On Sunday, October 9, 2022 at 6:20:50 PM UTC-7, S K wrote:
> note that the jew hate speech "antisemitism" "antisemite" etc. do not belong in honest discourse.
>
> But still quality haters like pat buchanan, Tucker Carlson et al are preferable. As a feral nigger Kanye is too unpredictable.

To Buchanan & Carlson, antisemitism might be business.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1990/09/20/pat-buchanan-the-jewish-question/bfc8e956-316d-4abb-b33b-97aace0b80d0/

S K posted: Apparently Kanye West is a righteous hater of jews

S K redefines the meaning of "righteous gentile":->

Who are the unrighteous haters of Jews?

On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
<ranjit_mathews@yahoo.com> wrote:

(Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)

It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
you stopped responding to S K.

While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.

--

Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida

I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.

On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 18:29:05 -0400, Tony Cooper
<tonycooper214@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
><ranjit_mathews@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>(Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)
>
>
>It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
>or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
>you stopped responding to S K.

A very strong ditto!

>While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
>sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
>We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.
>
>

On 2022-10-16 22:29:05 +0000, Tony Cooper said:

> On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
> <ranjit_mathews@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> (Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)
>
>
> It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
> or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
> you stopped responding to S K.
>
> While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
> sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
> We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.

Yes, but I think Dingbat _wants_ you to see them: he's an SK-enabler.
That's one of the reasons I don't read his posts.

--
Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.

On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 11:21:57 PM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> On 2022-10-16 22:29:05 +0000, Tony Cooper said:
>
> > On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
> > <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > (Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)
> >
> >
> > It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
> > or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
> > you stopped responding to S K.
> >
> > While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
> > sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
> > We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.
> Yes, but I think Dingbat _wants_ you to see them: he's an SK-enabler.
> That's one of the reasons I don't read his posts.
>
>
> --
> Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.

S K also hates the truth, and I'm going to keep telling him and you what he hopes and hates you don't hear about the simple that defines the COWARD.

On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 9:58:41 PM UTC-7, bozo de niro wrote:
> On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 11:21:57 PM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> > On 2022-10-16 22:29:05 +0000, Tony Cooper said:
> >
> > > On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
> > > <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > (Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)
> > >
> > >
> > > It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
> > > or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
> > > you stopped responding to S K.
> > >
> > > While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
> > > sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
> > > We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.
> > Yes, but I think Dingbat _wants_ you to see them: he's an SK-enabler.
> > That's one of the reasons I don't read his posts.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.
> S K also hates the truth, and I'm going to keep telling him and you what he hopes and hates you don't hear about the simple TRUTH that defines the COWARD.

dontcha arentcha COWARD
O
W
A
R
D

You'll always be your daddy's COWARD wontcha coward.

On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 3:29:11 PM UTC-7, Tony Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
> <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> (Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)
>
>
> It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
> or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
> you stopped responding to S K.
>
> While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
> sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
> We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.
>
>
There was just an anonymous death threat to a Jewish schoolteacher
and his rabbi father, in a letter claiming to be from a group of high
school pupils.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/we-dont-want-jews-letter-threatens-to-murder-french-teacher-like-samuel-paty/ar-AA12Xy43

In all the expressions of horror at the news, I've yet to see a complaint
that newsmedia, by reporting the threat. are enabling the terrorists who
made the threat. I'd like to see Athel make that claim in a letter to the
newsmedia, and post a draft of the letter. If he won't, then his claim that
those who comment on such a matter are enablers is disingenuous if
not arrant nonsense.

More to the point, my suggestion that a righteous hater is a
contradiction in terms is on topic in a.u.e by virtue of raising
the question whether it is proper English usage. Can a hater
of a motely group of people who have in common only their
religious affiliation or ethnic identity be termed righteous
in any context?

Can there be a righteous hater of Navajos or Rastafarians,
for instance?

If there can, how can it be objectively determined whether a
hater is righteous or unrighteous?

On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 21:47:46 UTC+11, Dingbat wrote:
> On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 3:29:11 PM UTC-7, Tony Cooper wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
> > <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > (Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)
> >
> >
> > It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
> > or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
> > you stopped responding to S K.
> >
> > While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
> > sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
> > We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.
> >
> >
> There was just an anonymous death threat to a Jewish schoolteacher
> and his rabbi father, in a letter claiming to be from a group of high
> school pupils.
> https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/we-dont-want-jews-letter-threatens-to-murder-french-teacher-like-samuel-paty/ar-AA12Xy43
>
> In all the expressions of horror at the news, I've yet to see a complaint
> that newsmedia, by reporting the threat. are enabling the terrorists who
> made the threat. I'd like to see Athel make that claim in a letter to the
> newsmedia, and post a draft of the letter. If he won't, then his claim that
> those who comment on such a matter are enablers is disingenuous if
> not arrant nonsense.
>
> More to the point, my suggestion that a righteous hater is a
> contradiction in terms is on topic in a.u.e by virtue of raising
> the question whether it is proper English usage. Can a hater
> of a motely group of people who have in common only their
> religious affiliation or ethnic identity be termed righteous
> in any context?

If the hater has no criminal record, has no personal interest, is highly regarded by his own community, much as say an Iranian ayatollah, or Trump at a longish stretch, then to his castefellows or kinfellows or colourfellows or creedfellows or classfellows he is righteous.

Those who hate me here, and there are so many of them, are soooo righteous in each other's eyes. That they hate what is right has nothing to do with their righteousness, which is an attitude formed from lovingly nurtured biases, long and deep.
>
> Can there be a righteous hater of Navajos or Rastafarians,
> for instance?

Why not.
>
> If there can, how can it be objectively determined whether a
> hater is righteous or unrighteous?

Popularity.
Trump and Gabbard are righteous haters of the warmongering Democrats. They are popular.

On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 03:47:43 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
<ranjit_mathews@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 3:29:11 PM UTC-7, Tony Cooper wrote:
>> On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
>> <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> (Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)
>>
>>
>> It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
>> or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
>> you stopped responding to S K.
>>
>> While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
>> sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
>> We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.
>>
>>
>There was just an anonymous death threat to a Jewish schoolteacher
> and his rabbi father, in a letter claiming to be from a group of high
> school pupils.
>https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/we-dont-want-jews-letter-threatens-to-murder-french-teacher-like-samuel-paty/ar-AA12Xy43
>
>In all the expressions of horror at the news, I've yet to see a complaint
>that newsmedia, by reporting the threat. are enabling the terrorists who
>made the threat. I'd like to see Athel make that claim in a letter to the
>newsmedia, and post a draft of the letter. If he won't, then his claim that
>those who comment on such a matter are enablers is disingenuous if
>not arrant nonsense.

Apples and oranges. This is not a "news" forum.
>
>More to the point, my suggestion that a righteous hater is a
>contradiction in terms is on topic in a.u.e by virtue of raising
>the question whether it is proper English usage.

The term can be discussed in a.u.e. without the S K post being quoted.
It would be the term itself, not the context, being discussed.
It's giving S K oxygen that I feel should be stopped.

> Can a hater
>of a motely group of people who have in common only their
>religious affiliation or ethnic identity be termed righteous
>in any context?
>
>Can there be a righteous hater of Navajos or Rastafarians,
>for instance?
>
>If there can, how can it be objectively determined whether a
>hater is righteous or unrighteous?
--

Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida

I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.

On Wednesday, 19 October 2022 at 00:20:54 UTC+11, Tony Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 03:47:43 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
> <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 3:29:11 PM UTC-7, Tony Cooper wrote:
> >> On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
> >> <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> (Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)
> >>
> >>
> >> It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
> >> or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
> >> you stopped responding to S K.
> >>
> >> While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
> >> sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
> >> We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.
> >>
> >>
> >There was just an anonymous death threat to a Jewish schoolteacher
> > and his rabbi father, in a letter claiming to be from a group of high
> > school pupils.
> >https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/we-dont-want-jews-letter-threatens-to-murder-french-teacher-like-samuel-paty/ar-AA12Xy43
> >
> >In all the expressions of horror at the news, I've yet to see a complaint
> >that newsmedia, by reporting the threat. are enabling the terrorists who
> >made the threat. I'd like to see Athel make that claim in a letter to the
> >newsmedia, and post a draft of the letter. If he won't, then his claim that
> >those who comment on such a matter are enablers is disingenuous if
> >not arrant nonsense.
> Apples and oranges. This is not a "news" forum.
> >
> >More to the point, my suggestion that a righteous hater is a
> >contradiction in terms is on topic in a.u.e by virtue of raising
> >the question whether it is proper English usage.
> The term can be discussed in a.u.e. without the S K post being quoted.
> It would be the term itself, not the context, being discussed.
>
> It's giving S K oxygen that I feel should be stopped.

Why? Are you against freedom of speech?
Please understand that freedom of speech means nothing if it does not cause consternation, inviting rebuttal.
What aspect of the Usenet charter code has skippy violated? What lies is he saying? What is he plagiarising?
Do we have to swear we won't be offensive to any particular social group when we make posts?

Certainly skippy is a pain in the arse, but to boycott him on that ground is so girly. Sheeplike, too. This attitude gives overmuch oxygen to certain privileged parties, often corrupt to their cores, at cost to others, left in the dark. Not nice! Leads to disasters like climate screwups, wars, suicides, divorces, pedophilia, etc. with emphasis on wrong issues, and neglect to doing right.

In short, Skippy is a neo Nazi, naturally hating Jews. Not the first, though, for that.There was one guy named Topaz, a dedicated Nazi. His antiJew posts in usenet are still available. Skippy is pale pink in comparison, not even a wannabe.

Skippy is often very offensive to me, but that hardly matters. He cannot help being a freakish nuisance, because of his upbringing in the foul city of Madras, where they worship film stars and perverts like the Great Leader P*.

Let Jews tell us, as a rebuttal, all the great good they have done to the world, so we can applaud them. I am not talking of Nobels here, but actual achievements for humanity that cannot be debunked. What are the top ten, then? What justifies their status as Chosen People, beyond criticism, lese majeste being highest royalty?

> > Can a hater
> >of a motely group of people who have in common only their
> >religious affiliation or ethnic identity be termed righteous
> >in any context?
> >
> >Can there be a righteous hater of Navajos or Rastafarians,
> >for instance?
> >
> >If there can, how can it be objectively determined whether a
> >hater is righteous or unrighteous?
> --
>
> Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida
>
> I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.

On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:05:58 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
<banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, 19 October 2022 at 00:20:54 UTC+11, Tony Cooper wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 03:47:43 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
>> <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 3:29:11 PM UTC-7, Tony Cooper wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
>> >> <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> (Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
>> >> or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
>> >> you stopped responding to S K.
>> >>
>> >> While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
>> >> sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
>> >> We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >There was just an anonymous death threat to a Jewish schoolteacher
>> > and his rabbi father, in a letter claiming to be from a group of high
>> > school pupils.
>> >https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/we-dont-want-jews-letter-threatens-to-murder-french-teacher-like-samuel-paty/ar-AA12Xy43
>> >
>> >In all the expressions of horror at the news, I've yet to see a complaint
>> >that newsmedia, by reporting the threat. are enabling the terrorists who
>> >made the threat. I'd like to see Athel make that claim in a letter to the
>> >newsmedia, and post a draft of the letter. If he won't, then his claim that
>> >those who comment on such a matter are enablers is disingenuous if
>> >not arrant nonsense.
>> Apples and oranges. This is not a "news" forum.
>> >
>> >More to the point, my suggestion that a righteous hater is a
>> >contradiction in terms is on topic in a.u.e by virtue of raising
>> >the question whether it is proper English usage.
>> The term can be discussed in a.u.e. without the S K post being quoted.
>> It would be the term itself, not the context, being discussed.
>>
>> It's giving S K oxygen that I feel should be stopped.
>
>Why? Are you against freedom of speech?

Your understanding of the concept of "freedom of speech" is as limited
as your understanding of mechanical and scientific principles.

My post neither denies S K his freedom to post nor Dingbat's freedom
to respond. It is an expression of opinion about the value of S K's
posts and the effect of Dingbat's responses.

"Hate speech" is allowed under the First Amendment to the US
Constitution, and the US Supreme Court has ruled (Snyder vs Phelps)
that the First Amendment does not make an exception for "Hate Speech".
Nothing in that ruling, though, prohibits anyone from condemning "hate
speech" or condemning the propogation of "hate speech".
--

Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida

I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.

On Wednesday, 19 October 2022 at 10:12:18 UTC+11, Tony Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:05:58 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
> <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, 19 October 2022 at 00:20:54 UTC+11, Tony Cooper wrote:
> >> On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 03:47:43 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
> >> <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 3:29:11 PM UTC-7, Tony Cooper wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
> >> >> <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> (Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
> >> >> or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
> >> >> you stopped responding to S K.
> >> >>
> >> >> While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
> >> >> sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
> >> >> We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >There was just an anonymous death threat to a Jewish schoolteacher
> >> > and his rabbi father, in a letter claiming to be from a group of high
> >> > school pupils.
> >> >https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/we-dont-want-jews-letter-threatens-to-murder-french-teacher-like-samuel-paty/ar-AA12Xy43
> >> >
> >> >In all the expressions of horror at the news, I've yet to see a complaint
> >> >that newsmedia, by reporting the threat. are enabling the terrorists who
> >> >made the threat. I'd like to see Athel make that claim in a letter to the
> >> >newsmedia, and post a draft of the letter. If he won't, then his claim that
> >> >those who comment on such a matter are enablers is disingenuous if
> >> >not arrant nonsense.
> >> Apples and oranges. This is not a "news" forum.
> >> >
> >> >More to the point, my suggestion that a righteous hater is a
> >> >contradiction in terms is on topic in a.u.e by virtue of raising
> >> >the question whether it is proper English usage.
> >> The term can be discussed in a.u.e. without the S K post being quoted.
> >> It would be the term itself, not the context, being discussed.
> >>
> >> It's giving S K oxygen that I feel should be stopped.
> >
> >Why? Are you against freedom of speech?
> Your understanding of the concept of "freedom of speech" is as limited
> as your understanding of mechanical and scientific principles.

Try to explain my new experiments in terms of mechanical and scientific principles:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s
and please explain why people like you are ignoring them, or what have they to do in this context.
> My post neither denies S K his freedom to post nor Dingbat's freedom
> to respond. It is an expression of opinion about the value of S K's
> posts and the effect of Dingbat's responses.

Fair enough, you have to allow freedom of speech - as you cannot stop it, this being an unmoderated group - but you do your best to suppress the speech of those you do not like while telling lies about my understanding of mechanical principles;
Which are sound, and refreshingly, revolutionarily novel, well explained for all in:

Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

Section 1
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

Section 1 (contd.)
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

Section 2
The Creation and Destruction of Energy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

Section 3
The Structure of Heavenly Bodies
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ

Section 4
The Nature of Explosion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ

Section 5
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/jhgcsTq-NrQ/ZBwG8S9jBQAJ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
IFE - 2 Experimental setups

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
IFE - 8 New Physics

NO one has found anything unscientific in them, they have been around for years, so try to be the first - if you can.
Note: Going against mainstream herd thought is not unscientific.

> "Hate speech" is allowed under the First Amendment to the US
> Constitution, and the US Supreme Court has ruled (Snyder vs Phelps)
> that the First Amendment does not make an exception for "Hate Speech".
> Nothing in that ruling, though, prohibits anyone from condemning "hate
> speech" or condemning the propogation of "hate speech".

Lies for suppression are also expressions of hate, don't you think, so in a fair universe you are as much to be blamed for your lying as skippy is for his hate speech.
You do not just condemn skippy for his hate speech. You ask for his suppression, that others boycott him or face consequences, and that is bullying, certainly going against freedom of speech.
To quote you:
"It's giving S K oxygen that I feel should be stopped."
In short, you want skippy effectively dead for his using freedom of speech.
Had you simply condemned, I would have nothing to say except you too used freedom of speech to condemn.
I have nothing to say about your condemning my understanding of mechanical and scientific principles, except that you are wrong about them. But then, so many are, and not all are dishonest, merely dull, sheepish.

> --
>
> Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida
>
> I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.

I am afraid there is more to it than that.

On Wednesday, 19 October 2022 at 10:57:48 UTC+11, S K wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 6:06:01 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 19 October 2022 at 00:20:54 UTC+11, Tony Cooper wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 03:47:43 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
> > > <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Sunday, October 16, 2022 at 3:29:11 PM UTC-7, Tony Cooper wrote:
> > > >> On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT), Dingbat
> > > >> <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> (Deleting the body of a post responding to S K)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> It's a free group, and I'm not going to tell someone else what to do
> > > >> or what to post. However, I think the group would be better served if
> > > >> you stopped responding to S K.
> > > >>
> > > >> While you use Google Groups and can't utilize the killfile option, the
> > > >> sensible people who have that feature available do have S K killfiled.
> > > >> We wouldn't see his antisemitic remarks if you wouldn't respond.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >There was just an anonymous death threat to a Jewish schoolteacher
> > > > and his rabbi father, in a letter claiming to be from a group of high
> > > > school pupils.
> > > >https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/we-dont-want-jews-letter-threatens-to-murder-french-teacher-like-samuel-paty/ar-AA12Xy43
> > > >
> > > >In all the expressions of horror at the news, I've yet to see a complaint
> > > >that newsmedia, by reporting the threat. are enabling the terrorists who
> > > >made the threat. I'd like to see Athel make that claim in a letter to the
> > > >newsmedia, and post a draft of the letter. If he won't, then his claim that
> > > >those who comment on such a matter are enablers is disingenuous if
> > > >not arrant nonsense.
> > > Apples and oranges. This is not a "news" forum.
> > > >
> > > >More to the point, my suggestion that a righteous hater is a
> > > >contradiction in terms is on topic in a.u.e by virtue of raising
> > > >the question whether it is proper English usage.
> > > The term can be discussed in a.u.e. without the S K post being quoted..
> > > It would be the term itself, not the context, being discussed.
> > >
> > > It's giving S K oxygen that I feel should be stopped.
> > Why? Are you against freedom of speech?
> > Please understand that freedom of speech means nothing if it does not cause consternation, inviting rebuttal.
> > What aspect of the Usenet charter code has skippy violated? What lies is he saying? What is he plagiarising?
> > Do we have to swear we won't be offensive to any particular social group when we make posts?
> >
> > Certainly skippy is a pain in the arse, but to boycott him on that ground is so girly. Sheeplike, too. This attitude gives overmuch oxygen to certain privileged parties, often corrupt to their cores, at cost to others, left in the dark. Not nice! Leads to disasters like climate screwups, wars, suicides, divorces, pedophilia, etc. with emphasis on wrong issues, and neglect to doing right.
> >
> > In short, Skippy is a neo Nazi, naturally hating Jews. Not the first, though, for that.There was one guy named Topaz, a dedicated Nazi. His antiJew posts in usenet are still available. Skippy is pale pink in comparison, not even a wannabe.
> >
> > Skippy is often very offensive to me, but that hardly matters. He cannot help being a freakish nuisance, because of his upbringing in the foul city of Madras, where they worship film stars and perverts like the Great Leader P*.
> >
> > Let Jews tell us, as a rebuttal, all the great good they have done to the world, so we can applaud them. I am not talking of Nobels here, but actual achievements for humanity that cannot be debunked. What are the top ten, then? What justifies their status as Chosen People, beyond criticism, lese majeste being highest royalty?
> > > > Can a hater
> > > >of a motely group of people who have in common only their
> > > >religious affiliation or ethnic identity be termed righteous
> > > >in any context?
> > > >
> > > >Can there be a righteous hater of Navajos or Rastafarians,
> > > >for instance?
> > > >
> > > >If there can, how can it be objectively determined whether a
> > > >hater is righteous or unrighteous?
> > > --
> > >
> > > Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida
> > >
> > > I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.
> Mahashay censorship is aleady happening. Google in under no obligation to publish my stuff (freedom of speech only applies to government censorship).. They delete my more insightful jew posts. I don't know if an AI bot detects "anti-semitism" or people like the curse on this group complain to google and get it done.
>
> (1) It is now known , outside of spaces within jew propaganda walls that the preternaturally horrific war in the Ukraine is a jew war
>
> (2) The WASP conservatives are SEETHING at this war for the jews,by the jews, of the jews - it is like a dam getting ready to break
>
> (3) the endless"palestinian terror attacks against peace-loving jews" play has ended.
> EVERYBODY knows it is jew murderousness that is driving the middle east.
>
> I have hated jews FOREVER but kept silent out of fear - until Henry the K's horrific racism towards Hindus/Indians was made public.
>
> (4) There will soon be a cataclysm unleashed against jews - and my insight (gentiles cannot live with jews because of 'Seinfeld") is the only one that can solve the jew problem without physical annihilation.

In which case you tell us, since Jews will not
"all the great good they have done to the world, so we can applaud them. I am not talking of Nobels here, but actual achievements for humanity that cannot be debunked. What are the top ten, then?"