as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google groups posts
affected google search rankings, possibly independent of their nearly obsolete
usenet connection which might help to explain the incomparably vast quantities
of spam passed along to usenet newsgroups without any regard whatsoever to the
irreparable consequences they have wrought against unwary users of this user's
network? some might say it's deliberate, "embrace, extend, extinguish" tactics

D <J@M> wrote:

> as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google groups posts
> affected google search rankings, possibly independent of their nearly obsolete
> usenet connection which might help to explain the incomparably vast quantities
> of spam passed along to usenet newsgroups without any regard whatsoever to the
> irreparable consequences they have wrought against unwary users of this user's
> network? some might say it's deliberate, "embrace, extend, extinguish" tactics
>

You're multiposting.

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator

My pet rock Gordon just is.

On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 22:11:15 +0000, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
>D <J@M> wrote:
>> as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google groups posts
>> affected google search rankings, possibly independent of their nearly obsolete
>> usenet connection which might help to explain the incomparably vast quantities
>> of spam passed along to usenet newsgroups without any regard whatsoever to the
>> irreparable consequences they have wrought against unwary users of this user's
>> network? some might say it's deliberate, "embrace, extend, extinguish" tactics
>
>You're multiposting.

you're advertising "gmail", so it makes sense that you'd play "net-cop"

they might wait until exactly midnight googleplex time or maybe sooner?
countdown timers (and probably sports betting, office pools, etc.) are
keeping track of the final days until google's disjunction from usenet
(using Tor Browser 13.0.9, pacific standard time, 00:00-24:00|PT/UT-8) . . .
https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20240222T00&p0=1241&msg=Google+Groups+Shutdown&font=slab&csz=1
>Google Groups Shutdown
>10 days 08 hours ... minutes ... seconds
>Time until Thursday, February 22, 2024 (Mountain View time)
[end quote]

guesstimate . . .

22 february 2024 02:14:14 am (074w00:11,40n44:29; jd 2460362.80155)
21 february 2024 11:14:14 pm (122w05:02,37n25:18; jd 2460362.80155)

D <J@M> wrote:

> On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 22:11:15 +0000, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> >D <J@M> wrote:
> >> as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google
> >> groups posts affected google search rankings, possibly independent of
> >> their nearly obsolete usenet connection which might help to explain the
> >> incomparably vast quantities of spam passed along to usenet newsgroups
> >> without any regard whatsoever to the irreparable consequences they have
> >> wrought against unwary users of this user's network? some might say
> >> it's deliberate, "embrace, extend, extinguish" tactics
> >>
> >
> > You're multiposting.
> >
>
> you're advertising "gmail", so it makes sense that you'd play "net-cop"
>

Are you seriously going to criticise me for using a mail service with
an unmunged address that works? I chose Gmail for its excellent spam
blocking. In case you aren't aware, Gmail is emphatically not the same
as Google Groups.

For your information: multiposting is widely regarded as rude;
use crossposting instead (if you must). Then your readers won't
have to see your words more than once.

[the rest of your article ignored as more ridiculous repetition.]

> they might wait until exactly midnight googleplex time or maybe sooner?
> countdown timers (and probably sports betting, office pools, etc.) are
> keeping track of the final days until google's disjunction from usenet
> (using Tor Browser 13.0.9, pacific standard time, 00:00-24:00|PT/UT-8) . . .
>
<https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20240222T00&p0=1241&msg=Google+Groups+Shutdown&font=slab&csz=1>
> >Google Groups Shutdown
> >10 days 08 hours ... minutes ... seconds
> >Time until Thursday, February 22, 2024 (Mountain View time)
> [end quote]
>
> guesstimate . . .
>
> 22 february 2024 02:14:14 am (074w00:11,40n44:29; jd 2460362.80155)
> 21 february 2024 11:14:14 pm (122w05:02,37n25:18; jd 2460362.80155)

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator

My pet rock Gordon just is.

On 11/02/2024 20:34, D wrote:
> as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google groups posts
> affected google search rankings, possibly independent of their nearly obsolete
> usenet connection which might help to explain the incomparably vast quantities
> of spam passed along to usenet newsgroups without any regard whatsoever to the
> irreparable consequences they have wrought against unwary users of this user's
> network? some might say it's deliberate, "embrace, extend, extinguish" tactics
>
>
Yes it has affected and they have filed for chapter 11 protection.

