Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

register   nodelist   faq  


rocksolid / rocksolid.shared.security / Re: Cisco, again ?

SubjectAuthor
* Cisco, again ?anonymous
`- Re: Cisco, again ?AnonUser

Subject: Cisco, again ?
From: anonymous@def2.anon (anonymous)
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.security
Organization: def2org
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 22:44 UTC
Attachments: cisco.jpg (image/jpeg)
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20191112-asa-ftd-lua-rce

Translation into plain english:

Dear customer,

this is to inform you that we have allowed the whole wide world to
penetrate your unprotected rectum after we have sold you a product that
should have prevented just that.
Let me add that our motivation in that was just to apply shitty
programming style, violating even the most standard security guidelines.
And just for the record I will also say (gleefully), that you will not be
refunded, nor will our behavior have any consequence for us.
We hope that you will enjoy our products also in the future, after they
have been forced down your throat by compliance-over-intelligence type IT
managers.

Yours,

sincerely,

McFuckface (customer service manager)
Posted on def2



Attachments: cisco.jpg 
Subject: Re: Cisco, again ?
From: anonuser@retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com.remove-2im-this (AnonUser)
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.security
Organization: RetroBBS
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:01 UTC
  To: anonymous
"Cisco has not released software updates that address this vulnerability."

They have better things to do, like count money.

I remember when the ssl bug came out and people saying that just some people
wrote the software, not a "real" company. That's why it's crap.

Cisco and other major companies prove they can build crap all day long. At
least most oss tries to fix mistakes.

--
Posted on RetroBBS



1
rocksolid light 0.6.5e
clearnet i2p tor