Nomen Nescio wrote:

>“People have a privacy interest in their internet search
>history, which is really an archive of your personal
>expression,” said Michael Price, who is lead litigator of the
>National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers’ Fourth
>Amendment Center and one of the 17-year-old’s attorneys. “Search
>engines like Google are a gateway to a vast trove of information
>online and the way most people find what they’re looking for.
>Every one of those queries reveals something deeply private
>about a person, things they might not share with friends, family
>or clergy.”
>
>https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/police-google-reverse-
>keyword-searches-rcna35749

Defense would all be quite simple ...
<https://www.torproject.org/download/>

A teen charged with setting a fire that killed five members of a
Senegalese immigrant family in Denver, Colorado, has become the
first person to challenge police use of Google search histories
to find someone who might have committed a crime, according to
his lawyers.

The pushback against this surveillance tool, known as a reverse
keyword search, is being closely watched by privacy and abortion
rights advocates, who are concerned that it could soon be used
to investigate women who search for information about obtaining
an abortion in states where the procedure is now illegal.

In documents filed Thursday in Denver District Court, lawyers
for the 17-year-old argue that the police violated the
Constitution when they got a judge to order Google to check its
vast database of internet searches for users who typed in the
address of a home before it was set ablaze on Aug. 5, 2020.
Three adults and two children died in the fire.

That search of Google�s records helped point investigators to
the teen and two friends, who were eventually charged in the
deadly fire, according to police records. All were juveniles at
the time of their arrests. Two of them, including the 17-year-
old, are being tried as adults; they both pleaded not guilty.
The defendant in juvenile court has not yet entered a plea.

The 17-year-old�s lawyers say the search, and all evidence that
came from it, should be thrown out because it amounted to a
blind expedition through billions of Google users� queries based
on a hunch that the killer typed the address into a search bar.
That, the lawyers argued, violated the Fourth Amendment, which
protects against unreasonable searches.

�People have a privacy interest in their internet search
history, which is really an archive of your personal
expression,� said Michael Price, who is lead litigator of the
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers� Fourth
Amendment Center and one of the 17-year-old�s attorneys. �Search
engines like Google are a gateway to a vast trove of information
online and the way most people find what they�re looking for.
Every one of those queries reveals something deeply private
about a person, things they might not share with friends, family
or clergy.�

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/police-google-reverse-
keyword-searches-rcna35749

They were too stupid or cheap to not have a VPN. I heard that NordVPN is the best. I use an SSH cotse.net connection. $5/month with unlimited email addresses. The cotse vpn does not have unlimited email addresses. You also have to set each program to use it.