Hello,

More precision about more philosophy about human smartness and about
artificial intelligence..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many
scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have to be more precision, so here is the definition in the dictionary
of "pattern" that i am using in my thoughts of my philosophy below:

Pattern is a particular way in which something is done, is organized, or
happens.

Read here in the dictionary to notice it:

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pattern

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask the following
philosophical question:

What is human smartness or intelligence ?

I will answer it by saying the following:

I think we call it human smartness because it discovers "useful"
patterns in the reality, so reality can contain static systems or
dynamic systems that contain smartness in form of useful patterns etc.,
so human smartness uses its smartness to "discover" those useful
patterns so that to become more and more smart, and by discovering the
useful patterns i also means knowing about there meanings of those
useful patterns so that to understand them, it is by logical analogy
like discovering the rules so that to become smart, so for example when
we are doing mathematics we can discover the useful rules or useful
patterns like the theorems in mathematics by using deductive logic and
inductive logic, so i can go further and say that Swarm intelligence
like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is a self-organization, and
Self-organization, also called (in the social sciences) spontaneous
order, is a process where some form of overall order arises from local
interactions between parts of an initially disordered system. The
process can be spontaneous when sufficient energy is available, not
needing control by any external agent, so then Swarm intelligence like
PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is self-organization since notice that
the exploration mechanism of PSO that is the global optimization is
"collaborating" with the exploitation mechanism of PSO that is the local
optimization so that to self-organize by finding the global optimum
, so then we can call Swarm intelligence like PSO(Particle Swarm
Optimization) a form of intelligence, this is why we call
it artificial intelligence.

Also you can read more about my thoughts of my philosophy about human
smartness in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs

More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence or general
artificial intelligence..

I think i am smart, and i have just explained below that the divide and
conquer algorithms are a particular case or special case of Swarm
intelligence of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), and i will explain
it more in my next posts, now notice with me that Swarm intelligence
uses localized optimization with exploitation as heuristics like Greedy
algorithms so that to enhance much more the artificial intelligence
algorithm, but notice with me that general artificial intelligence can
use Swarm intelligence like PSO at a lower level layer, and at a higher
level layer it can use the divide and conquer algorithms, i mean that
the unknown meaning can be divided and conquered by measuring it with
previous meanings from the data using artifical intelligence of for
example PathNET so that to find the unknown meaning, and i define the
meaning in artificial intelligence as as the higher concept that is
recognized with deep learning, and this way we can construct much more
rapidly more and more meanings and incorporate them in PathNET so that
to converge more and more to much more generalized artificial
intelligence that will rapidly approximate general artificial intelligence.

More philosophy about Swarm intelligence and PSO and artificial
intelligence..

Can we ask a philosophical question:

Is Swarm intelligence like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) a
brute-force general problem-solving technique and what is it ?

So i invite you first to read the following interesting article about
artificial intelligence of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization):

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization

And read my following thoughts about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/BKGvkTI5FY4

So I think i am smart and i will say that since artificial intelligence
of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is guided by not only exploration
but by the mechanism of exploitation, so this shows that this mechanism
of exploitation guides the problem-solving technique, so we can
not say that Swarm intelligence of PSO is a brute-force general
problem-solving technique, since brute-force general problem-solving
technique and algorithmic paradigm consists of systematically
enumerating all possible candidates for the solution and checking
whether each candidate satisfies the problem's statement, but notice
that brute-force general problem-solving technique is not guided by the
quality of exploitation of artificial intelligence of PSO(Particle Swarm
Optimization), and i can say that the artificial intelligence of
PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is Swarm intelligence that is more
general than the
particular case of the divide and conquer algorithms, since in the
divide and conquer algorithms we are guided by the divide mechanism that
is the "exploration" that finds a solution and after that there is an
exploitation of this solution of this quality that is the already sorted
small arrays in the case of mergesort that will permit the recursive
merge algorithm to reduce the time complexity to n*log(n), so i think it
is the same for PathNet in artificial intelligence that i also think
uses a kind of divide and conquer algorithm.

Here is PathNet in artificial intelligence, read carefully about it here:

https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46

More philosophy about declarative programming and imperative programming
and object oriented programming..

I invite you to read the following interesting webpage from wikipedia
about declarative programming:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declarative_programming

I think that declarative programming is too much abstraction
since Functional programming is declarative programming that attempts to
minimize or eliminate side effects by describing what the program must
accomplish in terms of the problem domain, rather than describe how to
accomplish it as a sequence of the programming language primitives (the
how being left up to the language's implementation). This is in contrast
with imperative programming, which implements algorithms in explicit
steps. So declarative programming like functional programming generally
uses higher levels of abstractions than imperative programs or OOP. That
is, they’re further away from describing what’s actually happening in
the computer or lower level layers of programming, so i think that
declarative programming like functional programming is too much
abstraction that lacks understanding of the lower level layers of
programming that is also very important to know so that to become
efficient, so i think that this way of too much abstraction or/and too
much centralization of cloud computing like of Amazon or functional
programming and such look like the old way of too much centralization
and too much abstraction of the mainframe computer that was lacking on
efficiency, so then we have to know how to "balance" so that to be
efficient.

More philosophy about functional programming and more..

I think that the Delphi List Monad and the Delphi Maybe Monad that i am
giving below are not slower and they are working correctly.

I think i am smart and i understand the objections of neo-Nazism and
white supremacism, but i think that neo-nazis and white supremacists are
not thinking correctly, because there way of thinking there racial
superiority is not the correct way simply because they are not taking
correctly into account the exponential progress of our humanity,
since i am convinced that with this exponential progress of our humanity
we will soon (in about 20 years or 30 years from now) be able to enhance
much more our genetics and become much more smart
or much more beautiful and we will soon be able to do much more
than that because we will soon become so powerful because of this
exponential progress of our humanity, so this is why i am not in
accordance with white supremacism and neo-nazism since they have to
adapt to this exponential progress of our humanity.

More philosophy about the exponential progress and about artificial
intelligence..

I think i am smart and i think that we are going to become so powerful
soon, i mean that this exponential progress of our humanity is an
amazing thing, and i think that with this exponential progress,
artificial intelligence too will soon become so powerful soon, so i
think that the most important thing now is not to ask if we are going to
become so powerful soon, but the most important thing it is that we have
to ensure high "safety" or high "reliability" of this process of
becoming so powerful by for example being a sophisticated philosophy.
And i invite you to look at the following video so that to understand
this exponential progress of our humanity: