Hey !

Can You come over to :
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar.medianewsonline.com/space21326space21326space21326space21326space21326space21326space21326space21326space21326space21326space21326space21326space21326space21326space21326/thesecondpage.php

and ask Your friends too to come over there ?

😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 2:30:11 AM UTC+2, Amine Moulay Ramdane wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
> More of my philosophy of what is it to be arab and more of my thoughts..
>
> I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
> invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
>
>
> So i will ask a philosophical question of:
>
> Why arabs want to also keep there being arab ?
>
>
> So i think that arabs are "strongly" genetically like conservatives, i mean that they want to keep there family values and they want to keep decency, so the arabic culture was also shaped a lot by decency of there being genetically decent people and by family values, so it is why arabs want to also keep there arabic culture. So look for example how my poems of Love and poems that i have invented quickly are shaped by decency, so look for example at my following poem of Love in french that i have invented quickly so that you notice it clearly:
>
> --
>
> Regardez donc cette belle mer !
>
> Puisque beau amour n'est pas amer
>
> Regardez donc cette belle mer !
>
> Puisque la beauté de même ces déserts !
>
> Regardez donc cette belle mer !
>
> Puisque beau amour n'est pas un adultère !
>
> Regardez donc cette belle mer !
>
> Puisque beau amour n'est pas instinct primaire !
>
> Regardez donc cette belle mer !
>
> Puisque beau amour en ordre comme un beau dictionnaire
>
> Regardez donc cette belle mer !
>
> Puisque beau amour est loin des sanguinaires !
>
> Regardez donc cette belle mer !
>
> Puisque beau amour est revolutionaire comme un beau visionnaire
>
> Regardez donc cette belle mer !
>
> Puisque beau amour est aussi douceur comme un coup de tonnere !
>
> Regardez donc cette belle mer !
>
> Puisque beau amour ce n'est pas juste imaginaire mais nécessaire !
>
> --
>
>
> And look here at all my poems of Love and poems that i have invented quickly so that you notice that they are shaped by decency:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mzYUmILCWyg
>
>
> More of my philosophy about France and about assimilation or integration and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i invite you to look at the following video so that you understand more
> what is happening in France:
>
> Débat Mélenchon VS Zemmour - Le replay
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBZZAtCeH0k
>
>
> So i think that the problem in the above video of the french jewish called Zemmour is that he is saying that arabs immigrants have to assimilate in France, but i think it is the problem, since it is not about integration , but it is about assimilation, but i think that assimilation is the fact to become only french, but i think that it is a violent conception that causes violence in France, so i think that France has to say that arabs have to integrate to France, other than that you have to understand more arabs, since i think that arabs are like "conservatives" of Republican conservatives in USA, i mean that they want to also keep there family values and they want to keep there arab decency, so it is also about morality, so i think that France is not what we call a conservative society, so i think it is why arabs immigrants are not liking this fact.
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the english language and more of my thoughts...
>
>
> I have just read the following english webpage about the english verb tenses etc., i invite you to read it to notice:
>
> https://www.grammarly.com/blog/verb-tenses/
>
>
> I think i am smart and i say to notice carefully that the verb tenses in the english language are easy to learn and easy to understand, since i think that all the verb tenses are easy but i think that the only verb tenses that are a "little" bit more difficult than others are the Present perfect or Present continuous and Past perfect or Past continuous, since they refer to actions that occurred in an indefinite time in the past or began in the past and continued or continuing to the present time, so i think all the english verb tenses are easy, so i think that the english language is easy to learn and easy to understand, so it is why i think that the english language has this kind of efficiency, and i think that it is also why so many people in the world speak english. And i say that the english language is easy, and here is more logical proof of it, read the following so that to notice it:
>
> Why is English Easy to Learn?
>
> https://live-english.net/english-easy-learn/
>
>
> And here is my new poem about the english language and notice how i have just quickly invented it, so here it is:
>
> --
>
> English is not like the yiddish
>
> Since english is so "easy" but not like the boyish
>
> Since it is not a Darwinian language but a kind of embellish
>
> And i say it with sincerity even if i am not the british
>
> English is not like the yiddish
>
> Since it permits to transcend and to accomplish
>
> And not to stay lonely and as just a simple dervish
>
> English is not like the yiddish
>
> So i am the beautiful white arab and not the Turkish
>
> And i am swimming using the beautiful english so that to not perish
>
> And it is why English is not for me like the yiddish
>
> And my beautiful way is not like smoking the hashish
>
> ---'
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the model and about civilization and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
> there is the model and there a bug that makes the model not successful,
> so is the model garbage if it contains a bug that makes it not successful ? so now you are understanding my thoughts below that say that humans are by nature civilized, since i think even if the model contains a bug that makes it not successful, the model can have the great majority of system that is successful or/or still useful.
>
> More of my philosophy about civilization and about competition and progress and more of my thoughts..
>
>
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i will ask a philosophical question of:
>
> Are humans by nature civilized ?
>
>
> So i think that humans are like civilized by nature, since the wanting to be happy of humans is like inherent to humans, and the wanting to be happy of humans is constrained by the future happiness, so then it is like a powerful mechanism that makes humans civilized, so you have not to just look at the appearances and think this or that, since i think that humans are by nature civilized, since the being civilized happens rapidly, so it is a rapid process, since the wanting to be happy is so powerful, and of course i have just said the following:
>
>
> More of my philosophy about how can we fight corruption and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i will ask the following philosophical question:
>
> How can we fight corruption ?
>
>
> So i will say that we have not to be pessimistic, since i think
> that in Democracy, the wanting to be happy of humans is also a powerful way of fighting corruption, since we can notice that the wanting to be happy is also constrained by the future happiness, so it creates responsability, and it creates competition , and competition is put in right way by the need of progress so that to be happy, and of course we have to make humans enough wise by educating them correctly.
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the way of prevention and about the way of statistics and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so as you notice that we have to be vigilant, since i think that Algeria is not Haiti, so i think that Algeria is not in a bad shape as Haiti or such, but of course i have to be more objective, so as you have just noticed that i have just talked about the good way of statistics as i am explaining it below, so as you notice we can monitor more the system with the way of statistics, but i think that there is also the way of "prevention", since there is for example the way of learning by making mistakes, but you have to be more smart and know how to be the right prevention from making mistakes, so i think it is the wise way, so then we can then talk about Democracy and about the separation of powers like in the U.S. Constitution that establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think we can ask a philosophical question such as of how to "ensure" the separation of powers so that to not corrupt the system and so that to be the right dose of meritocracy or quality ? so i think that Democracy has the mechanism of "competition" between the actors of Democracy like of that between the medias and congress and the government and the people, and i think that the separation of powers also comes with a kind of competition too that prevent corruption, so then we have to understand from it that statistics as i am explaining it below are not enough , since the basis of the system has to provide with the right mechanisms such as of Democracy and the separation of powers. And read my previous thoughts:
>
>
> More of my philosophy about corruption and about statistics and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
> so i invite you to look at the following new video of an algerian
> journalist that is speaking about the algerian system of governance:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pq7oXarkGMc
>
>
> So i think i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence
> in the above video, so notice that the algerian journalist in the above video is saying that the algerian system of governance is fondamentally corrupt and he is saying it hurts a lot the system and it is why it is not working, but notice the mistake that he is making, that he has first to ask if Algeria has a good organization like statistics Canada that gives good statistics about economy and healthcare system and about the system, and the statistics have to be macrostatistics or macroscale statistics and microstatistics or microscale statistics so that to show the advantages and disadvantages and the weaknesses of the system, so we can not just say as the algerian journalist above that the algerian system of governance is not working because it is corrupt, since we have to speak and give good statistics as i am saying above, so it is why i think that the above algerian journalist is not objective, so i think that we can logically infer from my thoughts that one of the most important thing to have as a country is a good organization like statistics Canada that gives good statistics about economy and healthcare system and about the system, and the statistics has to be macrostatistics or macroscale statistics and microstatistics or microscale statistics so that to show the advantages and disadvantages and the weaknesses of the system.
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the moral decline of western countries and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
> i think that the moral decline of western countries doesn't come from
> LGBT rights or such rights, since they have to respect the laws and not be the disorder against the laws, so i think that the problem of moral decline of western countries comes from the what i am explaining below, that modernity is also the wanting to be happy of modernity, so it is the wanting to be happy, and not egoism, since egoism is a pejorative expression, so i think that we have to say that it is the wanting to be happy of modernity that causes problems, so then since happiness is not only the today happiness , but it is also the future happiness that is a constraint, so it creates responsability that also says that we have to be "progress", so since we have to be progress , so we have to be competition between humans that merit a reward that can be the allowing the rich to be rich, and as i am explaining below that this wanting to be happy of humans also causes discrimination and hate between humans and it causes the what we call racism, so i say that if you want to solve those problems that comes from modern happiness by creating a new type of man, the new type of man has to be able to control himself by tuning his happiness so that to solve those problems.
>
>
> More of my philosophy about capitalism and about investments in stocks stocks and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
>
>
> Microsoft stock price stood in year 2022 at $268.09
>
> According to the latest long-term forecast, Microsoft price will hit $300 by the end of 2022 and then $400 by the middle of 2025. Microsoft will rise to $500 within the year of 2026, $600 in 2027, $700 in 2028, $800 in 2031 and $900 in 2033.
>
>
> Read more here:
>
> Microsoft Stock Forecast 2022 - 2025 - 2030
>
> https://coinpriceforecast.com/msft#:~:text=Microsoft%20stock%20price%20stood%20at,2031%20and%20%24900%20in%202033.
>
>
> So i think that my below thoughts about investments in stocks is valid, since look at the above example at the Microsoft stock prices above, the first thing to notice is that it is just a forecast, but as i am saying below that it is too risky, since you have to diversify your investment by for example investing in index funds as i am explaining it
> below, and second important thing to notice is that the stock
> price is the current price that a share of stock is trading for on the market , but it looks by analogy like the bitcoin currency, since
> it also follows demand and supply, but i think that investing in
> the stocks is better than investing in bitcoin, since there is also
> a return of investment in stocks that also permits you to sell much easily your shares of stock, and i think that this return of investment doesn't exist in bitcoin, also i think bitcoin has still much lesser value.
>
> More of my philosophy about being a seller of Amazon products and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I have just said the following:
>
> "I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, I have quickly taken a look at Amazon profit margin and ROI(Return of investment), and i think by being a sellers of Amazon(or the like) products you can become rich, since you can buy in more quantity so that to lower the price of an Item of Amazon, so it is better for you if you have more money when you start selling Amazon products, and after that i think that you can use Amazon shipment strategy that easy the things for you, and after you make much more money by being a seller of Amazon products, you can invest a part of your money in index funds in stocks that have an average ROI of around 10%, so i think you can become rich by this way of doing, and i think that it is better than Real Estate investment."
>
>
> But i think there is still a problem in the being a seller of Amazon products, and it is that when you are a seller and you buy more quantity of a product so that to lower the price of an Item, there is a "competition" in this process of buying more quantity of a product, like in the process of creativity below, so there can be others that can buy much more quantity than you, so that to lower more than you the price of an Item , so it is i think the problem, so i think so that to be successful as a seller of Amazon products, you have to have much more money when you start selling Amazon products and so that to "also" lower the Risk, also you have to know that in most cases, customers(that i think can be sellers of Amazon products) can request returns within 30 days of receiving their order, and this shows that it is not easy to become rich a i am saying below.
>
>
> More of my philosophy about Real Estate investment and about
> creativity and about stocks and bonds and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> According to the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF), as of Q1 2021 the average 25-year return for private commercial real estate properties held for investment purposes slightly outperformed the S&P 500 Index, with average annualized returns of 10.3% and 9.6%, respectively. Residential and diversified real estate investments also averaged returns of 10.3%, and i think that a good ROI for a rental property is usually above 10%, but 5% to 10% is also an acceptable range. Real estate investing can be lucrative, but it's important to understand the "risks". Key risks include bad locations, negative cash flows, high vacancies, and problem tenants. Other risks to consider are the lack of liquidity, hidden structural problems, and the unpredictable nature of the real estate market, so i think because of the Risks in Real Estate, i think it is in accordance with what i am saying below that it is not easy to become rich,
>
>
> More of my philosophy about Benjamin Franklin and about investments..
>
>
> I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
> invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
>
> I have just looked at the following video about the US. president Benjamin Franklin that talks about the EASIEST way to become rich:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hWbRmkVqhQ
>
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i am not in accordance with the US. president Benjamin Franklin in the above video, since let us take a look at the following interesting web page of the Investment growth calculator from Fidelity investments in Canada, since i am understanding it easily, and here it is and take a look at it carefully:
>
> https://www.fidelity.ca/en/growthcalculator/
>
>
> But notice that it is asking to put two important informations that are:
>
> 1- Rate of return
> 2- Inflation rate
>
>
> But i think that for the long-term investment, the Inflation rate is not so important, so i think that we have to focus on the "Rate of return",
> so i think i am highly smart, and i say that you can not be rich easily, since you can not for example invest in stocks of this or that company
> since it is so much more risky, so you have to "diversify" correctly by investing in index funds in stocks, since they are much less risky and i think that they have an average of around 10% of rate of return or return of investment, so i think that you can not get rich easily with it, since the Time to grow in the above calculator has to be set to around 40 years or so and this will permit you to have a "good" retirement, but it will not permit you to easily become rich, and i think that the Bond that is a fixed-income instrument that represents a loan made by an investor to a borrower (typically corporate or governmental) is not better in rate of return or return of investment than index funds, so then this shows that it is not easy to get generally rich for the people, and i mean "generally".
>
>
>
> More of my philosophy about Type III civilization and the next glacial period and more of my thoughts..
>
> Predicted changes in orbital forcing suggest that the next glacial period would begin at least 50,000 years from now. But i think since
> it will take humanity 3,200 years to reach Type II civilization, and 5,800 years to reach Type III civilization, so i think that at Type III
> civilization we will be able to solve the problematic of next glacial period and such problematics. But of course we have to know how to manage the exponential progress of our humanity, and i invite you to look at the following interesting video of Michio Kaku ( Read about him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michio_Kaku ) about how we’ll be Gods in year 2100 because of the exponential progress of our humanity, and read about the exponential progress of our humanity in my below thoughts, so here is the video of Michio Kaku and look at it carefully:
>
> https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10154204098338527
>
> More of my philosophy about the pie is not fixed in capitalism and more of my thoughts..
>
> And you are understanding from my below thoughts that
> i have just said that in our today world we are pushed by capitalism and progress to compete against each other, so then you are noticing that even if there is no fixed pie in capitalism, since because of innovation and industrialization and such, this make the economic output growing really fast and this permits capitalism to be not a zero-sum game, but you have to understand that this lower competition between people , but i say that there is for example still competition between humans on quality of products and services in our today world of capitalism and progress.
>
>
> More of my philosophy about Thomas Hobbes philosophy and about
> the how to civilize humans and more of my thoughts..
>
> So i invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Thomas Hobbes and his ideas:
>
> https://www.thecollector.com/thomas-hobbes-lifes-work/
>
>
> So i think that Thomas Hobbes was making a mistake, since he was not taking into account a variable that is the it’s important to remember that in the prehistoric era, the world was very sparsely populated and according to some estimates, around 15,000 years ago, the population of Europe was only 29,000, and the population of the whole world was less than half a million. So it’s likely there was an abundance of resources for hunter-gatherer groups, so it is why i think that when you look at for example the normal distribution for the human trait of violence , you will notice that there is only 16.4% of genetically violent humans, and i think that it can also be explained by the fact that since in the prehistoric era there where abundance of ressources for hunter-gatherer groups, so then i think it has affected the the natural selection process since they were not competing as we think. And of course, you might argue that if this is case, why do present day humans often behave so selfishly and ruthlessly? Why are these negative traits so normal in many cultures? Perhaps though these traits should be seen as the result of environmental and psychological factors, since i think that in our today world we are pushed by capitalism and progress to compete against each other.
>
>
> And read the following thoughts so that to understand more:
>
> "Traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness are natural to human beings. These were the traits that have been prevalent in human life for tens of thousands of years. So presumably these traits are still strong in us now. Of course, you might argue that if this is case, why do present day humans often behave so selfishly and ruthlessly? Why are these negative traits so normal in many cultures? Perhaps though these traits should be seen as the result of environmental and psychological factors."
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://theconversation.com/humans-arent-inherently-selfish-were-actually-hardwired-to-work-together-144145
>
>
>
> More of my philosophy about violent revolution and more of my thoughts..
>
>
>
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i invite you to look at the following video so that you understand something important:
>
> Why I QUIT The RAT RACE & The “ American Dream “
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVKb52Fqrko
>
>
> So i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in the above video, since i think that the brown guy in the above video is not
> understanding philosophy, since first he has to define what is
> personal responsability, so for example can we simply make responsable the governments of USA, so i think you can not do it this way, since rulers in the governments of USA can for example be genetically not so smart and genetically not so apt at being wise, so you are understanding the difficulty, so then it is why it has to come with a "kind" of "tolerance", so then i think that a violent revolution is not appropriate in USA, but then i think that smart reforms are the way to go.
>
>
> More of my philosophy about ethics and morality and about happiness and more of my thoughts..
>
> So notice carefully my thoughts below, so i think it is smart,
> since so that to model correctly i am using the english sentence below of: "Humans have the strong tendency to want to be happy" , so notice that it is smart, since it englobes the both the facts that it creates human acts that go against ethics and morality and it also creates human acts that are in accordance with ethics and morality, since happiness is also the today and future happiness that create "responsability", since the future happiness is a constraint, and it can model success too, so then i think it is smart, so then we have not to be naive as i am saying below, so reread carefully my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
> so as you notice in my below thoughts that i am not defining the wanting to maximize at best happiness by being ethical as the wanting to be happiness, but i know that in philosophy happiness is defined by the ethical and by morality, and it is in the ethical and in morality not an all absolute happiness, but you have to understand my views, so the ethical and morality is one thing, but i say that you have not to be naive since i say that humans have the strong tendency to wanting to be happy, so read my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:
>
> More of my philosophy about happiness and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think that, by logical analogy, the mechanism that creates the Mafia and such criminal organizations and that creates the street gangs look like the mechanism of how we become the what we call racism and how we become hate and discrimination between humans, since i think that it comes from the fact that humans want to be happy, so then this wanting to be happy causes hate and it causes discrimination between humans and it causes the what we call racism and it causes corruption and it creates criminal organizations and such.
>
>
> More of my philosophy about discrimination and racism and more of my thoughts...
>
> First you have to understand that science says that there is no human
> races, but there is only one race that we call the human race, so i will say the what we call racism and discrimination come from the fact the humans have the strong tendency to be really selective, so they "want" to have high quality things and they want to be with high quality humans and they want to eat the good things and they want to be rich , so i think that it is not that it is genetical in humans, but it is that humans want to be happy , so then they are really selective and it causes racism and it causes discrimination.
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the purpose and meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
> i invite you to read the following article from the Atlantic about the meaning of human life:
>
> https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/10/meaning-life-macronutrients-purpose-search/620440/
>
> So notice in the above article that it is saying that Positive Psychology says that human life has to have a Purpose and human life has to have a value, but i think that Positive psychology doesn't answer correctly, since i am explaining smartly in my below philosophies that there is no meaning of human life, and notice how i am explaining it by also showing the how humans are measuring the meaning of human life by also how they are measuring the value of human life, and see how i am giving my way of doing so that to transcend the problems caused by lack of meaning, and of course i am also saying that the value of human life today brought by pleasures of life plays the role of an opium of the people or drug, since there is still no meaning of human life, and of course i am giving in my philosophies the way to smartly transcend this problems of lack of meaning by for example saying that we have to focus much more on the exponential progress of our humanity that will soon make us powerful Gods, and this way of thinking about this exponential progress of our humanity makes us being hope and makes us being a positive energy and a positive spirit and makes us being patience, but of course you have to know how to manage correctly this exponential progress of our humanity.
>
>
> And i think i am a philosopher and so that to know how i am proving that human life has no meaning, read my thoughts of my philosophies in the following web link:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/PN44Q1m4e8g
>
>
> And here is how i am proving in the above web link that there is no meaning of human life:
>
> More of my philosophy about nihilism and about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, and i think i am a philosopher, so now i will invite you to look carefully at the following video:
>
> Life Has Never Been Easier: So Why Is Everyone Depressed?
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJ-zyVHYxyw
>
>
> So i am quickly discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in
> the above video, and the patterns are the following:
>
> So notice that the above video is saying that life has never been easier so why everyone is depressed, but i think that i am a philosopher and i say that the above video is making a big mistake and it is that he is comparing our human life with the old human life and it is a mistake , since by logical analogy i can for example say: What is it that we call a genetically smart human a genetically smart human ? so as you notice that the calling a genetically smart human is a relative way of measuring against the normal distribution of the genetical smartness, but is it the right answer if we measure like absolutely ? so i think that now you are noticing the big mistake, since humans are not measuring relatively the meaning of human life, but since in our today world there are many medias and there is democratization of medias and democratization of knowledge and information, so then humans are much more conscious about there human conditions than humans in the old world or in the past, and it is why they are becoming nihilistic, since they are like measuring absolutely and saying that humans are so weak when they look at all those constraints of human life and the constraints of our universe, so they say that human life is really bad, so then it is like a kind of nihilism, so the being nihilistic is to flirt with despair and the sentiment that life is not worth living, and of course notice that nihilism is also the sentiment that life is not worth living, so i am a philosopher and i say that a kind of nihilism can be the also believing that human life is not worth living without the negative emotions that comes with it and even if you live it in a kind of way , and of course i say that in nihilism, the flirting with despair can be not the negative emotions that comes with it, and of course this kind of nihilism makes humans really impatient and it creates a kind of disorder and it creates violence, and it is why this kind of nihilism is bad, and of course as you notice that i am defining nihilism as the following so that to construct a meaning of human life or life:
>
> I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about nihilism so that to understand:
>
> https://academyofideas.com/2022/11/nietzsche-and-nihilism-a-warning-to-the-west/
>
> So notice carefully in the above article that it defines nihilism as
> the following:
>
>
> "Nihilism is the conviction that there is no meaning to life, that the world is inhospitable to our highest hopes and values, and that there are no gods or higher purposes to justify our suffering. To be a nihilist is to flirt with despair and the sentiment that life is not worth living."
>
> So then i can say that in philosophy you have to make a difference between the problematics of the lack of the meaning of human life and of that of the becoming rich by for example the way of the engine of egoism as has said it the philosopher and economist Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, since i am a philosopher that says that you can become rich as a country, but the lack of meaning of human life can make the "way" or the "path" of the becoming rich of the country not good, since the lack of meaning of human life makes humans really impatient and it creates a kind of disorder and it creates violence, and it is the deficiency of the philosophy of absurdism of the french philosopher Albert Camus, since Albert Camus says in his absurdism philosophy that there is a lack of meaning of human life, but he doesn't give us the "right" way to give a meaning to human life and he doesn't talk correctly about the problematics that are caused by the lack of meaning of human life.
>
> More of my philosophy about the too much violence and more of my thoughts...
>
>
> I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i will ask the following philosophical question:
>
>
> And as you have just understood from the below interesting article,
> that traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness are "natural" to human beings. so now i will ask a philosophical question of:
>
> And what about the too much violence of this or that human or group of humans ?
>
> So i think that the too much violence of the this or that human or a group of humans has to be seen as a negative factor that goes against
> the own survival of the this or that human or this group of humans, since cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness are natural to human beings, so then you have to be very careful , since if you are too much violence, the majority will not like it , so the too much violence can hurt you badly and hurt badly your survival, also today we also have such as the U.S. Constitution that establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law) that can put you in prison , so you have to think twice before being too much violence, and of course since you are understanding it, you have also to adapt your way of doing business taking into account what i am just saying. And you can for example understand it by looking at Germany that has just arrested 25 suspected far-right extremists for plotting to overthrow government, read about it in the following article:
>
> https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/07/europe/germany-far-right-arrests-grm-intl/index.html
>
> More of my philosophy about why humans aren’t inherently selfish and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I invite you to read the following interesting article:
>
>
> Humans aren’t inherently selfish – we’re actually hardwired to work together
>
> "Traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness are natural to human beings. These were the traits that have been prevalent in human life for tens of thousands of years. So presumably these traits are still strong in us now. Of course, you might argue that if this is case, why do present day humans often behave so selfishly and ruthlessly? Why are these negative traits so normal in many cultures? Perhaps though these traits should be seen as the result of environmental and psychological factors."
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://theconversation.com/humans-arent-inherently-selfish-were-actually-hardwired-to-work-together-144145
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts..
>
> Today i will talk more about the meaning of human life and about the philosopher Albert Camus, and I invite you to look at the following video that talks about absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus:
>
> Is life meaningless? And other absurd questions - Nina Medvinskaya
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPtzpjC7TF4
>
>
> I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, and i think i am a philosopher, and i say that i am not in accordance with
> the above video, since in my philosophies, read them below, i am
> explaining how there is no meaning of human life, and i am explaining that you have to make a difference between the there is no meaning of human life and of that of the being happy, so i think that even if there is no meaning of human life, we can still have pleasures of life that make us more happy and this can also play the role of like an opium of people or a drug that permits us to not be so pessimistic and not be too much preoccupied by or with the meaning of human life, but my philosophies also explain that the problematic that still remains is that when there is no meaning of human, it still cause problems to the way or path to the goal of being wealthy or being rich, and it is what i am explaining in my philosophies, read them below, and of course i am giving in my philosophies the way to smartly transcend this problems by for example focusing much more on the exponential progress of our humanity that will soon make us powerful Gods, and this way of thinking about this exponential progress of our humanity makes us being hope and makes us being a positive energy and a positive spirit and makes us being patience, but of course you have to know how to manage correctly this exponential progress of our humanity.
>
>
> And here is my other thoughts about this exponential progress of our humanity etc. so that you understand my views:
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the way to follow and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think that from my thoughts of my new philosophies and that you can read below, that we have to be the positive energy and the positive spirit by focusing much more on the exponential progress of our humanity that i am talking about in my below thoughts, since as is saying it Michio Kaku in the below video, that we will soon be so powerful like Gods, other than that, notice how in my below thoughts i am also speaking about the good news about the new medical treatments and about the new medical drugs or medications , and it is in accordance with my new philosophies below, since it is a positive energy that also softens morals , and i invite you to read my thoughts of my new philosophies that i have invented so that to know more about my views on the subjects of philosophy, and here is the web link where you can read my thoughts of my new philosophies and of my new proverbs:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/PN44Q1m4e8g
>
>
> More of my philosophy of how we’ll be Gods in year 2100 and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i invite you to look at the following interesting video of Michio Kaku ( Read about him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michio_Kaku ) about how we’ll be Gods in year 2100 because of the exponential progress of our humanity, and read about the exponential progress of our humanity in my below thoughts, so here is the video of Michio Kaku and look at it carefully:
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10154204098338527
>
>
> More of my philosophy about how to regrow teeth and about genetics and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> Researchers have found a way to regrow teeth
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://www.iflscience.com/researchers-have-found-a-way-to-regrow-teeth-59196
>
>
> More of my philosophy about how to regrow cartilage and about genetics and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> A small tweak to genes may finally enable us to regrow cartilage
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://interestingengineering.com/health/a-small-tweak-to-genes-may-finally-enable-us-to-regrow-cartilage
>
>
> More of my philosophy about genetics and about the Era of genetically modified superhumans and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> New CRISPR-based Tool inserts large DNA sequences at desired sites in cells
>
> The following new technique, known as PASTE, could hold promise for treating diseases that are caused by defective genes with a large number of mutations, such as cystic fibrosis.
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://scitechupdates.com/new-crispr-based-tool-inserts-large-dna-sequences-at-desired-sites-in-cells/?fbclid=IwAR3T5A_cGsOmM6Vcb0nMXQTZOKEteSNwAagol-Utwx3OMUpycG6GjSsFw9U
>
>
> And new CRISPR-Cas approach permits more precise DNA cleavage
>
> So-called SpRYgests enable DNA cutting at practically any sequence for DNA editing.
>
> Read more here on ScienceDaily:
>
> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/10/221011161219.htm
>
>
> And i invite you to look in the following video at what is saying the Geneticist Jennifer Doudna that co-invented a groundbreaking new technology for editing genes, called CRISPR-Cas9, and she is a Nobel prize and she believes that the technical obstacles to gene editing have been overcome and the world is rapidly approaching the day when it will be possible to make essentially any kind of change to any kind of human genome, so i think we will soon be able to enhance much more the genetics of humans so that humans become much more smart or much more beautiful or such, and look at the following video so that to notice it, so we have to know how to be patience, and you have to take into account our exponential progress of humanity, read about it in my thoughts below:
>
> The Era of Genetically Modified Superhumans
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klo-rSlsju8
>
> More of my philosophy about intelligence and genetics and exponential
> progress and more..
>
> I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to read the following:
>
> "Genome-wide association studies allow scientists to start to see how
> combinations of many, many genes interact in complicated ways. And it
> takes huge data sets to sort through all the genetic noise and find
> variants that truly make a difference on traits like intelligence."
>
> Read more here on the following interesting article:
>
> https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/6/6/15739590/genome-wide-studies
>
> So i think that it needs huge data sets to detect the "patterns" that
> explain human intelligence and such human traits, so i think that the
> data, that permits it, is growing exponentially and really fast and the
> computer power is also growing exponentially and really fast, so i think
> that we will soon be able to find all the genetic variants in the human
> genome that make a difference on traits like intelligence.
>
> More of my philosophy about the knee of the exponential progress curve..
>
> I think that the easy part is that we will soon be able to enhance much more the genetics of humans and become much more smart and much more
> beautiful, since i think that we have "just" already attained the knee
> of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place
> where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster
> exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our
> humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much
> faster, this is why in about 10 or 15 years from now we will become so
> powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so
> that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:
>
> Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ
>
>
> More of my philosophy about reversing aging and about cancer and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I invite you to look at the following video:
>
> Researchers say they are close to reversing aging
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=DPARs7mL_7Q&fbclid=IwAR1jYYAjQfEKWsbtWsnFa78_TZjAvlQcCmVDMeHXxFIgph05iX5D1ScN6OY
>
>
> More of my philosophy about cancer and about health and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> The days of cancer relapse are over, thanks to this novel chemoimmunotherapy
>
> Novel nanoparticles know how to kill cancer for good.
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://interestingengineering.com/health/new-chemoimmunotherapy-kill-cancer-for-good
>
>
> More of my philosophy about cancer and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I think you will soon be able to pass a blood test that could detect cancers early, read about it here:
>
> A blood test that could detect cancers early will undergo trials in the U..S.
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://interestingengineering.com/health/blood-test-detect-cancers-trials
>
> And i think the following new treatment will allow to beat cancer,
> so i invite you to read about it carefully in the following article:
>
> Scientists attempt to beat cancer by suffocating cells within four hours
>
> https://interestingengineering.com/health/new-treatment-suffocating-cancer-cells
>
>
> Also you can read my new writing about new interesting medical treatments and drugs and about antibiotic resistance here:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vChmXT_pXUI
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the living longer and about health and
> about technology and more of my thoughts..
>
> I invite you to look at the following interesting video about why Japanese live so long:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzNcoENNsxQ
>
>
> But here is also how to to live so long and stay healthy:
>
> Elixir of life? A breakthrough anti-aging drug may be just around the corner
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://interestingengineering.com/health/rapamycin-anti-aging-drug-healthy-younger
>
> And read also the following:
>
> More of my philosophy about how multivitamin may improve cognition and possibly protect against decline and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> "New research shows that taking a daily supplement of multivitamin may improve cognition in older adults. In the study, researchers estimated that three years of multivitamin supplementation roughly translated to a 60-percent slowing of cognitive decline (about 1.8 years)."
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/09/220914102010.htm
>
>
> Also you can read my new writing about new interesting medical treatments and drugs and about antibiotic resistance here:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vChmXT_pXUI
>
>
> More of my philosophy about health and about alcohol consumption and about technology and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> Tea and wine may slow down memory decline, study reveals
>
> "According to a new study conducted by researchers from Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, people who consume more foods with antioxidant flavonols may have a slower rate of memory decline.
>
> Flavonols are a type of flavonoid, a group of natural substances found in fruits, vegetables, grains, tea, and wine. Known for their benefits on health, these natural compounds are regarded as an essential component in a wide range of nutraceutical, pharmacological, therapeutic, and cosmetic applications."
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://interestingengineering.com/health/tea-and-wine-may-slow-down-memory-decline-study-reveals
>
>
> But i advice to drink Tea and not wine, and here is why:
>
> More alcohol, less brain: Association begins with an average of just one drink a day
>
> "Even light-to-moderate drinking is associated with harm to the brain, according to a new study. Researchers analyzed data from more than 36,000 adults that found a link between drinking and reduced brain volume that begins at an average consumption level of less than one alcohol unit a day -- the equivalent of about half a beer -- and rises with each additional drink."
>
> Read more here on ScienceDaily:
>
> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/03/220304090349.htm
>
> Even light drinking can be harmful to health
>
> Research reveals cardiovascular risk of consuming small quantities of alcohol
>
> Read more here on ScienceDaily:
>
> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/01/220128100730.htm
>
> New study links moderate alcohol use with higher cancer risk
>
> Read more here on ScienceDaily:
>
> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/07/210714110410.htm
>
>
> More of my thoughts about unsustainable resource consumption and harmful pollution and about technology and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> How many humans can Earth sustain? And what does it mean if we've already passed it?
>
> As individuals, cutting down on meat, particularly red meat, can significantly reduce consumption of resources.
>
> And research shows that rehabilitating degraded habitats and increasing tree cover can have great restorative benefits to our environment.
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2019-07-25/population-growth-world-overshoot-day/11320990
>
> More of my philosophy about the first lab-grown meat in the US and about technology and more of my thoughts..
>
> FDA approves the sale of the first lab-grown meat in the US
>
> "Speaking to Wired, CEO of UPSIDE Foods, Uma Valeti, acknowledged that the cultivated meat industry is still in its infancy, and it may be another 15 years before it achieves scalability and can reach people in most parts of the world."
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://interestingengineering.com/health/fda-approve-lab-grown-meat-us
>
>
> And read my philosophy about quantum computers and about technology in my following thoughts in the following web link:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tQ0Cs6Nw1yc
>
>
> More of my philosophy about thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism and about scalability of productivity and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence about what is marxism and communism, and here they are:
>
> So i think that thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism of marxism and communism, is by logical analogy like the process of competition between ideas or between people that brings quality, so you can have a “synthesis” of private property and socialism understood as thesis and antithesis, and you can have collision of the bourgeoisie and the working class as competing thesis and antithesis that can bring a synthesis as quality, so i think that marxism and communism say that the bourgeoisie of the capitalistic system is not capable of treating correctly the working class, and i think it is from where comes marxism, but i think that this way of thinking is too extremist in our today world , since i also say that workers living standards depend on wage levels, not wage ratios, eventhough when measuring wage dispersion, economists frequently look at the 90/50 ratio, so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about the living standards that has brought capitalism, and of course capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, and i will also talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism by first asking the
> following philosophical question of:
>
> Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?
>
> I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
> we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
> Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
> logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic
> contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and
> Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
> camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
> comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
> smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
> characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
> this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so
> this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
> more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
> competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
> the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
> good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
> efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
> "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
> have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
> resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
> we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
> since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social
> Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
> members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
> we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
> competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
> of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
> society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
> congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
> contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
> the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
> party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
> civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
> so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.
>
>
> More precision of my philosophy about decentralization and about productivity and about scalability and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> Please reread my following thoughts about scalability of productivity below, since i have just corrected some typos in it, so as you understand from my thoughts that the how to make productivity efficiently scalable is easy for me, since i am understanding the how of it by discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence, so i invite you to reread my thoughts:
>
> I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above", i think i am
> discovering other patterns with my fluid intelligence about decentralization and about scalability of productivity, and it is that as i am saying below about scalability of productivity, that you have to take care of the "coherency", and i think that the coherency is quadratic in a complexity of O(n^2), and it is not like contention that is in a complexity of O(n), so it is why you have to know how to decentralize efficiently so that to lower the complexity of the coherency, so there is not only specialization in a job in what you do better that higher productivity and quality, but there is also the efficient decentralization and the efficiently lowering the contention and efficiently lowering the coherency. So notice how i am replying below to the PhD computer scientist about scalability of productivity, but you have to know that it is inherent in my answer below that you have to take care of the coherency as i am explaining above.
>
> So read my following thoughts so that to understand my views:
>
>
> More of my philosophy about IQ tests and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, but i have just passed more and more IQ tests, and i have just noticed that the manner in wich we test with IQ tests is not correct, since in an IQ test you can be more specialized and above average in one subtest of intelligence than in another subtest of intelligence inside an IQ test, since IQ tests test for many kind of intelligences such as the spatial and speed and calculations and logical intelligence etc., so i think that you can be really above average in logical intelligence, as i am really above average in logical intelligence, but at the same time you can be below average in calculations and/or spatial.., so since an IQ test doesn't test for this kind of specializations of intelligence, so i think it is not good, since testing for this kind specializations in intelligence is really important so that to be efficient by knowing the strong advantages of this or that person in every types of intelligences. And about the importance of specialization, read carefully my following thought about it:
>
>
> More of my philosophy about specialization and about efficiency and productivity..
>
> The previous CEO Larry Culp of General Electric and the architect of a strategy that represented a new turning point in the world corporate strategies, Larry Culp's strategy was to divide the company according to its activities. Something like we are better of alone, seperately and
> focused on each one's own activity, than together in a large
> conglomerate. And it is a move from integration to specialization.
> You see it is thought that a company always gains economies of scale
> as it grows, but this is not necessarily the case, since as the company
> gains in size - especially if it engages in many activities - it
> also generates its own bureaucracy, with all that entails in term
> of cost and efficiency. And not only that, it is also often the case
> that by bringing together very different activities, strategic focus is lost and decision-making is diluted, so that in the end no one ends up
> taking responsability, it doesn't always happen, but this reasons are
> basically what is driving this increasing specialization. So i invite to look at the following video so that to understand more about it:
>
> The decline of industrial icon of the US - VisualPolitik EN
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hqwYxFCY-k
>
>
> And here is my previous thoughts about specialization and productivity so that to understand much more:
>
> More about the Japanese Ikigai and about productivity and more of my thoughts..
>
> Read the following interesting article about Japanese Ikigai:
>
> The More People With Purpose, the Better the World Will Be
>
> https://singularityhub.com/2018/06/15/the-more-people-with-purpose-the-better-the-world-will-be/
>
> I think i am highly smart, so i say that the Japanese Ikigai is like a Japanese philosophy that is like the right combination or "balance" of passion, vocation, and mission, and Ikigai and MTP, as concepts, urge us to align our passions with a mission to better the world, but i think that Japanese Ikiai is a also smart since it gets the "passion" from the "mission", since the mission is also the engine, so you have to align the passion with the mission of the country or the global world so that to be efficient, and Japanese Ikigai is also smart since so that to higher productivity and be efficient, you have to "specialize" in doing a job, but so that to higher more productivity and be more efficient you can also specialize in what you do "better", and it is what is doing Japanese Ikigai, since i think that in Japanese Ikigai, being the passion permits to make you specialized in a job in what you do better, and here is what i have just smartly said about productivity:
>
> I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will now talk about another important idea of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and it is about "specialization" in an economic system, since i say that in an economic system we have to be specialized in doing a job so that to be efficient and productive, but not only that, but we have to specialize in doing a job in what we do better so that to be even more efficient and productive, and we have to minimize at best the idle time or the wasting of time doing a job, since i can also say that this average idle time or wasting time of the workers working in parallel can be converted to a contention like in parallel programming, so you have to minimize it at best, and you have to minimize at best the coherency like in parallel programming so that to scale much better, and of course all this can create an economy of scale, and also i invite you to read my following smart and interesting thoughts about scalability of productivity:
>
> I will talk about following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist:
>
> https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/
>
> Read more carefully here his thoughts about productivity:
>
> https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/
>
> And i think he is making a mistake in his above webpage about productivity:
>
> Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input
>
> But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).
>
> And it looks like the following:
>
> About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..
>
> Gustafson’s Law:
>
> • If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
> task then the serial component will not dominate
> • Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
> • Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
> problem size
>
> Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
> can take advantage of:
>
> • can consider weak and strong scaling
> • in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
> • Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
> • larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law
>
>
> Load balance is also a crucial factor.
>
>
> And read my following thoughts about Evolutionary Design methodology and that is so important so that to understand:
>
> And I invite you to look at step 4 of my below thoughts of software Evolutionary Design methodology with agile, here it is:
>
> 4- When in agile a team breaks a project into phases, it’s called
> incremental development. An incremental process is one in which
> software is built and delivered in pieces. Each piece, or increment,
> represents a complete subset of functionality. The increment may be
> either small or large, perhaps ranging from just a system’s login
> screen on the small end to a highly flexible set of data management
> screens. Each increment is fully coded Sprints, Planning, and
> Retrospectives.
>
> And you will notice that it has to be done by "prioritizing" the pieces of the software to be delivered to the customers, and here again in agile you are noticing that we are also delivering prototypes of the software, since we often associate prototypes with nearly completed or just-before launch versions of products. However, designers create prototypes at all phases of the design process at various resolutions. In engineering, students are taught to and practitioners think deeply before setting out to build. However, as the product or system becomes increasingly complex, it becomes increasingly difficult to consider all factors while designing. Facing this reality, designers are no longer just "thinking to build" but also "building to think." By getting hands on and trying to create prototypes, unforeseen issues are highlighted early, saving costs related with late stage design changes. This rapid iterative cycle of thinking and building is what allows designers to learn rapidly from doing. Creating interfaces often benefit from the "build to think" approach. For example, in trying to layout the automotive cockpit, one can simply list all the features, buttons, and knobs that must be incorporated. However, by prototyping the cabin does one really start to think about how the layout should be to the driver in order to avoid confusion while maximizing comfort. This then allows the designer iterate on their initial concept to develop something that is more intuitive and refined. Also prototypes and there demonstrations are designed to get potential customers interested and excited.
>
> More of my philosophy about the Evolutionary Design methodology and more...
>
> Here are some important steps of software Evolutionary Design methodology:
>
> 1- Taking a little extra time during the project to write solid code and
> fix problems today, they create a codebase that’s easy to maintain
> tomorrow.
>
> 2- And the most destructive thing you can do to your project is to build
> new code, and then build more code that depends on it, and then still
> more code that depends on that, leading to that painfully familiar
> domino effect of cascading changes...and eventually leaving you with
> an unmaintainable mess of spaghetti code. So when teams write code,
> they can keep their software designs simple by creating software
> designs based on small, self-contained units (like classes, modules,
> services, etc.) that do only one thing; this helps avoid the domino
> effect.
>
> 3- Instead of creating one big design at the beginning of the project
> that covers all of the requirements, agile architects use incremental
> design, which involves techniques that allow them to design a system
> that is not just complete, but also easy for the team to modify as
> the project changes.
>
> 4- When in agile a team breaks a project into phases, it’s called
> incremental development. An incremental process is one in which
> software is built and delivered in pieces. Each piece, or increment,
> represents a complete subset of functionality. The increment may be
> either small or large, perhaps ranging from just a system’s login
> screen on the small end to a highly flexible set of data management
> screens. Each increment is fully coded Sprints, Planning, and
> Retrospectives.
