"The United Nations on Wednesday reiterated its support for the one-China principle, noting that it follows the UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 2758 of 1971.

"Our position is very clear. We abide by General Assembly resolutions, by the one-China policy, and that is the orientation that we have in everything we do," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a briefing."

https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202208/04/WS62eb0baca310fd2b29e70278.html

ltlee1 <ltlee1@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "The United Nations on Wednesday reiterated its support for the one-China principle, noting that it follows the UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 2758 of 1971.
>
> "Our position is very clear. We abide by General Assembly resolutions,
> by the one-China policy, and that is the orientation that we have in
> everything we do," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a
> briefing."
>
> https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202208/04/WS62eb0baca310fd2b29e70278.html

Translated: UNSG stated that he requires *formal* change pf policy by
UNGA (PRC has veto power in UNSC).

--
A. Filip : Big (Tech) Brother is watching you.
| There is no cure for birth and death other than to enjoy the
| interval. (George Santayana)

On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 11:54:09 AM UTC-4, A. Filip wrote:
> ltlee1 wrote:
> > "The United Nations on Wednesday reiterated its support for the one-China principle, noting that it follows the UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 2758 of 1971.
> >
> > "Our position is very clear. We abide by General Assembly resolutions,
> > by the one-China policy, and that is the orientation that we have in
> > everything we do," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a
> > briefing."
> >
> > https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202208/04/WS62eb0baca310fd2b29e70278.html
> Translated: UNSG stated that he requires *formal* change pf policy by
> UNGA (PRC has veto power in UNSC).

Funny.
Waht if UNSG stated that the US is the UNSC member, not Venezuela.
Translated: UNSG stated that he requires *formal* change pf policy by
UNGA (US has veto power in UNSC). No?
>
> --
> A. Filip : Big (Tech) Brother is watching you.
> | There is no cure for birth and death other than to enjoy the
> | interval. (George Santayana)

ltlee1 <ltlee1@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 11:54:09 AM UTC-4, A. Filip wrote:
>> ltlee1 wrote:
>> > "The United Nations on Wednesday reiterated its support for the
>> > one-China principle, noting that it follows the UN General
>> > Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 2758 of 1971.
>> >
>> > "Our position is very clear. We abide by General Assembly resolutions,
>> > by the one-China policy, and that is the orientation that we have in
>> > everything we do," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a
>> > briefing."
>> >
>> > https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202208/04/WS62eb0baca310fd2b29e70278.html
>> Translated: UNSG stated that he requires *formal* change pf policy by
>> UNGA (PRC has veto power in UNSC).
>
> Funny.
> Waht if UNSG stated that the US is the UNSC member, not Venezuela.
> Translated: UNSG stated that he requires *formal* change pf policy by
> UNGA (US has veto power in UNSC). No?

There is a precedent for canceling UNGA resolutions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_3379
> United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379, adopted on 10
> November 1975 by a vote of 72 to 35 (with 32 abstentions),
> "determine[d] that Zionism is a form of racism and racial
> discrimination". It was revoked in 1991 with UN General Assembly
> Resolution 46/86.[1] […]
> The text of the revocation was simply: "The General Assembly Decides
> to revoke the determination contained in its resolution 3379 (XXX) of
> 10 November 1975." […]

--
A. Filip : Big (Tech) Brother is watching you.
| It'll be just like Beggars' Canyon back home. (Luke Skywalker)

On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 2:47:30 PM UTC-4, A. Filip wrote:
> ltlee1 wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 11:54:09 AM UTC-4, A. Filip wrote:
> >> ltlee1 wrote:
> >> > "The United Nations on Wednesday reiterated its support for the
> >> > one-China principle, noting that it follows the UN General
> >> > Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 2758 of 1971.
> >> >
> >> > "Our position is very clear. We abide by General Assembly resolutions,
> >> > by the one-China policy, and that is the orientation that we have in
> >> > everything we do," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a
> >> > briefing."
> >> >
> >> > https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202208/04/WS62eb0baca310fd2b29e70278..html
> >> Translated: UNSG stated that he requires *formal* change pf policy by
> >> UNGA (PRC has veto power in UNSC).
> >
> > Funny.
> > Waht if UNSG stated that the US is the UNSC member, not Venezuela.
> > Translated: UNSG stated that he requires *formal* change pf policy by
> > UNGA (US has veto power in UNSC). No?
> There is a precedent for canceling UNGA resolutions.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_3379
> > United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379, adopted on 10
> > November 1975 by a vote of 72 to 35 (with 32 abstentions),
> > "determine[d] that Zionism is a form of racism and racial
> > discrimination". It was revoked in 1991 with UN General Assembly
> > Resolution 46/86.[1] […]
> > The text of the revocation was simply: "The General Assembly Decides
> > to revoke the determination contained in its resolution 3379 (XXX) of
> > 10 November 1975." […]
> --

The US has precedent amending its constitution too.
Applying your kind logic, every utterance by by US official X related to the US
Constitution clause Y could or should be correctly understood as "US official
X says he requires an amendment to change the US Constitutional Clause Y".
No?

Feel free to think that way.
This is my last reply to this thread.

> A. Filip : Big (Tech) Brother is watching you.
> | It'll be just like Beggars' Canyon back home. (Luke Skywalker)

On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 2:35:40 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
> "The United Nations on Wednesday reiterated its support for the one-China principle, noting that it follows the UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 2758 of 1971.
>
> "Our position is very clear. We abide by General Assembly resolutions, by the one-China policy, and that is the orientation that we have in everything we do," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a briefing."
>
> https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202208/04/WS62eb0baca310fd2b29e70278.html

The One China principle is meaningless when the sovereignty of China over Taiwan is being cast aside.
The US sells arms to Taiwan with impunity and American politicians go in and out of Taiwan as and when they wish. Everyone of those politicians encourage the islanders to defy Chinese sovereignty over the island. This is going on for too long now. The Chinese should take decisive actions to stop this. Make this visit by that withered old witch Pelosi the last one by any American official.

David P., <news:16940c43-b943-4fd3-bb7b-2fb86898a955n@googlegroups.com>

> The U.S.A. should invade and take over Bermuda, Bahamas, Cuba, Hispaniola,
> and Jamaica, to enforce the One-America principle!

The USA, if it wants to show a high moral standard, must return Hawaii
back to the native locals and make it back an independent state, as it
was before the USA had unprovokedly - out of pure avidity - invaded
the small island nation and then brazenly annexed it against the will
of their majority.

> The E.U. should invade and take over Great Britain and Ireland, to enforce
> the
> One-Europe principle!
> Australia should invade and take over Papua-New Guinea and New Zealand, to
> enforce the One-Australia principle!

And the best you can do is to simply kill yourself.

It would improve environment and help solve the food shortage problem.

On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 11:38:55 PM UTC+8, Oleg Smirnov wrote:
> David P., <news:16940c43-b943-4fd3...@googlegroups.com>
> > The U.S.A. should invade and take over Bermuda, Bahamas, Cuba, Hispaniola,
> > and Jamaica, to enforce the One-America principle!
> The USA, if it wants to show a high moral standard, must return Hawaii
> back to the native locals and make it back an independent state, as it
> was before the USA had unprovokedly - out of pure avidity - invaded
> the small island nation and then brazenly annexed it against the will
> of their majority.
> > The E.U. should invade and take over Great Britain and Ireland, to enforce
> > the
> > One-Europe principle!
> > Australia should invade and take over Papua-New Guinea and New Zealand, to
> > enforce the One-Australia principle!
> And the best you can do is to simply kill yourself.
>
> It would improve environment and help solve the food shortage problem.

Return Okinawa, Guam, and Diego Garcia and etc, to the natives, too.

On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 9:10:26 PM UTC-4, David P. wrote:
> stoney wrote:
> > Oleg Smirnov wrote:
> > > David P. wrote:
> > > > The U.S.A. should invade and take over Bermuda, Bahamas, Cuba, Hispaniola,
> > > > and Jamaica, to enforce the One-America principle!
> > > The USA, if it wants to show a high moral standard, must return Hawaii
> > > back to the native locals and make it back an independent state, as it
> > > was before the USA had unprovokedly - out of pure avidity - invaded
> > > the small island nation and then brazenly annexed it against the will
> > > of their majority.
> > > > The E.U. should invade and take over Great Britain and Ireland, to enforce
> > > > the
> > > > One-Europe principle!
> > > > Australia should invade and take over Papua-New Guinea and New Zealand, to
> > > > enforce the One-Australia principle!
> > > And the best you can do is to simply kill yourself.
> > >
> > > It would improve environment and help solve the food shortage problem.
> > Return Okinawa, Guam, and Diego Garcia and etc, to the natives, too.
> ----------------
> We're the World's Policeman, whose job it is to protect the majority
> from bad actors like China, Russia, Iran, N. Korea, etc.!
> --
> --

Can the US properly "police" itself?
Should the US "police" itself properly first?

David P., <news:7efa35ed-3575-4ba8-9a74-89eac0ea54bfn@googlegroups.com>
> ltlee1 wrote:
>> David P. wrote:
>>> stoney wrote:
>>>> Oleg Smirnov wrote:
>>>>> David P. wrote:
>>>>>> The U.S.A. should invade and take over Bermuda, Bahamas, Cuba,
>>>>>> Hispaniola,
>>>>>> and Jamaica, to enforce the One-America principle!
>>>>> The USA, if it wants to show a high moral standard, must return Hawaii
>>>>> back to the native locals and make it back an independent state, as it
>>>>> was before the USA had unprovokedly - out of pure avidity - invaded
>>>>> the small island nation and then brazenly annexed it against the will
>>>>> of their majority.
>>>>>> The E.U. should invade and take over Great Britain and Ireland, to
>>>>>> enforce
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> One-Europe principle!
>>>>>> Australia should invade and take over Papua-New Guinea and New Zealand,
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> enforce the One-Australia principle!
>>>>> And the best you can do is to simply kill yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would improve environment and help solve the food shortage problem.
>>>> Return Okinawa, Guam, and Diego Garcia and etc, to the natives, too.
>>> ----------------
>>> We're the World's Policeman, whose job it is to protect the majority
>>> from bad actors like China, Russia, Iran, N. Korea, etc.!
>>> --
>> Can the US properly "police" itself?
>> Should the US "police" itself properly first?
> ----------------------
> Germany, Japan and Italy were bad actors, too, but they got humbled.
> I do agree, though, that the entire political class, worldwide, needs to
> have a job requirement to attend regular meetings of spiritual recovery,
> like "Politicians Anonymous", and it should very well start here in the
> United States!

The best you can contribute is to kill yourself.

It would improve environment and help solve the food shortage problem.

On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 3:00:20 PM UTC-4, David P. wrote:
> stoney wrote:
> > Oleg Smirnov wrote:
> > > David P. wrote:
> > > > The U.S.A. should invade and take over Bermuda, Bahamas, Cuba, Hispaniola,
> > > > and Jamaica, to enforce the One-America principle!
> > > The USA, if it wants to show a high moral standard, must return Hawaii
> > > back to the native locals and make it back an independent state, as it
> > > was before the USA had unprovokedly - out of pure avidity - invaded
> > > the small island nation and then brazenly annexed it against the will
> > > of their majority.
> > > > The E.U. should invade and take over Great Britain and Ireland, to enforce
> > > > the
> > > > One-Europe principle!
> > > > Australia should invade and take over Papua-New Guinea and New Zealand, to
> > > > enforce the One-Australia principle!
> > > And the best you can do is to simply kill yourself.
> > >
> > > It would improve environment and help solve the food shortage problem.
> > Return Okinawa, Guam, and Diego Garcia and etc, to the natives, too.
> -----------------
> What's the GDP of Okinawa, Guam, Diego Garcia, & etc.??
> The GDP of Taiwan is #21 on the list, behind USA, China, Japan, Germany,
> India, UK, France, Canada, Italy, Brazil, Russia, S. Korea, Australia, Iran,
> Spain, Mexico, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Netherlands, and Switzerland,
> YOU FILTHY PIG !!!
> --
> --
Countries all the world except 6 tiny ones had accepted and kept their agreement in
honoring the ONE CHINA principle. In contrast, the US is doing the utmost in violating
the agreement. Why?

On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 1:39:59 PM UTC-4, David P. wrote:
> ltlee1 wrote:
> > David P. wrote:
> > > stoney wrote:
> > > > Oleg Smirnov wrote:
> > > > > David P. wrote:
> > > > > > The U.S.A. should invade and take over Bermuda, Bahamas, Cuba, Hispaniola,
> > > > > > and Jamaica, to enforce the One-America principle!
> > > > > The USA, if it wants to show a high moral standard, must return Hawaii
> > > > > back to the native locals and make it back an independent state, as it
> > > > > was before the USA had unprovokedly - out of pure avidity - invaded
> > > > > the small island nation and then brazenly annexed it against the will
> > > > > of their majority.
> > > > > > The E.U. should invade and take over Great Britain and Ireland, to enforce
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > One-Europe principle!
> > > > > > Australia should invade and take over Papua-New Guinea and New Zealand, to
> > > > > > enforce the One-Australia principle!
> > > > > And the best you can do is to simply kill yourself.
> > > > >
> > > > > It would improve environment and help solve the food shortage problem.
> > > > Return Okinawa, Guam, and Diego Garcia and etc, to the natives, too.
> > > ----------------
> > > We're the World's Policeman, whose job it is to protect the majority
> > > from bad actors like China, Russia, Iran, N. Korea, etc.!
> > > --
> > Can the US properly "police" itself?
> > Should the US "police" itself properly first?
> ----------------------
> Germany, Japan and Italy were bad actors, too, but they got humbled.
> I do agree, though, that the entire political class, worldwide, needs to
> have a job requirement to attend regular meetings of spiritual recovery,
> like "Politicians Anonymous", and it should very well start here in the United States!
> --
Don't know anything about Politicians Anonymous. But if the US does not refrain from
trying to split Taiwan away from China. Those who dream of zero population growth
or close to zero world population might have their prayers answered.

An third nuclear age is upon us.

On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 3:00:20 AM UTC+8, David P. wrote:
> stoney wrote:
> > Oleg Smirnov wrote:
> > > David P. wrote:
> > > > The U.S.A. should invade and take over Bermuda, Bahamas, Cuba, Hispaniola,
> > > > and Jamaica, to enforce the One-America principle!
> > > The USA, if it wants to show a high moral standard, must return Hawaii
> > > back to the native locals and make it back an independent state, as it
> > > was before the USA had unprovokedly - out of pure avidity - invaded
> > > the small island nation and then brazenly annexed it against the will
> > > of their majority.
> > > > The E.U. should invade and take over Great Britain and Ireland, to enforce
> > > > the
> > > > One-Europe principle!
> > > > Australia should invade and take over Papua-New Guinea and New Zealand, to
> > > > enforce the One-Australia principle!
> > > And the best you can do is to simply kill yourself.
> > >
> > > It would improve environment and help solve the food shortage problem.
> > Return Okinawa, Guam, and Diego Garcia and etc, to the natives, too.
> -----------------
> What's the GDP of Okinawa, Guam, Diego Garcia, & etc.??
> The GDP of Taiwan is #21 on the list, behind USA, China, Japan, Germany,
> India, UK, France, Canada, Italy, Brazil, Russia, S. Korea, Australia, Iran,
> Spain, Mexico, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Netherlands, and Switzerland,
> YOU FILTHY PIG !!!
> --
> --

GDP not the issue and not relevance too.

On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 3:25:20 AM UTC+8, ltlee1 wrote:
> On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 3:00:20 PM UTC-4, David P. wrote:
> > stoney wrote:
> > > Oleg Smirnov wrote:
> > > > David P. wrote:
> > > > > The U.S.A. should invade and take over Bermuda, Bahamas, Cuba, Hispaniola,
> > > > > and Jamaica, to enforce the One-America principle!
> > > > The USA, if it wants to show a high moral standard, must return Hawaii
> > > > back to the native locals and make it back an independent state, as it
> > > > was before the USA had unprovokedly - out of pure avidity - invaded
> > > > the small island nation and then brazenly annexed it against the will
> > > > of their majority.
> > > > > The E.U. should invade and take over Great Britain and Ireland, to enforce
> > > > > the
> > > > > One-Europe principle!
> > > > > Australia should invade and take over Papua-New Guinea and New Zealand, to
> > > > > enforce the One-Australia principle!
> > > > And the best you can do is to simply kill yourself.
> > > >
> > > > It would improve environment and help solve the food shortage problem.
> > > Return Okinawa, Guam, and Diego Garcia and etc, to the natives, too.
> > -----------------
> > What's the GDP of Okinawa, Guam, Diego Garcia, & etc.??
> > The GDP of Taiwan is #21 on the list, behind USA, China, Japan, Germany,
> > India, UK, France, Canada, Italy, Brazil, Russia, S. Korea, Australia, Iran,
> > Spain, Mexico, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Netherlands, and Switzerland,
> > YOU FILTHY PIG !!!
> > --
> > --
> Countries all the world except 6 tiny ones had accepted and kept their agreement in
> honoring the ONE CHINA principle. In contrast, the US is doing the utmost in violating
> the agreement. Why?

Only 6 tiny countries in the world accepted Taiwan, US should have asked Taiwan to hand over Taiwan island to China. Us should have worked with China and Russia in the UNSC ordering the idiot Tsai of Taiwan to hand over Taiwan to China. Despite that, US still maintains its sinister "status quo" motives to prevent China from reuniting Taiwan at all. Hence, US is the culprit in breaking up their ties.

Is this USA objectives in breaking up families' ties like what they found in American families? Almost all Americans came from broken and hatred families. With so many broken families no wonder their children have some many fathers and mothers over their lives that nobody would want to ask if they had how many fathers and mothers before them. Also, with broken marriages and repeated divorces, no wonder their children followed like them, too. Children were mentally distorted by them madly bought gun and rifle in mass-shooting. Perhaps, what is happening in the past many years is God' work to punish Americans for its numerous unpardonable sins done to the world.