 8/25/2022 12:00 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>>>>>>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
>>>>>>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/08/25/whistleblower-fbi-officials-ordered-agents-to-steer-clear-of-hunter-biden-laptop-n2612219
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You guys are funny.  You complain about the MSM and American Pravda
>>>>> but post from strong right biases sources.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, but neutral credibility was lost with the first sentence:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s attempts to look like the
>>>>> impartial, professional, and apolitical law enforcement agency they
>>>>> once were in their glory days only makes them appear more like the
>>>>> Democratic Party’s Gestapo
>>>>
>>>> Do you seriously think you would see it published like this in the
>>>> New York Times or Washington Post?
>>>
>>>
>>> Of course not, they would not refer to the Democratic Party Gestapo.
>>> Reeks of bias.
>>>
>>> I know WAPO and NYT are left leaning but the actually report real
>>> news and real truth.  Do they leave things out?  Possibly.
>>>
>>> This article just comes across as a smear, not truth and facts.  I
>>> have no trust in them.
>>
>> Yes our sources are biased and you think that yours are not?
>
> I already said that.
>
> What makes your good and others bad?  Bias is bias, lies are lies.

And you have to watch BOTH SIDES and decide where the truth lies ...
--
Snag
“Free speech is my right to say what you don’t
want to hear.” -George Orwell

On 08/25/2022 09:50 AM, Frank wrote:
> On 8/25/2022 9:31 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 8/25/2022 7:19 AM, Frank wrote:
>>> On 8/24/2022 9:20 PM, T wrote:
>>>> On 8/24/22 16:19, Bob F wrote:
>>>>> On 8/24/2022 3:26 PM, 567gh wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:44:40 +1000, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8/24/2022 12:10 PM, Ken wrote:
>>>>>>>> AK wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 9:21:56 PM UTC-5, micky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Acc to Rachel Madow quoting the NYTimes, before the first
>>>>>>>>>> return of
>>>>>>>>>> documents, this January, stumpie went through the boxes
>>>>>>>>>> personally
>>>>>>>>>> deciding which ones to return and which ones to keep. In late
>>>>>>>>>> 2021,
>>>>>>>>>> before returning any of them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He returned about 150 classified docs, but kept about another
>>>>>>>>>> 150.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So he can't say he didn't know what he had.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When his lawyers tried to get him to return all of htem he
>>>>>>>>>> said, "It's
>>>>>>>>>> not theirs, it's mine."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The FBI found them in at least 2 places, the basement room
>>>>>>>>>> we've heard
>>>>>>>>>> about but also in a container in a closet in his office.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We still don't know if they were photographed, photocopied,
>>>>>>>>>> scanned,
>>>>>>>>>> copied to USB drives or otherwise given to his good friends,
>>>>>>>>>> such as
>>>>>>>>>> Putin and N. Korea guy who sends him love letters.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And the lawyer who signed the statement to the FBI, in Jan. I
>>>>>>>>>> think,
>>>>>>>>>> saying everything was returned when it wasn't was the woman,
>>>>>>>>>> Chritina
>>>>>>>>>> Bobb, Babs or Babette or something like that. Evan Corcoran
>>>>>>>>>> drafted the
>>>>>>>>>> statemnt.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So why didn't the investigation end then? ON June 22nd they
>>>>>>>>>> subpoenad
>>>>>>>>>> the video of the hall or the basement room and it showed
>>>>>>>>>> people moving
>>>>>>>>>> the boxes around and moving some papers from one box to another.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is almost surely the warticle msnbc was working from:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/22/us/politics/trump-mar-a-lago-documents.html
>>>>>>>>>> If I made a mistake in my summary, let me know.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He's as dirty as pig dung.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thi
>>>>>>>>> Trump will be in a federal prison some time next year.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you think people are pissed now at what has happened, just
>>>>>>>> wait and see what would happen if that happened.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree, the wacko righties are getting dangerously crazy. So
>>>>>>> much for their old "law and order" claims.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it looks like trump could be lining up for a possible 20 year
>>>>>>> sentence. They gave him many opportunities to return the stolen
>>>>>>> documents, but he ignored most of them. These are SERIOUS crimes!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No chance of a jail term for an ex president doing that.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in your mind, the laws of the USA do not apply to a president?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
>>>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
>>>
>>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/08/25/whistleblower-fbi-officials-ordered-agents-to-steer-clear-of-hunter-biden-laptop-n2612219
>>>
>>
>> You guys are funny. You complain about the MSM and American Pravda
>> but post from strong right biases sources.
>>
>> Sorry, but neutral credibility was lost with the first sentence:
>>
>> The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s attempts to look like the
>> impartial, professional, and apolitical law enforcement agency they
>> once were in their glory days only makes them appear more like the
>> Democratic Party’s Gestapo
>
> Do you seriously think you would see it published like this in the New
> York Times or Washington Post?

https://www.cjr.org/investigation/ben-bagdikian-pentagon-papers.php

The WaPo may not have been as enthusiastic about the FBI back then.

On 8/25/2022 9:45 PM, Snag wrote:
> On 8/25/2022 3:47 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 8/25/2022 12:44 PM, Frank wrote:
>>> On 8/25/2022 12:00 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
>>>>>>>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/08/25/whistleblower-fbi-officials-ordered-agents-to-steer-clear-of-hunter-biden-laptop-n2612219
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You guys are funny.  You complain about the MSM and American
>>>>>> Pravda but post from strong right biases sources.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, but neutral credibility was lost with the first sentence:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s attempts to look like the
>>>>>> impartial, professional, and apolitical law enforcement agency
>>>>>> they once were in their glory days only makes them appear more
>>>>>> like the Democratic Party’s Gestapo
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you seriously think you would see it published like this in the
>>>>> New York Times or Washington Post?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Of course not, they would not refer to the Democratic Party Gestapo.
>>>> Reeks of bias.
>>>>
>>>> I know WAPO and NYT are left leaning but the actually report real
>>>> news and real truth.  Do they leave things out?  Possibly.
>>>>
>>>> This article just comes across as a smear, not truth and facts.  I
>>>> have no trust in them.
>>>
>>> Yes our sources are biased and you think that yours are not?
>>
>> I already said that.
>>
>> What makes your good and others bad?  Bias is bias, lies are lies.
>
>   And you have to watch BOTH SIDES and decide where the truth lies ...

Correct, but some here constantly bash the major news outlets. Not
everything is "fake news"

On 8/24/22 20:01, 567gh wrote:
>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
>
> Inciting the storming of the Capitol is one of the most
> serious crimes possible and that is an undeniable fact,
> not propaganda at all.
Ha! That is pure propaganda. Trump did not
such thing.
But there is a lot of evidence
that it was an inside job to detract from
the worst fraudulent election since 1876
and to keep Trump from re-running.

On 8/25/22 20:41, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 8/25/2022 9:45 PM, Snag wrote:
>> On 8/25/2022 3:47 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> On 8/25/2022 12:44 PM, Frank wrote:
>>>> On 8/25/2022 12:00 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
>>>>>>>>> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/08/25/whistleblower-fbi-officials-ordered-agents-to-steer-clear-of-hunter-biden-laptop-n2612219
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You guys are funny.  You complain about the MSM and American
>>>>>>> Pravda but post from strong right biases sources.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, but neutral credibility was lost with the first sentence:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s attempts to look like the
>>>>>>> impartial, professional, and apolitical law enforcement agency
>>>>>>> they once were in their glory days only makes them appear more
>>>>>>> like the Democratic Party’s Gestapo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you seriously think you would see it published like this in the
>>>>>> New York Times or Washington Post?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course not, they would not refer to the Democratic Party
>>>>> Gestapo. Reeks of bias.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know WAPO and NYT are left leaning but the actually report real
>>>>> news and real truth.  Do they leave things out?  Possibly.
>>>>>
>>>>> This article just comes across as a smear, not truth and facts.  I
>>>>> have no trust in them.
>>>>
>>>> Yes our sources are biased and you think that yours are not?
>>>
>>> I already said that.
>>>
>>> What makes your good and others bad?  Bias is bias, lies are lies.
>>
>>    And you have to watch BOTH SIDES and decide where the truth lies ...
>
> Correct, but some here constantly bash the major news outlets.  Not
> everything is "fake news"

"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every
book rewritten, every picture has been repainted,
every statue and street building has been renamed,
every date has been altered. And the process is
continuing day by day and minute by minute. History
has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present
in which the Party is always right.”
― George Orwell, 1984

On 8/25/22 09:43, Frank wrote:
> On 8/25/2022 9:00 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>> Marilyn Manson <comawhiteknuckles@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 9:20:11 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
>>
>>> Did anyone else happen to notice that, as usual, T didn't answer the
>>> question that was asked?
>>>
>>> He's as bad as most politicians.
>>
>> Both he and Frank change the topic when the facts don't agree with them.
>
> We are just emulating your hero:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15RjcRJ3Z70

Senility on display

On 8/24/22 19:54, 567gh wrote:
> Yes, he should be jailed for inciting the storming of the Capitol,
> but the reality is that that isn't going to happen.
Except he did not. End justify the means?

On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 5:26:40 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
> On 8/24/22 20:01, 567gh wrote:
> >> One law for the Democrats; one law for the rest of us.
> >> And your "serious crimes" are pretty much propaganda.
> >
> > Inciting the storming of the Capitol is one of the most
> > serious crimes possible and that is an undeniable fact,
> > not propaganda at all.
> Ha! That is pure propaganda. Trump did not
> such thing.
>
> But there is a lot of evidence
> that it was an inside job to detract from
> the worst fraudulent election since 1876
> and to keep Trump from re-running.

Do you even read the shit you post?

I guess you do because it's rotting your brain and making
you sound stupider and stupider every day.

If someone provides evidence that doesn't fit your version
of the propaganda, you attack the source, but never dispute
the evidence.

When someone presents the same evidence published by a
source that you can't "discredit", you run and hide and never
respond. We see it all the time and it shows just how full of
shit you are.