>
> 5- And an iterative process in agile is one that makes progress through
> successive refinement. A development team takes a first cut
> at a system, knowing it is incomplete or weak in some (perhaps many)
> areas. They then iteratively refine those areas until the product is
> satisfactory. With each iteration the software is improved through
> the addition of greater detail.
>
> More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology..
>
> I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy,
> first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software
> projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are
> not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is
> why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools
> such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns,
> Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice
> carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is
> that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to
> normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects
> grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to
> optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between
> the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the
> performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to
> maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most
> out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can
> notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not
> allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we
> have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between
> "performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability"
> of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the
> people that of course respect the laws.
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the the importance of randomness in
> the genetic algorithm and in the evolutionary algorithms and more
> of my thoughts..
>
> More of my philosophy about the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart, so i will ask the following philosophical question about the genetic algorithm:
>
> Is the genetic algorithm a brute-force search and if it is
> not, how is it different than the brute-force search ?
>
> So i have just quickly took a look at some example of a minimization problem with a genetic algorithm, and i think that the genetic algorithm is not a brute-force search, since i think that when in a minimization
> problem with a genetic algorithm you do a crossover, also called recombination, that is a genetic operator used to combine the genetic information of two parents to generate new offspring, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to also explore locally and we call it exploitation, and when the genetic algorithm does genetical mutations with a level of probability, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to explore globally and we call it exploration, so i think a good genetic algorithm is the one that balance efficiently exploration and exploitation so that to avoid premature convergence, and notice that when you explore locally and globally you can do it with a bigger population that makes it search faster, so it is is why i think the genetic algorithm has this kind of patterns that makes it a much better search than brute-force search. And so that to know more about this kind of artificial intelligence , i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so that to understand more:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0
>
> More of my philosophy about the other conditions of the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
> .
> I think i am highly smart, and i think that the genetic algorithm
> is interesting too, but i have to speak about one other most important thing about the genetic algorithm, so i will ask a philosophical question about it:
>
> Since as i just said previously, read it below, that a good genetic algorithm has to efficiently balance between global(exploration) and local(exploitation) search , but how can you be sure that you have found a global optimum ?
>
> I think i am smart, and i will say that it also depends on the kind of problem, so if for example we have a minimization problem, you can
> rerun a number of times the genetic algorithm so that to select the best minimum among all the results and you can also give more time to
> the exploration so that to find the a better result, also you have to know that the genetic algorithm can be more elitist in the crossover steps, but i think that this kind of Elitism can has the tendency to not efficiently higher the average best of the average members of the population, so then it depends on wich problem you want to use the genetic algorithm, also i think that the genetic algorithm is
> a model that explains from where comes humans, since i also think
> that the genetic mutations of humans, that happens with a probability, has also not only come from the inside body from the chromosomes and genes, but they also were the result of solar storms that, as has said NASA, that may have been key to life on Earth, read here so that to notice it:
>
> https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/nasa-solar-storms-may-have-been-key-to-life-on-earth
>
> I think i am highly smart, and i will invite you to read my following
> smart thoughts about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so that you notice how i am talking about the so important thing that we call "randomness":
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0
>
>
> So i think i am highly smart, and notice that i am saying in the above web link the following about evolutionary algorithms:
>
> "I think that Modern trends in solving tough optimization problems tend
> to use evolutionary algorithms and nature-inspired metaheuristic
> algorithms, especially those based on swarm intelligence (SI), two major
> characteristics of modern metaheuristic methods are nature-inspired, and
> a balance between randomness and regularity."
>
> So i think that in the genetic algorithm, there is a part that is hard coded, like selecting the best genes, and i think that it is what
> we call regularity, since it is hard coded like that, but there is
> a so important thing in that genetic algorithm that we call randomness,
> and i think that it is the genetic mutations that happen with a
> probability and that give a kind of diversity, so i think that this
> genetic mutations are really important, since i can for example
> say that if the best genes are the ones that use "reason", so then reason too can make the people that has the tendency to use reason do
> a thing that is against there survival, like going to war when we
> feel that there is too much risk, but this going to war can make
> the members or people that use reason so that to attack the other enemy
> be extinct in a war when they loose a war, and it is the basis of randomness in a genetic algorithm, since even when there is a war
> between for example two Ant colonies, there are some members that do not make war and that can survive if other are extinct by making war, and i say it also comes from randomness of the genetics.
>
> More of my philosophy about student performance and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
>
>
> I have just read the following interesting article from McKinsey, and
> i invite you to read it carefully:
>
> Drivers of student performance: Asia insights
>
> https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/drivers-of-student-performance-asia-insights
>
> And i think i am smart, and i think that the following factors in the above article that influence student performance are not so difficult to implement:
>
> 1- Students who receive a blend of inquiry-based and teacher-directed
> instruction have the best outcomes
>
> 2- School-based technology yields the best results when placed in the
> hands of teachers
>
> 3- Early childhood education has a positive impact on student scores,
> but the quality and type of care is important
>
> But i think that the factor that is tricky to implement (since it needs good smartness) is good motivation calibration that permits to score 8 to 14 percent higher on the science test than poorly calibrated one, and the high self-identified motivation that permits to score 6 to 8 percent higher.
>
> More of my philosophy about what Americans think of Metaverse
> and more of my thoughts..
>
> Surprise! 78 percent of Americans think Metaverse is just hype
>
> "In his keynote speech, while announcing the company name change, Zuckerberg said that 3D spaces in the metaverse will let people socialize, learn, play, and collaborate in ways we have never seen before. The company revealed one of its virtual reality worlds later in the year to all those who had access to its proprietary headsets.."
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://interestingengineering.com/americans-think-metaverse-is-just-hype
>
> More of my philosophy about Zettascale and about Metaverse and more of my thoughts..
>
> As you have just noticed, i have just posted about Zettascale or ZettaFLOP that we need so that Metaverse be possible, and as you notice the article below, with of Intel’s Raja Koduri talking, says that the architecture is possible and it will be ready around 2027 or 2030 and it is the following:
>
> An architecture jump of 16x, power and thermals are 2x, data movement is 3x, and process is 5x. That is about 500x, on top of the two ExaFLOP Aurora system, gets to a ZettaFLOP.
>
> Interview with Intel’s Raja Koduri: Zettascale or ZettaFLOP? Metaverse what?
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://www.anandtech.com/show/17298/interview-with-intels-raja-koduri-zettascale-or-zettaflop-metaverse-what
>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.