Adolf Hitler may have had Jewish and African ancestors, according to a
recent DNA study by Belgian researchers.

In the decades since Adolf Hitler’s death, the Nazi leader’s ancestry
has been a subject of rampant speculation and intense controversy. Some
have suggested that his father, Alois, born to an unwed woman named
Maria Schickelgruber, was the illegitimate child of Leopold
Frankenberger, a young Jewish man whose family employed her as a maid.
(She subsequently married Johann Georg Hiedler–later spelled
“Hitler”–whose surname her son adopted.) Others have claimed that Alois’
biological father was also the grandfather of Hitler’s mother, Klara
Pözl, making Adolf the product of an incestuous marriage.

To unravel the mystery of the Fuhrer’s roots, the Belgian journalist
Jean-Paul Mulders teamed up with Marc Vermeeren, a historian who has
written extensively about Hitler and his ancestors. The duo collected
saliva samples from 39 of the infamous dictator’s living relatives,
including a great-nephew, Alexander Stuart-Houston, who lives in New
York, and an Austrian cousin identified only as “Norbert H.” Tests were
then conducted to reveal the samples’ principal haplogroups, which are
sets of chromosomes that geneticists use to define specific populations.

Writing in the Flemish-language magazine Knack, Mulders reported that
the relatives’ most dominant haplogroup, known as E1b1b, is rare in
Western Europeans but common among North Africans, and particularly the
Berber tribes of Morocco, Algeria, Libya and Tunisia. It is also one of
the major founding lineages of the Jewish population, present in 18 to
20 percent of Ashkenazi Jews and 8.6 to 30 percent of Sephardic Jews. In
other words, Hitler’s family tree may have included Jewish and African
ancestors.

The tragic irony of the discovery, of course, is that Hitler’s Nazi
regime systematically wiped out an estimated two-thirds of Europe’s
Jewish population between 1933 and 1945. People of African descent were
also considered enemies of the Aryans, whose supposed racial purity and
superiority were central to the “Mein Kampf” author’s lethal rhetoric.
As Mulders put it in the Knack article, “One can from this postulate
that Hitler was related to people whom he despised.”

As part of its continuing quest to pin down the Fuhrer’s heritage, Knack
hopes to conduct DNA tests on a jawbone fragment and piece of
bloodstained cloth retrieved from the Berlin bunker where Hitler
allegedly committed suicide. The Russian government has held these
artifacts in its archives since 1948 and continues to vouch for their
authenticity despite a contradictory 2009 study by American scientists.

Since the publication of the Knack article on August 18, 2010, academics
have been quick to point out that this does not necessarily mean the man
who inspired the Holocaust was either Jewish, African or a combination
of the two. The E1b1b haplogroup runs in other ethnic groups, for
instance, and DNA analysis remains an inexact science. But one thing
about this study’s results is certain, as Ronny Decorte, a geneticist
interviewed by Knack, remarked: “Hitler would not have been pleased.”

BY JENNIE COHEN

https://www.history.com/news/study-suggests-adolf-hitler-had-jewish-and-african-ancestors

On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 at 6:00:01 PM UTC-4, Judith Latham wrote:
> Adolf Hitler may have had Jewish and African ancestors, according to a
> recent DNA study by Belgian researchers.
>
> In the decades since Adolf Hitler’s death, the Nazi leader’s ancestry
> has been a subject of rampant speculation and intense controversy. Some
> have suggested that his father, Alois, born to an unwed woman named
> Maria Schickelgruber, was the illegitimate child of Leopold
> Frankenberger, a young Jewish man whose family employed her as a maid.
> (She subsequently married Johann Georg Hiedler–later spelled
> “Hitler”–whose surname her son adopted.) Others have claimed that Alois’
> biological father was also the grandfather of Hitler’s mother, Klara
> Pözl, making Adolf the product of an incestuous marriage.
>
> To unravel the mystery of the Fuhrer’s roots, the Belgian journalist
> Jean-Paul Mulders teamed up with Marc Vermeeren, a historian who has
> written extensively about Hitler and his ancestors. The duo collected
> saliva samples from 39 of the infamous dictator’s living relatives,
> including a great-nephew, Alexander Stuart-Houston, who lives in New
> York, and an Austrian cousin identified only as “Norbert H.” Tests were
> then conducted to reveal the samples’ principal haplogroups, which are
> sets of chromosomes that geneticists use to define specific populations.
>
> Writing in the Flemish-language magazine Knack, Mulders reported that
> the relatives’ most dominant haplogroup, known as E1b1b, is rare in
> Western Europeans but common among North Africans, and particularly the
> Berber tribes of Morocco, Algeria, Libya and Tunisia. It is also one of
> the major founding lineages of the Jewish population, present in 18 to
> 20 percent of Ashkenazi Jews and 8.6 to 30 percent of Sephardic Jews. In
> other words, Hitler’s family tree may have included Jewish and African
> ancestors.
>
> The tragic irony of the discovery, of course, is that Hitler’s Nazi
> regime systematically wiped out an estimated two-thirds of Europe’s
> Jewish population between 1933 and 1945. People of African descent were
> also considered enemies of the Aryans, whose supposed racial purity and
> superiority were central to the “Mein Kampf” author’s lethal rhetoric.
> As Mulders put it in the Knack article, “One can from this postulate
> that Hitler was related to people whom he despised.”
>
> As part of its continuing quest to pin down the Fuhrer’s heritage, Knack
> hopes to conduct DNA tests on a jawbone fragment and piece of
> bloodstained cloth retrieved from the Berlin bunker where Hitler
> allegedly committed suicide. The Russian government has held these
> artifacts in its archives since 1948 and continues to vouch for their
> authenticity despite a contradictory 2009 study by American scientists.
>
> Since the publication of the Knack article on August 18, 2010, academics
> have been quick to point out that this does not necessarily mean the man
> who inspired the Holocaust was either Jewish, African or a combination
> of the two. The E1b1b haplogroup runs in other ethnic groups, for
> instance, and DNA analysis remains an inexact science. But one thing
> about this study’s results is certain, as Ronny Decorte, a geneticist
> interviewed by Knack, remarked: “Hitler would not have been pleased.”
>
> BY JENNIE COHEN
>
> https://www.history.com/news/study-suggests-adolf-hitler-had-jewish-and-african-ancestors

Hitler has clout, no doubt about it. But it is not his alone. There are many who want to keep the memory of Hitler alive forever, even if they have to make it up. Those benefiting most from the never say die keep Hitler alive forever movement are those who call themselves victims of Hitler even if they have to claw their way back to Holocaust relatives they never knew and probably wouldn't want to know anyway. For some reason people want to keep the memory of Adolphus alive forever - for a variety of reasons, maybe more than I can imagine. I am really sick of people who believe everything they read such as Hitler was a Jew and a vegetarian and believed in astrology and even made national decisions based on his horoscope - all kinds of stuff we're supposed to believe about Hitler. Frankly the topic of Hitler is boring. Although I will admit I like the way the guy dressed and the way he worked a crowd. I also feel he must have had something to offer his people, otherwise they wouldn't have voted for him. He did not come down from outer space to take over the world. He was the leader of a country. Who knows, maybe his country was hemmed in, forced to take action first because they knew what was coming anyway, same as I sometimes suspect Japan bombed Pearl Harbor because it was their only hope knowing an enemy attack was heading their way soon anyway. These are my own concepts of history based on common sense and are therefore superior to most if not all of anything else you might read under that label.

Sieg motha fucking heil

On 6/30/2021 10:32 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 at 6:00:01 PM UTC-4, Judith Latham wrote:
>> Adolf Hitler may have had Jewish and African ancestors, according to a
>> recent DNA study by Belgian researchers.
>>
>> In the decades since Adolf Hitler’s death, the Nazi leader’s ancestry
>> has been a subject of rampant speculation and intense controversy. Some
>> have suggested that his father, Alois, born to an unwed woman named
>> Maria Schickelgruber, was the illegitimate child of Leopold
>> Frankenberger, a young Jewish man whose family employed her as a maid.
>> (She subsequently married Johann Georg Hiedler–later spelled
>> “Hitler”–whose surname her son adopted.) Others have claimed that Alois’
>> biological father was also the grandfather of Hitler’s mother, Klara
>> Pözl, making Adolf the product of an incestuous marriage.
>>
>> To unravel the mystery of the Fuhrer’s roots, the Belgian journalist
>> Jean-Paul Mulders teamed up with Marc Vermeeren, a historian who has
>> written extensively about Hitler and his ancestors. The duo collected
>> saliva samples from 39 of the infamous dictator’s living relatives,
>> including a great-nephew, Alexander Stuart-Houston, who lives in New
>> York, and an Austrian cousin identified only as “Norbert H.” Tests were
>> then conducted to reveal the samples’ principal haplogroups, which are
>> sets of chromosomes that geneticists use to define specific populations.
>>
>> Writing in the Flemish-language magazine Knack, Mulders reported that
>> the relatives’ most dominant haplogroup, known as E1b1b, is rare in
>> Western Europeans but common among North Africans, and particularly the
>> Berber tribes of Morocco, Algeria, Libya and Tunisia. It is also one of
>> the major founding lineages of the Jewish population, present in 18 to
>> 20 percent of Ashkenazi Jews and 8.6 to 30 percent of Sephardic Jews. In
>> other words, Hitler’s family tree may have included Jewish and African
>> ancestors.
>>
>> The tragic irony of the discovery, of course, is that Hitler’s Nazi
>> regime systematically wiped out an estimated two-thirds of Europe’s
>> Jewish population between 1933 and 1945. People of African descent were
>> also considered enemies of the Aryans, whose supposed racial purity and
>> superiority were central to the “Mein Kampf” author’s lethal rhetoric.
>> As Mulders put it in the Knack article, “One can from this postulate
>> that Hitler was related to people whom he despised.”
>>
>> As part of its continuing quest to pin down the Fuhrer’s heritage, Knack
>> hopes to conduct DNA tests on a jawbone fragment and piece of
>> bloodstained cloth retrieved from the Berlin bunker where Hitler
>> allegedly committed suicide. The Russian government has held these
>> artifacts in its archives since 1948 and continues to vouch for their
>> authenticity despite a contradictory 2009 study by American scientists.
>>
>> Since the publication of the Knack article on August 18, 2010, academics
>> have been quick to point out that this does not necessarily mean the man
>> who inspired the Holocaust was either Jewish, African or a combination
>> of the two. The E1b1b haplogroup runs in other ethnic groups, for
>> instance, and DNA analysis remains an inexact science. But one thing
>> about this study’s results is certain, as Ronny Decorte, a geneticist
>> interviewed by Knack, remarked: “Hitler would not have been pleased.”
>>
>> BY JENNIE COHEN
>>
>> https://www.history.com/news/study-suggests-adolf-hitler-had-jewish-and-african-ancestors
>
>
> Hitler has clout, no doubt about it. But it is not his alone. There are many who want to keep the memory of Hitler alive forever, even if they have to make it up. Those benefiting most from the never say die keep Hitler alive forever movement are those who call themselves victims of Hitler even if they have to claw their way back to Holocaust relatives they never knew and probably wouldn't want to know anyway. For some reason people want to keep the memory of Adolphus alive forever - for a variety of reasons, maybe more than I can imagine. I am really sick of people who believe everything they read such as Hitler was a Jew and a vegetarian and believed in astrology and even made national decisions based on his horoscope - all kinds of stuff we're supposed to believe about Hitler. Frankly the topic of Hitler is boring. Although I will admit I like the way the guy dressed and the way he worked a crowd. I also feel he must have had something to offer his people, otherwise they wouldn't have voted for him. He did not come down from outer space to take over the world. He was the leader of a country. Who knows, maybe his country was hemmed in, forced to take action first because they knew what was coming anyway, same as I sometimes suspect Japan bombed Pearl Harbor because it was their only hope knowing an enemy attack was heading their way soon anyway. These are my own concepts of history based on common sense and are therefore superior to most if not all of anything else you might read under that label.
>
> Sieg motha fucking heil
>
I have no interest in his politics, My only interest in Adolph Hitler
was his indulgence in the arts. Twice the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna
rejected his application, but as any serious student of fine art will
attest, Hitler was his generation's Van Gogh. View the link provided to
witness some of his work. I can see where people would think he was a
Jew (creativity) or a negro (flare)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paintings_by_Adolf_Hitler#:~:text=History-,Artistic%20ambition,1907%20and%20again%20in%201908.

On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 at 11:32:25 PM UTC-4, Judith Latham wrote:
> On 6/30/2021 10:32 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 at 6:00:01 PM UTC-4, Judith Latham wrote:
> >> Adolf Hitler may have had Jewish and African ancestors, according to a
> >> recent DNA study by Belgian researchers.
> >>
> >> In the decades since Adolf Hitler’s death, the Nazi leader’s ancestry
> >> has been a subject of rampant speculation and intense controversy. Some
> >> have suggested that his father, Alois, born to an unwed woman named
> >> Maria Schickelgruber, was the illegitimate child of Leopold
> >> Frankenberger, a young Jewish man whose family employed her as a maid.
> >> (She subsequently married Johann Georg Hiedler–later spelled
> >> “Hitler”–whose surname her son adopted.) Others have claimed that Alois’
> >> biological father was also the grandfather of Hitler’s mother, Klara
> >> Pözl, making Adolf the product of an incestuous marriage.
> >>
> >> To unravel the mystery of the Fuhrer’s roots, the Belgian journalist
> >> Jean-Paul Mulders teamed up with Marc Vermeeren, a historian who has
> >> written extensively about Hitler and his ancestors. The duo collected
> >> saliva samples from 39 of the infamous dictator’s living relatives,
> >> including a great-nephew, Alexander Stuart-Houston, who lives in New
> >> York, and an Austrian cousin identified only as “Norbert H.” Tests were
> >> then conducted to reveal the samples’ principal haplogroups, which are
> >> sets of chromosomes that geneticists use to define specific populations.
> >>
> >> Writing in the Flemish-language magazine Knack, Mulders reported that
> >> the relatives’ most dominant haplogroup, known as E1b1b, is rare in
> >> Western Europeans but common among North Africans, and particularly the
> >> Berber tribes of Morocco, Algeria, Libya and Tunisia. It is also one of
> >> the major founding lineages of the Jewish population, present in 18 to
> >> 20 percent of Ashkenazi Jews and 8.6 to 30 percent of Sephardic Jews. In
> >> other words, Hitler’s family tree may have included Jewish and African
> >> ancestors.
> >>
> >> The tragic irony of the discovery, of course, is that Hitler’s Nazi
> >> regime systematically wiped out an estimated two-thirds of Europe’s
> >> Jewish population between 1933 and 1945. People of African descent were
> >> also considered enemies of the Aryans, whose supposed racial purity and
> >> superiority were central to the “Mein Kampf” author’s lethal rhetoric.
> >> As Mulders put it in the Knack article, “One can from this postulate
> >> that Hitler was related to people whom he despised.”
> >>
> >> As part of its continuing quest to pin down the Fuhrer’s heritage, Knack
> >> hopes to conduct DNA tests on a jawbone fragment and piece of
> >> bloodstained cloth retrieved from the Berlin bunker where Hitler
> >> allegedly committed suicide. The Russian government has held these
> >> artifacts in its archives since 1948 and continues to vouch for their
> >> authenticity despite a contradictory 2009 study by American scientists..
> >>
> >> Since the publication of the Knack article on August 18, 2010, academics
> >> have been quick to point out that this does not necessarily mean the man
> >> who inspired the Holocaust was either Jewish, African or a combination
> >> of the two. The E1b1b haplogroup runs in other ethnic groups, for
> >> instance, and DNA analysis remains an inexact science. But one thing
> >> about this study’s results is certain, as Ronny Decorte, a geneticist
> >> interviewed by Knack, remarked: “Hitler would not have been pleased.”
> >>
> >> BY JENNIE COHEN
> >>
> >> https://www.history.com/news/study-suggests-adolf-hitler-had-jewish-and-african-ancestors
> >
> >
> > Hitler has clout, no doubt about it. But it is not his alone. There are many who want to keep the memory of Hitler alive forever, even if they have to make it up. Those benefiting most from the never say die keep Hitler alive forever movement are those who call themselves victims of Hitler even if they have to claw their way back to Holocaust relatives they never knew and probably wouldn't want to know anyway. For some reason people want to keep the memory of Adolphus alive forever - for a variety of reasons, maybe more than I can imagine. I am really sick of people who believe everything they read such as Hitler was a Jew and a vegetarian and believed in astrology and even made national decisions based on his horoscope - all kinds of stuff we're supposed to believe about Hitler. Frankly the topic of Hitler is boring. Although I will admit I like the way the guy dressed and the way he worked a crowd. I also feel he must have had something to offer his people, otherwise they wouldn't have voted for him. He did not come down from outer space to take over the world. He was the leader of a country. Who knows, maybe his country was hemmed in, forced to take action first because they knew what was coming anyway, same as I sometimes suspect Japan bombed Pearl Harbor because it was their only hope knowing an enemy attack was heading their way soon anyway. These are my own concepts of history based on common sense and are therefore superior to most if not all of anything else you might read under that label.
> >
> > Sieg motha fucking heil
> >
> I have no interest in his politics, My only interest in Adolph Hitler
> was his indulgence in the arts. Twice the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna
> rejected his application, but as any serious student of fine art will
> attest, Hitler was his generation's Van Gogh. View the link provided to
> witness some of his work. I can see where people would think he was a
> Jew (creativity) or a negro (flare)
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paintings_by_Adolf_Hitler#:~:text=History-,Artistic%20ambition,1907%20and%20again%20in%201908.

Who cares if he was a Jew. Actually it makes perfect sense to me.

"I have no interest in his politics, My only interest in Adolph Hitler 
was his indulgence in the arts. Twice the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna 
rejected his application, but as any serious student of fine art will 
attest, Hitler was his generation's Van Gogh. View the link provided to 
witness some of his work. I can see where people would think he was a 
Jew (creativity) or a negro (flare)."

Pretty funny.  I don’t agree about Jews being creative.  There are creative Jews, but no more so than any other ethnicity.  I suspect the creative label for Jews comes from their involvement in the entertainment industry on the ownership side, which I suppose is its own form of creativity.  As a group I find them rigid and inflexible but also entertaining in unintended ways.  But I'm not arguing.  I  understand why people see Jews as creative.  People see entertainers are creative even when they’re not - and because Jews run the show they too are falsely seen as creative and even worse artistic.  As an Artiste of the highest order I resent the intrusion.  Words are not good enough for me.  It’s easy to use the wrong ones. Or to interpret wrongly those used correctly.  For example the Negro is seen as having ‘flair’, (nice word by the way), but I see them more as uninhibited and unrestrained than having flair.  So I give credit where it is due.  Everyone brings something to the table - the table we share when we're really hungry.  That includes the Jew as well as the God Almighty American Negro.  May God bless all the peoples of this our earth.

Amen

> Who cares if he was a Jew. Actually it makes perfect sense to me.

Hello deserter! This is for you, Latham. Nothing personal, just in reference to the title of this thread. It starts out taking about a study. How many studies are there? Anyone can conduct a study or a survey. As for surveys, even if they are legit doesn't prove the subjects are telling the truth. Lots of people lie without even knowing it. Of course some do know it. But for example, if you conduct a survey asking 1,000 people, "Are you and open minded and tolerant person?", you can bet at least 999 of them are going to say yes. At the same time lots of people are vying for leadership roles in the "We're looking out for you game." Like the George Floyd protest people, just a bunch of losers looking for small pond leadership positions. I really do not like history as written, especially pertaining to military engagements and politics. The reality is as I said before. People, especially those seeking victim status (another industry), want to keep Hitler alive forever, maybe 20 years down the road digging out an ex Nazi soldier who just coincidentally is also the world's oldest man. But the crybabies and other professional victims love using Hitler and supposed past inequities to bolster their present day status on the basis of being related to someone who died in the Holocaust - "My great great grandmother died at Auschwitz, my parents told me" - and are ready to move forward in the victimhood game by allying themselves with Negroes and other minorities as "brothers in arms" when in reality the Jew wants less to do with other ethnicities than most admitted bigots. In other words, while I personally get along quite well with Jews, the truth of the matter is they are probably the most bigoted group of people on earth.

"Where do all these survivors come from????!!!!"

On 7/1/2021 2:20 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
>
>> Who cares if he was a Jew. Actually it makes perfect sense to me.
>
>
> Hello deserter! This is for you, Latham. Nothing personal, just in reference to the title of this thread. It starts out taking about a study. How many studies are there? Anyone can conduct a study or a survey. As for surveys, even if they are legit doesn't prove the subjects are telling the truth. Lots of people lie without even knowing it. Of course some do know it. But for example, if you conduct a survey asking 1,000 people, "Are you and open minded and tolerant person?", you can bet at least 999 of them are going to say yes. At the same time lots of people are vying for leadership roles in the "We're looking out for you game." Like the George Floyd protest people, just a bunch of losers looking for small pond leadership positions. I really do not like history as written, especially pertaining to military engagements and politics. The reality is as I said before. People, especially those seeking victim status (another industry), want to keep Hitler alive forever, maybe 20 years down the road digging out an ex Nazi soldier who just coincidentally is also the world's oldest man. But the crybabies and other professional victims love using Hitler and supposed past inequities to bolster their present day status on the basis of being related to someone who died in the Holocaust - "My great great grandmother died at Auschwitz, my parents told me" - and are ready to move forward in the victimhood game by allying themselves with Negroes and other minorities as "brothers in arms" when in reality the Jew wants less to do with other ethnicities than most admitted bigots. In other words, while I personally get along quite well with Jews, the truth of the matter is they are probably the most bigoted group of people on earth.
>
> "Where do all these survivors come from????!!!!"
>

If you really want to see 'survivors', announce that some Swiss bank has
discovered another billion dollars in jew assets from the war. Those
fuckers will be coming out of the woodwork.

> If you really want to see 'survivors', announce that some Swiss bank has
> discovered another billion dollars in jew assets from the war. Those
> fuckers will be coming out of the woodwork.

I am suspicious of any newly discovered stuff like forgotten music tapes of famous bands and so forth. Or writers. "Manuscript found!" I don't trust it. I don't believe it. At the same time I don't disbelieve it either. I just mostly don't care. It is funny though, recently discovered forgotten or misplaced historical type bullshit. I don't care if they make money off it. It's like counterfeiters. I have a hard time being against them because what they're counterfeiting is counterfeit to begin with, as one of my mottos so apply implies: "If it can be counterfeited it's not real."

On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 2:47:07 AM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > If you really want to see 'survivors', announce that some Swiss bank has
> > discovered another billion dollars in jew assets from the war. Those
> > fuckers will be coming out of the woodwork.
> I am suspicious of any newly discovered stuff like forgotten music tapes of famous bands and so forth. Or writers. "Manuscript found!" I don't trust it. I don't believe it. At the same time I don't disbelieve it either. I just mostly don't care. It is funny though, recently discovered forgotten or misplaced historical type bullshit. I don't care if they make money off it.. It's like counterfeiters. I have a hard time being against them because what they're counterfeiting is counterfeit to begin with, as one of my mottos so apply implies: "If it can be counterfeited it's not real."

The Basement tapes. Always from the basement. Why are they in the basement? Go upstairs for Gods sake. But no. It has to be the basement.

> The Basement tapes. Always from the basement. Why are they in the basement? Go upstairs for Gods sake. But no. It has to be the basement.

Sometimes it's the attic. Anne Frank style. Whatever it is I never trust it. It's right up there with commercials for health products from the Himalayas or some special place Westerners don't know about yet but people of that area have been using for thousands of years to live long productive lives. Seems like everything is some kind of scam. I guess that's the only real industry there is, selling shit we wouldn't use ourselves. But newly discovered stuff, art work and recordings and so forth, I never trust it. They find this shit and auction it off for millions of dollars. Is it real or is it counterfeit? Doesn't matter. Anyone who pays for it deserves to get ripped off.

On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 2:53:24 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The Basement tapes. Always from the basement. Why are they in the basement? Go upstairs for Gods sake. But no. It has to be the basement.
> Sometimes it's the attic. Anne Frank style. Whatever it is I never trust it. It's right up there with commercials for health products from the Himalayas or some special place Westerners don't know about yet but people of that area have been using for thousands of years to live long productive lives. Seems like everything is some kind of scam. I guess that's the only real industry there is, selling shit we wouldn't use ourselves. But newly discovered stuff, art work and recordings and so forth, I never trust it. They find this shit and auction it off for millions of dollars. Is it real or is it counterfeit? Doesn't matter. Anyone who pays for it deserves to get ripped off.

But what if Yoko has Johns balls in a jar? I know it woud be worth a lot. How much? Enough to get Chapman a record deal.

> But what if Yoko has Johns balls in a jar? I know it woud be worth a lot. How much? Enough to get Chapman a record deal.

I just googled the bitch. She is 88. Still lives in the same apartment building the beloved John died in front of that fateful day so many years ago.. I linked into one of her songs. It was ridiculous. I was going to send a link but figured it was a waste. I got to one spot where lots of different questions are asked about Lennon and other's in his tight death circle including Mark David Chapman who is still in prison and will probably never get out. The first thing he's going to do when they let him out is hunt down and kill John Hinkley of whom he has been intensely jealous for years. And why not? Hinckley tries to take out the President and gets paroled while Chapman rots in prison. Is that fair? Anyway, one of the questions asked was, "What was John Lennon's IQ?" I thought that was funny. I clicked to get the answer. "According to a test he took in his teens his IQ was 165", it said. How many IQ tests did he take? When I was a kid I took a ton of them, getting better with each new try, looking to break the genius barrier, which finally happened after who knows how many attempts. Once I got that genius mark I never took another IQ test.

Quit while you're ahead

On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 5:04:16 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > But what if Yoko has Johns balls in a jar? I know it woud be worth a lot. How much? Enough to get Chapman a record deal.
> I just googled the bitch. She is 88. Still lives in the same apartment building the beloved John died in front of that fateful day so many years ago.. I linked into one of her songs. It was ridiculous. I was going to send a link but figured it was a waste. I got to one spot where lots of different questions are asked about Lennon and other's in his tight death circle including Mark David Chapman who is still in prison and will probably never get out. The first thing he's going to do when they let him out is hunt down and kill John Hinkley of whom he has been intensely jealous for years. And why not? Hinckley tries to take out the President and gets paroled while Chapman rots in prison. Is that fair? Anyway, one of the questions asked was, "What was John Lennon's IQ?" I thought that was funny. I clicked to get the answer. "According to a test he took in his teens his IQ was 165", it said.. How many IQ tests did he take? When I was a kid I took a ton of them, getting better with each new try, looking to break the genius barrier, which finally happened after who knows how many attempts. Once I got that genius mark I never took another IQ test.
>
> Quit while you're ahead

So he was a genius. What is that doing for him now?

> So he was a genius. What is that doing for him now?

I knew he was a genius the minute I read the words to his most stirring and most memorable song ever - perhaps the greatest song ever written next to Paul Anka's "My Way." By the way, Anka was also a genius. But with Lennon, those words - oh my God, just incredible - "no wars, no more religion too" - "come together over me" - "give peace a chance" - the list goes on and on. These are not the words of a mere mortal. Of course John was a genius.. That's why he had to die. Chapman was a genius too. He knew Lennon from when they were kids. They were not friends. They were competitive in a friendly way. Both lads took IQ tests regularly trying to beat out the other. Both were hovering around the 165 range and Chapman was struggling to come up with a higher score. Lennon was struggling too but he was able to hide it. This worried Chapman. So after taking his last IQ test in which he scores 166, one point higher than John's 165, that is when Chapman knew he had to blow the whistle and end the game by blowing John's powerhouse brain out of his skull onto the pavement outside the famed Dakota Apartment Building in NYC where John's grieving wife Yoko lives to this day. Her IQ? 167. Mine? 182. But I was younger and smarter then. I'm older now so it's probably lower now. On top of that I'm sick of being a genius. It never paid off for me like it did for some lucky assholes like Einstein and other freaks who were able to channel their so-called gift into just one thing like physics or math and other worthless shit. But I hold no grudge. I don't put much stock in IQ tests anyway, except for the one I am working on now with Mr. Shit. This one will not involve academic questions in any form. Nothing learned. It is not easy putting such a test together. But if anybody can do it it's Mr. Shit and I.

On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 5:35:29 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > So he was a genius. What is that doing for him now?
> I knew he was a genius the minute I read the words to his most stirring and most memorable song ever - perhaps the greatest song ever written next to Paul Anka's "My Way." By the way, Anka was also a genius. But with Lennon, those words - oh my God, just incredible - "no wars, no more religion too" - "come together over me" - "give peace a chance" - the list goes on and on. These are not the words of a mere mortal. Of course John was a genius. That's why he had to die. Chapman was a genius too. He knew Lennon from when they were kids. They were not friends. They were competitive in a friendly way. Both lads took IQ tests regularly trying to beat out the other. Both were hovering around the 165 range and Chapman was struggling to come up with a higher score. Lennon was struggling too but he was able to hide it. This worried Chapman. So after taking his last IQ test in which he scores 166, one point higher than John's 165, that is when Chapman knew he had to blow the whistle and end the game by blowing John's powerhouse brain out of his skull onto the pavement outside the famed Dakota Apartment Building in NYC where John's grieving wife Yoko lives to this day. Her IQ? 167. Mine? 182. But I was younger and smarter then. I'm older now so it's probably lower now. On top of that I'm sick of being a genius. It never paid off for me like it did for some lucky assholes like Einstein and other freaks who were able to channel their so-called gift into just one thing like physics or math and other worthless shit. But I hold no grudge. I don't put much stock in IQ tests anyway, except for the one I am working on now with Mr. Shit. This one will not involve academic questions in any form. Nothing learned. It is not easy putting such a test together. But if anybody can do it it's Mr.. Shit and I.

Having a high IQ is a curse. I also live with it. Mine is off the chart. I am so smart I appear very stupid.

> Having a high IQ is a curse. I also live with it. Mine is off the chart. I am so smart I appear very stupid.

Life is a circle. There is a meeting place for all opposites. There is a point where absolute genius and absolute stupidity meet for only a split second. At that point they become the same thing. Too stupid to know they're smart and too smart to know they're stupid. But they don't need to know. They are there baby, alive in the moment, grooving as one. Once again it comes back to the blob, doesn't it? Even though a blob has a brain it is still one of the stupidest forms of life known to man. But so stupid it doesn't need to be smart. It has achieved true intelligence, the type that can't be measured.

I am Blob Smart

On Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 4:03:40 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Having a high IQ is a curse. I also live with it. Mine is off the chart.. I am so smart I appear very stupid.
> Life is a circle. There is a meeting place for all opposites. There is a point where absolute genius and absolute stupidity meet for only a split second. At that point they become the same thing. Too stupid to know they're smart and too smart to know they're stupid. But they don't need to know. They are there baby, alive in the moment, grooving as one. Once again it comes back to the blob, doesn't it? Even though a blob has a brain it is still one of the stupidest forms of life known to man. But so stupid it doesn't need to be smart. It has achieved true intelligence, the type that can't be measured.
>
> I am Blob Smart

The Blob only made one movie. He was set to make the sequel but then got uppity and demanded too much for it. The part instead went to Robert DeNiro..

> The Blob only made one movie. He was set to make the sequel but then got uppity and demanded too much for it. The part instead went to Robert DeNiro..

