Hey.... Would You mind being a while quiet ?

On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:54:26 PM UTC+2, Amine Moulay Ramdane wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
> More of my philosophy about how the US Department of Justice sues Google for advertising dominance and wants to break up the company and more of my thoughts..
>
> I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
> invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
>
>
> The US Department of Justice sues Google for advertising dominance and wants to break up the company
>
> "The US Department of Justice on Tuesday accused Alphabet's Google of abusing its dominant position in digital advertising, threatening to dismantle a key business at the heart of one of Silicon Valley's most successful internet companies. The government says Google should be forced to sell its suite of ad managers, going after a business that generated around 12% of Google's revenue in 2021 but also plays a vital role in the engine's overall sales research and cloud society."
>
> Read more here (and you can translate the web page from french to english)
>
> https://web.developpez.com/actu/340754/Le-ministere-US-de-la-Justice-poursuit-Google-pour-dominance-publicitaire-et-veut-demanteler-l-entreprise-ce-qui-pourrait-nuire-a-sa-capacite-a-fournir-de-la-pub-ciblee-selon-Paul-Gallant/
>
>
> More of my philosophy about automation and about Google and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I have just added the thoughts on the effective tax on robots, please read again:
>
>
> "A study by researchers from MIT and Boston University claims that automation is responsible for more than half of the increase in the income gap between the most educated and the least educated workers in the United States.. The study estimates that automation reduced the wages of men without a high school diploma by 8.8% and of women without a high school diploma by 2.3%. These figures have been adjusted for inflation. According to the study by Acemoglu and Restrepo, growing income inequality could also stem from, among other things, the decline in the prevalence of unions (a highly sensitive topic today in technology companies), market concentration resulting in a lack of competition for labour, or other types of technological change.
> Acemoglu and Restrepo's study comes at a time when the debate over whether or not to tax robots is heating up. More and more voices rise to call for a tax on robots to combat the effects of automation on income inequality. In this regard, a study published last month by economists at MIT suggests that introducing a tax on robot labor, preferably a modest tax, would incentivize companies to retain workers, while offsetting some of the payroll taxes lost through downsizing. Of course, the conclusions of the study are not unanimous.
>
> According to economists' calculations, an effective tax on robots would probably be between 1% and 3.7%. The report estimates that if the tax is much higher, it would exaggerate the role that robots play in the operational routines of companies; and if it is lower, companies would have no incentive to retain human employees at all."
>
> Read more here (and you can translate the web page from french to english):
>
> Study claims automation has caused more than half of US income inequality since 1980
>
> https://embarque.developpez.com/actu/340711/Une-etude-affirme-que-l-automatisation-est-a-l-origine-de-plus-de-la-moitie-de-l-inegalite-des-revenus-aux-Etats-Unis-depuis-1980-les-personnes-les-moins-diplomees-semblent-les-plus-touchees/
>
> And following are some of the advantages of automation:
>
> 1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
> the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
> thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.
>
> 2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
> there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
> production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker..
>
> 3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
> has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
> conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
> be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated
> mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
> examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
> significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
> TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).
>
> 4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment
> opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
> as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
> Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
> These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
> companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
> needed to use and operate the computers.
>
> 5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
> through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of
> production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage
> increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
> will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
> increase productivity.
>
> More of my philosophy about Google and about ChatGPT and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> Google is preparing its response to ChatGPT: developed by its subsidiary DeepMind, Sparrow will go into private beta later this year.
>
> "Sparrow is based on Deepmind's Chinchilla language model, which has fewer parameters than OpenAI's larger models (but was trained with lots of data). The language model, which was introduced in April 2022, outperformed GPT-3 in common language benchmarks. However, ChatGPT is based on the more advanced version 3.5 of GPT."
>
> Read more here (and you can translate the webpage from french to english)
>
> https://intelligence-artificielle.developpez.com/actu/340683/Google-prepare-sa-reponse-a-ChatGPT-developpe-par-sa-filiale-DeepMind-Sparrow-passera-en-beta-privee-plus-tard-cette-annee-Contrairement-a-l-IA-d-OpenAI-ce-dernier-devrait-citer-ses-sources/
>
>
> So then i think that even with the ChatGPT or GPT-4 , Google will still
> be powerful, since Google has well diversified its revenues that are composed from the Google Cloud that is 7.5% of Google revenue, and from
> Apps and hardware and content that are 10.9% of Google revenue
> and from Youtube ads that are 11.2% of Google revenue ..., so there remain the Ads from Google search, but since Google will soon come with Sparrow that will compete with ChatGPT and with Microsoft, so i think Google will still be a powerful company.
>
> ChatGPT passes Wharton Business School's MBA exam, gets a B
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/chatgpt-passes-wharton-business-schools-mba-exam-gets-a-b
>
> ChatGPT premium rolls out at $42 a month, Google still catching up
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/chatgpt-premium-rolls-out
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.