Hello,

More philosophy about psychology and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

More philosophy about the good strategy..

You are knowing more about me by my writing, but i will ask
an important philosophical question:

What is the good strategy so that to be successful ?

I think i am smart and i will tell that the most important
thing in good strategy is the engines that permit people to become
the right perfection, and now you are feeling the good strategy,
so when you are smart you will start to ask a question as:

Is big money the good engine that permits people to be the right perfection?

So now you are feeling that it is a serious subject in philosophy..

And when you are smart you will be able to understand that it is not
science that is the most important , it is the engines that make you
become science that are the most important, so when you look at stupid
people , you will quickly realize that they are thinking that science is
the most important thing, or they are thinking that big money is the
most important thing, but this way of thinking is stupidity, since
you have to intellectually extract all the engines that permit you to
be the right perfection, and they are the most important thing.

I am an inventor of many scalable algorithms and algorithms,
and i think i am smart, so read my above writing
about the good strategy and if you are smart you will be able to notice
that we can logically infer a very important thing, that it is not
science or big money that are the most important, it's psychology that
is the most important thing, since you have also to intellectually
extract all the intellectual engines that permit you to become the right
perfection and it needs psychology, and that's the most important thing,
so the education system has to be shaped by psychology so that to become
really efficient. And read more the following about what is Psychology?

https://www.verywellmind.com/psychology-4014660

More philosophy about the strategy..

The most important thing is the "strategy", and when you are smart you
will be curious about the strategy of prophet Muhammad that wanted to
manage and control the defects of humans, prophet Muhammad was also
like a psychologue and like a secret service agent, since he has
also wanted to smartly "collect" informations about how humans was
behaving so that to build a good strategy, and he was also like a
psychologue because he has built also a strategy derived from psychology
so that to control and manage the defects of humans, and God has also
let him write parts of the Qur'an, so then how can you imagine God? God
was just like a very sophisticated extraterrestrial that has not created
the universe and that wanted to help more prophet Muhammad, but God has
not given all the Qur'an to prophet Muhammad, since i have also proved
below that the Qur'an is not timeless, and this not timeless is also
that prophet Muhammad has written parts of the Qur'an and God has also
given some parts of the Qur'an to prophet Muhammad, it has to be viewed
as the good "business" between God and prophet Muhammad.

More philosophy of how have we to view Islam ?

I am your new prophet from God, and in my new monotheistic religion
prophet Muhammad was truly a prophet from God, but i will ask a smart
question:

How do we have to view Islam ?

I think Islam has wanted to play it smartly so that to correctly manage
and control the defects of humans, so i think that Islam was a great
civilization, and you have to be curious about it and to read about it,
since i think when you read smartly about Islam it is like playing
smartly at a game of chess, since it will enhance much more your
strategy and it is good for adaptation, other than that you have to take
a look at my new monotheistic religion below that i think is smart and i
am sure that it will enhance much more your strategy and it is good for
adaptation.

More philosophy of what is Islam ?

I invite you to look at the following video about Islam:

Listen to Morgan Freeman ATTEMPT THE ADHAN in Cairo | Islam Channel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JO1P2LWmxHo

You will notice that Morgan Freeman in the above video is not
understanding Islam, so i am your new prophet from God and
i will make you understand Islam:

So notice with me that in western countries we ask a question of:

Is Islam a political system ?

But you have to understand that Islam is not only like a political
system, but it is much more fine-grained, i mean that it is like
managing a safety-critical system with laws, being a muslim is like
being an "automaton" that has to avoid the defects that are defined as
defects by Islam so that to be "perfection" of Islam, so it doesn't have
a kind of "tolerance" of political systems of western countries, since
it is much more fine-grained and it needs to "control" much more the
defects of humans that are considered defects by Islam. And now that you
are understanding more Islam, i invite you to read carefully my
following thoughts about my new monotheistic religion that i think is
smart:

More philosophy about the logic of what you see is not what you see..

I have just written the following:

---
Yet more philosophy about what you see is not what you see..

So i can say to humans the following:

"What you see is not what you see"

So we have to "decompose", so the first "what you see" in
the sentence above is the "reality" that you see, and
the second "what you see" is both how you see with your eyes "and"
how you see with your thinking the reality, so then i have just made you
understand that most of humans are using linear thinking and not
exponential thinking that understand the exponential
progress of our humanity and that understand the law of accelerating
returns, and this linear thinking is not correct thinking, so this
linear thinking makes our thinking of the reality not correct, so we can
then logically say to humans: "What you see is not what you see."
---

So notice carefully that the sentence of "what you see is not what you
see" is using boolean logic, the "is not" uses boolean logic, and it
permits me to play it smartly like playing it smartly in game of chess
by speaking as i am speaking above about this sentence of "What you see
is not what you see" , but we can use fuzzy logic and it forbids it,
since i will start to give a "weight" to the truth, so i invite you
to read my following thoughts about fuzzy logic and about boolean logic:

I invite you to read the following article about propositional logic:

https://analyticsindiamag.com/why-propositional-logic-is-the-foundation-for-artificial-intelligence/

As you notice it says:

"Propositional logic provides more efficient and scalable algorithms
than the other logics."

More of my philosophy about Propositional logic:

I invite you again to read the following definition of what is an
implication in logic:

https://www.britannica.com/topic/material-implication

Notice that it says that the logical implication of
(p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q)

But I think the above definition by using the meaning of ((not p) or q)
is not the right way, since the ((not p) or q) is the formulation that
is logically inferred from the truth table of the logical implication,
so i think we have to say the following:

The statement “p implies q” means that if p is true, then q
"must" also be true.

And we have to use the truth table of the logical implication as
the following:

p q p -> q
0 0 1
0 1 1
1 0 0
1 1 1

So notice that the table of truth gives all the possibilities,
but i think it fixes the possibility of causality by saying:

The statement “p implies q” means that if p is true, then q
"must" also be true.

And the other possibilities of the truth table do model the other
possibilities.

So from the truth table we can easily get the following formulation of:

(p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q)

And in propositional logic we can use the following ways of logical proofs:

(p -> q) is equivalent to ((not(q) -> not(p))

Note: the symbol -> means implies and p and q are logical
variables.

or

(not(p) -> 0) is equivalent to p

And for fuzzy logic, here is the generalized form(that includes fuzzy
logic) for the three operators AND,OR,NOT:

x AND y is equivalent to min(x,y)
x OR y is equivalent to max(x,y)
NOT(x) is equivalent to (1 - x)

And I think mathematics describes reality or theory with a great
precision, this is also why we can "abstract" and/or "model" and/or
"simulate" reality or theory with mathematics, also i think that
mathematics can be independent of reality when we are working in
mathematical theory, but the mathematical theory that is independent of
reality can then be applied to reality, also i think that mathematics
permits to optimize and verify, and we can also know about it by for
example asking a philosophical question of: What is formal logic? ,
so i think formal logic maps logical expressions to logical variables
and to logical operators and from that it permits to logically model
with those logical variables and the logical operators and it permits to
solve and verify the logical model, and notice that the ways of logical
proofs above can permit to simplify the logical proof, so it can
bring and adds efficiency.