Kelce <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On 11/02/2024 20:34, D wrote:
> > as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google groups
> > posts affected google search rankings, possibly independent of their
> > nearly obsolete usenet connection which might help to explain the
> > incomparably vast quantities of spam passed along to usenet newsgroups
> > without any regard whatsoever to the irreparable consequences they have
> > wrought against unwary users of this user's network? some might say it's
> > deliberate, "embrace, extend, extinguish" tactics
> >
>
> Yes it has affected and they have filed for chapter 11 protection.

lol

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator

My pet rock Gordon just is.

On 11 Feb 2024, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted some
news:1qosdxs.dq5kzncm4c4sN%snipeco.2@gmail.com:

> D <J@M> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 22:11:15 +0000, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
>> wrote:
>> >D <J@M> wrote:
>> >> as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google
>> >> groups posts affected google search rankings, possibly independent
>> >> of their nearly obsolete usenet connection which might help to
>> >> explain the incomparably vast quantities of spam passed along to
>> >> usenet newsgroups without any regard whatsoever to the irreparable
>> >> consequences they have wrought against unwary users of this user's
>> >> network? some might say it's deliberate, "embrace, extend,
>> >> extinguish" tactics
>> >>
>> >
>> > You're multiposting.
>> >
>>
>> you're advertising "gmail", so it makes sense that you'd play
>> "net-cop"
>>
>
> Are you seriously going to criticise me for using a mail service with
> an unmunged address that works? I chose Gmail for its excellent spam
> blocking. In case you aren't aware, Gmail is emphatically not the
> same as Google Groups.
>
> For your information: multiposting is widely regarded as rude;
> use crossposting instead (if you must). Then your readers won't
> have to see your words more than once.
>
> [the rest of your article ignored as more ridiculous repetition.]

When will you be addressing his question(s)?

Trump 2024 wrote:
>
> On 11 Feb 2024, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted some
> news:1qosdxs.dq5kzncm4c4sN%snipeco.2@gmail.com:
>
> > D <J@M> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 22:11:15 +0000, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
> >> wrote:
> >> >D <J@M> wrote:
> >> >> as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google
> >> >> groups posts affected google search rankings, possibly independent
> >> >> of their nearly obsolete usenet connection which might help to
> >> >> explain the incomparably vast quantities of spam passed along to
> >> >> usenet newsgroups without any regard whatsoever to the irreparable
> >> >> consequences they have wrought against unwary users of this user's
> >> >> network? some might say it's deliberate, "embrace, extend,
> >> >> extinguish" tactics
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > You're multiposting.
> >> >
> >>
> >> you're advertising "gmail", so it makes sense that you'd play
> >> "net-cop"
> >>
> >
> > Are you seriously going to criticise me for using a mail service with
> > an unmunged address that works? I chose Gmail for its excellent spam
> > blocking. In case you aren't aware, Gmail is emphatically not the
> > same as Google Groups.
> >
> > For your information: multiposting is widely regarded as rude;
> > use crossposting instead (if you must). Then your readers won't
> > have to see your words more than once.
> >
> > [the rest of your article ignored as more ridiculous repetition.]
>
> When will you be addressing his question(s)?

What are the questions?

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:05:10 -0000 (UTC), Trump 2024 <go-trump@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 11 Feb 2024, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted some
>news:1qosdxs.dq5kzncm4c4sN%snipeco.2@gmail.com:
>> D <J@M> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 22:11:15 +0000, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
>>> >D <J@M> wrote:
>>> >> as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google
>>> >> groups posts affected google search rankings, possibly independent
>>> >> of their nearly obsolete usenet connection which might help to
>>> >> explain the incomparably vast quantities of spam passed along to
>>> >> usenet newsgroups without any regard whatsoever to the irreparable
>>> >> consequences they have wrought against unwary users of this user's
>>> >> network? some might say it's deliberate, "embrace, extend,
>>> >> extinguish" tactics
>>> >
>>> > You're multiposting.
>>>
>>> you're advertising "gmail", so it makes sense that you'd play
>>> "net-cop"
>>
>> Are you seriously going to criticise me for using a mail service with
>> an unmunged address that works? I chose Gmail for its excellent spam
>> blocking. In case you aren't aware, Gmail is emphatically not the
>> same as Google Groups.
>> For your information: multiposting is widely regarded as rude;
>> use crossposting instead (if you must). Then your readers won't
>> have to see your words more than once.
>> [the rest of your article ignored as more ridiculous repetition.]
>
>When will you be addressing his question(s)?

troll farm operatives have never discussed anything openly in a rational
manner, they have infiltrated and occupied every active usenet newsgroup
since their inception; it's down to nine days until google cuts the cord

Trump 2024 <go-trump@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11 Feb 2024, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted some
> news:1qosdxs.dq5kzncm4c4sN%snipeco.2@gmail.com:
>
> > D <J@M> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 22:11:15 +0000, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
> >> wrote:
> >> >D <J@M> wrote:
> >> >> as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google
> >> >> groups posts affected google search rankings, possibly independent
> >> >> of their nearly obsolete usenet connection which might help to
> >> >> explain the incomparably vast quantities of spam passed along to
> >> >> usenet newsgroups without any regard whatsoever to the irreparable
> >> >> consequences they have wrought against unwary users of this user's
> >> >> network? some might say it's deliberate, "embrace, extend,
> >> >> extinguish" tactics
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > You're multiposting.
> >> >
> >>
> >> you're advertising "gmail", so it makes sense that you'd play
> >> "net-cop"
> >>
> >
> > Are you seriously going to criticise me for using a mail service with
> > an unmunged address that works? I chose Gmail for its excellent spam
> > blocking. In case you aren't aware, Gmail is emphatically not the
> > same as Google Groups.
> >
> > For your information: multiposting is widely regarded as rude;
> > use crossposting instead (if you must). Then your readers won't
> > have to see your words more than once.
> >
> > [the rest of your article ignored as more ridiculous repetition.]
> >
>
> When will you be addressing his question(s)?
>

This question?

"have google groups posts affected google search rankings".

I won't be. Not only do I not know the answer, it's off topic here.

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator

My pet rock Gordon just is.

William Stickers wrote:
>
> Trump 2024 wrote:
> >
> > On 11 Feb 2024, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted some
> > news:1qosdxs.dq5kzncm4c4sN%snipeco.2@gmail.com:
> >
> > > D <J@M> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 22:11:15 +0000, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >D <J@M> wrote:
> > >> >> as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google
> > >> >> groups posts affected google search rankings, possibly independent
> > >> >> of their nearly obsolete usenet connection which might help to
> > >> >> explain the incomparably vast quantities of spam passed along to
> > >> >> usenet newsgroups without any regard whatsoever to the irreparable
> > >> >> consequences they have wrought against unwary users of this user's
> > >> >> network? some might say it's deliberate, "embrace, extend,
> > >> >> extinguish" tactics
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > You're multiposting.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> you're advertising "gmail", so it makes sense that you'd play
> > >> "net-cop"
> > >>
> > >
> > > Are you seriously going to criticise me for using a mail service with
> > > an unmunged address that works? I chose Gmail for its excellent spam
> > > blocking. In case you aren't aware, Gmail is emphatically not the
> > > same as Google Groups.
> > >
> > > For your information: multiposting is widely regarded as rude;
> > > use crossposting instead (if you must). Then your readers won't
> > > have to see your words more than once.
> > >
> > > [the rest of your article ignored as more ridiculous repetition.]
> >
> > When will you be addressing his question(s)?
>
>
> What are the questions?

So there wasn't one? OK.

D wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:05:10 -0000 (UTC), Trump 2024 <go-trump@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On 11 Feb 2024, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) posted some
> >news:1qosdxs.dq5kzncm4c4sN%snipeco.2@gmail.com:
> >> D <J@M> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 22:11:15 +0000, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> >>> >D <J@M> wrote:
> >>> >> as a layman i'm inclined to ask naive questions . . . have google
> >>> >> groups posts affected google search rankings, possibly independent
> >>> >> of their nearly obsolete usenet connection which might help to
> >>> >> explain the incomparably vast quantities of spam passed along to
> >>> >> usenet newsgroups without any regard whatsoever to the irreparable
> >>> >> consequences they have wrought against unwary users of this user's
> >>> >> network? some might say it's deliberate, "embrace, extend,
> >>> >> extinguish" tactics
> >>> >
> >>> > You're multiposting.
> >>>
> >>> you're advertising "gmail", so it makes sense that you'd play
> >>> "net-cop"
> >>
> >> Are you seriously going to criticise me for using a mail service with
> >> an unmunged address that works? I chose Gmail for its excellent spam
> >> blocking. In case you aren't aware, Gmail is emphatically not the
> >> same as Google Groups.
> >> For your information: multiposting is widely regarded as rude;
> >> use crossposting instead (if you must). Then your readers won't
> >> have to see your words more than once.
> >> [the rest of your article ignored as more ridiculous repetition.]
> >
> >When will you be addressing his question(s)?
>
> troll farm operatives have never discussed anything openly in a rational
> manner, they have infiltrated and occupied every active usenet newsgroup
> since their inception;

Your tinfoil hat needs adjusting.

> it's down to nine days until google cuts the cord

Yipee!