Hello,

More philosophy about economic Liberalism and about our world..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am a philosopher and i will invite you to look at the
following video:

L'EFFONDREMENT POLITIQUE QUI VIENT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJVbSHdttbY

I think that the above video is too pessimistic, but i am a philosopher
that is optimistic, since i think that social-liberalism of President
Emmanuel Macron government and of the Democrats in USA must be
understood more, and what i really mean is that the economic Liberalism
of social-liberalism is understanding the benefits of economic
cooperation and collaboration, so in reality we can say that the actors
in economy are not just actors of economic Liberalism that believes in
Adam Smith philosophy about economy of: "Human egoism is the engine of
the properity and happiness of nations", so then in reality there is
like a tendency of seeking like a balance between cooperation or
collaboration and competition and its egoism, so you can quickly notice
it by the fact that today there is also economic actors like of Open
source hardwares(like with the Open source Risc) and of Open source or
free softwares and of actors that share ideas across nations and
industries(and that needs the globalization phenomenon) that makes us
more creative and that's good for economy, so i am also very optimistic
about our world, since our humanity is progressing in an exponential
way, and data and information in internet is growing in an exponential
way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by the
democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and
democratization of information, and economies of scale resulted in the
most affordable price of any product for the consumer without the
manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies of scale
needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming much
more powerful and efficient.

More philosophy about Adam Smith and about Liberalism..

I think i am a philosopher and i will talk more about my philosophy:

I invite you to read the following about Emmanuel Macron's initial
political positions:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Ffr.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPositions_politiques_d%2527Emmanuel_Macron

So as you notice that Emmanuel Macron is a social-liberal like the
american Democrats in USA, so notice that they believe in economic
Liberalism of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith that said about
economy the following:

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

So Adam Smith justifies the pursuit of self-interest and egoism in
economy, but i think i am a sophisticated philosopher and i don't
agree with Adam Smith, since my new way of doing in economy is called
Coopetition not Liberalism, my new way of doing is called Coopetition
since it seeks like a balance between cooperation (or collaboration) and
competition, so i am taking the first four letters of cooperation and i
am taking the six last letters of competition and both
of them compose the name of my new way of doing in economy that is
called Coopetition, since i also think that Liberalism is too much
violence since it is based on competition and egoism, so i think that my
Coopetition is the right balance that avoids this too much violence of
Liberalism, also i think that my Coopetition is more efficient for
creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, and
here is also how i am explaining it:

More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and
cooperation..

I invite you to look at the following video:

Why is Communism So Appealing?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc

I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different,
and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in
my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that
"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"
and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation
come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from
ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they
need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism
that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not
circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so
my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between
competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also
collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and
sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my
new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts:

More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called
Adam Smith..

I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith:

ADAM SMITH - La main invisible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk

You can read about Adam Smith here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith

I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the
following(you
can listen to it in the above video):

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new
philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between
collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes
from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity
not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating
and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization),
so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration
and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD
papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new
philosophy and model:

My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the
far-right and nationalism.

So the first philosophical question is how to talk about
those above ideologies?

I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am
smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when
you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ
test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect
the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see
clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the
abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following:

Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial
intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is
what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization)
there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and
there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read
about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not
balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge
to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal
convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation
and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge
to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration
and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy
like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism
that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like
seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that
guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above
ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local
optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much
competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by
logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in
PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following:

Read the following article about economic nationalism:

Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications

https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/

Notice that it says the following:

"Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit,
becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is
counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more
nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly
interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries
for their economic and political and national security well being. When
companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are
more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and
otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad
policy."