With me it doesn't have to be a blob, just something with as little brain power as possible, and less stuff needed to get it around. No arms and legs and armor and other self defense shit. Too stupid to feel fear or pain. Aware of death, yes - no avoiding that. But as far removed from it as possible. I know we've already been there. So when I say I think being a blob could be cool people naturally think it's not possible because we've already been there and would still be there if it were really cool. So there must be something bad about it. I'm not sure. Maybe blob is the wrong word. A single cell thing is what I'm talking about - an ameba or whatever. Sure, it still has to eat. It still has needs, but less of them. It has little to offer in the way of self defense. It is more vulnerable than the average creature. But maybe that's better than devoting millions of centuries to creating new ways to defend ourselves only to die in the end anyway. Best to remain a blob.

On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 3:50:16 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The Blob only made one movie. He was set to make the sequel but then got uppity and demanded too much for it. The part instead went to Robert DeNiro.
> With me it doesn't have to be a blob, just something with as little brain power as possible, and less stuff needed to get it around. No arms and legs and armor and other self defense shit. Too stupid to feel fear or pain. Aware of death, yes - no avoiding that. But as far removed from it as possible. I know we've already been there. So when I say I think being a blob could be cool people naturally think it's not possible because we've already been there and would still be there if it were really cool. So there must be something bad about it. I'm not sure. Maybe blob is the wrong word. A single cell thing is what I'm talking about - an ameba or whatever. Sure, it still has to eat. It still has needs, but less of them. It has little to offer in the way of self defense. It is more vulnerable than the average creature. But maybe that's better than devoting millions of centuries to creating new ways to defend ourselves only to die in the end anyway. Best to remain a blob.

Can you describe it?
Well it was big and well a blob.
Any distinguishing marks?
Er no it is a blob. Everything sort of blends togehter.

> Can you describe it?
> Well it was big and well a blob.
> Any distinguishing marks?
> Er no it is a blob. Everything sort of blends togehter.

Gotta bring in the 'blobosseiurs'. A good one can look at 100 different blobs and ID them on the basis of appearance - size, shape, color, hue, all sorts of subtle nuances we can't even imagine. Of course this applies to more than just blobaphiles. Anyone who cares a lot about any one thing and has devoted their entire life to it's study will know it inside out no matter much the same it may all appear to those not in the know.

On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 5:59:59 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Can you describe it?
> > Well it was big and well a blob.
> > Any distinguishing marks?
> > Er no it is a blob. Everything sort of blends togehter.
> Gotta bring in the 'blobosseiurs'. A good one can look at 100 different blobs and ID them on the basis of appearance - size, shape, color, hue, all sorts of subtle nuances we can't even imagine. Of course this applies to more than just blobaphiles. Anyone who cares a lot about any one thing and has devoted their entire life to it's study will know it inside out no matter much the same it may all appear to those not in the know.

I was attacked by a blob!
Can you describe it?
NO!

> I was attacked by a blob!
> Can you describe it?
> NO!

I get the point, but the questions don't end there. You don't get off that easy.

"How did you fight it off? How are you even alive now to tell us about it? Where did it happen? Where did you last see it? Did it stink?"

The questions are endless and the answers better match up. We're after a killer here. For the sake of society, if you have any information on the blob please don't hold back with it. Tell us now where the blob is or we will beat your face for hours with one jelly fish after another.

On Sunday, July 18, 2021 at 4:50:43 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I was attacked by a blob!
> > Can you describe it?
> > NO!
> I get the point, but the questions don't end there. You don't get off that easy.
>
> "How did you fight it off? How are you even alive now to tell us about it? Where did it happen? Where did you last see it? Did it stink?"
>
> The questions are endless and the answers better match up. We're after a killer here. For the sake of society, if you have any information on the blob please don't hold back with it. Tell us now where the blob is or we will beat your face for hours with one jelly fish after another.

Once the blob has you the only way to escape is cut off the portion it already has. This is why the blob goes for your cock.

> Once the blob has you the only way to escape is cut off the portion it already has. This is why the blob goes for your cock.

So you're saying when the blob eats you, you become the blob. Even the minute it's on top of you, you become the blob. It enfolds you, overtakes you.. Yes, you must amputate your body bit by bit in order to escape - if you're lucky. Even then after getting home it can take days to wash off the smell. You know, that 'blob smell'.

On Monday, July 19, 2021 at 7:12:45 PM UTC-4, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Once the blob has you the only way to escape is cut off the portion it already has. This is why the blob goes for your cock.
> So you're saying when the blob eats you, you become the blob. Even the minute it's on top of you, you become the blob. It enfolds you, overtakes you.. Yes, you must amputate your body bit by bit in order to escape - if you're lucky. Even then after getting home it can take days to wash off the smell. You know, that 'blob smell'.

How many actors auditioned for the role of the blob? Did any use the method? And did the Blob win an Oscar? Please post your answers and send them along with 2 dollars.