Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

"Never give in. Never give in. Never. Never. Never." -- Winston Churchill


tech / sci.math / Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics

SubjectAuthor
* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations iDemps Fotopoulos
`- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations ibertietaylor

1
Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics

<v0lv9e$1ellm$1@paganini.bofh.team>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=156974&group=sci.math#156974

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Followup: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!tor-network!not-for-mail
From: lpo...@oop.gr (Demps Fotopoulos)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law
violations in electrodynamics
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:59:26 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <v0lv9e$1ellm$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References: <uvb7db$2bj35$1@tor.dont-email.me>
<e7b18fbbd25aef1edf75d3fd7baa053a@www.novabbs.com>
<1qso30i.hyqy7pf46wb5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
<v0limi$12erm$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:59:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="1529526"; posting-host="Y1rLKt6uIvvxBk7hWr2uaw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
User-Agent: Chrome/82.0.3496.87 Mobile Safari/632.24
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
X-TOR-Router: sha256:MzcuMTIwLjE2Ni4yMw== --
X-Face: 8'sm"Nl]58,Az{i`JI@cKnl[5*=SiEPs2\IlI&x40g%%$N+3e@a}h/)uQ_)x*~kA
{uUM!VyQ#,%Zj*/aN:V")2H/>O+B8Wlfh[G?v^^9`=n#(R,)v#wz-MXGfA0/1q([]^$\8*z
&9][?wA#XG7OT}#CVHn=lDf<]|.%84ep>/ijyY;SLJ*'K2~[%E}<8NE<VWNpw)uMY5_x)J|
n87Mwa{g'(VNC3yO;eJ+aOLwr}Gik/Q|HhMibX2&FaBA:aG;mw>60!yP%{.TJ3|_%gM*<]"
WinGEUdTYP
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEWQepSjsa08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 by: Demps Fotopoulos - Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:59 UTC

Volney wrote:

> On 4/27/2024 5:50 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>> FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand do conserve
>> energy-momentum. If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to
>> tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
>> and how these equations must be modified.
>> As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,
>
> It is entirely possible that Banjo stumbled across that apparent
> violation of momentum by momentum being carried away by the
> electromagnetic field. But we will never know since he refuses to
> produce a writeup in sufficient detail for someone to reproduce his
> experiment, instead writing "Watch my videos!!!". Add his stubbornness
> that he insists this is something new that violates
> Newton/Einstein/Maxwell rather than a known existing behavior, you do
> get the incompetent tinkerer.

not true, both wrong. Those are not "Maxwell's equations", but imported
equations he stole from somebody else, ie Faraday, kiss my ass, etc.

𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗲_𝗦𝗲𝗰.𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻_𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗲𝗱_𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁_𝗯𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗸_𝗶𝗳_𝗔𝗧𝗔𝗖𝗠𝗦_𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀_𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹_𝗯𝗲_𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱_𝗼𝗻_𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮𝘀_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0LmHzgkBYIll

𝗜𝗼𝗜_𝗜𝘁'𝘀_𝗔_𝗧𝗼𝘁𝗮𝗹_𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗘!_𝗧𝗵𝗲_𝗨.𝗦._𝗘𝘃𝗮𝗰𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱_𝗔𝗹𝗹_𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗔𝗕𝗥𝗔𝗠𝗦_𝗧𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀_𝗧𝗼_𝗧𝗵𝗲_𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗥!
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0sHDgX4ba5KS

Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics

<17de0fde42ad83db24adeec81295e2ac@www.novabbs.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=157023&group=sci.math#157023

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 03:46:38 +0000
Subject: Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law
violations in electrodynamics
From: bertieta...@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Kb.7U0Haso03Ftr0AiPyTuQeV74XbJbrlE2X7LQ8YtTAUUX5MCWcG
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cdf973c28ddff5d1d1235bf54e7ff9676b462801
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
References: <uvb7db$2bj35$1@tor.dont-email.me> <e7b18fbbd25aef1edf75d3fd7baa053a@www.novabbs.com> <1qso30i.hyqy7pf46wb5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <v0limi$12erm$1@dont-email.me> <v0lv9e$1ellm$1@paganini.bofh.team>
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <17de0fde42ad83db24adeec81295e2ac@www.novabbs.com>
 by: bertietaylor - Fri, 3 May 2024 03:46 UTC

Demps Fotopoulos wrote:

> Volney wrote:

>> On 4/27/2024 5:50 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>> FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand do conserve
>>> energy-momentum. If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to
>>> tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
>>> and how these equations must be modified.
>>> As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,
>>
>> It is entirely possible that Banjo stumbled across that apparent
>> violation of momentum by momentum being carried away by the
>> electromagnetic field. But we will never know since he refuses to
>> produce a writeup in sufficient detail for someone to reproduce his
>> experiment, instead writing "Watch my videos!!!". Add his stubbornness
>> that he insists this is something new that violates
>> Newton/Einstein/Maxwell rather than a known existing behavior, you do
>> get the incompetent tinkerer.

> not true, both wrong. Those are not "Maxwell's equations", but imported
> equations he stole from somebody else, ie Faraday, kiss my ass, etc.

The struggle then was with Ampere's equations for the electromagnetic force
which involved the two currents in the forward and backward path and the
now familiar F=Bil where only one current and the resultant magnetic fields
nomal to it impact upon the current conductor of length l. This is now
exclusively used in motor design.

bt

>
𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗲_𝗦𝗲𝗰.𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻_𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗲𝗱_𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁_𝗯𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗸_𝗶𝗳_𝗔𝗧𝗔𝗖𝗠𝗦_𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀_𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹_𝗯𝗲_𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱_𝗼𝗻_𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮𝘀_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆
> https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0LmHzgkBYIll

>
𝗜𝗼𝗜_𝗜𝘁'𝘀_𝗔_𝗧𝗼𝘁𝗮𝗹_𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗘!_𝗧𝗵𝗲_𝗨.𝗦._𝗘𝘃𝗮𝗰𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱_𝗔𝗹𝗹_𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗔𝗕𝗥𝗔𝗠𝗦_𝗧𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀_𝗧𝗼_𝗧𝗵𝗲_𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗥!
> https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0sHDgX4ba5KS


tech / sci.math / Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor