Nadegda wrote:
>
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 05:22:26 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>
> > Jim G. <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:04:05 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jim G. <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:05:46 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
> >>>>>Jim G. wrote:
> >>>>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:48:27 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
> >>>>>>>Jim G. wrote:
> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:13:04 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>Jim G. wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>Sometime in the past 24 hours, it seems my IP got added to a blacklist
> >>>>>>>>>>somewhere. The news.aioe.org web server refuses to let me view:
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>https://news.aioe.org/index.php?%20id=access-restrictions
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>That's rather ironic; and incorrect, since everyone in the entire world
> >>>>>>>>>>has the right to view that page. There should be no blacklisting of
> >>>>>>>>>>particular people (or, more likely, entire ISPs) from being able to read
> >>>>>>>>>>that page as it is public, non-confidential information.
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>The AIOE administrator is hereby directed to remove this "feature" and
> >>>>>>>>>>ensure that there are no restrictions whatsoever on who can read the
> >>>>>>>>>>above-indicated web page. If there has been a problem with abusive
> >>>>>>>>>>automated access, slap IPs that request it too many times in a short
> >>>>>>>>>>interval with a CAPTCHA or something. That will block bots but still
> >>>>>>>>>>let humans through. There is no need for measures as extreme as full
> >>>>>>>>>>IP bans.
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>It's working ok for me, the aioe admin must really hate
> >>>>>>>>>you, Derbytwit.
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>Are you on drugs?
> >>>
> >>>>>>>No. What've you got?
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>Who the hell is "Derbytwit"?
> >>>
> >>>>>>>I'm glad you asked, it means I can add my derbytwit sig
> >>>>>>>and crosspost to your vanity froup that was created by
> >>>>>>>your fellow Carleton students after some lab equipment
> >>>>>>>broke and you demanded it be fixed. Seems you stamped you
> >>>>>>>ickle feet, had a hissy fit, assaulted a security officer
> >>>>>>>and then you were ejected from the premises. You've been
> >>>>>>>going off the rails demanding things be fixed ever since.
> >>>>>>><https://tinyurl.com/2u6hsry6>
> >>>
> >>>>>>None of this is true, and I've snecked the group you were hoping to
> >>>>>>spam by crossposting nonsense between it and here.
> >>>
> >>>>>>Now, either you're delusional or you're acting in bad faith. Which
> >>>>>>is it, and if it's the former, I ask again, are you on drugs?
> >>>
> >>>>>Show us yer tits, Paul!
> >>>
> >>>>Crude and misogynistic response makes me suspect intentional bad faith
> >>>>now.
> >>>
> >>>>You appear to be a troll.
> >>>
> >>>>Goodbye.
> >>>
> >>>>*PLONK*
> >>>
> >>>>Now ... does anyone have any *constructive* ideas on how to get access
> >>>>to that restrictions list restored?
> >>>
> >>> Laundry detergent, bluing, and a properly-maintained washing machine in
> >>> the laundry room. Make sure you allow the socks to dry and darn the ones
> >>> with hole or just toss them out.
> >>>
> >>> I've been telling you this for decades.
> >>
> >>Just how many of these bizarre trolls *are* there?
> >>
> >>Oh, and *PLONK*.
> >>
> >>Meanwhile, when will my access to that web page be restored? It's been three
> >>whole days now.
> >
> > That hole in that undarned sock keeps getting bigger and bigger and
> > bigger.
>
> Ah, Adam Verman my old fiend. I see you're still just as paranoid as the
> day we met. Jim here is what, the 147th person you've accused of being your
> bogeyman Seamus?
>
> Meanwhile, do I derive any special status for being in the low double
> digits per the same ranking? Nah, it just means I've been around longer
> than he has. You're an equal opportunity paranoiac.
>
> > Huge hint: You don't do the "misogynist" accusation when you've put on a
> > MALE sock. You've created so many you just can't keep track and aren't
> > doing your own routing correctly.
>
> Don't be ridiculous. You don't have to be a woman to notice, or to call
> out, misogyny in others. Just a decent human being. Though I guess you
> wouldn't know much about *that*, now, would you, kooky?

Show us yer tits, Paul!

William Stickers <bill.stickers@innocent.com> wrote:
>Nadegda wrote:
>>
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 05:22:26 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>
>> > Jim G. <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> >>On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:04:05 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Jim G. <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:05:46 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
>> >>>>>Jim G. wrote:
>> >>>>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:48:27 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
>> >>>>>>>Jim G. wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:13:04 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>Jim G. wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>Sometime in the past 24 hours, it seems my IP got added to a
>blacklist
>> >>>>>>>>>>somewhere. The news.aioe.org web server refuses to let me view:
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>https://news.aioe.org/index.php?%20id=access-restrictions
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>That's rather ironic; and incorrect, since everyone in the
>entire world
>> >>>>>>>>>>has the right to view that page. There should be no blacklisting of
>> >>>>>>>>>>particular people (or, more likely, entire ISPs) from being
>able to read
>> >>>>>>>>>>that page as it is public, non-confidential information.
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>The AIOE administrator is hereby directed to remove this
>"feature" and
>> >>>>>>>>>>ensure that there are no restrictions whatsoever on who can read the
>> >>>>>>>>>>above-indicated web page. If there has been a problem with abusive
>> >>>>>>>>>>automated access, slap IPs that request it too many times in a short
>> >>>>>>>>>>interval with a CAPTCHA or something. That will block bots but still
>> >>>>>>>>>>let humans through. There is no need for measures as extreme as full
>> >>>>>>>>>>IP bans.
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>>>>It's working ok for me, the aioe admin must really hate
>> >>>>>>>>>you, Derbytwit.
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>>>Are you on drugs?
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>>No. What've you got?
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>>>Who the hell is "Derbytwit"?
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>>I'm glad you asked, it means I can add my derbytwit sig
>> >>>>>>>and crosspost to your vanity froup that was created by
>> >>>>>>>your fellow Carleton students after some lab equipment
>> >>>>>>>broke and you demanded it be fixed. Seems you stamped you
>> >>>>>>>ickle feet, had a hissy fit, assaulted a security officer
>> >>>>>>>and then you were ejected from the premises. You've been
>> >>>>>>>going off the rails demanding things be fixed ever since.
>> >>>>>>><https://tinyurl.com/2u6hsry6>
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>None of this is true, and I've snecked the group you were hoping to
>> >>>>>>spam by crossposting nonsense between it and here.
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>Now, either you're delusional or you're acting in bad faith. Which
>> >>>>>>is it, and if it's the former, I ask again, are you on drugs?
>> >>>
>> >>>>>Show us yer tits, Paul!
>> >>>
>> >>>>Crude and misogynistic response makes me suspect intentional bad faith
>> >>>>now.
>> >>>
>> >>>>You appear to be a troll.
>> >>>
>> >>>>Goodbye.
>> >>>
>> >>>>*PLONK*
>> >>>
>> >>>>Now ... does anyone have any *constructive* ideas on how to get access
>> >>>>to that restrictions list restored?
>> >>>
>> >>> Laundry detergent, bluing, and a properly-maintained washing machine in
>> >>> the laundry room. Make sure you allow the socks to dry and darn the ones
>> >>> with hole or just toss them out.
>> >>>
>> >>> I've been telling you this for decades.
>> >>
>> >>Just how many of these bizarre trolls *are* there?
>> >>
>> >>Oh, and *PLONK*.
>> >>
>> >>Meanwhile, when will my access to that web page be restored? It's been three
>> >>whole days now.
>> >
>> > That hole in that undarned sock keeps getting bigger and bigger and
>> > bigger.
>>
>> Ah, Adam Verman my old fiend. I see you're still just as paranoid as the
>> day we met. Jim here is what, the 147th person you've accused of being your
>> bogeyman Seamus?
>>
>> Meanwhile, do I derive any special status for being in the low double
>> digits per the same ranking? Nah, it just means I've been around longer
>> than he has. You're an equal opportunity paranoiac.
>>
>> > Huge hint: You don't do the "misogynist" accusation when you've put on a
>> > MALE sock. You've created so many you just can't keep track and aren't
>> > doing your own routing correctly.
>>
>> Don't be ridiculous. You don't have to be a woman to notice, or to call
>> out, misogyny in others. Just a decent human being. Though I guess you
>> wouldn't know much about *that*, now, would you, kooky?
>
>Show us yer tits, Paul!

Thank you

Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>
> William Stickers <bill.stickers@innocent.com> wrote:
> >Nadegda wrote:
> >>
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 05:22:26 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> >>
> >> > Jim G. <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> >>On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:04:05 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Jim G. <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> >>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:05:46 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
> >> >>>>>Jim G. wrote:
> >> >>>>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:48:27 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>Jim G. wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:13:04 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>Jim G. wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>Sometime in the past 24 hours, it seems my IP got added to a
> >blacklist
> >> >>>>>>>>>>somewhere. The news.aioe.org web server refuses to let me view:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>https://news.aioe.org/index.php?%20id=access-restrictions
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>That's rather ironic; and incorrect, since everyone in the
> >entire world
> >> >>>>>>>>>>has the right to view that page. There should be no blacklisting of
> >> >>>>>>>>>>particular people (or, more likely, entire ISPs) from being
> >able to read
> >> >>>>>>>>>>that page as it is public, non-confidential information.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>The AIOE administrator is hereby directed to remove this
> >"feature" and
> >> >>>>>>>>>>ensure that there are no restrictions whatsoever on who can read the
> >> >>>>>>>>>>above-indicated web page. If there has been a problem with abusive
> >> >>>>>>>>>>automated access, slap IPs that request it too many times in a short
> >> >>>>>>>>>>interval with a CAPTCHA or something. That will block bots but still
> >> >>>>>>>>>>let humans through. There is no need for measures as extreme as full
> >> >>>>>>>>>>IP bans.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>It's working ok for me, the aioe admin must really hate
> >> >>>>>>>>>you, Derbytwit.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>Are you on drugs?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>No. What've you got?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>Who the hell is "Derbytwit"?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>I'm glad you asked, it means I can add my derbytwit sig
> >> >>>>>>>and crosspost to your vanity froup that was created by
> >> >>>>>>>your fellow Carleton students after some lab equipment
> >> >>>>>>>broke and you demanded it be fixed. Seems you stamped you
> >> >>>>>>>ickle feet, had a hissy fit, assaulted a security officer
> >> >>>>>>>and then you were ejected from the premises. You've been
> >> >>>>>>>going off the rails demanding things be fixed ever since.
> >> >>>>>>><https://tinyurl.com/2u6hsry6>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>None of this is true, and I've snecked the group you were hoping to
> >> >>>>>>spam by crossposting nonsense between it and here.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>Now, either you're delusional or you're acting in bad faith. Which
> >> >>>>>>is it, and if it's the former, I ask again, are you on drugs?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>Show us yer tits, Paul!
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>Crude and misogynistic response makes me suspect intentional bad faith
> >> >>>>now.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>You appear to be a troll.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>Goodbye.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>*PLONK*
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>Now ... does anyone have any *constructive* ideas on how to get access
> >> >>>>to that restrictions list restored?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Laundry detergent, bluing, and a properly-maintained washing machine in
> >> >>> the laundry room. Make sure you allow the socks to dry and darn the ones
> >> >>> with hole or just toss them out.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I've been telling you this for decades.
> >> >>
> >> >>Just how many of these bizarre trolls *are* there?
> >> >>
> >> >>Oh, and *PLONK*.
> >> >>
> >> >>Meanwhile, when will my access to that web page be restored? It's been three
> >> >>whole days now.
> >> >
> >> > That hole in that undarned sock keeps getting bigger and bigger and
> >> > bigger.
> >>
> >> Ah, Adam Verman my old fiend. I see you're still just as paranoid as the
> >> day we met. Jim here is what, the 147th person you've accused of being your
> >> bogeyman Seamus?
> >>
> >> Meanwhile, do I derive any special status for being in the low double
> >> digits per the same ranking? Nah, it just means I've been around longer
> >> than he has. You're an equal opportunity paranoiac.
> >>
> >> > Huge hint: You don't do the "misogynist" accusation when you've put on a
> >> > MALE sock. You've created so many you just can't keep track and aren't
> >> > doing your own routing correctly.
> >>
> >> Don't be ridiculous. You don't have to be a woman to notice, or to call
> >> out, misogyny in others. Just a decent human being. Though I guess you
> >> wouldn't know much about *that*, now, would you, kooky?
> >
> >Show us yer tits, Paul!
>
> Thank you

You're welcome.
So is Paul. He loves it.

On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:52:19 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:

> The infestation known as Paul Derbyshire is quite famous.

You're talking about him the way the Nazis talked about Jews. Is
there a reason for that? Given the rise of the far right in politics
lately, language like that is concerning.

On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 19:07:24 +0000, Snoopy wrote:

> Sul meriggio di 2023-01-27,
> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> enarrava tali parole:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 05:22:26 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>
>>> Jim G. <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:04:05 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jim G. <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:05:46 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
>>>>>>>Jim G. wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:48:27 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Jim G. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:13:04 +0000, William Stickers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>Jim G. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>Sometime in the past 24 hours, it seems my IP got added to a blacklist
>>>>>>>>>>>>somewhere. The news.aioe.org web server refuses to let me view:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>https://news.aioe.org/index.php?%20id=access-restrictions
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>That's rather ironic; and incorrect, since everyone in the entire world
>>>>>>>>>>>>has the right to view that page. There should be no blacklisting of
>>>>>>>>>>>>particular people (or, more likely, entire ISPs) from being able to read
>>>>>>>>>>>>that page as it is public, non-confidential information.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The AIOE administrator is hereby directed to remove this "feature" and
>>>>>>>>>>>>ensure that there are no restrictions whatsoever on who can read the
>>>>>>>>>>>>above-indicated web page. If there has been a problem with abusive
>>>>>>>>>>>>automated access, slap IPs that request it too many times in a short
>>>>>>>>>>>>interval with a CAPTCHA or something. That will block bots but still
>>>>>>>>>>>>let humans through. There is no need for measures as extreme as full
>>>>>>>>>>>>IP bans.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>It's working ok for me, the aioe admin must really hate
>>>>>>>>>>>you, Derbytwit.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Are you on drugs?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No. What've you got?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Who the hell is "Derbytwit"?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I'm glad you asked, it means I can add my derbytwit sig
>>>>>>>>>and crosspost to your vanity froup that was created by
>>>>>>>>>your fellow Carleton students after some lab equipment
>>>>>>>>>broke and you demanded it be fixed. Seems you stamped you
>>>>>>>>>ickle feet, had a hissy fit, assaulted a security officer
>>>>>>>>>and then you were ejected from the premises. You've been
>>>>>>>>>going off the rails demanding things be fixed ever since.
>>>>>>>>><https://tinyurl.com/2u6hsry6>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>None of this is true, and I've snecked the group you were hoping to
>>>>>>>>spam by crossposting nonsense between it and here.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Now, either you're delusional or you're acting in bad faith. Which
>>>>>>>>is it, and if it's the former, I ask again, are you on drugs?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Show us yer tits, Paul!
>>>>>
>>>>>>Crude and misogynistic response makes me suspect intentional bad faith
>>>>>>now.
>>>>>
>>>>>>You appear to be a troll.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Goodbye.
>>>>>
>>>>>>*PLONK*
>>>>>
>>>>>>Now ... does anyone have any *constructive* ideas on how to get access
>>>>>>to that restrictions list restored?
>>>>>
>>>>> Laundry detergent, bluing, and a properly-maintained washing machine in
>>>>> the laundry room. Make sure you allow the socks to dry and darn the ones
>>>>> with hole or just toss them out.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been telling you this for decades.
>>>>
>>>>Just how many of these bizarre trolls *are* there?
>>>>
>>>>Oh, and *PLONK*.
>>>>
>>>>Meanwhile, when will my access to that web page be restored? It's been three
>>>>whole days now.
>>>
>>> That hole in that undarned sock keeps getting bigger and bigger and
>>> bigger.
>>
>> Ah, Adam Verman my old fiend. I see you're still just as paranoid as the
>> day we met. Jim here is what, the 147th person you've accused of being your
>> bogeyman Seamus?
>>
>> Meanwhile, do I derive any special status for being in the low double
>> digits per the same ranking? Nah, it just means I've been around longer
>> than he has. You're an equal opportunity paranoiac.
>>
>>> Huge hint: You don't do the "misogynist" accusation when you've put on a
>>> MALE sock. You've created so many you just can't keep track and aren't
>>> doing your own routing correctly.
>>
>> Don't be ridiculous. You don't have to be a woman to notice, or to call
>> out, misogyny in others. Just a decent human being. Though I guess you
>> wouldn't know much about *that*, now, would you, kooky?
>>
>
>
> Nadlicker Paul Derbyshire can't seem to comprehend he is a useless POS
> good-for-nothing lowlife. How fat are you now? I bet your pushing 300lbs
>
> easy

Well, this thread seems to have brought out *all* the kooks. <smh>

SWD <swd1@whitehouse.gov> wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:52:19 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>
> > The infestation known as Paul Derbyshire is quite famous.
> >
>
> You're talking about him the way the Nazis talked about Jews. Is
> there a reason for that? Given the rise of the far right in politics
> lately, language like that is concerning.
>

Over decades, Derbyshire has ruined many once-useful technical
and social groups by his trolling activities, this being one of them.

I notice that you're posting anonymously from mixmin; is there any
particular reason for that?

I further note that you are using:-

User-Agent: Small-weird-dick-with-a-head-like-a-mushroom 3.14

- both of which suggest that you yourself are a troll. Those signs
are characteristic of Derbyshire. Are you actually the notorious
newsgroup-abuser Paul Derbyshire? That would be beyond
irony indeed.

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe – My pet rock Gordon just is.

Rock music: <https://imgur.com/gallery/duV5yqj>

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 03:18:28 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:

> SWD <swd1@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:52:19 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>>
>> > The infestation known as Paul Derbyshire is quite famous.
>> >
>>
>> You're talking about him the way the Nazis talked about Jews. Is
>> there a reason for that? Given the rise of the far right in politics
>> lately, language like that is concerning.
>
> Over decades, Derbyshire has ruined many once-useful technical
> and social groups by his trolling activities, this being one of them.

.... says the kook who *actually* (along with murphy) ruined this
particular one with paranoid lunacy and derailing formerly-useful
threads with massive flamewars prompted by said paranoia.

> I notice that you're posting anonymously from mixmin; is there any
> particular reason for that?

This is Usenet, not Facebook. We have no real-names policy here, kook.

> I further note that you are using:-
>
> User-Agent: Small-weird-dick-with-a-head-like-a-mushroom 3.14
>
> - both of which suggest that you yourself are a troll.

And a from email of "swd1@whitehouse.gov". Clearly these are mocking
references to your former President. Sentiments widely held in this
planet's population these days, I'm given to understand.

> Those signs are characteristic of Derbyshire.

To you, *everything* is a "sign characteristic of Derbyshire".
Derbyshire is your God. If it rains on your picnic, it's his fault.
If someone disagrees with you on Usenet, it's his handiwork. If
you derail a thread on Usenet, it's *still* somehow his doing, which
only makes sense if he's the Creator and he created you along with
everyone and everything else. Let me amend that: he's not just your
God, but a Calvinist one who fated you to derail that thread before
you were even born. You have no free will of your own, and your guilt
and your fiery destination were preordained.

Me, I'm an atheist who holds no truck with that sort of dismal
nonsense. You should consider giving up your belief system and
following my example. :)

--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Checkmate admits that, for all intents and purposes, he carries a teddy
bear in public: <d6cnes.ket.17.19@news.alt.net>

Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 03:18:28 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>
> > SWD <swd1@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:52:19 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
> >>
> >> > The infestation known as Paul Derbyshire is quite famous.
> >> >
> >>
> >> You're talking about him the way the Nazis talked about Jews. Is
> >> there a reason for that? Given the rise of the far right in politics
> >> lately, language like that is concerning.
> >
> > Over decades, Derbyshire has ruined many once-useful technical
> > and social groups by his trolling activities, this being one of them.
>
> ... says the kook who *actually* (along with murphy) ruined this
> particular one with paranoid lunacy and derailing formerly-useful
> threads with massive flamewars prompted by said paranoia.
>
> > I notice that you're posting anonymously from mixmin; is there any
> > particular reason for that?
>
> This is Usenet, not Facebook. We have no real-names policy here, kook.
>
> > I further note that you are using:-
> >
> > User-Agent: Small-weird-dick-with-a-head-like-a-mushroom 3.14
> >
> > - both of which suggest that you yourself are a troll.
>
> And a from email of "swd1@whitehouse.gov". Clearly these are mocking
> references to your former President. Sentiments widely held in this
> planet's population these days, I'm given to understand.
>
> > Those signs are characteristic of Derbyshire.
>
> To you, *everything* is a "sign characteristic of Derbyshire".
> Derbyshire is your God. If it rains on your picnic, it's his fault.
> If someone disagrees with you on Usenet, it's his handiwork. If
> you derail a thread on Usenet, it's *still* somehow his doing, which
> only makes sense if he's the Creator and he created you along with
> everyone and everything else. Let me amend that: he's not just your
> God, but a Calvinist one who fated you to derail that thread before
> you were even born. You have no free will of your own, and your guilt
> and your fiery destination were preordained.
>
> Me, I'm an atheist who holds no truck with that sort of dismal
> nonsense. You should consider giving up your belief system and
> following my example. :)
>

Surprise, surprise! "Nadegda" eagerly takes the bait. Tell me
"Nadegda", why are you always so keen to defend the notorious
Paul Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario? Could it be that he truly
~is~ your puppet-master? No? Oh dear, that's another of my
theories down the drain, how embarrassing... ≈:o)

P. S. I note that you added a sneaky silent crosspost to alt.atheism,
you naughty boy. I've fixed that.

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe – My pet rock Gordon just is.

Rock music: <https://imgur.com/gallery/duV5yqj>

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 19:50:40 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:

> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 03:18:28 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>>
>> > Those signs are characteristic of Derbyshire.
>>
>> To you, *everything* is a "sign characteristic of Derbyshire".
>> Derbyshire is your God. If it rains on your picnic, it's his fault.
>> If someone disagrees with you on Usenet, it's his handiwork. If
>> you derail a thread on Usenet, it's *still* somehow his doing, which
>> only makes sense if he's the Creator and he created you along with
>> everyone and everything else. Let me amend that: he's not just your
>> God, but a Calvinist one who fated you to derail that thread before
>> you were even born. You have no free will of your own, and your guilt
>> and your fiery destination were preordained.

Let the above be hereinafter referred to as Paragraph A.

>> Me, I'm an atheist who holds no truck with that sort of dismal
>> nonsense. You should consider giving up your belief system and
>> following my example. :)
>
> Surprise, surprise! "Nadegda" eagerly takes the bait. Tell me
> "Nadegda", why are you always so keen to defend the notorious
> Paul Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario? Could it be that he truly
> ~is~ your puppet-master? No? Oh dear, that's another of my
> theories down the drain, how embarrassing... ≈:o)
>
> P. S. I note that you added a sneaky silent crosspost to alt.atheism,
> you naughty boy. I've fixed that.

Note how nothing in Sn!pe's burblefroth refutes any part of Paragraph A.
The whole thing is a smokescreen meant to distract.

Meanwhile, let the record show that Sn!pe accused someone else of being
a) a troll and b) Derbyshire based only on posting using an obvious
pseudonym and having humorous/parodic material in their headers.

I will now point out the obvious: that Sn!pe also uses an obvious
pseudonym and has humorous/parodic material in his headers, including
Organization and several X-headers.

Per Sn!pe's own "logic", we may conclude that Sn!pe is a) a troll (but we
knew that already, of course) and b) Derbyshire.

One single point in his favor: in one of those X-headers he actually
manages to use the word "comprises" correctly. Consider that "damning with
faint praise".

<snicker>

--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Checkmate admits that, for all intents and purposes, he carries a teddy
bear in public: <d6cnes.ket.17.19@news.alt.net>

Ted <tedsmasher@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

["Nadegda" wrote]
> >
> > Note how noth<BITCHSLAP>
> >
>
> STFU, you stupid bitch.
>

[to afn only] That was the correct response.

[fu2: bit-bucket]

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe – My pet rock Gordon just is.

Rock music: <https://imgur.com/gallery/duV5yqj>

On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:03:19 +0000, Nadegda wrote:

> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 19:50:40 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>
>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 03:18:28 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>
>>> > Those signs are characteristic of Derbyshire.
>>>
>>> To you, *everything* is a "sign characteristic of Derbyshire".
>>> Derbyshire is your God. If it rains on your picnic, it's his fault.
>>> If someone disagrees with you on Usenet, it's his handiwork. If
>>> you derail a thread on Usenet, it's *still* somehow his doing, which
>>> only makes sense if he's the Creator and he created you along with
>>> everyone and everything else. Let me amend that: he's not just your
>>> God, but a Calvinist one who fated you to derail that thread before
>>> you were even born. You have no free will of your own, and your guilt
>>> and your fiery destination were preordained.
>
> Let the above be hereinafter referred to as Paragraph A.

So recorded.

>>> Me, I'm an atheist who holds no truck with that sort of dismal
>>> nonsense. You should consider giving up your belief system and
>>> following my example. :)
>>
>> Surprise, surprise! "Nadegda" eagerly takes the bait. Tell me
>> "Nadegda", why are you always so keen to defend the notorious
>> Paul Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario? Could it be that he truly
>> ~is~ your puppet-master? No? Oh dear, that's another of my
>> theories down the drain, how embarrassing... ≈:o)
>>
>> P. S. I note that you added a sneaky silent crosspost to alt.atheism,
>> you naughty boy. I've fixed that.
>
> Note how nothing in Sn!pe's burblefroth refutes any part of Paragraph A.
> The whole thing is a smokescreen meant to distract.

SPNAK!

> Meanwhile, let the record show that Sn!pe accused someone else of being
> a) a troll and b) Derbyshire based only on posting using an obvious
> pseudonym and having humorous/parodic material in their headers.
>
> I will now point out the obvious: that Sn!pe also uses an obvious
> pseudonym and has humorous/parodic material in his headers, including
> Organization and several X-headers.
>
> Per Sn!pe's own "logic", we may conclude that Sn!pe is a) a troll (but we
> knew that already, of course) and b) Derbyshire.

SPNAK!!

> One single point in his favor: in one of those X-headers he actually
> manages to use the word "comprises" correctly. Consider that "damning with
> faint praise".
>
> <snicker>

SPANKY-SPANKY!

*snicker*

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 04:14:18 -0000 (UTC), kensi
<kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:03:19 +0000, Nadegda wrote:

> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 19:50:40 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
> >
> >> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
> >>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 03:18:28 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Those signs are characteristic of Derbyshire.
> >>>
> >>> To you, *everything* is a "sign characteristic of Derbyshire".
> >>> Derbyshire is your God. If it rains on your picnic, it's his
fault.
> >>> If someone disagrees with you on Usenet, it's his handiwork. If
> >>> you derail a thread on Usenet, it's *still* somehow his doing,
which
> >>> only makes sense if he's the Creator and he created you along
with
> >>> everyone and everything else. Let me amend that: he's not just
your
> >>> God, but a Calvinist one who fated you to derail that thread
before
> >>> you were even born. You have no free will of your own, and your
guilt
> >>> and your fiery destination were preordained.
> >
> > Let the above be hereinafter referred to as Paragraph A.

> So recorded.

> >>> Me, I'm an atheist who holds no truck with that sort of dismal
> >>> nonsense. You should consider giving up your belief system and
> >>> following my example. :)
> >>
> >> Surprise, surprise! "Nadegda" eagerly takes the bait. Tell me
> >> "Nadegda", why are you always so keen to defend the notorious
> >> Paul Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario? Could it be that he truly
> >> ~is~ your puppet-master? No? Oh dear, that's another of my
> >> theories down the drain, how embarrassing... ≈:o)
> >>
> >> P. S. I note that you added a sneaky silent crosspost to
alt.atheism,
> >> you naughty boy. I've fixed that.
> >
> > Note how nothing in Sn!pe's burblefroth refutes any part of
Paragraph A.
> > The whole thing is a smokescreen meant to distract.

> SPNAK!

> > Meanwhile, let the record show that Sn!pe accused someone else of
being
> > a) a troll and b) Derbyshire based only on posting using an
obvious
> > pseudonym and having humorous/parodic material in their headers.
> >
> > I will now point out the obvious: that Sn!pe also uses an obvious
> > pseudonym and has humorous/parodic material in his headers,
including
> > Organization and several X-headers.
> >
> > Per Sn!pe's own "logic", we may conclude that Sn!pe is a) a troll
(but we
> > knew that already, of course) and b) Derbyshire.

> SPNAK!!

> > One single point in his favor: in one of those X-headers he
actually
> > manages to use the word "comprises" correctly. Consider that
"damning with
> > faint praise".
> >
> > <snicker>

> SPANKY-SPANKY!

> *snicker*

Let's discuss some physics, kuntsi. You have a PhD, right?

On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 00:03:19 -0000 (UTC), circumcised jew cunt Nadezhda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

Time to trigger the left-wing jew cunts again. Melt, jew cunts, melt!

>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 19:50:40 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>
>> circumcised jew cunt Nadezhda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 03:18:28 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>
>>> > Those signs are characteristic of Derbyshire.
>>>
>>> To you, *everything* is a "sign characteristic of Derbyshire".
>>> Derbyshire is your God. If it rains on your picnic, it's his fault.
>>> If someone disagrees with you on Usenet, it's his handiwork. If
>>> you derail a thread on Usenet, it's *still* somehow his doing, which
>>> only makes sense if he's the Creator and he created you along with
>>> everyone and everything else. Let me amend that: he's not just your
>>> God, but a Calvinist one who fated you to derail that thread before
>>> you were even born. You have no free will of your own, and your guilt
>>> and your fiery destination were preordained.
>
>Let the above be hereinafter referred to as Paragraph A.
>
>>> Me, I'm an atheist who holds no truck with that sort of dismal
>>> nonsense. You should consider giving up your belief system and
>>> following my example. :)
>>
>> Surprise, surprise! "Nadegda" eagerly takes the bait. Tell me
>> "Nadegda", why are you always so keen to defend the notorious
>> Paul Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario? Could it be that he truly
>> ~is~ your puppet-master? No? Oh dear, that's another of my
>> theories down the drain, how embarrassing... ?:o)
>>
>> P. S. I note that you added a sneaky silent crosspost to alt.atheism,
>> you naughty boy. I've fixed that.
>
>Note how nothing in Sn!pe's burblefroth refutes any part of Paragraph A.
>The whole thing is a smokescreen meant to distract.
>
>Meanwhile, let the record show that Sn!pe accused someone else of being
>a) a troll and b) Derbyshire based only on posting using an obvious
>pseudonym and having humorous/parodic material in their headers.
>
>I will now point out the obvious: that Sn!pe also uses an obvious
>pseudonym and has humorous/parodic material in his headers, including
>Organization and several X-headers.
>
>Per Sn!pe's own "logic", we may conclude that Sn!pe is a) a troll (but we
>knew that already, of course) and b) Derbyshire.
>
>One single point in his favor: in one of those X-headers he actually
>manages to use the word "comprises" correctly. Consider that "damning with
>faint praise".
>
><snicker>

Ah, so THIS is where you've been hiding, jew cunt!

<snigger>
--

Die Juden sind unser Unglück.
- Heinrich Gotthard Freiherr von Treitschke (1834-1896)