Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

There is no sin but ignorance. -- Christopher Marlowe


interests / soc.culture.china / More about neo-Nazism and white supremacism..

SubjectAuthor
o More about neo-Nazism and white supremacism..World90

1
More about neo-Nazism and white supremacism..

<s91mvp$ur2$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=2368&group=soc.culture.china#2368

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: m...@m.com (World90)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: More about neo-Nazism and white supremacism..
Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 23:59:52 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 273
Message-ID: <s91mvp$ur2$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 03:59:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4105b0fadee8fc04b598d7585420525c";
logging-data="31586"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19krc1AU1lEX+bSRFAsJxCSaz+R+w5N8P4="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.10.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:T8bqDOEiEzaG1vTNUh/NWT9orwM=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.eternal-september.org:119
 by: World90 - Mon, 31 May 2021 03:59 UTC

Hello,

More about neo-Nazism and white supremacism..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many
scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart and i understand the objections of neo-Nazism and
white supremacism, but i think that neo-nazis and white supremacists are
not thinking correctly, because there way of thinking there racial
superiority is not the correct way simply because they are not taking
correctly into account the exponential progress of our humanity,
since i am convinced that with this exponential progress of our humanity
we will soon (in about 20 years or 30 years from now) be able to enhance
much more our genetics and become much more smart
or much more beautiful and we will soon be able to do much more
than that because we will soon become so powerful because of this
exponential progress of our humanity, so this is why i am not in
accordance with white supremacism and neo-nazism since they have to
adapt to this exponential progress of our humanity.

More philosophy about China and Russia..

I think that China and Russia have not to make wars, since i think
that the best way is that they have to manage correctly this exponential
progress of our humanity that will make us soon so powerful, by being
high safety and high reliability, so i think that making wars is so
archaic today, so we have not to make wars.

More philosophy about the exponential progress and about artificial
intelligence..

I think i am smart and i am really "happy" since i think that we are
going to become so powerful soon, i mean that this exponential progress
of our humanity is an amazing thing, and i think that with this
exponential progress, artificial intelligence too will soon become so
powerful soon, so i think that the most important thing now is not to
ask if we are going to become so powerful soon, but the most important
thing it is that we have to ensure high "safety" or high "reliability"
of this process of becoming so powerful by for example being a
sophisticated philosophy. And i invite you to look at the following
video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s

More philosophy about artificial intelligence and about the objective
function that guides..

I think i am smart, and i have quickly thought about the objective
function of artificial intelligence that guides, so the important
philosophical question in artificial intelligence is:

Is general artificial intelligence possible and what is the the
objective function that guides general artificial intelligence ?

I think that the objective function of general artificial intelligence
is not the same as a gradient descent with wich we optimize, since i
think that the objective function in artificial intelligence is
that we have to build like a model that approximate the result
of the reality, i mean that the objective function of general artificial
intelligence has to be that we measure the meaning with the previous
meanings from the data, and this way we approximate the meaning, so we
have to build much more meanings and meaning from the data and we have
to measure the unknown meaning with the previous meanings and if it
doesn't approximate well, so it is like a baby that doesn't know about
the meaning and it can become a dangerous environment for the baby like
for general artificial intelligence, and my way is also valid in a
distributed environment with many artifical intelligence robots, so i
think that the more localized artificial intelligence will become
incrementally and rapidly a more and more generalized artificial
intelligence that can approximate a general artificial intelligence, so
i think that general artificial intelligence is possible.

More philosophy about Swarm intelligence and about the too much
abstraction and more..

I invite you to read about Swarm intelligence here:

How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter

https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/

I think that humanity is using "specialization" and the "division" of
labour that reduces complexity so that to be efficient, so our evolution
looks like Swarm intelligence algorithms, since Swarm intelligence
algorithms also have to both explore with a bigger size of the
population of the Swarm intelligence algorithms and have to do
exploitation so that to reduce complexity and be efficient, and this
bigger size of of the population in Swarm intelligence algorithms that
explore is the division of labour that we use and it is also a
specialization and it looks like a divide and conquer algorithms, since
notice in the mergesort algorithm that we are reducing the time
complexity from for example a time complexity of an n^2 sorting
algorithm to n*log(n), and you are noticing it clearly since the
mergesort algorithm reduces much more the time complexity by recursively
"dividing" the array of elements so that to obtain a small arrays that
are already sorted(or we can sort the small arrays of 10 elements by
using an algorithm of sorting of n^2 and it will be more efficient), and
notice that when we obtain those small arrays that are already sorted,
it is what reduces the complexity and brings much more efficiency, since
we are recursively using the merge algorithm after that, and notice that
the mergesort is also like Swarm intelligence since when we recursively
divide and obtain the already sorted arrays, notice that this
recursively dividing leads to many already sorted arrays, and it is like
the bigger size of the population in Swarm intelligence that explore and
that leads to high efficiency, so i think that artificial
intelligence must be like a divide and conquer algorithm, so you divide
like in a Divide and conquer algorithm so that to obtain a high quality
or high efficiency since you reduce complexity, so it looks
like PathNet in artificial intelligence, read my following thoughts
about it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/BKGvkTI5FY4

More philosophy about black box models and too much abstraction..

I think that black box models in AI in deep learning etc. are also too
much abstraction, and speaking about the too much abstraction, i invite
you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy about Liberalism of
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/-UEOsak12mM

So as you are noticing from my thoughts in the above web link that the
economic Liberalism of Adam Smith is a too reductionist system that is
too much abstraction that doesn't work correctly and i am explaining it
in my thoughts above of my philosophy, other than that notice that
economic Liberalism of Adam Smith is not even taking into account an
important factor that i am speaking about in my below thoughts and it is
the too much abstraction that can happen in economy and that can lead to
inefficiency, so as you are noticing that this too much abstraction can
not be based on monopolistic practices, but it can lead to inefficiency,
i mean for example when you abstract too much, the others can not be
able of understanding sufficiently and correctly the inside or the
behind of your abstraction, so they can "lack" understanding and be
inefficient, so we have to be careful about cloud computing of Amazon
and such that can become a too much abstraction that leads to this kind
of inefficiency, so i think it is too much abstraction if you program
the software in a too high level way lacking programming and
understanding of the lower level ways of programming.

More philosophy about abstraction and the Divide and Conquer methodology..

I think that humanity is abstracting much more with cloud computing and
with functional programming and such, but since i think i am a
philosopher, there is a question in philosophy and it is the following:

Is abstraction always good ?

I think that abstraction comes with disadvantages and advantages,
so the best way is to know how to balance, it is like balancing between
Evolutionary design with an agile discipline and Planned design since
they both come with disadvantages and advantages, so abstraction can
come with disadvantages like the disadvantage that i am speaking about
below, since functional programming has the tendency to much more
move the data between a memory region and another memory region, and it
is inefficient, so i think that we have to take it into account and know
how to balance between abstraction and performance or speed, also
abstraction comes with another important disadvantage , and it is
that it can become a monopolistic practice, i mean that when you
abstract, the others can become too dependent on your abstraction and
they can not understand the inside of the abstraction,
so they can become inefficient, so we have to be careful about
abstraction since too much abstraction is not good, so i think that
functional programming is too much abstraction and i think Chapel
is too much abstraction, read here more about Chapel:


Click here to read the complete article

interests / soc.culture.china / More about neo-Nazism and white supremacism..

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor