"It was just last week that we noticed that parts of the transgender movement seemed to be getting militant and possibly dangerous. We did a whole segment about it on Thursday night. That segment was sparked by an NPR segment we had heard and never expected to hear. NPR, as always, as a matter of editorial policy, completely opposed to civilian ownership of firearms, with the possible exception of the IRS agents.

Yet here suddenly was that very same station, National Public Radio, positively urging trans people to buy guns, as many guns as possible and if necessary, to use them. "The world is dangerous," explained one trans gun owner, "You have to be dangerous back."

That seems strange to us. Is the United States really a dangerous place for trans people? Well, West Baltimore is dangerous. You could easily get murdered there. But if you're trans in this country, obviously there are many downsides, but there do appear to be some benefits. It's a lot easier to get into Harvard, for example. It's definitely easier to get a job at Citibank or in the Biden White House. If you're transgender can so much as fly a kite, the Pentagon will happily make you an F-35 pilot just so Hollywood can make a movie about it.

Identifying as trans, whatever, again, its downsides, does convey status in this country, which is why so many young people now do. Not a lot of 19-year-olds are pretending to be car mechanics or lineman for a regional power company in eastern Ohio, but plenty of college freshmen do pretend to be members of the opposite sex, and why wouldn't they? "

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-trans-movement-targeting-christians

On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 6:54:26 AM UTC-7, ltlee1 wrote:
> "It was just last week that we noticed that parts of the transgender movement seemed to be getting militant and possibly dangerous. We did a whole segment about it on Thursday night. That segment was sparked by an NPR segment we had heard and never expected to hear. NPR, as always, as a matter of editorial policy, completely opposed to civilian ownership of firearms, with the possible exception of the IRS agents.
>
> Yet here suddenly was that very same station, National Public Radio, positively urging trans people to buy guns, as many guns as possible and if necessary, to use them. "The world is dangerous," explained one trans gun owner, "You have to be dangerous back."
>
> That seems strange to us. Is the United States really a dangerous place for trans people? Well, West Baltimore is dangerous. You could easily get murdered there. But if you're trans in this country, obviously there are many downsides, but there do appear to be some benefits. It's a lot easier to get into Harvard, for example. It's definitely easier to get a job at Citibank or in the Biden White House. If you're transgender can so much as fly a kite, the Pentagon will happily make you an F-35 pilot just so Hollywood can make a movie about it.
>
> Identifying as trans, whatever, again, its downsides, does convey status in this country, which is why so many young people now do. Not a lot of 19-year-olds are pretending to be car mechanics or lineman for a regional power company in eastern Ohio, but plenty of college freshmen do pretend to be members of the opposite sex, and why wouldn't they? "
>
> https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-trans-movement-targeting-christians

Why do you keep posting this crap?

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tucker-carlson-npr-transgender-guns_n_641d9104e4b0bc5cb6562e21

On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 5:16:55 PM UTC, bmoore wrote:
> On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 6:54:26 AM UTC-7, ltlee1 wrote:
> > "It was just last week that we noticed that parts of the transgender movement seemed to be getting militant and possibly dangerous. We did a whole segment about it on Thursday night. That segment was sparked by an NPR segment we had heard and never expected to hear. NPR, as always, as a matter of editorial policy, completely opposed to civilian ownership of firearms, with the possible exception of the IRS agents.
> >
> > Yet here suddenly was that very same station, National Public Radio, positively urging trans people to buy guns, as many guns as possible and if necessary, to use them. "The world is dangerous," explained one trans gun owner, "You have to be dangerous back."
> >
> > That seems strange to us. Is the United States really a dangerous place for trans people? Well, West Baltimore is dangerous. You could easily get murdered there. But if you're trans in this country, obviously there are many downsides, but there do appear to be some benefits. It's a lot easier to get into Harvard, for example. It's definitely easier to get a job at Citibank or in the Biden White House. If you're transgender can so much as fly a kite, the Pentagon will happily make you an F-35 pilot just so Hollywood can make a movie about it.
> >
> > Identifying as trans, whatever, again, its downsides, does convey status in this country, which is why so many young people now do. Not a lot of 19-year-olds are pretending to be car mechanics or lineman for a regional power company in eastern Ohio, but plenty of college freshmen do pretend to be members of the opposite sex, and why wouldn't they? "
> >
> > https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-trans-movement-targeting-christians
> Why do you keep posting this crap?
>
> https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tucker-carlson-npr-transgender-guns_n_641d9104e4b0bc5cb6562e21

Have no idea on what you are talking about.
If you don't disagree with any of the posted text, please inform what you don't disagree and because of what.
Again, issues. Not personalities or posters.

A link is not any kind of answer unless posters specify how the it is relevant.

On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 1:54:26 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
> "It was just last week that we noticed that parts of the transgender movement seemed to be getting militant and possibly dangerous. We did a whole segment about it on Thursday night. That segment was sparked by an NPR segment we had heard and never expected to hear. NPR, as always, as a matter of editorial policy, completely opposed to civilian ownership of firearms, with the possible exception of the IRS agents.
>
> Yet here suddenly was that very same station, National Public Radio, positively urging trans people to buy guns, as many guns as possible and if necessary, to use them. "The world is dangerous," explained one trans gun owner, "You have to be dangerous back."
>
> That seems strange to us. Is the United States really a dangerous place for trans people? Well, West Baltimore is dangerous. You could easily get murdered there. But if you're trans in this country, obviously there are many downsides, but there do appear to be some benefits. It's a lot easier to get into Harvard, for example. It's definitely easier to get a job at Citibank or in the Biden White House. If you're transgender can so much as fly a kite, the Pentagon will happily make you an F-35 pilot just so Hollywood can make a movie about it.
>
> Identifying as trans, whatever, again, its downsides, does convey status in this country, which is why so many young people now do. Not a lot of 19-year-olds are pretending to be car mechanics or lineman for a regional power company in eastern Ohio, but plenty of college freshmen do pretend to be members of the opposite sex, and why wouldn't they? "
>
> https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-trans-movement-targeting-christians

Let me rephrase the title of this thread from
"Trans Movement: From equalizing to mainstreaming to extremizing" to
"Trans Movement: From seeking equality to seeking to be mainstream to extremizing"

Nothing wrong in seeking equality. LGBTQ are equally humans.
But LGBTQ sexual orientation and gender feeling are, statistically speaking,
"normal" human behavior and feeling.
And their "abnormal", again statistically speaking. behavior and feeling would
not be welcomed/considered as mainstream human behavior.

Humans in general don't care about what is mainstream in particle physics. United field
theory, String theory, or Quantum gravity are all fine. Whatever is mainstream won't affect
people as humans.

In contrast, most people still care about sexual orientation and biology based gender
determination. Why? Sexual reproduction has been a major tool of and an integral part
of biological evolution.

Hence, effort by LGBTQ supporters seeking to be mainstream would be resisted. The harder
they try, the harder would be the resistance.

What next?
"The world is dangerous," explained one trans gun owner, "You have to be dangerous back."

On Sunday, April 9, 2023 at 6:52:22 AM UTC, David P. wrote:
> ltlee1 wrote:
> > bmoore wrote:
> > > ltlee1 wrote:
> > > > "It was just last week that we noticed that parts of the transgender movement seemed to be getting militant and possibly dangerous. We did a whole segment about it on Thursday night. That segment was sparked by an NPR segment we had heard and never expected to hear. NPR, as always, as a matter of editorial policy, completely opposed to civilian ownership of firearms, with the possible exception of the IRS agents.
> > > >
> > > > Yet here suddenly was that very same station, National Public Radio, positively urging trans people to buy guns, as many guns as possible and if necessary, to use them. "The world is dangerous," explained one trans gun owner, "You have to be dangerous back."
> > > >
> > > > That seems strange to us. Is the United States really a dangerous place for trans people? Well, West Baltimore is dangerous. You could easily get murdered there. But if you're trans in this country, obviously there are many downsides, but there do appear to be some benefits. It's a lot easier to get into Harvard, for example. It's definitely easier to get a job at Citibank or in the Biden White House. If you're transgender can so much as fly a kite, the Pentagon will happily make you an F-35 pilot just so Hollywood can make a movie about it.
> > > >
> > > > Identifying as trans, whatever, again, its downsides, does convey status in this country, which is why so many young people now do. Not a lot of 19-year-olds are pretending to be car mechanics or lineman for a regional power company in eastern Ohio, but plenty of college freshmen do pretend to be members of the opposite sex, and why wouldn't they? "
> > > >
> > > > https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-trans-movement-targeting-christians
> > > Why do you keep posting this crap?
> > >
> > > https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tucker-carlson-npr-transgender-guns_n_641d9104e4b0bc5cb6562e21
> > Have no idea on what you are talking about.
> > If you don't disagree with any of the posted text, please inform what you don't disagree and because of what.
> > Again, issues. Not personalities or posters.
> >
> > A link is not any kind of answer unless posters specify how the it is relevant.
> -----------
> What percentage of the population was Trans 50 years ago? What percentage now?
> What percentage 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000 years ago? How has it changed over time?
> Also the percentage of homosexuals...
> --
> --
Whatever.
LGBTQ promotors are overstretching in their effort to make them "normal"(statistically speaking)/mainstream.

On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 1:54:26 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
> "It was just last week that we noticed that parts of the transgender movement seemed to be getting militant and possibly dangerous. We did a whole segment about it on Thursday night. That segment was sparked by an NPR segment we had heard and never expected to hear. NPR, as always, as a matter of editorial policy, completely opposed to civilian ownership of firearms, with the possible exception of the IRS agents.
>
> Yet here suddenly was that very same station, National Public Radio, positively urging trans people to buy guns, as many guns as possible and if necessary, to use them. "The world is dangerous," explained one trans gun owner, "You have to be dangerous back."
>
> That seems strange to us. Is the United States really a dangerous place for trans people? Well, West Baltimore is dangerous. You could easily get murdered there. But if you're trans in this country, obviously there are many downsides, but there do appear to be some benefits. It's a lot easier to get into Harvard, for example. It's definitely easier to get a job at Citibank or in the Biden White House. If you're transgender can so much as fly a kite, the Pentagon will happily make you an F-35 pilot just so Hollywood can make a movie about it.
>
> Identifying as trans, whatever, again, its downsides, does convey status in this country, which is why so many young people now do. Not a lot of 19-year-olds are pretending to be car mechanics or lineman for a regional power company in eastern Ohio, but plenty of college freshmen do pretend to be members of the opposite sex, and why wouldn't they? "
>
> https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-trans-movement-targeting-christians

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Release the Tennessee Shooter's Manifesto

Americans deserve the truth about the killings in Nashville.

The transgender-identifying person who killed six, including three children, at Covenant Elementary in Nashville last month, was a chatty gal. The New York Post reports that, after Audrey Hale was neutralized by Nashville cops Rex Engelbert and Michael Collazo, “Twenty journals, five laptops, a suicide note and various other notes written by Hale were seized from the house she shared with her parents as well as two memoirs, five Covenant School yearbooks and seven cellphones, according to a search warrant.”

That is quite an output for a twenty-eight-year-old. The shooter’s manifesto has sparked the interest of the public, and according to Rasmussen, nearly two-thirds of Americans want it to be released. Although Metro Nashville Police Department promised to release the documents after a review—at some indefinite date—the FBI has been dragging its feet, hesitating to publish the document due to alleged sensitive content. Those excuses still don’t explain why her autobiographical writings and diaries are unavailable. Metro Nashville Council Member Courtney Johnston, who has been in touch with the agency, is reported to have explained why the feds have not been planning to release it: “What I was told is, her manifesto was a blueprint on total destruction, and it was so, so detailed at the level of what she had planned... That document in the wrong person’s hands would be astronomically dangerous.”
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/release-the-tennessee-shooters-manifesto/

On Sunday, April 9, 2023 at 8:55:25 AM UTC-4, ltlee1 wrote:
> On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 1:54:26 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
> > "It was just last week that we noticed that parts of the transgender movement seemed to be getting militant and possibly dangerous. We did a whole segment about it on Thursday night. That segment was sparked by an NPR segment we had heard and never expected to hear. NPR, as always, as a matter of editorial policy, completely opposed to civilian ownership of firearms, with the possible exception of the IRS agents.
> >
> > Yet here suddenly was that very same station, National Public Radio, positively urging trans people to buy guns, as many guns as possible and if necessary, to use them. "The world is dangerous," explained one trans gun owner, "You have to be dangerous back."
> >
> > That seems strange to us. Is the United States really a dangerous place for trans people? Well, West Baltimore is dangerous. You could easily get murdered there. But if you're trans in this country, obviously there are many downsides, but there do appear to be some benefits. It's a lot easier to get into Harvard, for example. It's definitely easier to get a job at Citibank or in the Biden White House. If you're transgender can so much as fly a kite, the Pentagon will happily make you an F-35 pilot just so Hollywood can make a movie about it.
> >
> > Identifying as trans, whatever, again, its downsides, does convey status in this country, which is why so many young people now do. Not a lot of 19-year-olds are pretending to be car mechanics or lineman for a regional power company in eastern Ohio, but plenty of college freshmen do pretend to be members of the opposite sex, and why wouldn't they? "
> >
> > https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-trans-movement-targeting-christians
> Let me rephrase the title of this thread from
> "Trans Movement: From equalizing to mainstreaming to extremizing" to
> "Trans Movement: From seeking equality to seeking to be mainstream to extremizing"
>
> Nothing wrong in seeking equality. LGBTQ are equally humans.
> But LGBTQ sexual orientation and gender feeling are, statistically speaking,
> "normal" human behavior and feeling.
> And their "abnormal", again statistically speaking. behavior and feeling would
> not be welcomed/considered as mainstream human behavior.
>
> Humans in general don't care about what is mainstream in particle physics.. United field
> theory, String theory, or Quantum gravity are all fine. Whatever is mainstream won't affect
> people as humans.
>
> In contrast, most people still care about sexual orientation and biology based gender
> determination. Why? Sexual reproduction has been a major tool of and an integral part
> of biological evolution.

"Clear majorities of Americans support restrictions affecting transgender children, a Washington Post-KFF poll finds,
offering political jet fuel for Republicans in state legislatures and Congress who are pushing measures restricting
curriculum, sports participation and medical care.

Most Americans don’t believe it’s even possible to be a gender that differs from that assigned at birth. A 57 percent
majority of adults said a person’s gender is determined from the start, with 43 percent saying it can differ."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/05/05/trans-poll-gop-politics-laws/
>
> Hence, effort by LGBTQ supporters seeking to be mainstream would be resisted. The harder
> they try, the harder would be the resistance.
>
> What next?
> "The world is dangerous," explained one trans gun owner, "You have to be dangerous back."