On 20-Oct-22 16:38, Tony Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
>>> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
>>>> * Kerr-Mudd, John:
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
>>>>> Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
>>>>>> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
>>>>>> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:
>>
>>>>>>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
>>>>>>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
>>>>>>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
>>>>>>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
>>>>>>> subscribe to that NG.
>>>>>> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
>>>>> That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
>>>>> to clarify 'urcm'
>>>> I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
>>>> perchance anyone else's mother here?
>>> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
>>>
>>> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
>>> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
>>> - if that's what you were hinting at.
>>> --
>>> Bah, and indeed Humbug.
>>
>> Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
>> into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
>> explain himself and apologize?
>
> Dragged into the thread?
>
> You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
> thread!

Don't you go bringing facts into this!

--
Sam Plusnet

On 2022-10-20, Sam Plusnet wrote:

> On 20-Oct-22 16:38, Tony Cooper wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
>> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
>>>> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
>>>>> * Kerr-Mudd, John:
>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
>>>>>> Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
>>>>>>> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
>>>>>>>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
>>>>>>>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
>>>>>>>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
>>>>>>>> subscribe to that NG.
>>>>>>> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
>>>>>> That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
>>>>>> to clarify 'urcm'
>>>>> I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
>>>>> perchance anyone else's mother here?
>>>> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
>>>> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
>>>> - if that's what you were hinting at.
>>>> --
>>>> Bah, and indeed Humbug.
>>>
>>> Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
>>> into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
>>> explain himself and apologize?
>>
>> Dragged into the thread?
>>
>> You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
>> thread!
>
> Don't you go bringing facts into this!

"Facts are stubborn things."

--
Bob Dylan knows
And I bet Alan Freed did
There are things in night
That it's better not to behold

On 2022-10-20 09:38, Tony Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
>>> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
>>>> * Kerr-Mudd, John:
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
>>>>> Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
>>>>>> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
>>>>>> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:
>>
>>>>>>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
>>>>>>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
>>>>>>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
>>>>>>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
>>>>>>> subscribe to that NG.
>>>>>> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
>>>>> That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
>>>>> to clarify 'urcm'
>>>> I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
>>>> perchance anyone else's mother here?
>>> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
>>>
>>> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
>>> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
>>> - if that's what you were hinting at.
>>> --
>>> Bah, and indeed Humbug.
>>
>> Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
>> into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
>> explain himself and apologize?
>
> Dragged into the thread?
>
> You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
> thread!

Incredible. Six days and he has not only forgotten he started it, but
also that he posted in it yesterday.

--
Greek cows say "μ"

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:54:03 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@verizon.net> wrote:

>On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 11:38:29 AM UTC-4, Tony Cooper wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
>> <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
>> >> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
>> >> > * Kerr-Mudd, John:
>> >> > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
>> >> > > Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
>> >> > >> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
>> >> > >> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:
>
>> >> > >>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
>> >> > >>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
>> >> > >>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
>> >> > >>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
>> >> > >>> subscribe to that NG.
>> >> > >> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
>> >> > > That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
>> >> > > to clarify 'urcm'
>> >> > I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
>> >> > perchance anyone else's mother here?
>> >> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
>> >> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
>> >> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
>> >> - if that's what you were hinting at.
>> >> --
>> >> Bah, and indeed Humbug.
>> >Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
>> >into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
>> > explain himself and apologize?
>>
>> Dragged into the thread?
>>
>> You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
>> thread!
>
>Hey, moron. What in what Mudd replied to had anything to do with me?
>
>Never heard of "thread drift"?
>
>You tried your best to derail the thread at the very beginning, but
>you failed.

Yes, my attempt to "derail" the thread was a clear, concise, and
accurate answer to the question you asked to start the thread.

Little did I know that the question you wanted an answer for was not
the question you posed.

--

Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida

I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.

On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 1:25:56 PM UTC-4, Sam Plusnet wrote:
> On 20-Oct-22 16:38, Tony Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> > <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
> >>> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
> >>>> * Kerr-Mudd, John:
> >>>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
> >>>>> Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
> >>>>>> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:

> >>>>>>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
> >>>>>>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
> >>>>>>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
> >>>>>>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
> >>>>>>> subscribe to that NG.
> >>>>>> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
> >>>>> That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
> >>>>> to clarify 'urcm'
> >>>> I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
> >>>> perchance anyone else's mother here?
> >>> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
> >>> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
> >>> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
> >>> - if that's what you were hinting at.
> >>> --
> >>> Bah, and indeed Humbug.
> >> Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
> >> into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
> >> explain himself and apologize?
> > Dragged into the thread?
> > You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
> > thread!
>
> Don't you go bringing facts into this!

What does that fact have to do with anything Mudd was looking at?

On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 3:12:40 PM UTC-4, lar3ryca wrote:
> On 2022-10-20 09:38, Tony Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> > <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
> >>> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
> >>>> * Kerr-Mudd, John:
> >>>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
> >>>>> Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
> >>>>>> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:

> >>>>>>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
> >>>>>>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
> >>>>>>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
> >>>>>>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
> >>>>>>> subscribe to that NG.
> >>>>>> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
> >>>>> That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
> >>>>> to clarify 'urcm'
> >>>> I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
> >>>> perchance anyone else's mother here?
> >>> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
> >>> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
> >>> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
> >>> - if that's what you were hinting at.
> >>> --
> >>> Bah, and indeed Humbug.
> >> Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
> >> into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
> >> explain himself and apologize?
> > Dragged into the thread?
> > You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
> > thread!
>
> Incredible. Six days and he has not only forgotten he started it, but
> also that he posted in it yesterday.
> --
> Greek cows say "μ"

Another cowardly jackass who is afraid to actually look at what I write.

What does my posting "in it yesterday" have to do with whatever Mudd
was wasting electrons on?

As usual, it is Moron Cooper who tries to encourage his stooge to fight.

On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 3:34:16 PM UTC-4, Tony Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:54:03 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 11:38:29 AM UTC-4, Tony Cooper wrote:
> >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> >> <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> >On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
> >> >> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
> >> >> > * Kerr-Mudd, John:
> >> >> > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
> >> >> > > Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
> >> >> > >> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
> >> >> > >> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:
> >> >> > >>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
> >> >> > >>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
> >> >> > >>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
> >> >> > >>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
> >> >> > >>> subscribe to that NG.
> >> >> > >> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
> >> >> > > That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
> >> >> > > to clarify 'urcm'
> >> >> > I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
> >> >> > perchance anyone else's mother here?
> >> >> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
> >> >> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
> >> >> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
> >> >> - if that's what you were hinting at.
> >> >> --
> >> >> Bah, and indeed Humbug.
> >> >Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
> >> >into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
> >> > explain himself and apologize?
> >> Dragged into the thread?
> >> You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
> >> thread!
> >Hey, moron. What in what Mudd replied to had anything to do with me?

The Unanswered Question.

> >Never heard of "thread drift"?
> >You tried your best to derail the thread at the very beginning, but
> >you failed.
>
> Yes, my attempt to "derail" the thread was a clear, concise, and
> accurate answer to the question you asked to start the thread.

Yeah, just keep on flaunting your inability to read for context and content.

> Little did I know that the question you wanted an answer for was not
> the question you posed.

If the question had been addressed to you specifically, it might have
been spelled out in sufficient detail that even you could understand
it. That was not necessary for ordinary readers of English.
> --
> Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida
> I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.

And flaunting unfathomable stupidity.

lar3ryca submitted this gripping article, maybe on Thursday:
> On 2022-10-20 09:38, Tony Cooper wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
>> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
>>>> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
>>>>> * Kerr-Mudd, John:
>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
>>>>>> Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7
>>>>>>> @127.0.0.1> :
>>>>>>> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, different group
>>>>>>>>> http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
>>>>>>>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
>>>>>>>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
>>>>>>>> subscribe to that NG.
>>>>>>> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
>>>>>> That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I
>>>>>> had
>>>>>> to clarify 'urcm'
>>>>> I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
>>>>> perchance anyone else's mother here?
>>>> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
>>>> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
>>>> - if that's what you were hinting at.
>>>> -- Bah, and indeed Humbug.
>>>
>>> Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
>>> into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
>>> explain himself and apologize?
>>
>> Dragged into the thread?
>>
>> You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
>> thread!
>
> Incredible. Six days and he has not only forgotten he started it, but also
> that he posted in it yesterday.

Sub thread. But, yeah, he didn't word it precisely, did he?

/dps

--
"That's a good sort of hectic, innit?"

" Very much so, and I'd recommend the haggis wontons."
-njm

> lar3ryca submitted this gripping article, maybe on Thursday:
>> Incredible. Six days and he has not only forgotten he started it, but
>> also that he posted in it yesterday.

I guess you've been reading AUE much longer than I have. Why do you
wonder about PTD?

On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:37:01 PM UTC-4, snide...@gmail.com wrote:
> lar3ryca submitted this gripping article, maybe on Thursday:
> > On 2022-10-20 09:38, Tony Cooper wrote:
> >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> >> <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
> >>>> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
> >>>>> * Kerr-Mudd, John:
> >>>>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
> >>>>>> Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7
> >>>>>>> @127.0.0.1> :
> >>>>>>> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:
> >>>>>>>>> No, different group
> >>>>>>>>> http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
> >>>>>>>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
> >>>>>>>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
> >>>>>>>> subscribe to that NG.
> >>>>>>> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
> >>>>>> That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I
> >>>>>> had
> >>>>>> to clarify 'urcm'
> >>>>> I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
> >>>>> perchance anyone else's mother here?
> >>>> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
> >>>> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
> >>>> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
> >>>> - if that's what you were hinting at.
> >>>> -- Bah, and indeed Humbug.
> >>> Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
> >>> into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
> >>> explain himself and apologize?
> >> Dragged into the thread?
> >> You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
> >> thread!
> > Incredible. Six days and he has not only forgotten he started it, but also
> > that he posted in it yesterday.
>
> Sub thread. But, yeah, he didn't word it precisely, did he?

Golly.

Had nothing to do with the subthread.

Compare the heading with the content Mudd was looking at and explain
what the latter had to do with the former, and how his condemnatory
outburst reasonably ensued.

On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:41:46 PM UTC-4, Silvano wrote:
> > lar3ryca submitted this gripping article, maybe on Thursday:

> >> Incredible. Six days and he has not only forgotten he started it, but
> >> also that he posted in it yesterday.
>
> I guess you've been reading AUE much longer than I have. Why do you
> wonder about PTD?

lar3 "killfiled" PTD a few days after arriving here because he did not
like being asked to justify his condemnation of all organ music on
the grounds that many organs are installed in churches. He thus has
no data at all on which to base "wonder."

(He will tell you he was here long before I was. There was, however,
no visible overlap -- since he appears not to have crossposted to
sci.lang during the short time such crosspostings were occasionally
initiated by certain persons who had no understanding of linguistics
but chose to post lies about linguistics to the linguistics group.

Yes, I mean Bob Cunningham.

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, at 13:12:35, lar3ryca posted:
>Greek cows say "μ"
The way I learnt Greek, it was cats, not cows, that said mu.
As in "There's nothing nu under the sun."
(Phi! I don't even have those Greek characters on my keyboard.)
--
Paul

On 2022-10-20 15:30, Paul Wolff wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, at 13:12:35, lar3ryca posted:
>> Greek cows say "μ"
> The way I learnt Greek, it was cats, not cows, that said mu.
> As in "There's nothing nu under the sun."
> (Phi! I don't even have those Greek characters on my keyboard.)

Listen to the μsic, or perhaps the νn
I named my dog φdo

It's awkward, but it can be done.

On a Linux machine, ctrl+shift, unnnn
where nnnn is the hexadecimal unicode.

--
𝄠 𝆺𝅥𝅯 Take my hand. I'm a sranger with a pair o' dice.

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:36:19 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@verizon.net> wrote:

>On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 3:34:16 PM UTC-4, Tony Cooper wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:54:03 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
>> <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 11:38:29 AM UTC-4, Tony Cooper wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
>> >> <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >> >On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
>> >> >> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
>> >> >> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
>> >> >> > * Kerr-Mudd, John:
>> >> >> > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
>> >> >> > > Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
>> >> >> > >> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
>> >> >> > >> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:
>
>> >> >> > >>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
>> >> >> > >>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
>> >> >> > >>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
>> >> >> > >>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
>> >> >> > >>> subscribe to that NG.
>> >> >> > >> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
>> >> >> > > That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
>> >> >> > > to clarify 'urcm'
>> >> >> > I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
>> >> >> > perchance anyone else's mother here?
>> >> >> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
>> >> >> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
>> >> >> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
>> >> >> - if that's what you were hinting at.
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Bah, and indeed Humbug.
>> >> >Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
>> >> >into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
>> >> > explain himself and apologize?
>> >> Dragged into the thread?
>> >> You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
>> >> thread!
>> >Hey, moron. What in what Mudd replied to had anything to do with me?
>
>The Unanswered Question.
>
>> >Never heard of "thread drift"?

Yes. Thread drift is when the original topic is changed to another
topic by a comment that is not directly related to the preceeding
posts.

Quite ordinary in this group.

If you, too, know what it is you would know that's exactly what
Kerr-Mudd did and would not continue to attempt to excuse your
blatantly ignorant claim of being "dragged in".

>> >You tried your best to derail the thread at the very beginning, but
>> >you failed.
>>
>> Yes, my attempt to "derail" the thread was a clear, concise, and
>> accurate answer to the question you asked to start the thread.
>
>Yeah, just keep on flaunting your inability to read for context and content.
>
>> Little did I know that the question you wanted an answer for was not
>> the question you posed.
>
>If the question had been addressed to you specifically, it might have
>been spelled out in sufficient detail that even you could understand
>it. That was not necessary for ordinary readers of English.
>> --
>> Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida
>> I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.
>
>And flaunting unfathomable stupidity.
--

Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida

I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.

* Kerr-Mudd, John:

> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
> Quinn C <lispamateur@crommatograph.info> wrote:
>
>> * Kerr-Mudd, John:
>>
>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
>>> Madhu <enometh@meer.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
>>>> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:
>>>>
>>>>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
>>>>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
>>>>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
>>>>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
>>>>> subscribe to that NG.
>>>>
>>>> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
>>>>
>>> That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
>>> to clarify 'urcm'
>>
>> I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
>> perchance anyone else's mother here?
>>
> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.

The first part seems to reduce the notion of "mother" to "biological
mother" (while the second part is completely irrelevant) ...

> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
> - if that's what you were hinting at.

.... but now you seem right back to a wider notion.

No, that didn't help.
--
Quinn C
My pronouns are they/them
(or other gender-neutral ones)

* Quinn C:

> * Peter T. Daniels:
>
>> On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 9:16:20 PM UTC-4, Peter Moylan wrote:
>>> On 18/10/22 03:24, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>>>> On 2022-10-17 16:05:29 +0000, Adam Funk said:
>>
>>>>> You normally see some of the header lines (Subject, From, Date)
>>>>> without any extra effort.
>>>> How much effort is needed to select "Show full headers"?
>>>
>>> I've just gone searching for that in GG, without any luck. I know that
>>> GG used to have that option, but if it still exists then it is well hidden.
>>
>> It was "show original message," under the ... menu, but now it's
>> grayed out.
>>
>>> In a different article PTD suggests that such an option would have no
>>> point. On the contrary, I've often needed to look at article headers. In
>>> my case, they have two main uses:
>>
>> Not no point at all. No point for an ordinary user.
>>
>>> (a) When there's confusion over apparently garbled text, the headers
>>> reveal the character set used by the author. Now and then we've had
>>> discussions over such cases, where a discussion has been complicated by,
>>> for example, Latin-1 text being misinterpreted as UTF-8 by a faulty
>>> newsreader. (Does GG still have that bug?)
>>
>> Did it ever?
>
> It certainly did. I think it was when the encoding was QP. This has
> become obsolete because all systems are 8-bit safe these days.

I correct myself - it still has the bug, even with regular 8-bit, it
just happened here:
<https://groups.google.com/g/de.etc.sprache.deutsch/c/IDCEXJbTpsU/m/OvoSevGaAwAJ>

I sent in a flawless crêpe.

�� (just to make sure this post is in UTF-8)　
--
Quinn C
My pronouns are they/them
(or other gender-neutral ones)

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:41:42 +0200
Silvano <Silvano@noncisonopernessuno.it> wrote:

> > lar3ryca submitted this gripping article, maybe on Thursday:
> >> Incredible. Six days and he has not only forgotten he started it, but
> >> also that he posted in it yesterday.
>
> I guess you've been reading AUE much longer than I have. Why do you
> wonder about PTD?

Quite. Best ignored.

--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:23:00 -0400
Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:36:19 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 3:34:16 PM UTC-4, Tony Cooper wrote:
> >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:54:03 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> >> <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> >On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 11:38:29 AM UTC-4, Tony Cooper wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> >> >> <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> >> >On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
> >> >> >> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
> >> >> >> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
> >> >> >> > * Kerr-Mudd, John:
> >> >> >> > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
> >> >> >> > > Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> > >> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
> >> >> >> > >> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:
> >
> >> >> >> > >>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
> >> >> >> > >>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
> >> >> >> > >>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
> >> >> >> > >>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
> >> >> >> > >>> subscribe to that NG.
> >> >> >> > >> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
> >> >> >> > > That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
> >> >> >> > > to clarify 'urcm'
> >> >> >> > I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
> >> >> >> > perchance anyone else's mother here?
> >> >> >> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
> >> >> >> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
> >> >> >> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
> >> >> >> - if that's what you were hinting at.
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> Bah, and indeed Humbug.
> >> >> >Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
> >> >> >into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
> >> >> > explain himself and apologize?
> >> >> Dragged into the thread?
> >> >> You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
> >> >> thread!
> >> >Hey, moron. What in what Mudd replied to had anything to do with me?
> >
> >The Unanswered Question.
> >
> >> >Never heard of "thread drift"?
>
> Yes. Thread drift is when the original topic is changed to another
> topic by a comment that is not directly related to the preceeding
> posts.
>
> Quite ordinary in this group.
>
> If you, too, know what it is you would know that's exactly what
> Kerr-Mudd did and would not continue to attempt to excuse your
> blatantly ignorant claim of being "dragged in".
>
>
Good grief. I thought I was perhaps been seen to be "mothering" PTD by
trying to persuade him to play nicely. As I said, I've decided it's
impossible.

>
>
> >> >You tried your best to derail the thread at the very beginning, but
> >> >you failed.
> >>
> >> Yes, my attempt to "derail" the thread was a clear, concise, and
> >> accurate answer to the question you asked to start the thread.
> >
> >Yeah, just keep on flaunting your inability to read for context and content.
> >
> >> Little did I know that the question you wanted an answer for was not
> >> the question you posed.
> >
> >If the question had been addressed to you specifically, it might have
> >been spelled out in sufficient detail that even you could understand
> >it. That was not necessary for ordinary readers of English.
> >> --
> >> Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida
> >> I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.
> >
> >And flaunting unfathomable stupidity.

You've (and me I guess) have got him riled up good and proper.
(I hope I've used the expression correctly for 'over there').
--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:16:08 -0400
Quinn C <lispamateur@crommatograph.info> wrote:

> * Kerr-Mudd, John:
>
> > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
> > Quinn C <lispamateur@crommatograph.info> wrote:
> >
> >> * Kerr-Mudd, John:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
> >>> Madhu <enometh@meer.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
> >>>> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
> >>>>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
> >>>>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
> >>>>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
> >>>>> subscribe to that NG.
> >>>>
> >>>> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
> >>>>
> >>> That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
> >>> to clarify 'urcm'
> >>
> >> I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
> >> perchance anyone else's mother here?
> >>
> > I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
>
> The first part seems to reduce the notion of "mother" to "biological
> mother" (while the second part is completely irrelevant) ...
>
well there were (/are) two connotations of "mother" ; In the first part of
my reply I'm stating clearly that I'm not Madhu's biological mother - not
that there should be much room for confusion. The second part is a
question I perceived as hinting that I was attempting to "mother"
someone else (on this NG), I could only think back to my initial
reactions to PTD's erroneous posts -

> > Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
> > now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
> > - if that's what you were hinting at.

- which is why there's a conditional part.

>
> ... but now you seem right back to a wider notion.
>
> No, that didn't help.

I was trying to cover all the bases. Ah well.

--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.

On Friday, October 21, 2022 at 4:21:41 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:41:42 +0200
> Silvano <Sil...@noncisonopernessuno.it> wrote:

> > > lar3ryca submitted this gripping article, maybe on Thursday:
> > >> Incredible. Six days and he has not only forgotten he started it, but
> > >> also that he posted in it yesterday.
> > I guess you've been reading AUE much longer than I have. Why do you
> > wonder about PTD?
>
> Quite. Best ignored.
> --
> Bah, and indeed Humbug.

THEN FUCKING IGNORE, YOU FUCKING LIAR.

On Friday, October 21, 2022 at 4:28:51 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:23:00 -0400
> Tony Cooper <tonyco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:36:19 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> > <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > >On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 3:34:16 PM UTC-4, Tony Cooper wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:54:03 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> > >> <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > >> >On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 11:38:29 AM UTC-4, Tony Cooper wrote:
> > >> >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
> > >> >> <gram...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > >> >> >On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:21:32 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
> > >> >> >> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
> > >> >> >> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
> > >> >> >> > * Kerr-Mudd, John:
> > >> >> >> > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
> > >> >> >> > > Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
> > >> >> >> > >> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
> > >> >> >> > >> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:

> > >> >> >> > >>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
> > >> >> >> > >>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
> > >> >> >> > >>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
> > >> >> >> > >>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
> > >> >> >> > >>> subscribe to that NG.
> > >> >> >> > >> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
> > >> >> >> > > That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
> > >> >> >> > > to clarify 'urcm'
> > >> >> >> > I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
> > >> >> >> > perchance anyone else's mother here?
> > >> >> >> I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
> > >> >> >> Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
> > >> >> >> now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
> > >> >> >> - if that's what you were hinting at.
> > >> >> >> --
> > >> >> >> Bah, and indeed Humbug.
> > >> >> >Could someone explain to me what the bloody hell dragging me
> > >> >> >into this thread has to do with ANYTHING, and demand that Mudd
> > >> >> > explain himself and apologize?
> > >> >> Dragged into the thread?
> > >> >> You started the thread! You have posted about 20 times in this
> > >> >> thread!
> > >> >Hey, moron. What in what Mudd replied to had anything to do with me?
> > >The Unanswered Question.
> > >> >Never heard of "thread drift"?
> > Yes. Thread drift is when the original topic is changed to another
> > topic by a comment that is not directly related to the preceeding
> > posts.
> > Quite ordinary in this group.
> > If you, too, know what it is you would know that's exactly what
> > Kerr-Mudd did and would not continue to attempt to excuse your
> > blatantly ignorant claim of being "dragged in".
>
> Good grief. I thought I was perhaps been seen to be "mothering" PTD by
> trying to persuade him to play nicely. As I said, I've decided it's
> impossible.

When in your whole fucking lying participation in this newsgroup
have you ever attempted to "persuade" anything?

> > >> >You tried your best to derail the thread at the very beginning, but
> > >> >you failed.
> > >> Yes, my attempt to "derail" the thread was a clear, concise, and
> > >> accurate answer to the question you asked to start the thread.
> > >Yeah, just keep on flaunting your inability to read for context and content.
> > >> Little did I know that the question you wanted an answer for was not
> > >> the question you posed.
> > >If the question had been addressed to you specifically, it might have
> > >been spelled out in sufficient detail that even you could understand
> > >it. That was not necessary for ordinary readers of English.
> > >> --
> > >> Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida
> > >> I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.
> > >And flaunting unfathomable stupidity.
>
> You've (and me I guess) have got him riled up good and proper.
> (I hope I've used the expression correctly for 'over there').
> --
> Bah, and indeed Humbug.

Is that your aim? A far cry from "ignore," you fucking liar.

On Friday, October 21, 2022 at 4:37:53 AM UTC-4, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:16:08 -0400
> Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
> > * Kerr-Mudd, John:
> > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:05:26 -0400
> > > Quinn C <lispa...@crommatograph.info> wrote:
> > >> * Kerr-Mudd, John:
> > >>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:46:50 +0530
> > >>> Madhu <eno...@meer.net> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> * "Kerr-Mudd, John" <20221019090732.1ab8d637084666f6c82cdec7 @127.0.0.1> :
> > >>>> Wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:07:32 +0100:

> > >>>>>> No, different group http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
> > >>>>>> u.k.rec.cycling.m seems to use chiark moderation software and seems to
> > >>>>>> add an "Organization: SGO" header unless superseded
> > >>>>> Thanks. I'm not a Christian, and aren't (amn't?) interested so don't
> > >>>>> subscribe to that NG.
> > >>>> [I'm a Hindu myself but I that didn't stop me.
> > >>> That's fine; if it interests you, I am not your mother! I just felt I had
> > >>> to clarify 'urcm'
> > >> I'm certainly interested to know you're not Madhu's mother. Are you
> > >> perchance anyone else's mother here?
> > > I'm nobody's mother; I'm male and identify as heterosexual. HTH.
> > The first part seems to reduce the notion of "mother" to "biological
> > mother" (while the second part is completely irrelevant) ...
>
> well there were (/are) two connotations of "mother" ; In the first part of
> my reply I'm stating clearly that I'm not Madhu's biological mother - not
> that there should be much room for confusion. The second part is a
> question I perceived as hinting that I was attempting to "mother"
> someone else (on this NG), I could only think back to my initial
> reactions to PTD's erroneous posts -

When did you _ever_ do such a thing, as opposed to "reacting" to
your stoogemaster's distortions by selective and misinterpreted
quoting of them?

> > > Maybe, at one time, I did think PTD's behaviour might be correctable, I
> > > now realise this is not acheivable, so I'm ignoring him.
> > > - if that's what you were hinting at.
>
> - which is why there's a conditional part.
>
> > ... but now you seem right back to a wider notion.
> > No, that didn't help.
>
> I was trying to cover all the bases. Ah well.

All your bases are belong to us.
> --
> Bah, and indeed Humbug.

* Peter T. Daniels:

> On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 10:21:11 AM UTC-4, Quinn C wrote:
>> * Peter T. Daniels:
>
>>> Over the summer, a car ad ran briefly (I supposed because
>>> it didn't stimulate visits to the dealership) but now it's returned
>>> with greater frequency than it had at first.
>>>
>>> The 30-second (presumably) spot has three vignettes.
>>>
>>> (1) Driver says, "Watch this!" (scene; car parallel-parking
>>> itself) Passenger says, "It parked itself! That's so you!"
>>>
>>> (2) Passenger says, "You know where you're going! That's
>>> so you!" (followed by nearly inaudible exchange possibly
>>> suggesting that he's following the built-in GPS)
>>>
>>> (3) Soccer mom delivers about half a dozen little tykes
>>> to the game. Coach says, "You brought all those players
>>> in your [brand name]?" Mom: (assents) Coach: "That's
>>> so you!" Mom: "It is, isn't it."
>>>
>>> What on earth does "That's so you" mean?
>>
>> The last one seems a normal use of "that's so you": you're the mom who
>> helps other moms by driving all their kids (with gratuitous mention of
>> car brand because it's an ad.)
>
> But the "It is" (sorry, no tag question) is so smug.

Dialog from a scene in Nancy Drew (2019):

- You look amazing!
- I am amazing!

But yes, that was meant to indicate the second person is full of
herself.

--
Bring home one dismembered body part, once, mind you, once,
and people get twitchy about checking your luggage ever after.
-- Vicereine Cordelia
in L. McMaster Bujold, Gentleman Jole and the Red Queen

Peter T. Daniels wrote:

> What does my posting "in it yesterday" have to do with whatever Mudd
> was wasting electrons on?
>
> As usual, it is Moron Cooper who tries to encourage his stooge to fight.

"Listen, asshole, you heckle me one more time and I'm gonna come down
there and kick your ass."