Hey, Nancy Pelosi, you the bitchy, go get yourself fucked (if there is any taker).
Don't bring trouble to this part of the world.

Now, get this right, you bitch: Taiwan is a part of China's sovereign territory. You can't go in or out as you wish. Unless you want your arse nuked.

On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:26:29 AM UTC, wog wacker wrote:
> Hey, Nancy Pelosi, you the bitchy, go get yourself fucked (if there is any taker).
> Don't bring trouble to this part of the world.
>
> Now, get this right, you bitch: Taiwan is a part of China's sovereign territory. You can't go in or out as you wish. Unless you want your arse nuked..

Itchy, bitchy Nancy Pelosi,
Coming over to Asia-Pacific,
Talking about regional peace,
While giving it a piss.

The US efforts to suppress a rising China is inexhaustible. One such efforts is to split up China. It has little hope of doing so in Tibet and Xinjiang. It has failed in HK. Taiwan is now its last remaining hope.

Russia’s “special military operations” in Ukraine has given the US an excuse to intensify its effort to split Taiwan from China. In a cunning twist of plot, it wants to con the world to believe that China will do something similar to Taiwan soon.

While the US is eager to show the world that it has the might to stop China, individual US politician is seizing the opportunity to show that he/she alone can stand up to China, to boost his/her own political career.

Nancy Pelosi has been one such politician for a long time now. In Tian An Men, she led protests against the Chinese government of those days. In HK, she lent her support to huge anti-government protests there by referring to them as “a beautiful sight to behold”. When the protesters took over the site of government, the Legislative Assembly building, she was most exalted. If the protesters had succeeded, HK would have been one of her stops in her current trip to the Asia-Pacific.

Past and present US Presidents have different approach to deal with the rise of China. Trump hit China with pragmatics like trade and IPR. He went ahead mostly alone, ignoring US allies. Biden is doing it with the ideologies of democracy, freedom and human rights, together with like-minded allies.The Biden Admin. has turned US vs China to Democracy vs Autocracy. US politicians who defy China to visit Taiwan proclaim that they are doing it to “ protect and defend democracy and freedom”.

That’s bullshit. The issue that the US has with China regarding Taiwan is not ideological. It is geopolitical. The reunification of Taiwan with China would mean a stronger and more powerful China with extensive influence in the Asia-Pacific. The US cannot accept this. It is putting itself in the way of reunification. It can find ready allies in this endeavor one of which is Japan. Japan colonised Taiwan for about 50 years from the later part of the Qing Dynasty until its defeat in WW2. It would like to have Taiwan return to its fold. The real enemy of China are those on the island itself which support independence for Taiwan, the Taiwan Independent (TI). Whether its Japan or TI, these are all dogs under one US Master. Beating off these dogs will not solve the Taiwan issue for China. To win over Taiwan, China will have to beat off their Master, the US. For that, it needs might, superior military might.

Those US politicians who defy China to visit Taiwan know that they will be escorted in and out of the island by their nation’s superior military might. China’s President had warned against Pelosi’s visit. It went ahead. That’s a humiliation for China. Now China is carrying out military exercises to blockade Taiwan. What will happen if the US uses its carrier fleets to break the blockade? Will it not be another humiliation for China?

It is not wise of China to threaten and sabre-rattle at Taiwan when its the US which has provoked it. A better way to deal with the provocations would be to send a hypersonic missile flying high over the US. If the Americans fail to intercept the missile, the message from the Chinese would be loud and clear.

Ultimately, to solve the Taiwan issue, China would have to get the US out of the way. To achieve this, it would have to possess a military might which is on par or surpasses that of the US.

wog wacker <wogwacker@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey, Nancy Pelosi, you the bitchy, go get yourself fucked (if there is any taker).
> Don't bring trouble to this part of the world.
>
> Now, get this right, you bitch: Taiwan is a part of China's sovereign
> territory. You can't go in or out as you wish. Unless you want your
> arse nuked.

Once China always China - Does Russia remember? :-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan
> The island was annexed in 1683 by the Qing dynasty of China,

--
A. Filip : Big (Tech) Brother is watching you.
| Remember that as a teenager you are in the last stage of your life
| when you will be happy to hear that the phone is for you.
| (Fran Lebowitz, "Social Studies")

On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 2:55:35 AM UTC-4, A. Filip wrote:
> wog wacker <wogw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey, Nancy Pelosi, you the bitchy, go get yourself fucked (if there is any taker).
> > Don't bring trouble to this part of the world.
> >
> > Now, get this right, you bitch: Taiwan is a part of China's sovereign
> > territory. You can't go in or out as you wish. Unless you want your
> > arse nuked.
> Once China always China - Does Russia remember? :-)
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan
> > The island was annexed in 1683 by the Qing dynasty of China,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koxinga
"In 1661, Koxinga led his troops on a landing at Lakjemuyse[30] to attack the Dutch colonists in Dutch
Formosa.[31][32] Koxinga said to the Dutch "Hitherto this island had always belonged to China..."

BTW, Koxinga or Coxinga is literally 3 Chinese character Country-Last Name-Lord (or the Lord with the last
name of the country). Koxinga was Taiwan's George Washington more than other part of China. Numerous
temples were devoted to him. And his birthday was celebrated.

>
> --
> A. Filip : Big (Tech) Brother is watching you.
> | Remember that as a teenager you are in the last stage of your life
> | when you will be happy to hear that the phone is for you.
> | (Fran Lebowitz, "Social Studies")