Hello,

Read again, i correct about more philosophy about the invisible hand and
regulation of Adam Smith philosophy..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith and The Invisible Hand Theory:

Adam Smith and The Invisible Hand Theory

https://medium.com/@awhunt1002/adam-smith-and-the-invisible-hand-theory-8f992b73b71a

So as you are noticing that it says that in economic Liberalism of Adam
Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not
lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and
self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, but i think i am a philosopher and i think that
there is something missing in the economic Liberalism of Adam Smith, and
it is the way of doing of my philosophy that i call economic Coopetition
that "diversify" much better the products and services that are
regulated by self-interest and competition and that's much better for
"creativity", since we can notice that we even need economic actors that
share ideas across nations and industries (and this needs globalization)
that make us much more creative and that's good for economy, so i invite
you to read my previous following thoughts so that to understand my
philosophy:

More philosophy about the invisible hand and regulation of Adam Smith
philosophy..

I invite you to read the following about Adam Smith philosophy:

The Role of Self-Interest and Competition in a Market Economy

https://www.stlouisfed.org/education/economic-lowdown-podcast-series/episode-3-the-role-of-self-interest-and-competition-in-a-market-economy

So as you are noticing that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith has
brought his philosophy of economic Liberalism, but notice in the above
webpage that Adam Smith described the opposing, but complementary forces
of self-interest and competition as the invisible hand, it means that
while producers and consumers are not acting with the intent of serving
the needs of others or society, they do, since when you work, your goal
is to earn money, but in the process you provide a valuable good or
service that benefits others and society, so it is the basis
of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is the engine of
the properity and happiness of nations", but i think i am a philosopher
and i don't agree with Adam Smith philosophy since we can notice
that we even need economic actors that share ideas across nations and
industries(and that needs the globalization phenomenon) that make us
much more creative and that's good for economy, so this shows
that my new way of my philosophy that i call Coopetition is required, so
i invite you to read about it in my below thoughts and writing:

More philosophy about economic Liberalism and about our world..

I think i am a philosopher and i will invite you to look at the
following video:

L'EFFONDREMENT POLITIQUE QUI VIENT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJVbSHdttbY

I think that the above video is too pessimistic, but i am a philosopher
that is optimistic, since i think that social-liberalism of President
Emmanuel Macron government and of the Democrats in USA must be
understood more, and what i really mean is that the economic Liberalism
of social-liberalism is understanding the benefits of economic
cooperation and collaboration, so in reality we can say that the actors
in economy are not just actors of economic Liberalism that believe in
Adam Smith philosophy about economy of: "Human egoism is the engine of
the properity and happiness of nations", so then notice that in reality
there is like a tendency of seeking like a balance between cooperation
or collaboration and competition and its egoism, so you can quickly
notice it by the fact that today there is also economic actors like of
Open source hardwares(like with the Open source RISC-V) and of Open
source or free softwares and of actors that share ideas across nations
and industries(and that needs the globalization phenomenon) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, so i am also very
optimistic about our world, since our humanity is progressing in an
exponential way, and data and information in internet is growing in an
exponential way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by
the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and
democratization of information, and economies of scale resulted in the
most affordable price of any product for the consumer without the
manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies of scale
needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming much
more powerful and efficient.

More philosophy about Adam Smith and about Liberalism..

I think i am a philosopher and i will talk more about my philosophy:

I invite you to read the following about Emmanuel Macron's initial
political positions:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Ffr.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPositions_politiques_d%2527Emmanuel_Macron

So as you notice that Emmanuel Macron is a social-liberal like the
american Democrats in USA, so notice that they believe in economic
Liberalism of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith that said about
economy the following:

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

So Adam Smith justifies the pursuit of self-interest and egoism in
economy, but i think i am a sophisticated philosopher and i don't
agree with Adam Smith, since my new way of doing in economy is called
Coopetition not Liberalism, my new way of doing is called Coopetition
since it seeks like a balance between cooperation (or collaboration) and
competition, so i am taking the first four letters of cooperation and i
am taking the six last letters of competition and both
of them compose the name of my new way of doing in economy that is
called Coopetition, since i also think that Liberalism is too much
violence since it is based on competition and egoism, so i think that my
Coopetition is the right balance that avoids this too much violence of
Liberalism, also i think that my Coopetition is more efficient for
creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, and
here is also how i am explaining it:

More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and
cooperation..

I invite you to look at the following video:

Why is Communism So Appealing?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc

I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different,
and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in
my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that
"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"
and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation
come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from
ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they
need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism
that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not
circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so
my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between
competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also
collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and
sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my
new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts:

More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called
Adam Smith..

I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith:

ADAM SMITH - La main invisible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk

You can read about Adam Smith here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith

I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the
following(you
can listen to it in the above video):

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new
philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between
collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes
from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity
not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating
and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization),
so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration
and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD
papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new
philosophy and model:

My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the
far-right and nationalism.

So the first philosophical question is how to talk about
those above ideologies?

I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am
smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when
you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ
test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect
the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see
clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the
abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following: