Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

You will be the last person to buy a Chrysler.


interests / alt.usage.english / Re: don't leave a single, solitary thing beautiful

SubjectAuthor
* Re: don't leave a single, solitary thing beautifulHibou
`- Re: don't leave a single, solitary thing beautifulBebercito

1
Re: don't leave a single, solitary thing beautiful

<uq7dju$33jrv$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=202803&group=alt.usage.english#202803

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: vpaereru...@yahoo.com.invalid (Hibou)
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
Subject: Re: don't leave a single, solitary thing beautiful
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 08:54:22 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <uq7dju$33jrv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <fb9ca446-5f24-4c90-923e-0d33c537f8f3n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 08:54:22 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7084a4bc06ad123ab821efa80f91ed1";
logging-data="3264383"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19XIRXbjrJra+2gc7u/JsOt"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bmsSC/bF3LZc8JWuyBp8LOuT9Xw=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <fb9ca446-5f24-4c90-923e-0d33c537f8f3n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Hibou - Sat, 10 Feb 2024 08:54 UTC

Le 10/02/2024 à 04:44, arthurvv vart a écrit :
>
> Franny said. “If you're a poet, you do something beautiful. I mean you're
> supposed to leave something beautiful after you get off the page and
> everything. The ones you're talking about don't leave a single, solitary thing
> beautiful.
>
> From "Franny and Zooey" by J.D> Salinger
>
> https://www.google.com/books/edition/Franny_and_Zooey/jaSiDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=franny+and+zooey+%22thing+beautiful%22&pg=PT17&printsec=frontcover
>
> http://tinyurl.com/mvy6xaj2
>
> I find 'a single. solitary thing beautiful' strange here. It is grammatically
> correct, but doesn't seem to mean what it is supposed to mean.
>
> You create something beautiful and leave it there, therefore you
> leave a beautiful thing. The adjective should precede the noun.
>
> They left no stone unturned.
> They left everything broken.
> He left the TV unrepaired although he was supposed to repair it.
>
> In all these cases, the 'thing' was already there.
>
> If I go somewhere and make something beautiful and leave it there,
> I have left a solitary beautiful thing there.
>
> What do you think?

I think it's dialogue, meant to be realistic and informal. In this
context "single, solitary" is quite natural as a form of emphasis, and
"thing beautiful" natural as an echo of "something beautiful". It's a
wee rhetorical surprise, and so stronger than "beautiful thing".

Re: don't leave a single, solitary thing beautiful

<90aa8ead-0cde-410e-be8e-6066bdd1d71bn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=202828&group=alt.usage.english#202828

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUwFbOxqFCWFH+v43+fbbHF4FsVqf0IwoixVY8d2uR/Reao81D0/1AuRx0QNHXrctanrtuMnFK6HCjggaHaj63y7e3SrW1biG3jwCu0X2823m075dQ5
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1884:b0:68c:e706:6973 with SMTP id cx4-20020a056214188400b0068ce7066973mr165949qvb.13.1707592504868;
Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:15:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW7D6xpDtmpozKjIZlyXJHaaMhvczN6XYIrQ91ugyjyJ/FbHbKagzQtgIOD9skH0f6+ddFFLZplsLclYcYHP1/wTv1fVaaGBQ3WYDwwKFxbY96rng==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:310b:b0:6e2:c370:6eca with SMTP id
b11-20020a056830310b00b006e2c3706ecamr22752ots.7.1707592504586; Sat, 10 Feb
2024 11:15:04 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:15:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <uq7dju$33jrv$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a01:e0a:ab8:8630:1818:e81:a0db:a785;
posting-account=iXFtuQoAAACf6-We4FJmsBUwGjyuQKj5
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a01:e0a:ab8:8630:1818:e81:a0db:a785
References: <fb9ca446-5f24-4c90-923e-0d33c537f8f3n@googlegroups.com> <uq7dju$33jrv$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <90aa8ead-0cde-410e-be8e-6066bdd1d71bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: don't leave a single, solitary thing beautiful
From: beberc...@aol.com (Bebercito)
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:15:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 3291
 by: Bebercito - Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:15 UTC

Le samedi 10 février 2024 à 09:54:27 UTC+1, Hibou a écrit :
> Le 10/02/2024 à 04:44, arthurvv vart a écrit :
> >
> > Franny said. “If you're a poet, you do something beautiful. I mean you're
> > supposed to leave something beautiful after you get off the page and
> > everything. The ones you're talking about don't leave a single, solitary thing
> > beautiful.
> >
> > From "Franny and Zooey" by J.D> Salinger
> >
> > https://www.google.com/books/edition/Franny_and_Zooey/jaSiDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=franny+and+zooey+%22thing+beautiful%22&pg=PT17&printsec=frontcover
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/mvy6xaj2
> >
> > I find 'a single. solitary thing beautiful' strange here. It is grammatically
> > correct, but doesn't seem to mean what it is supposed to mean.
> >
> > You create something beautiful and leave it there, therefore you
> > leave a beautiful thing. The adjective should precede the noun.
> >
> > They left no stone unturned.
> > They left everything broken.
> > He left the TV unrepaired although he was supposed to repair it.
> >
> > In all these cases, the 'thing' was already there.
> >
> > If I go somewhere and make something beautiful and leave it there,
> > I have left a solitary beautiful thing there.
> >
> > What do you think?
> I think it's dialogue, meant to be realistic and informal. In this
> context "single, solitary" is quite natural as a form of emphasis, and
> "thing beautiful" natural as an echo of "something beautiful".

+1

> It's a wee rhetorical surprise,

An "anastrophe".

> and so stronger than "beautiful thing".


interests / alt.usage.english / Re: don't leave a single, solitary thing beautiful

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor