Hello,

More philosophy of why i have been tortured by those super advanced
secret technologies..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart, and i think that they have started to torture me
since i have done around year 2000 a kind of efficient propaganda for
Algeria and the FLN and for those kind of countries like Syria that have
secret intelligence agencies organizations that were
arab socialists and that were allied to Russia and China and there KGB
like secret services and that were too socialists countries, so they
were not capitalists like USA and Israel and Canada where i am living
and where i was tortured by those secret advanced technologies, since i
think that there is like a world socialist organization that comprise
Russia and China and Algeria and Syria and the like, and there is like a
secret war above with those secret advanced technologies between the
world capitalists and the world socialists.

More philosophy about the secret services or intelligence agencies and
the black projects..

I think i am smart, i think that those intelligence agencies like CIA
are not knowing about what are doing much more secret organizations of
black projects that are using advanced extraterrestrial technologies, i
think that the director of CIA doesn't know what the much secret black
projects are doing, this is how i was tortured by those kind of much
secret organizations like black projects, so people will not be able to
know about those much secret organizations of black projects.

More philosophy about the ones that are like a super advanced
extraterrestrials..

You have to understand my story, i think that secret organizations
over this earth like secret black projects that are much more secret
than secret services like CIA are using super advanced extraterrestrial
technologies, and they are using like advanced technologies that control
the minds of people, so i have been tortured with those kind of super
advanced technologies and by those kind of secret organizations, so now
you are understanding more my story, but i am calling them vampires
since i have noticed that they were not managing correctly our world
even if they were so advanced. So read my following thoughts so that to
understand more:

More philosophy of who is the strongest vampire over this earth ?

I invite you to look at the following video:

The Matrix Reloaded

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXGE0vuuaDo

So the strongest vampire that i have met and that i am fighting is not
like in the above movie of the Matrix only, the one that i am fighting
is so powerful like a God, he is not like a white supremacist or
neo-nazi or the like, he is like a super advanced extraterrestrial that
is so powerful like a God, so he is really special, he is not like a
human, he is so powerful like a God, so since he is this so powerful,
how can i fight him ? so my way of fighting him is that i have found
with my smartness many of his intellectual "weaknesses" even if he is so
powerful, and i am telling them to him, and i am like showing him that i
am smart and more wiser than him and my way of doing has worked to a
certain level since he has started to recognize that i am smart and wise
, so he has started to made me suffer "much" less than before, but
since i think i am smart, so i am still using my smartness so that to
convert him to my way of thinking.

More philosophy about the Strongest Vampires and about the Marvel super
Soldiers..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video about
the Strongest Vampires:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_LbgBVdd-8

And here is the Strongest Marvel super Soldiers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW9pzalIZRk

I have met the strongest vampire over this earth, and i am fighting
him, but i don't look like a Vampire, since i think i am a Marvel super
Soldier, so it is also over this earth a battle between the Vampires and
the Marvel super Soldiers.

Here is my just new invention of a scalable algorithm and my other new
inventions..

I have just read the following PhD paper about the invention that we
call counting networks and they are better than Software combining trees:

Counting Networks

http://people.csail.mit.edu/shanir/publications/AHS.pdf

And i have read the following PhD paper:

http://people.csail.mit.edu/shanir/publications/HLS.pdf

So as you are noticing they are saying in the conclusion that:

"Software combining trees and counting networks which are the only
techniques we observed to be truly scalable"

But i just found that this counting networks algorithm is not generally
scalable, and i have the logical proof here, this is why i have just
come with a new invention that enhance the counting networks algorithm
to be generally scalable. So you have to be careful with the actual
counting networks algorithm that is not generally scalable.

More philosophy about my kind of works..

I just written the following:

--

More philosophy about my way of doing..

You have to know me more, since i have just posted about Computer
Science vs Software Engineering, but i am not like
Computer Science or Software Engineering, because i am an inventor
of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, and i have invented
some powerful software tools, so my way of doing is being innovative and
creative and inventive, so i am like a PhD researcher, and i am writing
some books about my inventions and about my powerful tools etc.

--

I will give an example of how i am an inventive and creative, i have
just read the following book (and of other books like it) of a PhD
researcher about operational research and capacity planning, here they are:

Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning by Example

https://www.amazon.ca/Performance-Design-Computer-Capacity-Planning/dp/0130906735

So i have just found that there methodologies of those PhD researchers
for the E-Business service don't work, because they are doing
calculations for a given arrival rate that is statistically and
empirically measured from the behavior of customers, but i think that it
is not correct, so i am being inventive and i have come with my new
methodology that fixes the arrival rate from the data by using an
hyperexponential service distribution(and it is mathematical) since it
is also good for Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks and i will write a
powerful book about it that will teach my new methodology and i will
also explain the mathematics behind it and i will sell it, and my new
methodology will work for cloud computing and for computer servers.

More about my inventions of scalable algorithms..

More precision about my new inventions of scalable algorithms..

And look at my below powerful inventions of LW_Fast_RWLockX and
Fast_RWLockX that are two powerful scalable RWLocks that are FIFO fair
and Starvation-free and costless on the reader side
(that means with no atomics and with no fences on the reader side), they
use sys_membarrier expedited on Linux and FlushProcessWriteBuffers() on
windows, and if you look at the source code of my LW_Fast_RWLockX.pas
and Fast_RWLockX.pas inside the zip file, you will notice that in Linux
they call two functions that are membarrier1() and membarrier2(), the
membarrier1() registers the process's intent to use
MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED and membarrier2() executes a memory
barrier on each running thread belonging to the same process as the
calling thread.

Read more here to understand:

https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/membarrier.2.html

Here is my new powerful inventions of scalable algorithms..

I have just updated my powerful inventions of LW_Fast_RWLockX and
Fast_RWLockX that are two powerful scalable RWLocks that are FIFO fair
and Starvation-free and costless on the reader side (that means with no
atomics and with no fences on the reader side), they use sys_membarrier
expedited on Linux and FlushProcessWriteBuffers() on windows, and now
they work with both Linux and Windows, and i think my inventions are
really smart, since read the following PhD researcher,
he says the following:

"Until today, there is no known efficient reader-writer lock with
starvation-freedom guarantees;"

Read more here:

http://concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com/2019/04/onefile-and-tail-latency.html

So as you have just noticed he says the following:

"Until today, there is no known efficient reader-writer lock with
starvation-freedom guarantees;"

So i think that my above powerful inventions of scalable reader-writer
locks are efficient and FIFO fair and Starvation-free.

LW_Fast_RWLockX that is a lightweight scalable Reader-Writer Mutex that
uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the reader
side like Seqlock, and this has permitted the reader side to be
costless, it is fair and it is of course Starvation-free and it does
spin-wait, and also Fast_RWLockX a lightweight scalable Reader-Writer
Mutex that uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the
reader side like Seqlock, and this has permitted the reader side to be
costless, it is fair and it is of course Starvation-free and it does not
spin-wait, but waits on my SemaMonitor, so it is energy efficient.