Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

It's clever, but is it art?

interests / alt.politics / COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected

SubjectAuthor
* COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis RejectedBradley K. Sherman
`* Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis RejectedNoBody
 `* Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis RejectedBradley K. Sherman
  +- Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis RejectedRudy Canoza
  `* Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis RejectedNoBody
   `- Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis RejectedNoBody

1
COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected

<sve1am$96r$1@panix3.panix.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=15580&group=alt.politics#15580

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix3.panix.com!panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: bks...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected
Date: 26 Feb 2022 20:07:50 -0000
Organization: RNA + Sunlight
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <sve1am$96r$1@panix3.panix.com>
Reply-To: bks@panix.com
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3";
logging-data="10588"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
 by: Bradley K. Sherman - Sat, 26 Feb 2022 20:07 UTC

Caveat; not peer-reviewed yet:
|
| Scientists released a pair of extensive studies on Saturday
| that point to a market in Wuhan, China, as the origin of
| the coronavirus pandemic. The two reports, totalling about
| 150 pages, have not yet been published in a scientific
| journal.
|
| The researchers analyzed data from a range of sources to
| look for clues to how the pandemic arose. They concluded
| that the coronavirus was present in live mammals sold in
| the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in late 2019. The
| research suggests that the virus very likely twice spilled
| over into people working or shopping at the market. The
| researchers said they found no support for an alternate
| hypothesis that the coronavirus escaped from a lab in
| Wuhan.
| ...
<https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/02/26/science/covid-virus-wuhan-origins.html>

There are extensive open discussions among domain experts
on Twitter, e.g.:
<https://twitter.com/MichaelWorobey/status/1497607313397481472>

--bks

Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected

<n25n1hd74edce2uaeeh30nvlu5vad28f0k@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=15621&group=alt.politics#15621

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: NoB...@nowhere.com (NoBody)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 10:12:15 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <n25n1hd74edce2uaeeh30nvlu5vad28f0k@4ax.com>
References: <sve1am$96r$1@panix3.panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f311b2f3949ae3555ea9a6d050325937";
logging-data="27020"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1939dUR8axg41czbUhF+qgsN9fSKG8jUzY="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:V8wb04mguPC0NHPidCqvcWAAwkM=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220227-2, 2/27/2022), Outbound message
 by: NoBody - Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:12 UTC

On 26 Feb 2022 20:07:50 -0000, bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
wrote:

>Caveat; not peer-reviewed yet:

You've rejected non-peer reviewed posts before yet here you are
pushing nonsense from the NYT. Interesting that your propaganda posts
have increased since Russia invaded. Looks like I was right all along
about you.

Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected

<svg4li$np2$2@reader1.panix.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=15624&group=alt.politics#15624

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: bks...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:17:06 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: RNA + Sunlight
Message-ID: <svg4li$np2$2@reader1.panix.com>
References: <sve1am$96r$1@panix3.panix.com> <n25n1hd74edce2uaeeh30nvlu5vad28f0k@4ax.com>
Reply-To: bks@panix.com
Injection-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:17:06 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3";
logging-data="24354"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 by: Bradley K. Sherman - Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:17 UTC

Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On 26 Feb 2022 20:07:50 -0000, bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
>wrote:
>
>>Caveat; not peer-reviewed yet:
>
>You've rejected non-peer reviewed posts before yet here you are
>pushing nonsense from the NYT.
> ...

It's not nonsense. It's the most likely scenario, by far.

--bks

Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected

<q7NSJ.45493$m1S7.1732@fx36.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=15631&group=alt.politics#15631

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx36.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.6.1
Subject: Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sve1am$96r$1@panix3.panix.com>
<n25n1hd74edce2uaeeh30nvlu5vad28f0k@4ax.com> <svg4li$np2$2@reader1.panix.com>
From: notgen...@gmail.com (Rudy Canoza)
In-Reply-To: <svg4li$np2$2@reader1.panix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <q7NSJ.45493$m1S7.1732@fx36.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 07:52:54 -0800
X-Received-Bytes: 1497
 by: Rudy Canoza - Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:52 UTC

On 2/27/2022 7:17 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> On 26 Feb 2022 20:07:50 -0000, bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Caveat; not peer-reviewed yet:
>>
>> You've rejected non-peer reviewed posts before yet here you are
>> pushing nonsense from the NYT.
>> ...
>
> It's not nonsense. It's the most likely scenario, by far.

The consensus of expert opinion is that the virus came from the Wuhan open air
market.

Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected

<8sdp1htcv27vbthib0uqdhbdo7b5mfbr8r@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=15717&group=alt.politics#15717

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: NoB...@nowhere.com (NoBody)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:55:33 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <8sdp1htcv27vbthib0uqdhbdo7b5mfbr8r@4ax.com>
References: <sve1am$96r$1@panix3.panix.com> <n25n1hd74edce2uaeeh30nvlu5vad28f0k@4ax.com> <svg4li$np2$2@reader1.panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a3bbb92727b4bb26c3b5c8783e0050cf";
logging-data="9856"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19zbKO2lYBErRkZWU30Xq8Rb1cVDkgj+78="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:l38//zK9bT9NEFJm3oPefwRf74Q=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220227-6, 2/27/2022), Outbound message
 by: NoBody - Mon, 28 Feb 2022 11:55 UTC

On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:17:06 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:

>Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>On 26 Feb 2022 20:07:50 -0000, bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Caveat; not peer-reviewed yet:
>>
>>You've rejected non-peer reviewed posts before yet here you are
>>pushing nonsense from the NYT.
>> ...
>
>It's not nonsense. It's the most likely scenario, by far.
>
> --bks

Only to morons. Love how you ignored how I pointed out your double
standard.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/reason-scientists-believe-coronavirus-originated-lab-wuhan-china

https://www.wsj.com/articles/another-potential-covid-19-lab-leak-clue-china-11644615472

I could go on but you prefer actual propaganda from the NYT.

Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected

<7k1s1h55pgnl72algv5qblj045dem0cvd4@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=15860&group=alt.politics#15860

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: NoB...@nowhere.com (NoBody)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Re: COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 06:42:23 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <7k1s1h55pgnl72algv5qblj045dem0cvd4@4ax.com>
References: <sve1am$96r$1@panix3.panix.com> <n25n1hd74edce2uaeeh30nvlu5vad28f0k@4ax.com> <svg4li$np2$2@reader1.panix.com> <8sdp1htcv27vbthib0uqdhbdo7b5mfbr8r@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8542cc5a4d233131fb9688924aa1ecca";
logging-data="15850"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18CBFbGn4FjRTpimFRZ05oh6HbHAHC0s38="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:U8s/EndKJctWzeVOtiqpvg47LAQ=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220301-2, 3/1/2022), Outbound message
 by: NoBody - Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:42 UTC

On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:55:33 -0500, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:17:06 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>Sherman) wrote:
>
>>Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>On 26 Feb 2022 20:07:50 -0000, bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Caveat; not peer-reviewed yet:
>>>
>>>You've rejected non-peer reviewed posts before yet here you are
>>>pushing nonsense from the NYT.
>>> ...
>>
>>It's not nonsense. It's the most likely scenario, by far.
>>
>> --bks
>
>Only to morons. Love how you ignored how I pointed out your double
>standard.
>
>
>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/reason-scientists-believe-coronavirus-originated-lab-wuhan-china
>
>https://www.wsj.com/articles/another-potential-covid-19-lab-leak-clue-china-11644615472
>
>I could go on but you prefer actual propaganda from the NYT.

The Russian troll runs away again.

interests / alt.politics / COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis Rejected

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor